This changes VirtualDataExtractor's GetByteSize to return the virtual
byte size of the buffer (external users only understand the data
contents in terms of the virtual sizes & offsets). There are check
methods in DataExtractor that check they are not going off the end of a
buffer, they usually use the BytesLeft() method. There are a couple of
callers of BytesLeft() externally, but it is predominantly an internal
use API. I have BytesLeft() use the physical size of the buffer, not the
virtual size, for the benefit of the DataExtractor methods. (and to
avoid duplicating all of them down in VirtualDataExtractor)
Another problem is the we call SetData on DataExtractorSP's (e.g. see
the ObjectFile ctor) with the DataBuffer it already has, an offset of 0,
and the GetByteSize. A no-op for a DataExtractor that is already using
that DataBuffer. But SetData would try to use that length as a physical
size, and truncate the buffer that the DataExtractor would accept.
I added VirtualDataExtractor subclass methods for the SetData's, detect
(1) data being added to an uninitialized DataExtractor, (2) the same
data / offset / length as currently being used is added to the
DataExtractor (a no-op), or (3) we're genuinely changing the data source
or setting an offset / length that is different. This final case we're
not ready to handle today, I added asserts for them so we can catch it
in debug builds, and then I clear the LookupTable and add a no-op entry
so this extractor will behave like a plain DataExtractor -- because I
don't know better to do. If we genuinely need to handle this case, and
I'm pretty sure we don't need to, I'd have to assume that we're taking a
subset of the original data source (an offset & length), so we'd need to
update all of the LookupTable entries to reflect the new offsets, and
remove entries that are no longer referring to the subsetted range. I'll
leave that until there's any evidence it's actually needed.
rdar://148939795
In a PR last month I changed the ObjectFile CreateInstance etc methods
to accept an optional DataExtractorSP instead of a DataBufferSP, and
retain the extractor in a shared pointer internally in all of the
ObjectFile subclasses. This is laying the groundwork for using a
VirtualDataExtractor for some Mach-O binaries on macOS, where the
segments of the binary are out-of-order in actual memory, and we add a
lookup table to make it appear that the TEXT segment is at offset 0 in
the Extractor, etc. Working on the actual implementation, I realized we
were still using DataBufferSP's in ModuleSpec and Module, as well as in
ObjectFile::GetModuleSpecifications.
I originally was making a much larger NFC change where I had all
ObjectFile subclasses operating on DataExtractors throughout their
implementation, as well as in the DWARF parser. It was a very large
patchset. Many subclasses start with their DataExtractor, then create
smaller DataExtractors for parts of the binary image - the string table,
the symbol table, etc., for processing.
After consideration and discussion with Jonas, we agreed that a
segment/section of a binary will never require a lookup table to access
the bytes within it, so I changed
VirtualDataExtractor::GetSubsetExtractorSP to (1) require that the
Subset be contained within a single lookup table entry, and (2) return a
simple DataExtractor bounded on that byte range. By doing this, I was
able to remove all of my very-invasive changes to the ObjectFile
subclass internals; it's only when they are operating on the entire
binary image that care is needed.
One pattern that subclasses like ObjectFileBreakpad use is to take an
ArrayRef of the DataBuffer for a binary, then create a StringRef of
that, then look for strings in it. With a VirtualDataExtractor and
out-of-order binary segments, with gaps between them, this allows us to
search the entire buffer looking for a string, and segfault when it gets
to an unmapped region of the buffer. I added a
VirtualDataExtractor::GetSubsetExtractorSP(0) which gets the largest
contiguous memory region starting at offset 0 for this use case, and I
added a comment about what was being done there because I know it is not
obvious, and people not working on macOS wouldn't be familiar with the
requirement. (when we have a ModuleSpec with a DataExtractor, any of the
ObjectFile subclasses get a shot at Creating, so they all have to be
able to iterate on these)
rdar://148939795
We have many places where an ObjectFile subclass will take the
DataExtractor representing the entire binary, create a subsection of
that in a new DataExtractor for processing. For instance, an object file
might have symbol table entries with offsets into the string table. A
common code pattern is to create a DataExtractor representing the string
table, and then pulling out the c-strings based on those offsets from
the string table DataExtractor.
