We previously failed to treat an array with an instantiation-dependent
but not value-dependent bound as being an instantiation-dependent type.
We now track the array bound expression as part of a constant array type
if it's an instantiation-dependent expression.
llvm-svn: 373685
We now only use this function directly after initialization. As Clear()
resets the ASTContext back to its initial state, this is just a no-op.
There are no other users for this and we no longer can set the ASTContext
after construction, so Clear has no useful purpose anymore. It's also
mostly copy-pasted from Finalize().
llvm-svn: 373460
Reason for this patch is the Ssame reason as for the previous patches:
Having a ClangASTContext and being able to switch the associated ASTContext isn't
a use case we have (or should have), so let's simplify all this code.
This way it becomes clearer in what order we initialize data structures.
The DWARFASTParserClangTests changes are necessary as the test is using
a ClangASTContext but relied on the fact that no called function ever calls
getASTContext() on our ClangASTContext (as that would create the ASTContext).
As we now always create the ASTContext the fact that we had an uninitialized
FileSystem made the test crash.
llvm-svn: 373457
We have no use case in LLDB where we actually do want to change the ASTContext after
it the ClangASTContext has been constructed. All callers of setASTContext are just setting
the ASTContext directly after construction, so we might as well make this a Constructor
instead of supporting this tricky use case.
llvm-svn: 373330
Now using default initializers and StringRef.
Also formats the member list that we excluded from clang-format
at some point and still hangs around with the old LLDB code style.
llvm-svn: 373329
Summary:
It uses the new ability of ABI plugins to vend llvm::MCRegisterInfo
structs (which is what is needed to turn dwarf register numbers into
strings).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: tatyana-krasnukha, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67966
llvm-svn: 373208
LLDB synthesizes decls using asm labels. These decls cannot have a mangle
different than the one specified in the label name. I.e., the '\01' prefix
should not be added.
Fixes an expression evaluation failure in lldb's TestVirtual.py on iOS.
rdar://45827323
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67774
llvm-svn: 372903
levels:
-- none: no lax vector conversions [new GCC default]
-- integer: only conversions between integer vectors [old GCC default]
-- all: all conversions between same-size vectors [Clang default]
For now, Clang still defaults to "all" mode, but per my proposal on
cfe-dev (2019-04-10) the default will be changed to "integer" as soon as
that doesn't break lots of testcases. (Eventually I'd like to change the
default to "none" to match GCC and general sanity.)
Following GCC's behavior, the driver flag -flax-vector-conversions is
translated to -flax-vector-conversions=integer.
This reinstates r371805, reverted in r371813, with an additional fix for
lldb.
llvm-svn: 371817
ClangASTContext doesn't use m_persistent_variables in a way specific to
ClangPersistentVariables. Therefore, it should hold a unique pointer to
PersistentExpressionState instead of a ClangPersistentVariablesUP.
This also prevents you from pulling in a plugin header when including
ClangASTContext.h
Doing this exposed an implicit dependency in ObjCLanguage that was
corrected by including ClangModulesDeclVendor.h
llvm-svn: 371470
Summary:
DumpDataExtractor uses ClangASTContext in order to get the proper llvm
fltSemantics for the type it needs so that it can dump floats in a more
precise way. However, there's no reason that this behavior needs to be
specific ClangASTContext. Instead, I think it makes sense to ask
TypeSystems for the float semantics for a type of a given size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67239
llvm-svn: 371258
Summary:
This removes DeclVendor's dependency on clang (and ClangASTContext).
DeclVendor has no need to know about specific TypeSystems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66628
llvm-svn: 369735
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
This reapplies r369690 with a previously missing constructor for LanguageSet.
llvm-svn: 369710
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
llvm-svn: 369690
Summary:
Currently the heuristic used in ClangASTContext::CreateRecordType to identify an anonymous class is that there is that name is a nullptr or simply a null terminator. This heuristic is not accurate since it will also sweep up unnamed classes and lambdas. The improved heuristic relies on the requirement that an anonymous class must be contained within a class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66175
llvm-svn: 368937
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
Summary:
Ideally CompilerType would have no knowledge of clang or any individual
TypeSystem. Decoupling clang is relatively straightforward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66102
llvm-svn: 368741
Summary:
And not `zero`. This is the last API needed to be converted to
an Optional<T>.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66093
llvm-svn: 368614
These types were recently added in D62960 but it seems the patch didn't
consider LLDB which causes a bunch of compiler warnings about
missing enum values. It seems this feature isn't fully implemented yet,
so I don't think we can write any test for this. For now lets just add
the missing types to our usual list of unsupported types.
llvm-svn: 368424
Summary:
This simplifies the interface, as I'm trying to understand how
we can upstream swift support.
<rdar://problem/36377967>
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, xiaobai, compnerd, friss
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65781
llvm-svn: 367946
D65562 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65562> moves LangStandard.h from clang/Frontend to clang/Basic. This patch
adjusts the single file in lldb that uses it to match.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65717
llvm-svn: 367865
Summary:
The change https://reviews.llvm.org/D55575 modified ClangASTContext::CreateParameterDeclaration to call decl_ctx->addDecl(decl); this caused a regression since the existing code in DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildParameters is called with the containing DeclContext. So when end up with cases where we are parsing a parameter for a member function and the parameter is added to the CXXRecordDecl as opposed to the CXXMethodDecl. This example is given in the regression test TestBreakpointInMemberFuncWNonPrimitiveParams.py which without this fix in a modules build leads to assert on setting a breakpoint in a member function with non primitive parameters. This scenario would be common when debugging LLDB or clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65414
llvm-svn: 367726
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
In ClangASTContext::CreateFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo a TemplateArgumentList is allocated on the stack but is treated as if it is persistent in subsequent calls. When we exit the function func_decl will still point to the stack allocated memory. We will use TemplateArgumentList::CreateCopy instead which will allocate memory out of the DeclContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64777
llvm-svn: 366365
Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763
llvm-svn: 366148
Summary:
If we call this function with a non-namespace as a second argument (and a nullptr name), we currently
only get a nullptr as a return when we hit the "Bad!!!" code path. This patch just adds an assert as this
seems to be a programming error in the calling code.
Reviewers: shafik
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57880
llvm-svn: 365157
Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html
with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.
Changes:
- add the consteval keyword.
- add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
- add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
- adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
- add tests for basic semantic.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790
llvm-svn: 363362
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
Add a function to flatten the nested aggregate type
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62702
Patch by Wanyi Ye <kusmour@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 362543
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
Summary:
This is the final phase of the refactoring towards using llvm::Expected
and llvm::Error in the ASTImporter API.
This involves the following:
- remove old Import functions which returned with a pointer,
- use the Import_New functions (which return with Err or Expected) everywhere
and handle their return value
- rename Import_New functions to Import
This affects both Clang and LLDB.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, aprantl, a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61438
llvm-svn: 360760
Summary:
r360109 added a new enum case, causing lldb build to fail with several errors like:
lldb/source/Symbol/ClangASTContext.cpp:4342:11: error: enumeration value 'MacroQualified' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
This adds the missing switch cases.
I'm not an lldb maintainer and just used my best judgement that it's probably expected that we break in these cases. Feel free to ping / revert / fix this change if this behavior is not appropriate.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61640
llvm-svn: 360146
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
by respecting the "artificial" attribute on variables. Function
arguments that are artificial and useful to end-users are being
whitelisted by the language runtime.
<rdar://problem/45322477>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61451
llvm-svn: 359841
