These are defined in the user range until standard versions of them get
adopted into dwarf, which is expected in DWARF6.
Some of these amount to reservations currently as no code to use them is
included. It would be very helpful to get them committed to avoid
conflicts necessitating encoding changes while we are in the process of
upstreaming.
---------
Co-authored-by: Juan Martinez Fernandez <juamarti@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: Emma Pilkington <Emma.Pilkington@amd.com>
These are identified by misc-include-cleaner. I've filtered out those
that break builds. Also, I'm staying away from llvm-config.h,
config.h, and Compiler.h, which likely cause platform- or
compiler-specific build failures.
Reapply "[NFC][DebugInfo][DWARF] Create new low-level dwarf library (#…
(#145959)
This reapplies cbf781f0bdf2f680abbe784faedeefd6f84c246e, with fixes for
the shared-library build and the unconventional sanitizer-runtime build.
Original Description:
This is the culmination of a series of changes described in [1].
Although somewhat large by line count, it is almost entirely mechanical,
creating a new library in DebugInfo/DWARF/LowLevel. This new library has
very minimal dependencies, allowing it to be used from more places than
the normal DebugInfo/DWARF library--in particular from MC.
1.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-debuginfo-dwarf-refactor-into-to-lower-and-higher-level-libraries/86665/2
This is the culmination of a series of changes described in [1].
Although somewhat large by line count, it is almost entirely mechanical,
creating a new library in DebugInfo/DWARF/LowLevel. This new library has
very minimal dependencies, allowing it to be used from more places than
the normal DebugInfo/DWARF library--in particular from MC.
I am happy to put it in another location, or to structure it differently
if that makes sense. Some have suggested in BinaryFormat, but it is not
a great fit there. But if that makes more sense to the reviewers, I can
do that.
Another possibility would be to use pass-through headers to allow
clients who don't care to depend only on DebugInfo/DWARF. This would be
a much less invasive change, and perhaps easier for clients. But also a
system that hides details.
Either way, I'm open.
1.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-debuginfo-dwarf-refactor-into-to-lower-and-higher-level-libraries/86665/2
