As discussed on PR42025, with more complex boolean math we can end up with many truncations/extensions of the comparison results through each bitop.
This patch handles the cases introduced in combineBitcastvxi1 by pushing the sign extension through the AND/OR/XOR ops so its just the original SETCC ops that gets extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68226
llvm-svn: 373834
Added some tests testing urem and srem operations with a constant divisor.
Patch by TG908 (Tim Gymnich)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68421
llvm-svn: 373830
This is an omission in rL371441. Loads which happened to be unordered weren't being added to the PendingLoad set, and thus weren't be ordered w/respect to side effects which followed before the end of the block.
Included test case is how I spotted this. We had an atomic load being folded into a using instruction after a fence that load was supposed to be ordered with. I'm sure it showed up a bunch of other ways as well.
Spotted via manual inspecting of assembly differences in a corpus w/and w/o the new experimental mode. Finding this with testing would have been "unpleasant".
llvm-svn: 373814
This reverts r371177 (git commit f879c6875563c0a8cd838f1e13b14dd33558f1f8)
It caused PR43566 by removing empty, address-taken MachineBasicBlocks.
Such blocks may have references from blockaddress or other operands, and
need more consideration to be removed.
See the PR for a test case to use when relanding.
llvm-svn: 373805
Outlining from noreturn functions doesn't do the correct thing right now. The
outliner should respect that the caller is marked noreturn. In the event that
we have a noreturn function, and the outlined code is in tail position, the
outliner will not see that the outlined function should be tail called. As a
result, you end up with a regular call containing a return.
Fixing this requires that we check that all candidates live inside noreturn
functions. So, for the sake of correctness, don't outline from noreturn
functions right now.
Add machine-outliner-noreturn.mir to test this.
llvm-svn: 373791
InstrEmitter's virtual register handling assumes that clones are emitted
after the cloned node. Make sure this assumption actually holds.
Fixes a "Node emitted out of order - early" assertion on the testcase.
This is probably a very rare case to actually hit in practice; even
without the explicit edge, the scheduler will usually end up scheduling
the nodes in the expected order due to other constraints.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68068
llvm-svn: 373782
The immediate form of VPCMP can represent these completely. The
vpcmpgt/eq are just shorter encodings.
This patch removes the isel patterns and just swaps the opcodes
and removes the immediate in MCInstLower. This matches where we do
some other encodings tricks.
Removes over 10K bytes from the isel table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68446
llvm-svn: 373766
We already do this for ISD::TRUNCATE, but we can do the same for X86ISD::VTRUNC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68432
llvm-svn: 373765
A set of function attributes is required in any function that uses constrained
floating point intrinsics. None of our tests use these attributes.
This patch fixes this.
These tests have been tested against the IR verifier changes in D68233.
Reviewed by: andrew.w.kaylor, cameron.mcinally, uweigand
Approved by: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67925
llvm-svn: 373761
Darwin platforms need the frame register to always point at a valid record even
if it's not updated in a leaf function. Backtraces are more important than one
extra GPR.
llvm-svn: 373738
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
As discussed on llvm-dev and:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43542
...we have transforms that assume shift operations are legal and transforms to
use them are profitable, but that may not hold for simple targets.
In this case, the MSP430 target custom lowers shifts by repeating (many)
simpler/fixed ops. That can be avoided by keeping this code as setcc/select.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68397
llvm-svn: 373666
The IR was using a fixed 8 byte alignment, but the MIR portion was using native alignment. Since the test doesn't appear to be deliberately testing overalignment, just make the IR match the MIR.
llvm-svn: 373658
Summary:
This is follow up patch of https://reviews.llvm.org/D67595.
Adjust naming and the Commutable operands for additional patterns
to make it easier to read.
The testcase update also show that we can save some unecessary fmr as
well.
