98 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kazu Hirata
46d750be2e
[Sema] Remove unused includes (NFC) (#116461)
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
2024-11-16 07:37:33 -08:00
Chuanqi Xu
82034aca30
[C++20] [Modules] Warn for importing implementation partition unit in interface units (#108493)
Recently, there are multiple false positive issue reports about the
reachability of implementation partition units:
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/105882
- https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101348
- https://lists.isocpp.org/core/2024/08/16232.php

And according to our use experience for modules, we find it is a pretty
good practice to not import implementation partition units in the
interface units. It can help developers to have a pretty good mental
model for when to use an implementation partition unit: that any unit in
the module but not in the module interfaces can be in the implementation
partition unit.

So I think it is good to add the diagnostics.
2024-09-14 14:45:50 +08:00
Helena Kotas
938cbdb4cf
[HLSL] Implement export keyword (#96823)
Implements `export` keyword in HLSL.

There are two ways the `export` keyword can be used:
1. On individual function declarations
```
export void f() {}
```
2. On a group of function declaration:
```
export {
   void f1();
   void f2() {}
}
```

Functions declared with the `export` keyword have external linkage. The
implementation does not include validation of when a function can or
cannot be exported, such as when it has resource argument or semantic
annotations. That will be covered by llvm/llvm-project#93330.

Currently all function declarations in global or named namespaces have
external linkage by default so there are no specific code changes
required right now to make sure exported function have external linkage
as well. That will change as part of llvm/llvm-project#92071. Any
additional changes to make sure exported functions still have external
linkage will be done as part of this work item.

Fixes #92812
2024-07-01 13:55:25 -07:00
Vlad Serebrennikov
bae2c54912 [clang][NFC] Move documentation of Sema functions into Sema.h
This patch moves documentation of `Sema` functions from `.cpp` files to `Sema.h` when there was no documentation in the latter, or it can be trivially subsumed. More complicated cases when there's less trivial divergence between documentation attached to declaration and the one attached to implementation are left for a later PR that would require review.

It appears that doxygen can find the documentation for a function defined out-of-line even if it's attached to an implementation, and not declaration. But other tools, e.g. clangd, are not as powerful. So this patch significantly improves autocompletion experience for (at least) clangd-based IDEs.
2024-07-01 20:55:57 +03:00
Chuanqi Xu
790f931886 [NFC] [Modules] Extract the logic to decide whether the module units belongs to the same module
This patch extracts the logci to decide how we decide the module units
belongs to the same module into a member function of ASTContext. This is
helpful to refactor the implementation in the future.
2024-06-24 15:58:46 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
aac4d03423 [C++20] [Modules] Mark exported all declarations as used
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85122

As the title suggested, it looks pretty sensible.
2024-04-19 09:46:18 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
f2695a1c2f [C++20] [Modules] Avoid writing untouched DeclUpdates from GMF in
Reduced BMI

Mitigate https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61447

The root cause of the above problem is that when we write a declaration,
we need to lookup all the redeclarations in the imported modules. Then
it will be pretty slow if there are too many redeclarations in different
modules. This patch doesn't solve the porblem.

What the patchs mitigated is, when we writing a named module, we shouldn't
write the declarations from GMF if it is unreferenced **in current
module unit**. The difference here is that, if the declaration is used
in the imported modules, we used to emit it as an update. But we
definitely want to avoid that after this patch.

For that reproducer in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61447, it used to take 2.5s
to compile and now it only takes 0.49s to compile, which is a big win.
2024-04-18 11:00:28 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
4d62929852 [C++20] [Modules] Disambuguous Clang module and C++20 Named module further
This patch tries to make the boundary of clang module and C++20 named
module more clear.

The changes included:

- Rename `TranslationUnitKind::TU_Module` to
  `TranslationUnitKind::TU_ClangModule`.
- Rename `Sema::ActOnModuleInclude` to `Sema::ActOnAnnotModuleInclude`.
- Rename `ActOnModuleBegin` to `Sema::ActOnAnnotModuleBegin`.
- Rename `Sema::ActOnModuleEnd` to `Sema::ActOnAnnotModuleEnd`.
- Removes a warning if we're trying to compile a non-module unit as
  C++20 module unit. This is not actually useful and makes (the future)
  implementation unnecessarily complex.

