This allows us to merge some optimizations common between the 3-leg
overload and the two ranges overload.
In some cases this could also improve performance, since we avoid
checking one of the iterators if the size if the ranges is known. I
haven't been able to show any improvements though.
This is also a prerequisite for optimizing `std::search`.
`__libcpp_{ctz, clz}` were previously used as fallbacks for `__builtin_{ctzg, clzg}` to ensure compatibility with older compilers (Clang 18 and earlier), as `__builtin_{ctzg, clzg}` became available in Clang 19. Now that support for Clang 18 has been officially dropped in #130142, we can now safely replace all instances of `__libcpp_{ctz, clz}` with `__count{l,r}_zero` (which internally call `__builtin_{ctzg, clzg}` and eliminate the fallback logic.
Closes#131179.
The PR removes the unnecessary division and modulo operations in the
one-word specialization `__bitset<1, _Size>`. The reason is that for the
one-word specialization, we have `__pos < __bits_per_word` (as
`__bitset<1, _Size>` is an implementation detail only used by the public
`bitset`). So `__pos / __bits_per_word == 0` and `__pos / __pos %
__bits_per_word == __pos`.
The current implementation of `{std, ranges}::equal` fails to correctly
compare `vector<bool>`s when the underlying storage type is smaller than
`int` (e.g., `unsigned char`, `unsigned short`, `uint8_t` and
`uint16_t`). See [demo](https://godbolt.org/z/j4s87s6b3)). The problem
arises due to integral promotions on the intermediate bitwise
operations, leading to incorrect final equality comparison results. This
patch fixes the issue by ensuring that `{std, ranges}::equal` operate
properly for both aligned and unaligned bits.
Fixes#126369.
This PR fixes an ambiguous call encountered when using the `std::ranges::find` or `std::find`
algorithms with `vector<bool>` with small `allocator_traits::size_type`s, an issue reported
in #122528. The ambiguity arises from integral promotions during the internal bitwise
arithmetic of the `find` algorithms when applied to `vector<bool>` with small integral
`size_type`s. This leads to multiple viable candidates for small integral types:
__libcpp_ctz(unsigned), __libcpp_ctz(unsigned long), and __libcpp_ctz(unsigned long long),
none of which represent a single best viable match, resulting in an ambiguous call error.
To resolve this, we propose invoking an internal function __countr_zero as a dispatcher
that directs the call to the appropriate overload of __libcpp_ctz. Necessary amendments
have also been made to __countr_zero.
This PR optimizes the performance of `std::ranges::rotate` for
`vector<bool>::iterator`. The optimization yields a performance
improvement of up to 2096x.
Closes#64038.
This PR optimizes the performance of `std::ranges::swap_ranges` for
`vector<bool>::iterator`, addressing a subtask outlined in issue #64038.
The optimizations yield performance improvements of up to **611x** for
aligned range swap and **78x** for unaligned range swap comparison.
Additionally, comprehensive tests covering up to 4 storage words (256
bytes) with odd and even bit sizes are provided, which validate the
proposed optimizations in this patch.
This PR optimizes the performance of `std::ranges::equal` for
`vector<bool>::iterator`, addressing a subtask outlined in issue #64038.
The optimizations yield performance improvements of up to 188x for
aligned equality comparison and 82x for unaligned equality
comparison. Moreover, comprehensive tests covering up to 4 storage words
(256 bytes) with odd and even bit sizes are provided, which validate the
proposed optimizations in this patch.
As a follow-up to #121013 (which optimized `ranges::copy`) and #121026
(which optimized `ranges::copy_backward`), this PR enhances the
performance of `std::ranges::{move, move_backward}` for
`vector<bool>::iterator`, addressing a subtask outlined in issue #64038.
The optimizations bring performance improvements analogous to those
achieved for the `{copy, copy_backward}` algorithms: up to 2000x for
aligned moves and 60x for unaligned moves. Moreover, comprehensive
tests covering up to 4 storage words (256 bytes) with odd and even bit
sizes are provided, which validate the proposed optimizations in this
patch.
This PR addresses an undefined behavior that arises when using the
`std::fill` and `std::fill_n` algorithms, as well as their ranges
counterparts `ranges::fill` and `ranges::fill_n`, with `vector<bool, Alloc>`
that utilizes a custom-sized allocator with small integral types.
As a follow-up to #121013 (which focused on `std::ranges::copy`), this
PR optimizes the performance of `std::ranges::copy_backward` for
`vector<bool>::iterator`, addressing a subtask outlined in issue #64038.
The optimizations yield performance improvements of up to 2000x for
aligned copies and 60x for unaligned copies.
This PR fixes the ambiguities in name lookup caused by non-standard
member typedefs `size_type` and `difference_type` in `std::bitset`.
Follows up #121620.
Closes#121618.
This implements the requirements for the container iterator requirements
for array, deque, vector, and `vector<bool>`.
Implements:
- LWG3352 strong_equality isn't a thing
Implements parts of:
- P1614R2 The Mothership has Landed
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62486
As time went by, a few files have become mis-formatted w.r.t.
clang-format. This was made worse by the fact that formatting was not
being enforced in extensionless headers. This commit simply brings all
of libcxx/include in-line with clang-format again.
We might have to do this from time to time as we update our clang-format
version, but frankly this is really low effort now that we've formatted
everything once.
As of 4d20cfcf4eb08217ed37c4d4c38dc395d7a66d26, `__bit_reference`
contains a template `__fill_n` with a bool `_FillValue` parameter.
Unfortunately there is a relatively widely used piece of scientific
software called NetCDF, which exposes a (C) macro `_FillValue` in its
public headers.
When building the NetCDF C++ bindings, this quickly leads to compilation
errors when the macro interferes with the template in `__bit_reference`.
Rename the parameter to `_FillVal` to avoid the conflict.
The single-iterator algorithms have an implementation for `false` and `true`, which are almost identical. Instead of writing two functions, this refactors the code to take the value searched for as a template parameter. This avoids a lot of code duplication and makes it easier to reason about the algorithm and their difference.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156033
Formatting a const qualified vector<bool> fails to work on libc++. This
is due to our non-conforming type for vector<bool>::const_reference. The
type is a __bit_const_reference<vector> instead of a bool. (This is
fixed in ABI v2.)
This fixes this formatter and enables the test written for it.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144279
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
`vector<bool>::const_reference` and `vector<bool>::const_iterator::reference` should be the same type.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123851
Notably the following ctors remain non-explicit because they
are used as implicit conversions in too many places:
* __debug_less(_Compare&)
* __map_iterator(_TreeIterator)
* __map_const_iterator(_TreeIterator)
* __hash_map_iterator(_HashIterator)
* __hash_map_const_iterator(_HashIterator)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119894
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
