This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
After feedback from D122861, do the same thing with some of the other headers. Try to move the
headers so they have a similar style and way of doing things.
Reviewed By: ldionne, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124227
We need CLOCK_MONOTONIC equivalent implementation for z/OS within libc++. The default implementation is asserting.
On z/OS the lack of 'clock_gettime()' and 'time_point()' force us to look for alternatives.
The current proposal is to use `gettimeofday()` for CLOCK_MONOTONIC which is also used in CLOCK_REALTIME. This will allow us to skip the assertion with compromised CLOCK_MONOTONIC implementation which will not guarantee to never go back in time because it will use `gettimeofday()` but only when it's set.
Is this a good compromise for platforms which does not support monotonic clock?
Hopefully this will spark the discussion and agreement how to proceed in this situation.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93542
