Fortran 2023 constraint C7108 prohibits the use of a structure
constructor in a way that is ambiguous with a generic function reference
(intrinsic or user-defined). Sadly, no Fortran compiler implements this
constraint, and the common portable interpretation seems to be the
generic resolution, not the structure constructor.
Restructure the processing of structure constructors in expression
analysis so that it can be driven both from the parse tree as well as
from generic resolution, and then use it to detect ambigous structure
constructor / generic function cases, so that a portability warning can
be issued. And document this as a new intentional violation of the
standard in Extensions.md.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/138807.
Nearly, but not all, other compilers have a blanket prohibition against
the use of an INTENT(OUT) dummy argument in a specification expression.
Some compilers, however, permit an INTENT(OUT) dummy argument to appear
in a specification expression in a BLOCK construct or inner procedure
via host association.
The argument some have put forth to accept this usage comes from a
reading of 10.1.11 (specification expressions) in Fortran 2023 that, if
followed consistently, would also require host-associated OPTIONAL dummy
argument to be allowed. That would be dangerous for reasons that should
be obvious.
However, I can agree that a non-OPTIONAL dummy argument can't be assumed
to remain undefined on entry to a BLOCK construct or inner procedure, so
we can accept host-associated INTENT(OUT) in specification expressions
with a portability warning.
A function or subroutine can allow an object of the same name to appear
in its scope, so long as the name is not used. This is similar to the
case of a name being imported from multiple distinct modules, and
implemented by the same representation.
It's not clear whether this is conforming behavior or a common
extension.
…dummy
We presently allow a NULL() actual argument to associate with a
non-optional dummy allocatable argument only under INTENT(IN). This is
too strict, as it precludes the case of a dummy argument with default
intent. Continue to require that the actual argument be definable under
INTENT(OUT) and INTENT(IN OUT), and (contra XLF) interpret NULL() as
being an expression, not a definable variable, even when it is given an
allocatable MOLD.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/115984.
Move non-common files from FortranCommon to FortranSupport (analogous to
LLVMSupport) such that
* declarations and definitions that are only used by the Flang compiler,
but not by the runtime, are moved to FortranSupport
* declarations and definitions that are used by both ("common"), the
compiler and the runtime, remain in FortranCommon
* generic STL-like/ADT/utility classes and algorithms remain in
FortranCommon
This allows a for cleaner separation between compiler and runtime
components, which are compiled differently. For instance, runtime
sources must not use STL's `<optional>` which causes problems with CUDA
support. Instead, the surrogate header `flang/Common/optional.h` must be
used. This PR fixes this for `fast-int-sel.h`.
Declarations in include/Runtime are also used by both, but are
header-only. `ISO_Fortran_binding_wrapper.h`, a header used by compiler
and runtime, is also moved into FortranCommon.
