Also, changes how the CSR loop is indexed, which should avoid bugs like the one fixed by rG4a57bb5a3b74bdad9b0518009a7d7ac7ca2ac650
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120668
The "-fzero-call-used-regs" option tells the compiler to zero out
certain registers before the function returns. It's also available as a
function attribute: zero_call_used_regs.
The two upper categories are:
- "used": Zero out used registers.
- "all": Zero out all registers, whether used or not.
The individual options are:
- "skip": Don't zero out any registers. This is the default.
- "used": Zero out all used registers.
- "used-arg": Zero out used registers that are used for arguments.
- "used-gpr": Zero out used registers that are GPRs.
- "used-gpr-arg": Zero out used GPRs that are used as arguments.
- "all": Zero out all registers.
- "all-arg": Zero out all registers used for arguments.
- "all-gpr": Zero out all GPRs.
- "all-gpr-arg": Zero out all GPRs used for arguments.
This is used to help mitigate Return-Oriented Programming exploits.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110869
Fix a couple of things that were causing stack protection to not work
correctly in functions that have scalable vectors on the stack:
* Use TypeSize when determining if accesses to a variable are
considered out-of-bounds so that the behaviour is correct for
scalable vectors.
* When stack protection is enabled move the stack protector location
to the top of the SVE locals, so that any overflow in them (or the
other locals which are below that) will be detected.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51137
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111631
AMDGPU is unusual in that the both stack is indexed in the same
direction as stack growth (up). We therefore always need the emergency
stack slots placed as low as possible to ensure they are in range of
load/store instruction immediate offsets. The existing logic is mostly
OK, but failed if we required stack realignment.
I don't understand what the existing control isFPCloseToIncomingSP is
supposed to mean, but can only be used to stop placing the scavenge
slots earlier. Make this explicit so that targets can opt-in rather
than opt-out only.
Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are
invariably treated as RegState::Debug operands. This change enforces
this invariant as part of MachineInstr::addOperand so that all passes
emit this flag consistently.
RegState::Debug is inconsistently set on DBG_VALUE registers throughout
LLVM. This runs the risk of a filtering iterator like
MachineRegisterInfo::reg_nodbg_iterator to process these operands
erroneously when not parsed from MIR sources.
This issue was observed in the development of the llvm-mos fork which
adds a backend that relies on physical register operands much more than
existing targets. Physical RegUnit 0 has the same numeric encoding as
$noreg (indicating an undef for DBG_VALUE). Allowing debug operands into
the machine scheduler correlates $noreg with RegUnit 0 (i.e. a collision
of register numbers with different zero semantics). Eventually, this
causes an assert where DBG_VALUE instructions are prohibited from
participating in live register ranges.
Reviewed By: MatzeB, StephenTozer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110105
And always print it.
This makes some LLVM diagnostics match up better with Clang's diagnostics.
Updated some AMDGPU uses of DiagnosticInfoResourceLimit and now we print
better diagnostics for those.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110204
If a target lists both a subreg and a superreg in a callee-saved
register mask, the prolog will spill both aliasing registers. Instead,
don't spill the subreg if a superreg is being spilled. This case is hit by the
PowerPC SPE code, as well as a modified RISC-V backend for CHERI I maintain out
of tree.
Reviewed By: jhibbits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73170
-Wframe-larger-than= is an interesting warning; we can't know the frame
size until PrologueEpilogueInsertion (PEI); very late in the compilation
pipeline.
-Wframe-larger-than= was propagated through CC1 as an -mllvm flag, then
was a cl::opt in LLVM's PEI pass; this meant it was dropped during LTO
and needed to be re-specified via -plugin-opt.
Instead, make it part of the IR proper as a module level attribute,
similar to D103048. Introduce -fwarn-stack-size CC1 option.
Reviewed By: rsmith, qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103928
This patch introduces "DBG_PHI" instructions, a marker of where a PHI
instruction used to be, before PHI elimination. Under the instruction
referencing model, we want to know where every value in the function is
defined -- and a PHI, even if implicit, is such a place.