This patch meant to be a NFC fix. But it shows that it fixed a bug
suprisingly that previously we would surppress the unused-value warning
in named modules. Because it shares the same logic with clang modules,
which has headers semantics. This shows the change is meaningful.
2024-03-13 13:57:52 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
d3df2a834c [C++20] [Modules] Handle transitive import in the module properly
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/84002

Per [module.import]p7:

> Additionally, when a module-import-declaration in a module unit of
> some module M imports another module unit U of M, it also imports all
> translation units imported by non-exported module-import-declarations
> in the module unit purview of U.

However, we only tried to implement it during the implicit import of
primary module interface for module implementation unit.

Also we didn't implement the last sentence from [module.import]p7
completely:

> These rules can in turn lead to the importation of yet more
> translation units.

This patch tries to care the both issues.
2024-03-06 15:46:55 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
c2c840bd92 [Modules] Don't prevent @import from ObjectiveC
Previously we forbiden the users to import named modules from clang header
modules. However, due to an oversight, the @import form of Objective C
got involved. This is not want and we fix that in this patch.
2023-12-28 10:45:47 +08:00
Kazu Hirata
f3dcc2351c
[clang] Use StringRef::{starts,ends}_with (NFC) (#75149)
This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.

I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
2023-12-13 08:54:13 -08:00
Chuanqi Xu
0f7aaeb324 [C++20] [Modules] Allow export from language linkage
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/71347

Previously I misread the concept of module purview. I thought if a
declaration attached to a unnamed module, it can't be part of the module
purview. But after the issue report, I recognized that module purview is
more of a concept about locations instead of semantics.

Concretely, the things in the language linkage after module declarations
can be exported.

This patch refactors `Module::isModulePurview()` and introduces some
possible code cleanups.
2023-11-09 17:44:41 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
427f13bd72 [NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Remove 'ModuleInterface' bit in Sema::ModuleScope
The 'ModuleInterface' in Sema::ModuleScope is confusing. It actually
means 'not implementation'. This patch removes that bit and extract the
information from the recorded clang::Module.
2023-11-09 15:20:32 +08:00
Vlad Serebrennikov
8775947633
[clang][NFC] Refactor clang::Linkage (#71049)
This patch introduces a new enumerator `Invalid = 0`, shifting other enumerators by +1. Contrary to how it might sound, this actually affirms status quo of how this enum is stored in `clang::Decl`:
```
  /// If 0, we have not computed the linkage of this declaration.
  /// Otherwise, it is the linkage + 1.
  mutable unsigned CacheValidAndLinkage : 3;
```
This patch makes debuggers to not be mistaken about enumerator stored in this bit-field. It also converts `clang::Linkage` to a scoped enum.
2023-11-02 20:57:29 +04:00
Vlad Serebrennikov
65761200ce [clang][NFC] Refactor LinkageSpecDecl::LanguageIDs
This patch converts `LinkageSpecDecl::LanguageIDs` into scoped enum, and moves it to namespace scope, so that it can be forward-declared where required.
2023-11-01 16:44:34 +03:00
Jan Svoboda
523c471250 Reapply "[clang] NFCI: Adopt SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()"
This reapplies ddbcc10b9e26b18f6a70e23d0611b9da75ffa52f, except for a tiny part that was reverted separately: 65331da0032ab4253a4bc0ddcb2da67664bd86a9. That will be reapplied later on, since it turned out to be more involved.

This commit is enabled by 5523fefb01c282c4cbcaf6314a9aaf658c6c145f and f0f548a65a215c450d956dbcedb03656449705b9, specifically the part that makes 'clang-tidy/checkers/misc/header-include-cycle.cpp' separator agnostic.
2023-09-08 19:04:01 -07:00
Jan Svoboda
0a9611fd8d Revert "[clang] NFCI: Adopt SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()"
This reverts commit ddbcc10b9e26b18f6a70e23d0611b9da75ffa52f.