Reviewers: #powerpc, steven.zhang, hfinkel, nemanjai
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai
Subscribers: wuzish, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, shchenz, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68112
llvm-svn: 373652
This patch recognizes the shuffle pattern we get from a
v8i64->v8i8 truncate when v8i64 isn't a legal type.
With VLX we can use two VTRUNCs, unpckldq, and a insert_subvector.
Diffrential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68374
llvm-svn: 373645
Register indexing 64-bit elements is possible on the SALU, but not the
VALU. Handle splitting this into two 32-bit indexes. Extend waterfall
loop handling to allow moving a range of instructions.
llvm-svn: 373638
We can still do a waterfall loop over the index if using a VGPR to
index an SGPR. The result will still be a VGPR, but we can avoid the
wide copy of the source register to a VGPR.
llvm-svn: 373637
The Hexagon code assumes there's no existing terminator when inserting its
trip count condition check.
This causes swp-stages5.ll to break. The generated code looks good to me,
it is likely a permutation. I have disabled the new codegen path to keep
everything green and will investigate along with the other 3-4 tests
that have different codegen.
Fixes expensive-checks build.
llvm-svn: 373629
During studying support for bitfield, I found an issue for
an example like the one in test offset-reloc-middle-chain.ll.
struct t1 { int c; };
struct s1 { struct t1 b; };
struct r1 { struct s1 a; };
#define _(x) __builtin_preserve_access_index(x)
void test1(void *p1, void *p2, void *p3);
void test(struct r1 *arg) {
struct s1 *ps = _(&arg->a);
struct t1 *pt = _(&arg->a.b);
int *pi = _(&arg->a.b.c);
test1(ps, pt, pi);
}
The IR looks like:
%0 = llvm.preserve.struct.access(base, ...)
%1 = llvm.preserve.struct.access(%0, ...)
%2 = llvm.preserve.struct.access(%1, ...)
using %0, %1 and %2
In this case, we need to generate three relocatiions
corresponding to chains: (%0), (%0, %1) and (%0, %1, %2).
After collecting all the chains, the current implementation
process each chain (in a map) with code generation sequentially.
For example, after (%0) is processed, the code may look like:
%0 = base + special_global_variable
// llvm.preserve.struct.access(base, ...) is delisted
// from the instruction stream.
%1 = llvm.preserve.struct.access(%0, ...)
%2 = llvm.preserve.struct.access(%1, ...)
using %0, %1 and %2
When processing chain (%0, %1), the current implementation
tries to visit intrinsic llvm.preserve.struct.access(base, ...)
to get some of its properties and this caused segfault.
This patch fixed the issue by remembering all necessary
information (kind, metadata, access_index, base) during
analysis phase, so in code generation phase there is
no need to examine the intrinsic call instructions.
This also simplifies the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68389
llvm-svn: 373621
Adds support to AArch64FrameLowering to allocate fixed-stack SVE objects.
The focus of this patch is purely to allow the stack frame to
allocate/deallocate space for scalable SVE objects. More dynamic
allocation (at compile-time, i.e. determining placement of SVE objects
on the stack), or resolving frame-index references that include
scalable-sized offsets, are left for subsequent patches.
SVE objects are allocated in the stack frame as a separate region below
the callee-save area, and above the alignment gap. This is done so that
the SVE objects can be accessed directly from the FP at (runtime)
VL-based offsets to benefit from using the VL-scaled addressing modes.
The layout looks as follows:
+-------------+
| stack arg |
+-------------+
| Callee Saves|
| X29, X30 | (if available)
|-------------| <- FP (if available)
| : |
| SVE area |
| : |
+-------------+
|/////////////| alignment gap.
| : |
| Stack objs |
| : |
+-------------+ <- SP after call and frame-setup
SVE and non-SVE stack objects are distinguished using different
StackIDs. The offsets for objects with TargetStackID::SVEVector should be
interpreted as purely scalable offsets within their respective SVE region.
