922 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel
8a4d05ddb3 [ConstantFolding] add copysign tests for more FP types; NFC
D102673 proposes to ease the current type check, but
there doesn't appear to be any test coverage for that.
2021-06-04 11:42:53 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks
26044c6a54 [InstSimplify] Treat invariant group insts as bitcasts for load operands
We can look through invariant group intrinsics for the purposes of
simplifying the result of a load.

Since intrinsics can't be constants, but we also don't want to
completely rewrite load constant folding, we convert the load operand to
a constant. For GEPs and bitcasts we just treat them as constants. For
invariant group intrinsics, we treat them as a bitcast.

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101103
2021-06-01 16:33:06 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
3aa943070c [test] Precommit test for D101103 2021-06-01 16:31:02 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
8086f9d87e [ConstFold] Simplify a load's GEP operand through local aliases
MSVC-style RTTI produces loads through a GEP of a local alias which
itself is a GEP. Currently we aren't able to devirtualize any virtual
calls when MSVC RTTI is enabled.

This patch attempts to simplify a load's GEP operand by calling
SymbolicallyEvaluateGEP() with an option to look through local aliases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101100
2021-05-27 16:04:19 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
ca7eaa0a54 [InstSimplify] allow undef element match in vector select condition value
The semantics of select with undefined/poison condition
are not explicitly stated in the LangRef, but this matches
comments in the code and Alive2 appears to concur:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/KXytmd

We can find this pattern after demanded elements transforms.

As noted in D101191, fuzzers are finding infinite loops because
we may not account for this pattern in other passes.
2021-05-25 14:25:34 -04:00
David Goldblatt
8607a02357 [InstSimplify] Transform X * Y % Y --> 0
simplifyDiv already handles the case X * Y / Y --> X (barring overflow).
This adds the equivalent handling to simplifyRem.

Correctness:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/J2cUbS
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/us9NUM
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/AvaDGJ
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/kq9ige

Extending the situations in which we apply this transform would not be
correct:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Lf9V63
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/6RPQK3
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/p9UdxC
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/A2zlhE
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/vHTtLw
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/lvpH42

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102864
2021-05-25 10:16:04 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
a0e71f1832 [ConstProp] propagate poison from vector reduction element(s) to result
This follows from the underlying logic for binops and min/max.
Although it does not appear that we handle this for min/max
intrinsics currently.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Kq9Xnh
2021-05-24 10:34:40 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
3dd2063671 [ConstProp] add tests for vector reductions with poison elements; NFC 2021-05-24 10:34:40 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
cb3bc9d81d [InstSimplify] add more tests for rem-mul-div; NFC
See D102864 for discussion.
2021-05-23 09:46:29 -04:00
David Goldblatt
3c4b79481d [InstSimplify] add tests for rem-of-mul; NFC
These are baseline tests for D102864
2021-05-21 15:46:39 -04:00
Joe Ellis
5a476987f7 [InstSimplify] Properly constrain {insert,extract}_subvector intrinsic fold
The previous rule:

   (insert_vector _, (extract_vector X, 0), 0) -> X

is not quite correct. The correct fold should be:

   (insert_vector Y, (extract_vector X, 0), 0) -> X
   where: Y is X, or Y is undef

This commit updates the pattern.

Reviewed By: peterwaller-arm, paulwalker-arm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102699
2021-05-21 10:05:03 +00:00
Joe Ellis
2ed7db0d20 [InstSimplify] Remove redundant {insert,extract}_vector intrinsic chains
This commit removes some redundant {insert,extract}_vector intrinsic
chains by implementing the following patterns as instsimplifies:

   (insert_vector _, (extract_vector X, 0), 0) -> X
   (extract_vector (insert_vector _, X, 0), 0) -> X

Reviewed By: peterwaller-arm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101986
2021-05-13 16:09:50 +00:00
Juneyoung Lee
395607af3c Reapply [ConstantFold] Fold more operations to poison
This was reverted to mitigate mitigate miscompiles caused by
the logical and/or to bitwise and/or fold. Reapply it now that
the underlying issue has been fixed by D101191.

-----

This patch folds more operations to poison.

Alive2 proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mxcb9G (it does not contain tests about div/rem because they fold to poison when raising UB)

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92270
2021-05-13 16:04:12 +02:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin
22d295f695 [AMDGPU] Constant fold Intrinsic::amdgcn_perm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102203
2021-05-10 16:23:11 -07:00
Dávid Bolvanský
62fcda9378 Revert "[InstSimplify] Added tests for PR50173, NFC"
This reverts commit 4e7a4c73dab6605f4fcc7bf09c2ee85e7925f6d7. Not needed, pattern is handled by instcombine already.
2021-05-04 23:04:05 +02:00
Dávid Bolvanský
4e7a4c73da [InstSimplify] Added tests for PR50173, NFC 2021-05-04 19:32:44 +02:00
Sanjay Patel
15a42339fe [ValueTracking] soften assert for invertible recurrence matching
There's a TODO comment in the code and discussion in D99912
about generalizing this, but I wasn't sure how to implement that,
so just going with a potential minimal fix to avoid crashing.