The 'clang-tidy/checkers/misc/header-include-cycle.cpp' test started failing on Windows: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/216/builds/26855.
2023-09-06 13:23:23 -07:00
Jan Svoboda
ddbcc10b9e [clang] NFCI: Adopt SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()
This commit replaces some calls to the deprecated `FileEntry::getName()` with `FileEntryRef::getName()` by swapping current usages of `SourceManager::getFileEntryForID()` with `SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()`. This lowers the number of usages of the deprecated `FileEntry::getName()` from 95 to 50.
2023-09-06 10:49:48 -07:00
Chuanqi Xu
574ee1c02e [C++20] [Modules] Prevent to accept clang modules
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64755

This wouldn't affect the form @import as the test shows. The two
affected test case `diag-flags.cpp` and `diag-pragma.cpp` are old test
cases in 2017 and 2018, when we're not so clear about the direction of
modules. And the things that these 2 tests tested can be covered by
clang modules naturally. So I change the them into clang modules to
not block this patch.
2023-08-17 11:45:50 +08:00
Elliot Goodrich
b0abd4893f [llvm] Add missing StringExtras.h includes
In preparation for removing the `#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"`
from the header to source file of `llvm/Support/Error.h`, first add in
all the missing includes that were previously included transitively
through this header.
2023-06-25 15:42:22 +01:00
Iain Sandoe
b37233a253 [C++20][Modules] Complete implementation of module.import p7.
The following test fails to compile TU b.cpp because we are not making the transitively imported modules visible (per [module.import]/p7)

```
a.cppm:
export module a;

export int foo() {
   return 42;
}

b.cppm:
export module b;
import a;

export int bar();

b.cpp:
module b;

int bar() {
   return foo();
}

clang++ -c -std=c++2b -fmodule-output a.cppm
clang++ -c -std=c++2b -fmodule-output -fprebuilt-module-path=. b.cppm
clang++ -c -std=c++2b -fprebuilt-module-path=. b.cpp
b.cpp:4:12: error: declaration of 'foo' must be imported from module 'a' before it is required
   return foo();
```

This is fixed by the following patch (which also addresses a FIXME in basic.def.odr/p6.cppm).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152746
2023-06-25 08:33:39 +01:00
Iain Sandoe
e5c7904fa0 [C++20][Modules] Implement P2615R1 revised export diagnostics.
It has been reported to that the current clang  errors for, specifically,
static_assert in export contexts are a serious blocker to adoption of
modules in some cases.

There is also implementation divergence with GCC and MSVC allowing the
constructs mentioned below where clang currently rejects them with an
error.

The category of errors [for declarations in an exported context] is:
(unnamed, static_assert, empty and asm decls). These are now permitted
after P2615R1 which was approved by WG21 as a DR (and thus should be
applied to C++20 as well).

This patch removes these diagnostics and amends the testsuite accordingly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152946
2023-06-24 09:01:59 +01:00
Kadir Cetinkaya
4d0cfa6d09
[clang] Don't create import decls without -fmodules
When modules are disabled, there's no loaded module for these import
decls to point at. This results in crashes when there are modulemap
files but no -fmodules flag (this configuration is used for layering
check violations).

This patch makes sure import declarations are introduced only when
modules are enabled, which makes this case similar to textual headers
(no import decls are created for #include of textual headers from a
modulemap).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152274
2023-06-16 09:26:45 +02:00
Chuanqi Xu
52bc4b16cb [NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Refactor Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU into
Decl::isInAnotherModuleUnit

Refactor `Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU` to `Decl::isInAnotherModuleUnit`
to make code simpler a little bit. Note that although this patch
introduces a FIXME, this is an existing issue and this patch just tries
to describe it explicitly.
2023-05-23 10:52:22 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
fc89e9044d [C++20] [Modules] Emit an warning for experimental header units
Currently, the header units are rarely used and it is not well tested.
To avoid further misunderstandings, let's mark it as experimental and
emit a warning when users wants to import it.