Reviewers: thegameg, rovka, t.p.northover, efriedma, rengolin, greened
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61437
llvm-svn: 373585
This improves broadcast load folding of i64 elements on 32-bit
targets where i64 isn't legal.
Previously we had to represent these as vXf64 vbroadcast_loads and
a bitcast to vXi64. But we didn't have any isel patterns
looking for that.
This also allows us to remove or simplify some isel patterns that
were looking for bitcasted vbroadcast_loads.
llvm-svn: 373566
When SIFixSGPRCopies attempts to fix an illegal copy from vector to
scalar register it calls moveToVALU(). A copy from an agpr to sgpr
becomes a copy from agpr to agpr, which may result in the illegal
register class at a use of this copy.
Solution is to copy it always into a vgpr. This may result in a
subsequent copy into an agpr if that is what really needed, however
should not happen too often and likely will be folded later.
The opposite situation may not happen because an sgpr is always
illegal where agpr is legal, so such user instructions may not
exist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68358
llvm-svn: 373544
If the vselect result type needs to be split, it will try to
also try to split the condition if it happens to be a setcc.
With avx512 where k-registers are legal, its probably better
to just use a kshift to split the mask register.
llvm-svn: 373536
Store rlwinm Rx, Ry, 32, 0, 31 as rlwinm Rx, Ry, 0, 0, 31 and store
rldicl Rx, Ry, 64, 0 as rldicl Rx, Ry, 0, 0. Otherwise SH field is overflow and
fails assertion in assembly printing stage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66991
llvm-svn: 373519
The previous code tried to do a trick where we would extract the subvector from the location we were inserting. Then xor that with the new value. Take the xored value and clear out the bits above the subvector size. Then shift that xored subvector to the insert location. And finally xor that with the original vector. Since the old subvector was used in both xors, this would leave just the new subvector at the inserted location. Since the surrounding bits had been zeroed no other bits of the original vector would be modified.
Unfortunately, if the old subvector came from undef we might aggressively propagate the undef. Then we end up with the XORs not cancelling because they aren't using the same value for the two uses of the old subvector. @bkramer gave me a case that demonstrated this, but we haven't reduced it enough to make it easily readable to see what's happening.
This patch uses a safer, but more costly approach. It isolate the bits above the insertion and bits below the insert point and ORs those together leaving 0 for the insertion location. Then widens the subvector with 0s in the upper bits, shifts it into position with 0s in the lower bits. Then we do another OR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68311
llvm-svn: 373495
Summary:
64-bit WebAssembly (wasm64) is not specified and not supported in the
WebAssembly backend. We do have support for it in clang, however, and
we would like to keep that support because we expect wasm64 to be
specified and supported in the future. For now add an error when
trying to use wasm64 from the backend to minimize user confusion from
unexplained crashes.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, sunfish
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68254
llvm-svn: 373493
Summary:
Extend cachepolicy operand in the new VMEM buffer intrinsics
to supply information whether the buffer data is swizzled.
Also, propagate this information to MIR.
Intrinsics updated:
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_raw_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_raw_tbuffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_load_format
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store
int_amdgcn_struct_buffer_store_format
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_load
int_amdgcn_struct_tbuffer_store
Furthermore, disable merging of VMEM buffer instructions
in SI Load/Store optimizer, if the "swizzled" bit on the instruction
is on.
The default value of the bit is 0, meaning that data in buffer
is linear and buffer instructions can be merged.
There is no difference in the generated code with this commit.
However, in the future it will be expected that front-ends
use buffer intrinsics with correct "swizzled" bit set.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, tpr
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, arphaman, jfb, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68200
llvm-svn: 373491
This was reverted in r373454 due to breaking the expensive-checks bot.
This version addresses that by omitting the addSuccessorWithProb() call
when omitting the range check.
> Switch lowering: omit range check for bit tests when default is unreachable (PR43129)
>
> This is modeled after the same functionality for jump tables, which was
> added in r357067.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68131
llvm-svn: 373477