The test is a reduction beyond useful code (there's no user of
%user...), but it is based on https://llvm.org/PR50191, so this
is asserting on real code.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101772
2021-05-03 15:57:40 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
1089158c5a [ConstantFolding] propagate poison through vector reduction intrinsics 2021-04-29 12:54:20 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
678018138d [ConstProp] add tests for vector reductions of poison; NFC 2021-04-29 12:20:59 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
5e6dc5e404 [InstSimplify] generalize ctlz-of-shifted-constant
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/zWL_VQ
2021-04-21 14:23:55 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
859e1f420d [InstSimplify] add tests for ctlz-of-shift-constant; NFC 2021-04-21 14:23:55 -04:00
Nikita Popov
de18fa9e52 Revert "[InstSimplify] Bypass no-op and-mask, using known bits (PR49543)"
This reverts commit ea1a0d7c9ae3e5232a4163fc67efad4aabd51f2b.

While this is strictly more powerful, it is also strictly slower.
InstSimplify intentionally does not perform many folds that it
is allowed to perform, if doing so requires a KnownBits calculation
that will be repeated in InstCombine.

Maybe it's worthwhile to do this here, but that needs a more
explicitly stated motivation, evaluated in a review.
2021-04-21 09:55:25 +02:00
Roman Lebedev
ea1a0d7c9a
[InstSimplify] Bypass no-op and-mask, using known bits (PR49543)
We already special-cased a few interesting patterns,
but that is strictly less powerful than using KnownBits.

So instead get the known bits for the operand of `and`,
and iff all the unset bits of the `and`-mask are known to be zeros
in the operand, we can omit said `and`.
2021-04-21 00:31:46 +03:00
Roman Lebedev
8cff391995
[NFC][InstSimplify] Add one more test for unneeded 'and' 2021-04-21 00:31:46 +03:00
Joe Ellis
effacc1599 [AArch64] Constant fold sve_convert_from_svbool(zero) to zero
Co-authored-by: Paul Walker <paul.walker@arm.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100463
2021-04-20 10:02:49 +00:00
Juneyoung Lee
2813acb7d1 Update m_Undef to match vectors/aggrs with undefs and poisons mixed
This fixes https://reviews.llvm.org/D93990#2666922
by teaching `m_Undef` to match vectors/aggrs with poison elements.

As suggested, fixes in InstCombine files to use the `m_Undef` matcher instead
of `isa<UndefValue>` will be followed.

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100122
2021-04-18 10:57:04 +09:00
Thomas Lively
5c729750a6 [WebAssembly] Remove saturating fp-to-int target intrinsics
Use the target-independent @llvm.fptosi and @llvm.fptoui intrinsics instead.
This includes removing the instrinsics for i32x4.trunc_sat_zero_f64x2_{s,u},
which are now represented in IR as a saturating truncation to a v2i32 followed by
a concatenation with a zero vector.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100596
2021-04-16 12:11:20 -07:00
Sander de Smalen
672f673004 [SVE] Remove checks for warnings in scalable-vector tests.
After D98856 these tests will by default break (fatal_error) if any of
the wrong interfaces are used, so there's no longer a need to have a
RUN line that checks for a warning message emitted by the compiler.
2021-04-07 15:59:32 +01:00
Florian Hahn
4059c1c32d [SimplifyInst] Use correct type for GEPs with vector indices.
The current code does not properly handle vector indices unless they are
the first index.

At the moment LangRef gives the impression that the vector index must be
the one and only index (https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#getelementptr-instruction).

But vector indices can appear at any position and according to the
verifier there may be multiple vector indices. If that's the case, the
number of elements must match.

This patch updates SimplifyGEPInst to properly handle those additional
cases.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99961
2021-04-06 17:56:10 +01:00
Sanjay Patel
e2a0f512ea [InstSimplify] fix potential miscompile in select value equivalence
This is the sibling fix to c590a9880d7a -
as there, we can't subsitute a vector value the equality
compare replacement that we are trying requires that the
comparison is true for the entire value. Vector select
can be partly true/false.
2021-04-05 16:52:34 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
78e5cf66fe [InstSimplify] add test for vector select with operand replacement; NFC
We need a sibling fix to c590a9880d7a
( https://llvm.org/PR49832 ) to avoid miscompiling.
2021-04-05 16:52:34 -04:00
Juneyoung Lee
6147501617 [InstSimplify] Add a test for folding comparison with a undef vector (NFC)
This is to fix https://reviews.llvm.org/D93990#2666922
2021-04-04 13:46:56 +09:00
George Mitenkov
807b019ca2 [ConstantFolding] Fixing addo/subo with undef
When folding addo/subo with undef, the current
convention is to use { -1, false } for addo and
{ 0, false } for subo. This was fixed for InstSimplify in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGf094d65beaa492e845b03561eddd75b5be653a01,
but not in ConstantFolding.

