876 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Juneyoung Lee
3170978173 [InstSimplify] Add tests for pr49495 (NFC) 2021-03-10 17:54:46 +09:00
Sanjay Patel
0a2d69480d [InstSimplify] cttz(1<<x) --> x
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/TDacYu
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/KF84S3
2021-03-08 16:30:14 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
afa443831b [InstSimplify] add tests for cttz of shifted-1; NFC 2021-03-08 16:30:13 -05:00
Nikita Popov
7faad5c900 [ConstantFold] Handle icmp of global and null consistently
Return UGT rather than NE for icmp @g, null, which is slightly
stronger. This is consistent with what we do for more complex
folds. It is somewhat silly that @g ugt null does not get folded
while (gep @g) ugt null does.
2021-03-08 17:18:01 +01:00
Nikita Popov
f08148e874 [ConstProp] Fix folding of pointer icmp with signed predicates
While @g ugt null is always true (ignoring weak symbols),
@g sgt null is not necessarily the case -- that would imply that
it is forbidden to place globals in the high half of the address
space.
2021-03-08 17:12:12 +01:00
Nikita Popov
2ef03bc3a8 [ConstProp] Add more tests for pointer icmp folding (NFC) 2021-03-08 17:06:12 +01:00
Sanjay Patel
f75b5305f4 [ConstantFold] allow folding icmp of null and constexpr
I noticed that we were not folding expressions like this:
icmp ult (constexpr), null
in https://llvm.org/PR49355, so we end up with extremely large
icmp instructions as the constant expressions pile up on each other.

There is no potential to mis-fold an unsigned boundary condition
with a zero/null, so this is just falling through a crack in the
pattern matching.

The more general case of comparisons of non-zero constants and
constexpr are more tricky and may require the datalayout to know
how to cast to different types, etc. Negative tests verify that
we are only changing a subset of potential patterns.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98150
2021-03-08 08:53:59 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
a093942c28 [ConstProp][JumpThreading] add more test coverage for potential nullptr folds; NFC
See D98150.
2021-03-08 08:53:59 -05:00
Simon Pilgrim
c2d18d7005 [KnownBits] Add min/max shift amount handling to shl/lshr/ashr KnownBits helpers
Pulled out of the original D90479 patch - also includes the "impossible shift amount" filtering from computeKnownBitsFromShiftOperator.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90479
2021-03-08 11:44:31 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
898b40645d [ConstProp] add tests for cmp with null and constexpr; NFC 2021-03-07 14:02:44 -05:00
Philip Reames
cf40539eac Use the right pass in test introduced in f1fdbd67 2021-03-04 12:21:13 -08:00
Philip Reames
f1fdbd671b [test] Add DCE coverage for gc.relocate 2021-03-04 12:18:06 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim
96a3dfeb93 Revert rGd65ddca83ff85c7345fe9a0f5a15750f01e38420 - "[ValueTracking] ComputeKnownBits - minimum leading/trailing zero bits in LSHR/SHL (PR44526)"
This is causing sanitizer test failures that I haven't been able to fix yet.
2021-02-24 18:03:17 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
d65ddca83f [ValueTracking] ComputeKnownBits - minimum leading/trailing zero bits in LSHR/SHL (PR44526)
Followup to D72573 - as detailed in https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1709 we don't make use of the known leading/trailing zeros for shifted values in cases where we don't know the shift amount value.

Stop ValueTracking returning zero for poison shift patterns and use the KnownBits shift helpers directly.

Extend KnownBits::shl to combine all possible shifted combinations if both min/max shift amount values are in range.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90479
2021-02-24 12:15:45 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
1020d16156 [InstSimplify] Handle nsw shl -> poison patterns
Pulled out from D90479 - this recognises invalid nsw shl patterns with signbit changes that result in poison.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97305
2021-02-23 18:26:56 +00:00
Caroline Concatto
2d728bbff5 [CodeGen][SelectionDAG]Add new intrinsic experimental.vector.reverse
This patch adds  a new intrinsic experimental.vector.reduce that takes a single
vector and returns a vector of matching type but with the original lane order
 reversed. For example:

```
vector.reverse(<A,B,C,D>) ==> <D,C,B,A>
```

The new intrinsic supports fixed and scalable vectors types.
The fixed-width vector relies on shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour.
Scalable vector uses the new ISD node - VECTOR_REVERSE.