This is discussed in modules developers meeting.
2023-05-18 16:12:41 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
88a720d194 [NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Rename ASTContext::getNamedModuleForCodeGen to ASTContext::getCurrentNamedModule
The original name "ASTContext::getNamedModuleForCodeGen" is not properly
reflecting the usage of the interface. This interface can be used to
judge the current module unit in both sema analysis and code generation.
So the original name was not so correct.
2023-05-16 11:24:35 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
7f37066915 Revert "[NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Refactor Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU into"
This reverts commit f109b1016801e2b0dbee278f3c517057c0b1d441 as required
in
f109b10168 (commitcomment-113477829).
2023-05-16 10:47:53 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
f109b10168 [NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Refactor Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU into
Decl::isInCurrentModuleUnit

Refactor `Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU` to `Decl::isInCurrentModuleUnit`
to make code simpler a little bit. Note that although this patch
introduces a FIXME, this is an existing issue and this patch just tries
to describe it explicitly.
2023-05-10 16:01:27 +08:00
Mark de Wever
ba15d186e5 [clang] Use -std=c++23 instead of -std=c++2b
During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.

This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.

Drive-by fixes c++1z -> c++17 and c++2a -> c++20 when seen.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149553
2023-05-04 19:19:52 +02:00
Chuanqi Xu
c1f76363e0 [C++20] [Modules] Continue parsing after we found reserved module names
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62112

In the previous change, we'll stop parsing directly after we found
reserved module names. But this may be too aggressive. This patch
changes this. Note that the parsing will still be stopped if the module
name is `module` or `import`.
2023-04-13 15:14:34 +08:00
Iain Sandoe
6e4f870a21 re-land [C++20][Modules] Introduce an implementation module.
We need to be able to distinguish individual TUs from the same module in cases
where TU-local entities either need to be hidden (or, for some cases of ADL in
template instantiation, need to be detected as exposures).

This creates a module type for the implementation which implicitly imports its
primary module interface per C++20:
[module.unit/8] 'A module-declaration that contains neither an export-keyword
nor a module-partition implicitly imports the primary module interface unit of
the module as if by a module-import-declaration.

Implementation modules are never serialized (-emit-module-interface for an
implementation unit is diagnosed and rejected).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
2023-03-29 08:52:28 +05:30
Aaron Ballman
e574833c2b Downgrade reserved module identifier error into a warning
Any project that wants to import std; potentially needs to be able to
build a module that does export std;. We silenced the error diagnostic
if the module identified itself as a system header, but this isn't
quite good enough, what we really need is a way to identify a system
module. It would be nice for that feature to be shared among the major
implementations, so this downgrades the diagnostic from an error to a
warning temporarily to give implementers time to determine what that
mechanism will look like. We may convert this warning back into an
error in a future release of Clang, but it's not guaranteed we will do
so.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61446
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146986
2023-03-28 08:53:44 -04:00
Mitch Phillips
074f6fd61d Revert "[C++20][Modules] Introduce an implementation module."
This reverts commit c6e9823724ef6bdfee262289ee34d162db436af0.

Reason: Broke the ASan buildbots, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
(the original phabricator review) for more info.
2023-03-27 05:01:53 -07:00
Iain Sandoe
c6e9823724 [C++20][Modules] Introduce an implementation module.
We need to be able to distinguish individual TUs from the same module in cases
where TU-local entities either need to be hidden (or, for some cases of ADL in
template instantiation, need to be detected as exposures).

This creates a module type for the implementation which implicitly imports its
primary module interface per C++20:
[module.unit/8] 'A module-declaration that contains neither an export-keyword
nor a module-partition implicitly imports the primary module interface unit of
the module as if by a module-import-declaration.

Implementation modules are never serialized (-emit-module-interface for an
implementation unit is diagnosed and rejected).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
2023-03-23 12:47:44 +00:00
Chuanqi Xu
bf52ead24c [C++20] [Modules] Support to export declarations in language linkage
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60405

See the discussion in the above link for the background.

What the patch does:
- Rename `Module::ModuleKind::GlobalModuleFragment` to
  `Module::ModuleKind::ExplicitGlobalModuleFragment`.
- Add another module kind `ImplicitGlobalModuleFragment` to
  `ModuleKind`.
- Create an implicit global module fragment for the language linkage
  declarations inside a module purview.
    - If the language linkage lives inside the scope of an export decl,
      the created modules is marked as exported to outer modules.
- In fact, Sema will only create at most 2 implicit global module
  fragments to avoid creating a lot of unnecessary modules in the edging
case.