Reviewed By: nikic, lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99564
2021-03-31 21:47:29 +03:00
Sanjay Patel
adf42dff42 [ValueTracking] peek through min/max to find isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo
This is similar to the select logic just ahead of the new code.
Min/max choose exactly one value from the inputs, so if both of
those are a power-of-2, then the result must be a power-of-2.

This might help with D98152, but we likely still need other
pieces of the puzzle to avoid regressions.

The change in PatternMatch.h is needed to build with clang.
It's possible there is a better way to deal with the 'const'
incompatibities.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99276
2021-03-24 17:54:38 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
a8708708cf [InstSimplify] add tests for min/max intrinsic analysis; NFC 2021-03-24 12:21:59 -04:00
Craig Topper
4c38c35c8d [ValueTracking] Teach canCreateUndefOrPoison that ctpop does not create undef or poison.
This select of ctpop with 0 pattern can get left behind after
loop idiom recognize converts a loop to ctpop. LLVM 10 was able
to optimize this, but LLVM 11 and later is not. The difference
seems to be that some select transforms are now limited based
on canCreateUndefOrPoison.

Teaching canCreateUndefOrPoison about ctpop restores the
LLVM 10 codegen.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99207
2021-03-23 12:42:18 -07:00
Nikita Popov
7e18cd887c [InstCombine] Whitelist non-refining folds in SimplifyWithOpReplaced
This is an alternative to D98391/D98585, playing things more
conservatively. If AllowRefinement == false, then we don't use
InstSimplify methods at all, and instead explicitly implement a
small number of non-refining folds. Most cases are handled by
constant folding, and I only had to add three folds to cover
our unit tests / test-suite. While this may lose some optimization
power, I think it is safer to approach from this direction, given
how many issues this code has already caused.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99027
2021-03-22 22:12:56 +01:00
Nikita Popov
59dbf4d516 [InstSimplify] Add load of undef aggregate test (NFC)
To make sure this doesn't crash the following commit.
2021-03-21 17:42:26 +01:00
Nikita Popov
b32f5d5045 [InstSimplify] Regenerate test checks (NFC) 2021-03-21 17:41:21 +01:00
Nikita Popov
ece1403aca [InstSimplify] Add additional select operand replacement tests (NFC)
This tests for binops with identity elements.
2021-03-21 15:30:30 +01:00
Simonas Kazlauskas
6513995be3 [InstSimplify] Restrict a GEP transform to avoid provenance changes
This is a follow-up to D98588, and fixes the inline `FIXME` about a GEP-related simplification not
preserving the provenance.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qbQoAY

Additional tests were added in {rGf125f28afdb59eba29d2491dac0dfc0a7bf1b60b}

Depends on D98672

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98611
2021-03-16 18:53:05 +02:00
Sanjay Patel
660728acd4 [InstSimplify] ctlz({signbit} >>u x) --> x
The motivating pattern was handled in 0a2d69480d ,
but we should have this for symmetry.

But this really highlights that we could generalize for
any shifted constant if we match this in instcombine.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MrmVNt
2021-03-15 12:03:35 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
3c93852a78 [InstSimplify] add tests for ctlz of shifted constant; NFC 2021-03-15 12:03:35 -04:00
Simonas Kazlauskas
f125f28afd [InstSimplify] Add additional GEP transform tests & regenerate 2021-03-14 23:18:26 +02:00
Bjorn Pettersson
529c8e8dc6 [InstSimplify] Simplify smul.fix and smul.fix.sat
Add simplification of smul.fix and smul.fix.sat according to
  X * 0 -> 0
  X * undef -> 0
  X * (1 << scale) -> X

This includes the commuted patterns and splatted vectors.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98299
2021-03-12 09:09:58 +01:00
Bjorn Pettersson
3638bdfbda [ConstantFold] Handle undef/poison when constant folding smul_fix/smul_fix_sat
Do constant folding according to
  posion * C -> poison
  C * poison -> poison
  undef * C -> 0
  C * undef -> 0
for smul_fix and smul_fix_sat intrinsics (for any scale).

Reviewed By: nikic, aqjune, nagisa

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98410
2021-03-12 09:09:58 +01:00
Juneyoung Lee
3170978173 [InstSimplify] Add tests for pr49495 (NFC) 2021-03-10 17:54:46 +09:00
Sanjay Patel
0a2d69480d [InstSimplify] cttz(1<<x) --> x
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/TDacYu
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/KF84S3
2021-03-08 16:30:14 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
afa443831b [InstSimplify] add tests for cttz of shifted-1; NFC 2021-03-08 16:30:13 -05:00
Nikita Popov
7faad5c900 [ConstantFold] Handle icmp of global and null consistently
Return UGT rather than NE for icmp @g, null, which is slightly
stronger. This is consistent with what we do for more complex
folds. It is somewhat silly that @g ugt null does not get folded
while (gep @g) ugt null does.
2021-03-08 17:18:01 +01:00