This new intrinsic is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].

Patch by Paul Walker (@paulwalker-arm).

[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94883
2021-02-15 13:39:43 +00:00
aqjune
5f3c99085d [ValueTracking] Dereferenced pointers are noundef
This is a follow-up of D95238's LangRef update.
This patch updates `programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison(V)` to return true if
`V` is used by any memory-accessing instruction.
Interestingly, this affected many tests in Attributors, mainly about adding noundefs.
The tests are updated using llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py. I checked that the diffs
are about updating noundefs.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96642
2021-02-14 22:50:48 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
debaf942cf [InstSimplify] add tests that look into pointer operands of instructions 2021-02-13 16:25:27 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
06829034ca Revert "[ConstantFold] Fold more operations to poison"
This reverts commit 53040a968dc2ff20931661e55f05da2ef8b964a0 due to its
bad interaction with select i1 -> and/or i1 transformation.

This fixes:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49005
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48435
2021-02-04 00:24:02 +09:00
Florian Hahn
292077072e
[Local] Treat calls that may not return as being alive.
With the addition of the `willreturn` attribute, functions that may
not return (e.g. due to an infinite loop) are well defined, if they are
not marked as `willreturn`.

This patch updates `wouldInstructionBeTriviallyDead` to not consider
calls that may not return as dead.

This patch still provides an escape hatch for intrinsics, which are
still assumed as willreturn unconditionally. It will be removed once
all intrinsics definitions have been reviewed and updated.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94106
2021-01-23 16:05:14 +00:00
Nikita Popov
fdab28edef [InstSimplify] Add willreturn to more libcall tests (NFC)
Annotate more math libcalls with willreturn. The attribute would
have been added by the InferFuncAttrs.
2021-01-22 21:58:59 +01:00
Nikita Popov
9d2796210f [Tests] Add willreturn to libcalls in some tests
Willreturn would be inferred by FuncAttrs for these. Annotate them
to preserve test behavior in the future.
2021-01-22 21:47:35 +01:00
Nikita Popov
a13c0f62c3 [InstSimplify] Fold x*C1/C2 <= x (PR48744)
We can fold x*C1/C2 <= x to true if C1 <= C2. This is valid even
if the multiplication is not nuw: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/vULors

The multiplication or division can be replaced by shifts. We don't
handle the case where both are shifts, as that should get folded
away by InstCombine.
2021-01-17 16:02:55 +01:00
Nikita Popov
4bfbfb9bcb [InstSimplify] Add tests for x*C1/C2<=x (NFC)
Tests for PR48744.
2021-01-17 16:02:55 +01:00
Dávid Bolvanský
63bedc80da [InstSimplify] Handle commutativity for 'and' and 'outer or' for (~A & B) | ~(A | B) --> ~A
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94870
2021-01-16 19:42:50 +01:00
Dávid Bolvanský
416854d0f7 [InstSimplify] Precommit new testcases; NFC 2021-01-16 19:11:58 +01:00
Dávid Bolvanský
a4e2a5145a [InstSimplify] Add (~A & B) | ~(A | B) --> ~A 2021-01-16 15:43:34 +01:00
Nikita Popov
7ecad2e4ce [InstSimplify] Don't fold gep p, -p to null
This is a partial fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44403.
Folding gep p, q-p to q is only legal if p and q have the same
provenance. This fold should probably be guarded by something like
getUnderlyingObject(p) == getUnderlyingObject(q).