Just like instruction numbers, we can use this to identify a value to be
used as a variable value, but we don't need to know what instruction
defines that value, for example:
bb1:
DBG_PHI $rax, 1
[... more insts ... ]
bb2:
DBG_INSTR_REF 1, 0, !1234, !DIExpression()
This specifies that on entry to bb1, whatever value is in $rax is known
as value number one -- and the later DBG_INSTR_REF marks the position
where variable !1234 should take on value number one.
PHI locations are stored in MachineFunction for the duration of the
regalloc phase in the DebugPHIPositions map. The map is populated by
PHIElimination, and then flushed back into the instruction stream by
virtregrewriter. A small amount of maintenence is needed in
LiveDebugVariables to account for registers being split, but only for
individual positions, not for entire ranges of blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86812
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that
parameter, passed in X22.
The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001
in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect
of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three
values there:
* 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR]
* 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR]
* 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.
All other values are currently reserved.
If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the
discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.
There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing
front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr
if necessary).
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
D89239 adjusts the stack offset of emergency spill slots for overaligned
stacks. However the adjustment is not valid for targets whose stack
grows up (such as AMDGPU).
This change makes the adjustment conditional only to those targets whose
stack grows down.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49686
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99504
This patch adds handling for DBG_VALUE_LIST in the MIR-passes (after
finalize-isel), excluding the debug liveness passes and DWARF emission. This
most significantly affects MachineSink, which now needs to consider all used
registers of a debug value when sinking, but for most passes this change is
simply replacing getDebugOperand(0) with an iteration over all debug operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92578
Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect
reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc; simplifies `spillReg` behaviour
so as to not be dependent on changes elsewhere in the patch stack.
This reverts commit d2000b45d033c06dc7973f59909a0ad12887ff51.
This patch adds a new instruction that can represent variadic debug values,
DBG_VALUE_VAR. This patch alone covers the addition of the instruction and a set
of basic code changes in MachineInstr and a few adjacent areas, but does not
correctly handle variadic debug values outside of these areas, nor does it
generate them at any point.
The new instruction is similar to the existing DBG_VALUE instruction, with the
following differences: the operands are in a different order, any number of
values may be used in the instruction following the Variable and Expression
operands (these are referred to in code as “debug operands”) and are indexed
from 0 so that getDebugOperand(X) == getOperand(X+2), and the Expression in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR must use the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator to pass arguments into the
expression.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator is only valid in expressions appearing in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR; it takes a single argument and pushes the debug operand at the
index given by the argument onto the Expression stack. For example the
sub-expression `DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0` has the meaning “Push the debug operand at
index 0 onto the expression stack.”
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82363
In RISC-V there is a single addressing mode of the form imm(reg) where
imm is a signed integer of 12-bit with a range of [-2048..2047] bytes
from reg.
The test MultiSource/UnitTests/C++11/frame_layout of the LLVM test-suite
exercises several scenarios with the stack, including function calls
where the stack will need to be realigned to to a local variable having
a large alignment of 4096 bytes.
In situations of large stacks, the RISC-V backend (in
RISCVFrameLowering) reserves an extra emergency spill slot which can be
used (if no free register is found) by the register scavenger after the
frame indexes have been eliminated. PrologEpilogInserter already takes
care of keeping the emergency spill slots as close as possible to the
stack pointer or frame pointer (depending on what the function will
use). However there is a final alignment step to honour the maximum
alignment of the stack that, when using the stack pointer to access the
emergency spill slots, has the side effect of setting them farther from
the stack pointer.
In the case of the frame_layout testcase, the net result is that we do
have an emergency spill slot but it is so far from the stack pointer
(more than 2048 bytes due to the extra alignment of a variable to 4096
bytes) that it becomes unreachable via any immediate offset.
During elimination of the frame index, many (regular) offsets of the
stack may be immediately unreachable already. Their address needs to be
computed using a register. A virtual register is created and later
RegisterScavenger should be able to find an unused (physical) register.
However if no register is available, RegisterScavenger will pick a
physical register and spill it onto an emergency stack slot, while we
compute the offset (restoring the chosen register after all this). This
assumes that the emergency stack slot is easily reachable (this is,
without requiring another register!).
This is the assumption we seem to break when we perform the extra
alignment in PrologEpilogInserter.
