This reverts commit adaff46d087799072438dd744b038e6fd50a2d78.
Drop the -O3 checks from default-attributes.hip. I don't know why they
are different on some bots but reverting this is far too disruptive.
Removing it from the codegen pipeline induces a lot of test churn
because llc is no longer optimizing out implicit arguments to kernels.
Mostly mechanical, but there are some creative test updates. I preferred
to take the changes as-is in tests where the ABI isn't relevant. In
cases where it's more relevant, or the optimize out logic was too
ingrained in the test, I pre-run the optimization. Some cases manually
add attributes to disable inputs.
The previous name 'amdgpu_code_object_version', was misleading since
this is really a property of the HSA OS. The new spelling also matches
the asm directive I added in bc82cfb.
Summary:
This patch introduces a mechanism to check the code object version from the module flag, This avoids checking from command line.
In case the module flag is missing, we use the current default code object version supported in the compiler.
For tools whose inputs are not IR, we may need other approach (directive, for example) to check the code
object version, That will be in a separate patch later.
For LIT tests update, we directly add module flag if there is only a single code object version associated with all checks in one file.
In cause of multiple code object version in one file, we use the "sed" method to "clone" the checks to achieve the goal.
Reviewer: arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D14313
The AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis was previously a CGSCC pass, and assumed
that a function's callees were always analyzed prior to their callees.
When it was refactored into a module pass, this assumption no longer
always holds. This results in calls being erroneously identified as
indirect, and reserving private segment space for them. This results in
significantly slower kernel launch latency.
This patch changes the order in which the module's functions are analyzed
from the order in which they occur in the module to a post-order traversal
of the call graph. Perhaps Clang always generates the module's functions
in such an order, but this is not the case for the Cray Fortran compiler.
Reviewed By: #amdgpu, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126025