This patch is a partial fix that removes the special handling for
gep p, 0-p, which will fold to a null pointer, which would certainly
not pass an underlying object check (unless p is also null, in which
case this would fold trivially anyway). Folding to a null pointer
is particularly problematic due to the special handling it receives
in many places, making end-to-end miscompiles more likely.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93820
2021-01-12 20:24:23 +01:00
Nikita Popov
1ecae1e62a [ConstantFold] Fold fptoi.sat intrinsics
The APFloat::convertToInteger() API already implements the desired
saturation semantics.
2021-01-10 17:37:27 +01:00
Nikita Popov
bdb748a0ab [ConstantFold] Add tests for fptoi.sat (NFC) 2021-01-10 17:08:11 +01:00
David Green
e185b1dd7b [ConstProp] Constant propagation for get.active.lane.mask instrinsics
Similar to the Arm VCTP intrinsics, if the operands of an
active.lane.mask are both known, the constant lane mask can be
calculated. This can come up after unrolling the loops.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94103
2021-01-08 16:10:01 +00:00
Juneyoung Lee
3a60a1f165 [InstSimplify] Fold insertelement vec, poison, idx into vec
This is a simple patch that adds folding from `insertelement vec, poison, idx` into `vec`.

Alive2 proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/2y2vbC

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93994
2021-01-07 10:10:14 +09:00
Nikita Popov
d042f2db5b [InstSimplify] Fold call null/undef to poison
Calling null or undef results in immediate undefined behavior.
Return poison instead of undef in this case, similar to what
we do for immediate UB due to division by zero.
2021-01-06 21:09:30 +01:00
Nikita Popov
a6df39236f [InstSimplify] Fold out-of-bounds shift to poison
Make InstSimplify return poison rather than undef for out-of-bounds
shifts, as specified by LandRef:

> If op2 is (statically or dynamically) equal to or larger than the
> number of bits in op1, this instruction returns a poison value.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93998
2021-01-06 20:41:37 +01:00
Juneyoung Lee
f665a8c5b8 [InstSimplify] gep with poison operand is poison
This is a tiny update to fold gep poison into poison. :)

Alive2 proofs:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/7Nwdri
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/sDP4sC
2021-01-05 11:07:49 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
f28b026d32 [InstSimplify] add a test for gep with poison operand (NFC) 2021-01-05 11:03:11 +09:00
Nikita Popov
3715c99be9 [InstSimplify] Fold nnan/ninf violation to poison
As the comment already indicates, performing an operation with
nnan/ninf flags on a nan/inf or undef results in poison. Now that
we have a proper poison value, we no longer need to relax it to
undef.
2021-01-03 22:05:40 +01:00
Nikita Popov
766cf7f32e [InstSimplify] Fold division by zero to poison
Div/rem by zero is immediate undefined behavior and anything goes.
Currently we fold it to undef, this patch changes it to fold to
poison instead, which is slightly stronger.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93995
2021-01-03 20:52:45 +01:00
Nikita Popov
f094d65bea [InstSimplify] Fix addo/subo with undef (PR43188)
We can't fold the first result to undef, because not all values
may be reachable under the constraint that no overflow occurred.
Use the same folds we do for saturated math instead.

Proofs:
uaddo: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/zf55N_
saddo: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/a_xPgS
usubo: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/DmRqwt
ssubo: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/8ag7U-
2021-01-03 18:51:49 +01:00
Nikita Popov
c6ad00d709 [InstSimplify] Return poison for out of bounds extractelement
This is the same change as D93990, but for extractelement rather
than insertelement.

> If idx exceeds the length of val for a fixed-length vector, the
> result is a poison value. For a scalable vector, if the value of
> idx exceeds the runtime length of the vector, the result is a
> poison value.
2021-01-03 18:15:58 +01:00
Nikita Popov
858b99d774 [InstSimplify] Regenerate test checks (NFC) 2021-01-03 18:09:58 +01:00
Juneyoung Lee
2139958b53 [InstSimplify] Return poison if insertelement touches out of bounds
This is a simple patch that updates InstSimplify to return poison if the index is/can be out-of-bounds