When code does this, it creates a new DataExtractor, copies the
Endianness and Wordsize from the original, copies the DataBufferSP from
the original, and specifies a new start and offset into the DataBuffer.
However, if the binary is actaully stored in a VirtualDataExtractor,
this code pattern loses the correct virtual-to-physical table
translation and will not work correctly. This new method simplifies this
common pattern, and correctly takes a subset of a VirtualDataExtractor.
The current implementation only allows a subset of a
VirtualDataExtractor that is contained within a single virtual entry
(LookupTable entry) and returns a DataExtractor with the corret offsets
calculated from the LookupTable. If we need to a VirtualDataExtractor to
create a Subset DataExtractor representing multiple separate virtual
ranges of data, we'll need to copy over the LookupTable entries that
cover all the bytes, and update them to be relative to the new
VirtualDataExtractor. It's a bit of work, and it's not needed right now,
so I'm not tackling that.
I am working on a larger PR which needs this new method. This PR
contains a unit test that uses it.
rdar://148939795
The ObjectFile plugin interface accepts an optional DataBufferSP
argument. If the caller has the contents of the binary, it can provide
this in that DataBufferSP. The ObjectFile subclasses in their
CreateInstance methods will fill in the DataBufferSP with the actual
binary contents if it is not set.
ObjectFile base class creates an ivar DataExtractor from the
DataBufferSP passed in.
My next patch will be a caller that creates a VirtualDataExtractor with
the binary data, and needs to pass that in to the ObjectFile plugin,
instead of the bag-of-bytes DataBufferSP. It builds on the previous
patch changing ObjectFile's ivar from DataExtractor to DataExtractorSP
so I could pass in a subclass in the shared ptr. And it will be using
the VirtualDataExtractor that Jonas added in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168802
No behavior is changed by the patch; we're simply moving the creation of
the DataExtractor to the caller, instead of a DataBuffer that is
immediately used to set up the ObjectFile DataExtractor. The patch is a
bit complicated because all of the ObjectFile subclasses have to
initialize their DataExtractor to pass in to the base class.
I ran the testsuite on macOS and on AArch64 Ubutnu. (btw David, I ran it
under qemu on my M4 mac with SME-no-SVE again, Ubuntu 25.10, checked
lshw(1) cpu capabilities, and qemu doesn't seem to be virtualizing the
SME, that explains why the testsuite passes)
rdar://148939795
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>
Some inter-plugin dependencies are okay, others are not. Yet others not,
but we're sort of stuck with them. The idea is to be able to prevent
backsliding while making sure that acceptable dependencies are..
accepted. For context, see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139170 and the attached
changes to the documentation.
If we're not touching them, we don't need to do anything special to pass
them along -- with one important caveat: due to how cmake arguments
work, the implicitly passed arguments need to be specified before
arguments that we handle.
This isn't particularly nice, but the alternative is enumerating all
arguments that can be used by llvm_add_library and the macros it calls
(it also relies on implicit passing of some arguments to
llvm_process_sources).
Our LLDB parser didn't correctly handle archives of all flavors on different systems, it currently only correctly handled BSD archives, normal and thin, on macOS, but I noticed that it was getting incorrect information when decoding a variety of archives on linux. There were subtle changes to how names were encoded that we didn't handle correctly and we also didn't set the result of GetObjectSize() correctly as there was some bad math. This didn't matter when exracting .o files from .a files for LLDB because the size was always way too big, but it was big enough to at least read enough bytes for each object within the archive.
