When making `DBG_VALUE`/`DBG_VALUE_LIST` instructions undefined, there
is a method that takes care of it so we don't need to do it manually.
This changes the test because previously we are converting
`DBG_VALUE_LIST`s into `DBG_VALUE $noreg` but now we leave
`DBG_VALUE_LIST` but set it to undef by turning all its register
operands `$noreg`. The effect is the same.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145998
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
`WebAssemblyDebugValueManager` does not currently handle
`DBG_VALUE_LIST`, which is a recent addition to LLVM. We tried to
nullify them within the constructor of `WebAssemblyDebugValueManager` in
D102589, but it made the class error-prone to use because it deletes
instructions within the constructor and thus invalidates existing
iterators within the BB, so the user of the class should take special
care not to use invalidated iterators. This actually caused a bug in
ExplicitLocals pass.
Instead of trying to fix ExplicitLocals pass to make the iterator usage
correct, which is possible but error-prone, this adds
NullifyDebugValueLists pass that nullifies all `DBG_VALUE_LIST`
instructions before we run WebAssembly specific passes in the backend.
We can remove this pass after we implement handlers for
`DBG_VALUE_LIST`s in `WebAssemblyDebugValueManager` and elsewhere.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/14255.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102999
