Currently, the library-internal feature test macros are only defined if
the feature is not available, and always have the prefix
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_`. This patch changes that, so that they are always
defined and have the prefix `_LIBCPP_HAS_` instead. This changes the
canonical use of these macros to `#if _LIBCPP_HAS_FEATURE`, which means
that using an undefined macro (e.g. due to a missing include) is
diagnosed now. While this is rather unlikely currently, a similar change
in `<__configuration/availability.h>` caught a few bugs. This also
improves readability, since it removes the double-negation of `#ifndef
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_FEATURE`.
The current patch only touches the macros defined in `<__config>`. If
people are happy with this approach, I'll make a follow-up PR to also
change the macros defined in `<__config_site>`.
This re-formats a few headers that had become out-of-sync with respect
to formatting since we ran clang-format on the whole codebase. There's
surprisingly few instances of it.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging them.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152652
The source file is used to anchor the destructor of format_error. When
format is moved from experimental to stable this code would move to the
dylib. One issue with code in the dylib is that it can't be used in
constexpr context. There is a proposal to make format work during
constant evaluation
P2758 Emitting messages at compile time
This paper has initially been received favourable by EWG. Therefore move
the code to the header. This also avoids possible availability issues on
Mac back deployment targets.
Note it is expected that format will no longer be experimental with the
next LLVM release.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150073
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143163
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
By default, Clang does not include headers that are skipped due to
the include guard optimization in the --trace-includes output, which
breaks the use case that we were trying to use it for.
However, Clang does support the -fshow-skipped-includes flag, which
does exactly what we need and will result in an accurate include
graph.
As a fly-by fix, make sure that our includes don't differ between
-fexceptions and -fno-exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134829
This version is build without support for the experimental library but
the code still wants to link this function. Inlining the function solves
the issue.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132667
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
This replaces _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY with _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI. It's
not intended to do for other parts of libc++. This change makes it easy
to search and replace all occurrences of the patches in review.