We can "float" the emergency spill slots by increasing (in absolute
value) their offsets from the incoming stack pointer. This way the
emergency spill slots will remain close to the stack pointer (once the
function has allocated storage for the stack, including the needed
realignment). The new size computed in PrologEpilogInserter is padding
so it should be OK to move the emergency spill slots there. Also because
we're increasing the alignment, the new location should stay aligned for
the purpose of the emergency spill slots.
Note that this change also impacts other backends as shown by the tests.
Changes are minor adjustments to the emergency stack slot offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89239
Extend PEI to emit a DWARF expression for StackOffsets that have
a fixed and scalable component. This means the expression that needs
to be added is either:
<base> + offset
or:
<base> + offset + scalable_offset * scalereg
where for SVE, the scale reg is the Vector Granule Dwarf register, which
encodes the number of 64bit 'granules' in an SVE vector and which
the debugger can evaluate at runtime.
Reviewed By: jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90020
This only needs to be called once for the function, and it visits all
the necessary blocks in the function. It looks like
631f6b888c50276450fee8b9ef129f37f83fc5a1 accidentally moved this into
the loop over all save blocks.
To accommodate frame layouts that have both fixed and scalable objects
on the stack, describing a stack location or offset using a pointer + uint64_t
is not sufficient. For this reason, we've introduced the StackOffset class,
which models both the fixed- and scalable sized offsets.
The TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference is made to return a StackOffset,
so that this can be used in other interfaces, such as to eliminate frame indices
in PEI or to emit Debug locations for variables on the stack.
This patch is purely mechanical and doesn't change the behaviour of how
the result of this function is used for fixed-sized offsets. The patch adds
various checks to assert that the offset has no scalable component, as frame
offsets with a scalable component are not yet supported in various places.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90018
Following on from this RFC[0] from a while back, this is the first patch towards
implementing variadic debug values.
This patch specifically adds a set of functions to MachineInstr for performing
operations specific to debug values, and replacing uses of the more general
functions where appropriate. The most prevalent of these is replacing
getOperand(0) with getDebugOperand(0) for debug-value-specific code, as the
operands corresponding to values will no longer be at index 0, but index 2 and
upwards: getDebugOperand(x) == getOperand(x+2). Similar replacements have been
added for the other operands, along with some helper functions to replace
oft-repeated code and operate on a variable number of value operands.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139376.html<Paste>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81852
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551
When optimising for code size at the expense of performance, it is often
worth saving and restoring some of r0-r3, if IPRA will be able to take
advantage of them. This doesn't cost any extra code size if we already
have a PUSH/POP pair, and increases the number of available registers
across any calls to the function.
We already have an optimisation which tries fold the subtract/add of the
SP into the PUSH/POP by using extra registers, which somewhat conflicts
with this. I've made the new optimisation less aggressive in cases where
the existing one is likely to trigger, which gives better results than
either of these optimisations by themselves.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69936
This reverts commit 649aba93a27170cb03a4b17c98a19b9237a880b8, now that
the approach started there has been shown to be workable in the patch
series culminating in https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192.
Summary:
This reverts commit 3ef169e586f4d14efe690c23c878d5aa92a80eb5. The
purpose of this commit was to allow stack machines to perform
instruction selection for instructions with variadic defs. However,
MachineInstrs fundamentally cannot support variadic defs right now, so
this change does not turn out to be useful.
Depends on D73927.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73928
Summary:
WebAssembly is unique among upstream targets in that it does not at
any point use physical registers to store values. Instead, it uses
virtual registers to model positions in its value stack. This means
that some target-independent lowering activities that would use
physical registers need to use virtual registers instead for
WebAssembly and similar downstream targets. This CL generalizes the
existing `usesPhysRegsForPEI` lowering hook to
`usesPhysRegsForValues` in preparation for using it in more places.
One such place is in InstrEmitter for instructions that have variadic
defs. On register machines, it only makes sense for these defs to be
physical registers, but for WebAssembly they must be virtual registers
like any other values. This CL changes InstrEmitter to check the new
target lowering hook to determine whether variadic defs should be
physical or virtual registers.