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93990
2021-01-04 00:43:02 +09:00
Nikita Popov
26680269e0 [InstSimplify] Add tests for gep p, -p without inbounds (NFC)
This is additional test coverage for D93820.
2021-01-01 17:00:02 +01:00
Juneyoung Lee
ae6e89327b Precommit tests that have poison as shufflevector's placeholder
This commit copies existing tests at llvm/Transforms containing
'shufflevector X, undef' and replaces them with 'shufflevector X, poison'.
The new copied tests have *-inseltpoison.ll suffix at its file name
(as db7a2f347f132b3920415013d62d1adfb18d8d58 did)
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93793

Test files listed using

grep -R -E "^[^;]*shufflevector <.*> .*, <.*> undef" | cut -d":" -f1 | uniq

Test files copied & updated using

file_org=llvm/test/Transforms/$1
if [[ "$file_org" = *-inseltpoison.ll ]]; then
  file=$file_org
else
  file=${file_org%.ll}-inseltpoison.ll
  if [ ! -f $file ]; then
    cp $file_org $file
  fi
fi
sed -i -E 's/^([^;]*)shufflevector <(.*)> (.*), <(.*)> undef/\1shufflevector <\2> \3, <\4> poison/g' $file
head -1 $file | grep "Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py" -q
if [ "$?" == 1 ]; then
  echo "$file : should be manually updated"
  # The test is manually updated
  exit 1
fi
python3 ./llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py --opt-binary=./build-releaseassert/bin/opt $file
2020-12-29 17:09:31 +09:00
Sanjay Patel
236c4524a7 [InstSimplify] remove ctpop of 1 (low) bit
https://llvm.org/PR48608

As noted in the test comment, we could handle a more general
case in instcombine and remove this, but I don't have evidence
that we need to do that.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MRW9gD
2020-12-28 16:06:20 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
1351f719d4 [InstSimplify] add tests for ctpop; NFC (PR48608) 2020-12-28 16:06:19 -05:00
Juneyoung Lee
db7a2f347f Precommit transform tests that have poison as insertelement's placeholder
This commit copies existing tests at llvm/Transforms and replaces
'insertelement undef' in those files with 'insertelement poison'.
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D93586)

Tests listed using this script:

grep -R -E '^[^;]*insertelement <.*> undef,' . | cut -d":" -f1 | uniq |
wc -l

Tests updated:

file_org=llvm/test/Transforms/$1
file=${file_org%.ll}-inseltpoison.ll
cp $file_org $file
sed -i -E 's/^([^;]*)insertelement <(.*)> undef/\1insertelement <\2> poison/g' $file
head -1 $file | grep "Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py" -q
if [ "$?" == 1 ]; then
  echo "$file : should be manually updated"
  # I manually updated the script
  exit 1
fi
python3 ./llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py --opt-binary=./build-releaseassert/bin/opt $file
2020-12-24 11:46:17 +09:00
Sanjay Patel
38ca7face6 [InstSimplify] reduce logic with inverted add/sub ops
https://llvm.org/PR48559
This could be part of a larger ValueTracking API,
but I don't see that currently.

https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gR0

  Name: and
  Pre: C1 == ~C2
  %sub = add i8 %x, C1
  %sub1 = sub i8 C2, %x
  %r = and i8 %sub, %sub1
  =>
  %r = 0

  Name: or
  Pre: C1 == ~C2
  %sub = add i8 %x, C1
  %sub1 = sub i8 C2, %x
  %r = or i8 %sub, %sub1
  =>
  %r = -1

  Name: xor
  Pre: C1 == ~C2
  %sub = add i8 %x, C1
  %sub1 = sub i8 C2, %x
  %r = xor i8 %sub, %sub1
  =>
  %r = -1
2020-12-21 08:51:43 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
d6118759f3 [InstSimplify] add tests for inverted logic operands; NFC 2020-12-21 08:51:42 -05:00
Roman Lebedev
e9289dc25f
[InstSimplify] Don't miscompile X == 0 ? abs(X) : -abs(X) --> -abs(X) xform
The transform wasn't checking that the LHS of the comparison
*is* the `X` in question...
This is the miscompile that was holding up D87188.

Thanks to Dave Green for producing an actionable reproducer!
2020-12-18 21:18:13 +03:00