In #168245, I attempted to dump the available settings to Markdown. That
required a full build of LLDB. However, to build the docs, only the swig
wrappers should need to be compiled. The comment was that we should be
able to use the definitions from the TableGen files.
Currently, the property definitions in don't have information about the
path where they will be available. They only contain a `Definition`
which groups properties, so they can be added to
`OptionValueProperties`.
With this PR, I'm adding the path for each property definition. For
example, `symbols.enable-external-lookup` would have `Name =
enable-external-lookup, Path = symbols`. In LLDB itself, we don't need
this path, we only need it for the documentation. To avoid mismatches
between the actual path and the declared one, I added a debug-only check
when a property group is added to a parent
(`OptionValueProperties::AppendProperty`).
The TableGen emitter for the properties now additionally emits
`g_{definition}_properties_def`, which includes both the array of
properties and the expected path. This constant has to be used to
initialize a `OptionValueProperties`.
I couldn't test this for everything (e.g. IntelPT or ProcessKDP), but
the necessary changes are simple: (1) set the `Path` in the TableGen
file, (2) update `initialize` to use `_def`.
Get the shared cache filepath and uuid that the inferior process is
using from debugserver, try to open that shared cache on the lldb host
mac and if the UUID matches, index all of the binaries in that shared
cache. When looking for binaries loaded in the process, get them from
the already-indexed shared cache.
Every time a binary is loaded, PlatformMacOSX may query the shared cache
filepath and uuid from the Process, and pass that to
HostInfo::GetSharedCacheImageInfo() if available (else fall back to the
old HostInfo::GetSharedCacheImageInfo method which only looks at lldb's
own shared cache), to get the file being requested.
ProcessGDBRemote caches the shared cache filepath and uuid from the
inferior, once it has a non-zero UUID. I added a lock for this ivar
specifically, so I don't have 20 threads all asking for the shared cache
information from debugserver and updating the cached answer. If we never
get back a non-zero UUID shared cache reply, we will re-query at every
library loaded notification. debugserver has been providing the shared
cache UUID since 2013, although I only added the shared cache filepath
field last November.
Note that a process will not report its shared cache filepath or uuid at
initial launch. As dyld gets a chance to execute a bit, it will start
returning binaries -- it will be available at the point when libraries
start loading. (it won't be available yet when the binary & dyld are the
only two binaries loaded in the process)
I tested this by disabling lldb's scan of its own shared cache
pre-execution -- only loading the system shared cache when the inferior
process reports that it is using that. I got 6-7 additional testsuite
failures running lldb like that, because no system binaries were loaded
before exeuction start, and the tests assumed they would be.
rdar://148939795
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>
We have a problem when some code on the private state thread needs to
run an expression. The private state thread is the one that fetches
"raw" events from the Process Plugin and decides how to handle them. But
if the private state thread needs to fetch the processed events to drive
running an expression, it can't also be the thread processing the raw
events.
We solve this by swapping in a modal private state thread just to handle
the events from the expression evaluation. That worked until you could
cause the expression evaluation to happen from Python, because then it
wasn't just the fetching of events that matter, but also the state of
the process and the state of the runlocks. The modal private state
thread is really a modal version of the thread and its associated state.
This patch gathers all the relevant control parameters into a structure
which we can swap in and out when needed.
It also adds a test using the new "was_hit" breakpoint resolver
affordance, which, since it acts as an asynchronous breakpoint callback,
gets run on the private state thread, showing that with the change we
can call expressions in the `was_hit` callback without problems.
When a server is unable to allocate memory for the `_M` packet, it may
respond with an error code. In this case,
`GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::AllocateMemory()` sets
`m_supports_alloc_dealloc_memory` to `eLazyBoolYes`; `eLazyBoolNo` is
only used if the server cannot handle the packet at all. Before this
patch, `ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory()` checked this flag and
returned `LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS` without setting an error, which caused
`Process::CanJIT()` to set `m_can_jit = eCanJITYes`, resulting in
`IRMemoryMap::FindSpace()` attempting to allocate memory in the inferior
process and failing. With the patch,
`ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory()` returns an error and `m_can_jit`
is set to `eCanJITNo`.
Example debug session:
```
(lldb) platform connect...
(lldb) file test
(lldb) br set...
(lldb) run
Process 100 launched:...
Process 100 stopped
* thread #1,...
(lldb) expr $x0
error: Couldn't allocate space for materialized struct: Couldn't malloc: address space is full
error: errored out in virtual lldb_private::LLVMUserExpression::DoExecute, couldn't PrepareToExecuteJITExpression
```
Introducing `llvm::createStringErrorV` caused a `0.5%` compile-time
regression because it's an inline function in a core header. This moves
the API to a new header to prevent including this function in files that
don't need it.
Also includes the header in the source files that have been using
`createStringErrorV` (which currently is just LLDB).