These changes are necessary to support a generalized CALL instruction
for WebAssembly that is capable of returning an arbitrary number of
arguments. Fully implementing that instruction will require additional
changes that are described in comments here but left for a follow up
commit.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, qcolombet
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71484
Summary:
Detect a run of memory tagging instructions for adjacent stack frame slots,
and replace them with a shorter instruction sequence
* replace STG + STG with ST2G
* replace STGloop + STGloop with STGloop
This code needs to run when stack slot offsets are already known, but before
FrameIndex operands in STG instructions are eliminated; that's the
reason for the new hook in PrologueEpilogue.
This change modifies STGloop and STZGloop pseudos to take the size as an
immediate integer operand, and adds _untied variants of those pseudos
that are allowed to take the base address as a FI operand. This is needed to
simplify recognizing an STGloop instruction as operating on a stack slot
post-regalloc.
This improves memtag code size by ~0.25%, and it looks like an additional ~0.1%
is possible by rearranging the stack frame such that consecutive STG
instructions reference adjacent slots (patch pending).
Reviewers: pcc, ostannard
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70286
Summary:
Detect a run of memory tagging instructions for adjacent stack frame slots,
and replace them with a shorter instruction sequence
* replace STG + STG with ST2G
* replace STGloop + STGloop with STGloop
This code needs to run when stack slot offsets are already known, but before
FrameIndex operands in STG instructions are eliminated; that's the
reason for the new hook in PrologueEpilogue.
This change modifies STGloop and STZGloop pseudos to take the size as an
immediate integer operand, and base address as a FI operand when
possible. This is needed to simplify recognizing an STGloop instruction
as operating on a stack slot post-regalloc.
This improves memtag code size by ~0.25%, and it looks like an additional ~0.1%
is possible by rearranging the stack frame such that consecutive STG
instructions reference adjacent slots (patch pending).
Reviewers: pcc, ostannard
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70286
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
The LocalStackSlotPass pre-allocates a stack protector and makes sure
that it comes before the local variables on the stack.
We need to make sure that later during PEI we don't re-allocate a new
stack protector slot. If that happens, the new stack protector slot will
end up being **after** the local variables that it should be protecting.
Therefore, we would have two slots assigned for two different stack
protectors, one at the top of the stack, and one at the bottom. Since
PEI will overwrite the assigned slot for the stack protector, the load
that is used to compare the value of the stack protector will use the
slot assigned by PEI, which is wrong.
For this, we need to check if the object is pre-allocated, and re-use
that pre-allocated slot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64757
llvm-svn: 366371
This patch addresses PR41675, where a stack-pointer variable is dereferenced
too many times by its location expression, presenting a value on the stack as
the pointer to the stack.
The difference between a stack *pointer* DBG_VALUE and one that refers to a
value on the stack, is currently the indirect flag. However the DWARF backend
will also try to guess whether something is a memory location or not, based
on whether there is any computation in the location expression. By simply
prepending the stack offset to existing expressions, we can accidentally
convert a register location into a memory location, which introduces a
suprise (and unintended) dereference.
The solution is to add DW_OP_stack_value whenever we add a DIExpression
computation to a stack *pointer*. It's an implicit location computed on the
expression stack, thus needs to be flagged as a stack_value.
For the edge case where the offset is zero and the location could be a register
location, DIExpression::prepend will still generate opcodes, and thus
DW_OP_stack_value must still be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63429
llvm-svn: 364736
This patch changes MIR stack-id from an integer to an enum,
and adds printing/parsing support for this in MIR files. The default
stack-id '0' is now renamed to 'default'.
This should make MIR tests that have stack objects with different stack-ids
more descriptive. It also clarifies code operating on StackID.
Reviewers: arsenm, thegameg, qcolombet
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60137
llvm-svn: 363533
Refactor DIExpression::With* into a flag enum in order to be less
error-prone to use (as discussed on D60866).
Patch by Djordje Todorovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61943
llvm-svn: 361137
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
This re-commit fixes issues reported in the first one. Namely deref was
inserted under wrong conditions and additionally the deref_size argument
was incorrectly encoded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 359535
It causes clang to crash while building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/952230
for reproducer.
> The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
> prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
> expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
> address instead of the value behind it.
>
> The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
> big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
> larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
> address).
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358281
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358268