This patch does the following:
- switch over to use LLVM's archive parser and avoids previous code duplication
- remove values from ObjectContainerBSDArchive::Object that we don't use like:
- uid
- gid
- mode
- fix ths ObjectContainerBSDArchive::Object::file_size value to be correct
- adds tests to test that we get the correct module specifications
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159408
Recently we've observed lldb crashes caused by missing object file linked to a thin archive (.a) files. The crash is due to a missing NULL check in the code when looking for child object file referred by the thin archive. Malformed archive file should not crash LLDB. Instead, it should report the error and continue.
New error message will look like the following
```
error: libfoo.a(__objects__/foo/barAppDelegate.mm.o) failed to load objfile for path/to/libfoo.a.
Debugging will be degraded for this module.
```
Test Plan:
llvm-lit test
```
./bin/llvm-lit -sv ../llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/archives/TestBSDArchives.py
```
Test without code change will error out with LLDB crash
```
--
Command Output (stderr):
--
PASS: LLDB (~/llvm-upstream/Debug/bin/clang-arm64) :: test (TestBSDArchives.BSDArchivesTestCase)
PASS: LLDB (~/llvm-upstream/Debug/bin/clang-arm64) :: test_frame_var_errors_when_archive_missing (TestBSDArchives.BSDArchivesTestCase)
FAIL: LLDB (~/llvm-upstream/Debug/bin/clang-arm64) :: test_frame_var_errors_when_mtime_mistmatch_for_object_in_archive (TestBSDArchives.BSDArchivesTestCase)
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0. HandleCommand(command = "b a")
1. HandleCommand(command = "breakpoint set --name 'a'")
Fatal Python error: Segmentation fault
Current thread 0x00000001f7b99e00 (most recent call first):
File "~/llvm-upstream/Debug/bin/LLDB.framework/Resources/Python/lldb/__init__.py", line 3270 in HandleCommand
File "~/llvm-upstream/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2070 in runCmd
File "~/llvm-upstream/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2421 in expect
File "~/llvm-upstream/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/archives/TestBSDArchives.py", line 156 in test_frame_var_errors_when_thin_archive_malformed
...
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156367
Support universal Mach-O binaries with a fat64 header. After
4d683f7fa7d4, dsymutil can now generate such binaries when the offsets
would otherwise overflow the 32-bit offsets in the regular fat header.
rdar://107289570
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147012
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This patch teaches LLDB about Mach-O filesets. Filsets are Mach-O files
that contain a bunch of other Mach-O files. Unlike universal binaries,
which have a different header, Filesets use load commands to describe
the different entries it contains.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132433
This patch deals with ObjectFile, ObjectContainer and OperatingSystem
plugins. I'll convert the other types in separate patches.
In order to enable piecemeal conversion, I am leaving some ConstStrings
in the lowest PluginManager layers. I'll convert those as the last step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112061
There is no reason why this function should be returning a ConstString.
While modifying these files, I also fixed several instances where
GetPluginName and GetPluginNameStatic were returning different strings.
I am not changing the return type of GetPluginNameStatic in this patch, as that
would necessitate additional changes, and this patch is big enough as it is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111877
In all these years, we haven't found a use for this function (it has
zero callers). Lets just remove the boilerplate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109600
This converts a default constructor's member initializers into C++11
default member initializers. This patch was automatically generated with
clang-tidy and the modernize-use-default-member-init check.
$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-default-member-init' -fix
This is a mass-refactoring patch and this commit will be added to
.git-blame-ignore-revs.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103483
This patch introduces a LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER macro to hide the needlessly
repetitive creation of scoped timers in LLDB. It's similar to the
LLDB_LOG(F) macro.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93663
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
Use LLDB_PLUGIN_DEFINE_ADV to make the name of the generated initializer
match the name of the plugin. This is a step towards generating the
initializers with a def file. I'm landing this change in pieces so I can
narrow down what exactly breaks the Windows bot.
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
The previously landed patch got reverted because it was lacking:
(1) A plugin definition for the Objective-C language runtime,
(2) The dependency between the Static and WASM dynamic loader,
(3) Explicit initialization of ScriptInterpreterNone for lldb-test.
All issues have been addressed in this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215