Corrected various spelling mistakes such as 'occurred', 'receiver',
'initialized', 'length', and others in comments, variable names,
function names, and documentation throughout the project. These
changes improve code readability and maintain consistency in naming
and documentation.
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
(ignore the first commit, it is the dependency of this PR)
Servers advertise what their maximum packet size is, MultiMemRead needs
to respect that.
Depends on:
* https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172020
Instead of returning an `Expected<vector<...>>` it now returns an Error,
and receives a vector argument to fill in. This will be useful to
support a change were ParseMultiMemReadPacket will be called multiple
times in a loop with the same vector; without this change, we would have
to concatenate vectors and copy memory around.
These fallback layouts are essentially guesses. Used when there is
no other way to query register information from the debug server.
Therefore there is a risk that LLDB and the debug server disagree,
which can produce strange effects.
I have added a log message here so we have a clue when triaging
these problems.
Note that it's not wrong to assume a layout in some situations.
It's how some debug servers were built. However if you end up
using the fallback when the server expected you to use XML,
you're likely going to have a bad time.
If you connect lldb without libxml2 enabled, to a debug stub,
that server may offer Target XML but lldb will not use it. This
often causes incorrect or missing registers.
So much so that I think users should be made aware of this so
they can find an lldb with libxml2 enabled.
This warning will only be printed when:
* The debug server offered us Target XML but lldb does not have libxml2,
and -
* qRegisterInfo was not supported by the debug server.
This means that (lldb without libxml2) -> (lldb-server or debugserver)
will not warn as we'll fall back to qRegisterInfo. All that's
potentially
missing is advanced register formatting information, which most people
won't notice is missing anyway. If they do, the logs contain information
about this.
If you connect (lldb without libxml2) > (gdbserver, or a stub inspired
by it)
you will see this warning. As they do not support qRegisterInfo.
```
$ ./bin/lldb /tmp/test.o -o "gdb-remote 1234"
(lldb) target create "/tmp/test.o"
Current executable set to '/tmp/test.o' (aarch64).
(lldb) gdb-remote 1234
warning: the debug server supports Target Description XML but LLDB does not have XML parsing enabled. Using "qRegisterInfo" was also not possible. Register information may be incorrect or missing.
```
When qRegisterInfo is not supported, there are 4 possible situations.
1. The debug server offered Target XML and we do not have libxml2
We should warn the user so they can find an lldb with libxml2.
2. The debug server offered Target XML but it was not valid XML
Ideally we'd warn here too, but the error handling needs more
work to implement this, and there is logging for it if you know
where to look.
3. The debug server did not offer Target XML and we have libxml2
4. The debug server did not offer Target XML and we do have libxml2
There's no XML to parse, so no reason to warn. The user is not getting
a worse debug experience because we lack libxml2.
Their only course of action here would be to replace the debug stub.
Given that this occurs a lot with stubs embedded in kernels or debug
hardware, they may not have a choice either.
This commit makes use of the newly created MultiMemRead packet to
provide an efficient implementation of MultiMemRead inside
ProcessGDBRemote.
Testing is tricky, but it is accomplished two ways:
1. Some Objective-C tests would fail if this were implemented incorrectly,
as there is already an in-tree use of the base class implementation of
MultiMemRead, which is now getting replaced by the derived class.
2. One Objective-C test is modified so that we ensure the packet is
being sent by looking at the packet logs. While not the most elegant
solution, it is a strategy adopted in other tests as well. This gets
around the fact that we cannot instantiate / unittest a mock
ProcessGDBRemote.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163651
…rotocol
When writing a custom gdb-remote server I realized that the encoder and
decoder of register formats is incomplete.
- Add the encoder on the server side and add an llvm_unreachable is
there's a missing case.
- Add a decoder on the client side that doesn't fail. We have to keep it
flexible.
I couldn't figure out an easy way to test this but the changes seem very
straightforward to me.
Extend support in LLDB for WebAssembly. This PR adds a new Process
plugin (ProcessWasm) that extends ProcessGDBRemote for WebAssembly
targets. It adds support for WebAssembly's memory model with separate
address spaces, and the ability to fetch the call stack from the
WebAssembly runtime.
I have tested this change with the WebAssembly Micro Runtime (WAMR,
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime) which implements
a GDB debug stub and supports the qWasmCallStack packet.
