The bool is in the wrong place and might get implicitly converted from
the previous second argument - a pointer. Thinking about it more,
it's not really the best place for that functionality anyways,
only a single caller needs that.
This reverts commit 3c5b1f2d94d021005ce3769a4402d4a4ae843989.
We really can't recover that knowledge, and `nounwind` knowledge,
(and not just a lack of the unwind edge, aka `call` instead of `invoke`),
is e.g. part of the reasoning in e.g. `mayHaveSideEffects()`.
Note that this is call-site-specific knowledge,
just because some callsite had an `unreachable`
unwind edge, does not mean that all will.
Pretty boring, removeUnwindEdge() already known how to update DomTree,
so if we are to call it, we must first flush our own pending updates;
otherwise, we just stop predecessors from branching to us,
and for certain predecessors, stop their predecessors from
branching to them also.
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Summary:
At least for CoreCLR, a catchpad which immediately executes an
`unreachable` instruction indicates that the exception can never have a
matching type, and so such catchpads can be removed, and so can their
catchswitches if the catchswitch becomes empty.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15846
llvm-svn: 256809
