+load methods are static initializers and treated specially by the
runtime: all +load methods for a class & its categories are called when
loading that class, unlike regular methods where only one definition
will get called per message. Thus, there is no need to check for
duplicates.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147230
We were previously assuming that to hold, but it appears that `swiftc`
may generate classes that link against `__objc_empty_cache` for their
rodata pointer.
This should allow us to re-land {D142916} (as a stack).
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147229
This implements ld64's checks for duplicate method names in categories &
classes.
In addition, this sets us up for implementing Obj-C category merging.
This diff handles the most of the parsing work; what's left is rewriting
those category / class structures.
Numbers for chromium_framework:
base diff difference (95% CI)
sys_time 2.182 ± 0.027 2.200 ± 0.047 [ -0.2% .. +1.8%]
user_time 6.451 ± 0.034 6.479 ± 0.062 [ -0.0% .. +0.9%]
wall_time 6.841 ± 0.048 6.885 ± 0.105 [ -0.1% .. +1.4%]
samples 33 22
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54912.
Issues seen with the previous land will be fixed in the next commit.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thevinster, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142916
This implements ld64's checks for duplicate method names in categories &
classes.
In addition, this sets us up for implementing Obj-C category merging.
This diff handles the most of the parsing work; what's left is rewriting
those category / class structures.
Numbers for chromium_framework:
base diff difference (95% CI)
sys_time 2.182 ± 0.027 2.200 ± 0.047 [ -0.2% .. +1.8%]
user_time 6.451 ± 0.034 6.479 ± 0.062 [ -0.0% .. +0.9%]
wall_time 6.841 ± 0.048 6.885 ± 0.105 [ -0.1% .. +1.4%]
samples 33 22
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54912.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thevinster, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142916
This is an NFC diff that prepares for pruning & relocating `__eh_frame`.
Along the way, I made the following changes to ...
* clarify usage of `section` vs. `subsection`
* remove `map` & `vec` from type names
* disambiguate class `Section` from template parameter `SectionHeader`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113241
The previous logic was duplicated between symbol-initiated
archive loads versus flag-initiated loads (i.e. `-force_load` and
`-ObjC`). This resulted in code duplication as well as redundant work --
we would create Archive instances twice whenever we had one of those
flags; once in `getArchiveMembers` and again when we constructed the
ArchiveFile.
This was motivated by an upcoming diff where we load archive members
containing ObjC-related symbols before loading those containing
ObjC-related sections, as well as before performing symbol resolution.
Without this refactor, it would be difficult to do that while avoiding
loading the same archive member twice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108780
@thakis pointed out that `mach_header` and `mach_header_64`
actually have the same set of (used) fields, with the 64-bit version
having extra padding. So we can access the fields we need using the
single `mach_header` type instead of using templates to switch between
the two.
I also spotted a potential issue where hasObjCSection tries to parse a
file w/o checking if it does indeed match the target arch... As such,
I've added a quick magic number check to ensure we don't access invalid
memory during `findCommand()`.
Addresses PR50180.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101724
As preparation for a subsequent diff that implements builtin section renaming, define more `constexpr` strings in namespaces `lld::macho::segment_names` and `lld::macho::section_names`, and use them to replace string literals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101393
The main challenge was handling the different on-disk structures (e.g.
`mach_header` vs `mach_header_64`). I tried to strike a balance between
sprinkling `target->wordSize == 8` checks everywhere (branchy = slow, and ugly)
and templatizing everything (causes code bloat, also ugly). I think I struck a
decent balance by judicious use of type erasure.
Note that LLD-ELF has a similar architecture, though it seems to use more templating.
Linking chromium_framework takes about the same time before and after this
change:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.52 4.67 4.595 4.5945 0.044423204
+ 20 4.5 4.71 4.575 4.582 0.056344803
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99633
