14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tres Popp
c1fa60b4cd [mlir] Update method cast calls to function calls
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.

Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.

Context:

* https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
* Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443

Implementation:
This follows a previous patch that updated calls
`op.cast<T>()-> cast<T>(op)`. However some cases could not handle an
unprefixed `cast` call due to occurrences of variables named cast, or
occurring inside of class definitions which would resolve to the method.
All C++ files that did not work automatically with `cast<T>()` are
updated here to `llvm::cast` and similar with the intention that they
can be easily updated after the methods are removed through a
find-replace.

See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
for the clang-tidy check that is used and then update printed
occurrences of the function to include `llvm::` before.

One can then run the following:
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy

run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
                 -export-fixes /tmp/cast/casts.yaml mlir/*\
                 -header-filter=mlir/ -fix

rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150348
2023-05-12 11:21:30 +02:00
Matthias Springer
42c31d8302 [mlir][IR] Clean up mergeBlockBefore and mergeBlocks
* `RewriterBase::mergeBlocks` is simplified: it is implemented in terms of `mergeBlockBefore`.
* The signature of `mergeBlockBefore` is consistent with other API (such as `inlineRegionBefore`): an overload for a `Block::iterator` is added.
* Additional safety checks are added to `mergeBlockBefore`: detect cases where the resulting IR could be invalid (no more `dropAllUses`) or partly unreachable (likely a case of incorrect API usage).
* Rename `mergeBlockBefore` to `inlineBlockBefore`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144969
2023-03-06 13:46:08 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
9e5d2495ac Use APInt::isOne instead of APInt::isOneValue (NFC)
Note that isOneValue has been soft-deprecated in favor of isOne.
2023-02-19 23:06:36 -08:00
Jeff Niu
4d67b27817 [mlir] Add operations to BlockAndValueMapping and rename it to IRMapping
The patch adds operations to `BlockAndValueMapping` and renames it to `IRMapping`. When operations are cloned, old operations are mapped to the cloned operations. This allows mapping from an operation to a cloned operation. Example:

```
Operation *opWithRegion = ...
Operation *opInsideRegion = &opWithRegion->front().front();

IRMapping map
Operation *newOpWithRegion = opWithRegion->clone(map);
Operation *newOpInsideRegion = map.lookupOrNull(opInsideRegion);
```

Migration instructions:
All includes to `mlir/IR/BlockAndValueMapping.h` should be replaced with `mlir/IR/IRMapping.h`. All uses of `BlockAndValueMapping` need to be renamed to `IRMapping`.

Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139665
2023-01-12 13:16:05 -08:00
Ramkumar Ramachandra
22426110c5 mlir/tblgen: use std::optional in generation
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional. This patch changes the way mlir-tblgen generates .inc
files, and modifies tests and documentation appropriately. It is a "no
compromises" patch, and doesn't leave the user with an unpleasant mix of
llvm::Optional and std::optional.

A non-trivial change has been made to ControlFlowInterfaces to split one
constructor into two, relating to a build failure on Windows.

See also: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <r@artagnon.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138934
2022-12-17 11:13:26 +01:00
Jakub Kuderski
abc362a107 [mlir][arith] Change dialect name from Arithmetic to Arith
Suggested by @lattner in https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-define-precise-arith-semantics/65507/22.

Tested with:
`ninja check-mlir check-mlir-integration check-mlir-mlir-spirv-cpu-runner check-mlir-mlir-vulkan-runner check-mlir-examples`

and `bazel build --config=generic_clang @llvm-project//mlir:all`.

Reviewed By: lattner, Mogball, rriddle, jpienaar, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134762
2022-09-29 11:23:28 -04:00
Kazu Hirata
0820c6ef60 [mlir] Don't include StringSwitch.h (NFC)
These files don't seem to use StringSwitch.
2022-09-18 23:09:40 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
6d5fc1e3d5 [mlir] Don't use Optional::getValue (NFC) 2022-06-20 23:20:25 -07:00
Alexander Batashev
b34fb277df [mlir][cf] Implement missing SwitchOp::build function
Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126594
2022-06-03 09:08:04 +03:00
Vitaly Buka
f735b3a2b0 [mlir] Prevent argStorage relocations
This fixes msan reports like https://reviews.llvm.org/P8285

Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124576
2022-04-29 11:09:32 -07:00
Chris Lattner
5dedf911de [AsmParser] Rework logic around "region argument parsing"
The asm parser had a notional distinction between parsing an
operand (like "%foo" or "%4#3") and parsing a region argument
(which isn't supposed to allow a result number like #3).

Unfortunately the implementation has two problems:

1) It didn't actually check for the result number and reject
   it.  parseRegionArgument and parseOperand were identical.
2) It had a lot of machinery built up around it that paralleled
   operand parsing.  This also was functionally identical, but
   also had some subtle differences (e.g. the parseOptional
   stuff had a different result type).

I thought about just removing all of this, but decided that the
missing error checking was important, so I reimplemented it with
a `allowResultNumber` flag on parseOperand.  This keeps the
codepaths unified and adds the missing error checks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124470
2022-04-28 11:12:44 -07:00
Markus Böck
0c789db541 [mlir] Add support for operation-produced successor arguments in BranchOpInterface
This patch revamps the BranchOpInterface a bit and allows a proper implementation of what was previously `getMutableSuccessorOperands` for operations, which internally produce arguments to some of the block arguments. A motivating example for this would be an invoke op with a error handling path:
```
invoke %function(%0)
  label ^success ^error(%1 : i32)

^error(%e: !error, %arg0 : i32):
  ...
```
The advantages of this are that any users of `BranchOpInterface` can still argue over remaining block argument operands (such as `%1` in the example above), as well as make use of the modifying capabilities to add more operands, erase an operand etc.

The way this patch implements that functionality is via a new class called `SuccessorOperands`, which is now returned by `getSuccessorOperands`. It basically contains an `unsigned` denoting how many operator produced operands exist, as well as a `MutableOperandRange`, which are the usual forwarded operands we are used to. The produced operands are assumed to the first few block arguments, followed by the forwarded operands afterwards. The role of `SuccessorOperands` is to provide various utility functions to modify and query the successor arguments from a `BranchOpInterface`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123062
2022-04-08 08:28:16 +02:00
Markus Böck
e13d23bc6c [mlir] Rename OpAsmParser::OperandType to OpAsmParser::UnresolvedOperand
I am not sure about the meaning of Type in the name (was it meant be interpreted as Kind?), and given the importance and meaning of Type in the context of MLIR, its probably better to rename it. Given the comment in the source code, the suggestion in the GitHub issue and the final discussions in the review, this patch renames the OperandType to UnresolvedOperand.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54446

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122142
2022-03-21 21:42:13 +01:00
River Riddle
ace01605e0 [mlir] Split out a new ControlFlow dialect from Standard
This dialect is intended to model lower level/branch based control-flow constructs. The initial set
of operations are: AssertOp, BranchOp, CondBranchOp, SwitchOp; all split out from the current
standard dialect.

See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118966
2022-02-06 14:51:16 -08:00