2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sam McCall
cf9b25e0ad [lit] Script to automate use of %(line-n). Use in CodeComplete tests.
Tests where the RUN-lines/CHECK-ed output refer to line numbers in the test
file are a maintenance burden, as inserting text in the appropriate place
invalidates all the subsequent line numbers.

Lit supports %(line+n) for this, and FileCheck supports [[@LINE+N]].
But many existing tests don't make use of it and still need to be modified.

This commit adds a script that can find line numbers in tests according to a
regex and replace them with the appropriate relative-line reference.
It contains some options to avoid inappropriately rewriting tests where absolute
numbers are appropriate: a "nearby" threshold and a refusal by default to
replace only some matched line numbers.

I've applied it to CodeComplete tests, this proves the concept but also are the
single worst group of tests I've seen in this respect.
These changes are likely to hit merge conflicts, but can be regenerated with:

```
find ../clang/test/CodeCompletion/ -type f | grep -v /Inputs/ | xargs ../llvm/utils/relative_lines.py --verbose --near=20 --pattern='-code-completion-at[ =]%s:(\\d+):' --pattern='requires fix-it: {(\d+):\d+-(\d+):\d+}'
````

As requested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D140044

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59553

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140217
2022-12-19 14:19:21 +01:00
Ilya Biryukov
ebf0a6d75d [CodeComplete] Do not complete self-initializations
Summary:
Removes references to initialized variable from the following completions:

    int x = ^;

Handles only the trivial cases where the variable name is completed
immediately at the start of initializer or assignment, more complicated
cases aren't covered, e.g. these completions still contain 'x':

    // More complicated expressions.
    int x = foo(^);
    int x = 10 + ^;
    // Other kinds of initialization.
    int x{^};
    int x(^);
    // Constructor initializers.
    struct Foo {
      Foo() : x(^) {}
      int x;
    };

We should address those in the future, but they are outside of the scope of
this initial change.

Reviewers: sammccall

Reviewed By: sammccall

Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54156

llvm-svn: 346301
2018-11-07 10:02:31 +00:00