Reviewed By: iains

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144367
2023-03-03 10:31:48 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
2dfa957f12 [NFC] Remove the unused parameter in Sema::PushGlobalModuleFragment
The `IsImplicit` parameter should be removed since it is not used now.
2023-02-20 15:37:55 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
70d78e0358 [NFC] Remove unused Sema::DirectModuleImports
Sema::DirectModuleImports is not used now. Remove it for clearness.
2023-02-20 15:07:49 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
999ead9dc9 [Modules] Code cleanup after removing ModulesTS
Some codes become unused after we remove ModulesTS.
2023-02-16 15:22:38 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
612f3ac26f [Modules] Remove -fmodules-ts
As the diagnostic message shows, we should remove -fmodules-ts flag in
clang/llvm17. Since clang/llvm16 is already branched. We can remove the
depreacared flag now.
2023-02-16 14:40:32 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
24ecd99842 [NFC] Set C++20 Named Modules for CodeGen in ASTContext in the early place
Previously we'll set the named modules for ASTContext in ParseAST. But
this is not intuitive and we need comments to tell the intuition. This
patch moves the code the right the place, where the corrresponding
module is first created/loaded. Now it is more intuitive and we can use
the value in the earlier places.
2023-02-13 17:14:58 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
1782e8f9e8 [C++20] [Modules] Allow -fmodule-file=<module-name>=<BMI-Path> for implementation unit and document the behavior
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57293.

Previsouly we can't use `-fmodule-file=<module-name>=<BMI-Path>` for
implementation units, it is a bug. Also the behavior of the above option
is not tested nor documented for C++20 Modules. This patch addresses the
2 problems.
2023-02-08 16:45:00 +08:00
Iain Sandoe
53a1314ed1 [C++20][Modules] Fix named module import diagnostics.
We have been incorrectly disallowing imports of named modules in the
global and private module fragments.

This addresses: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59688

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140927
2023-01-22 10:22:36 +00:00
Jan Svoboda
c3efd52770 [clang][modules] Disallow importing private framework in the implementation
Whenever we are compiling implementation of a framework (with the `-fmodule-name=FW` option), we never translate `#import <FW/Header.h>` to an import, regardless of whether "Header.h" belongs to "FW" or "FW_Private". For the same reasons, we also disallow `@import FW`. However, we still allow `@import FW_Private`. This patch disallows that a well, to be consistent with the rest of the rules.

Reviewed By: benlangmuir

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142167
2023-01-20 13:37:36 -08:00
Richard Howell
75fbb5d223 [clang][nfc] refactor Module::Header to use OptionalFileEntryRef
Refactor the `Module::Header` class to use an `OptionalFileEntryRef`
instead of a `FileEntry*`. This is preparation for refactoring the
`TopHeaderNames` to use `FileEntryRef` so that we preserve the
lookup path of the headers when serializing.

This is mostly based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D90497

Reviewed By: jansvoboda11

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142113
2023-01-20 07:23:11 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
6ad0788c33 [clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<.  I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 12:31:01 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
a1580d7b59 [clang] Add #include <optional> (NFC)
This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 11:07:21 -08:00
Benjamin Kramer
854c10f8d1 [Clang] Prepare for llvm::Optional becoming std::optional.
The needed tweaks are mostly trivial, the one nasty bit is Clang's usage
of OptionalStorage. To keep this working old Optional stays around as
clang::CustomizableOptional, with the default Storage removed.
Optional<File/DirectoryEntryRef> is replaced with a typedef.

I tested this with GCC 7.5, the oldest supported GCC I had around.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140332
2022-12-20 00:41:40 +01:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek
205c0589f9 Revert "[clang] Convert OptionalFileEntryRefDegradesToFileEntryPtr to std::optional"
This reverts commit 8f0df9f3bbc6d7f3d5cbfd955c5ee4404c53a75d.

The Optional*RefDegradesTo*EntryPtr types want to keep the same size as
the underlying type, which std::optional doesn't guarantee. For use with
llvm::Optional, they define their own storage class, and there is no way
to do that in std::optional.

On top of that, that commit broke builds with older GCCs, where
std::optional was not trivially copyable (static_assert in the clang
sources was failing).
2022-12-18 11:23:54 -08:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek
8f0df9f3bb [clang] Convert OptionalFileEntryRefDegradesToFileEntryPtr to std::optional 2022-12-17 15:24:14 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
8595f2e54d [Sema] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-03 11:13:39 -08:00