```
(lldb) process connect --plugin wasm connect://localhost:4567
Process 1 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = trace
frame #0: 0x40000000000001ad
wasm32_args.wasm`main:
-> 0x40000000000001ad <+3>: global.get 0
0x40000000000001b3 <+9>: i32.const 16
0x40000000000001b5 <+11>: i32.sub
0x40000000000001b6 <+12>: local.set 0
(lldb) b add
Breakpoint 1: where = wasm32_args.wasm`add + 28 at test.c:4:12, address = 0x400000000000019c
(lldb) c
Process 1 resuming
Process 1 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
frame #0: 0x400000000000019c wasm32_args.wasm`add(a=<unavailable>, b=<unavailable>) at test.c:4:12
1 int
2 add(int a, int b)
3 {
-> 4 return a + b;
5 }
6
7 int
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
* frame #0: 0x400000000000019c wasm32_args.wasm`add(a=<unavailable>, b=<unavailable>) at test.c:4:12
frame #1: 0x40000000000001e5 wasm32_args.wasm`main at test.c:12:12
frame #2: 0x40000000000001fe wasm32_args.wasm
```
This PR is based on an unmerged patch from Paolo Severini:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801. I intentionally stuck to the
foundations to keep this PR small. I have more PRs in the pipeline to
support the other features/packets.
My motivation for supporting Wasm is to support debugging Swift compiled
to WebAssembly:
https://www.swift.org/documentation/articles/wasm-getting-started.html
.. from the guts of GDBRemoteCommunication to ~top level.
This is motivated by #131519 and by the fact that's impossible to guess
whether the author of a symlink intended it to be a "convenience
shortcut" -- meaning it should be resolved before looking for related
files; or an "implementation detail" -- meaning the related files should
be located near the symlink itself.
This debate is particularly ridiculous when it comes to lldb-server
running in platform mode, because it also functions as a debug server,
so what we really just need to do is to pass /proc/self/exe in a
platform-independent manner.
Moving the location logic higher up achieves that as lldb-platform (on
non-macos) can pass `HostInfo::GetProgramFileSpec`, while liblldb can
use the existing complex logic (which only worked on liblldb anyway as
lldb-platform doesn't have a lldb_private::Platform instance).
Another benefit of this patch is a reduction in dependency from
GDBRemoteCommunication to the rest of liblldb (achieved by avoiding the
Platform dependency).
The function was extremely messy in that it, depending on the set of
arguments, it could either modify the Connection object in `this` or
not. It had a lot of arguments, with each call site passing a different
combination of null values. This PR:
- packs "url" and "comm_fd" arguments into a variant as they are
mutually exclusive
- removes the (surprising) "null url *and* null comm_fd" code path which
is not used as of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145017
- marks the function as `static` to make it clear it (now) does not
operate on the `this` object.
Depends on #145017
This lets get rid of platform-specific code in ProcessGDBRemote and use
the
same code path (module differences in socket types) everywhere. It also
unlocks
further cleanups in the debugserver launching code.
The main effect of this change is that lldb on windows will now use the
`--fd` lldb-server argument for "local remote" debug sessions instead of
having lldb-server connect back to lldb. This is the same method used by
lldb on non-windows platforms (for many years) and "lldb-server
platform" on windows for truly remote debug sessions (for ~one year).
Depends on #145015.
This patch should be mostly obvious, but in one place, this patch
changes:
const auto &it = std::find(...)
to:
auto it = llvm::find(...)
We do not need to bind to a temporary with const ref.
The new test added in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132783
was failing on Windows because it created a new error to say it did not
support the feature, but then returned the existing, default constructed
error. Which was a success value.
This also changes the GDBRemote error message to the same phrasing used
in all the other places so we don't have to special case any platform.
This reapplies commit
232525f069.
The original commit triggered a sanitizer failure when `Target` was
destroyed. In `Target::Destroy`, `DeleteCurrentProcess` was called, but
it did not destroy the thread creation breakpoints for the underlying
`ProcessGDBRemote` because `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear` was not called in
that path.
`Target `then proceeded to destroy its breakpoints, which resulted in a
call to the destructor of a `std::vector` containing the breakpoints.
Through a sequence of complicated events, destroying breakpoints caused
the reference count of the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` to finally
reach zero. This, in turn, called `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear`, which
attempted to destroy the breakpoints. To do that, it would go back into
the Target's vector of breakpoints, which we are in the middle of
destroying.
We solve this by moving the breakpoint deletion into
`Process:DoDestroy`, which is a virtual Process method that will be
called much earlier.
This reverts commit 232525f06942adb3b9977632e38dcd5f08c0642d.
This change is causing test crashes while running
TestCompletion.py on Darwin systems, most of the CI runs
have failed since it has been merged in.
Currently, these breakpoints are being accumulated every time a new
process if created (e.g. through a `run`). Depending on the
circumstances, the old breakpoints are even left enabled, interfering
with subsequent processes. This is addressed by removing the breakpoints
in ProcessGDBRemote::Clear
Note that these breakpoints are more of a PlatformDarwin thing, so in
the future we should look into moving them there.
This reverts commit
87b7f63a11,
reapplying
7e66cf74fb
with a small (and probably temporary)
change to generate more debug info to help with diagnosing buildbot
issues.
Make StreamAsynchronousIO an unique_ptr instead of a shared_ptr. I tried
passing the class by value, but the llvm::raw_ostream forwarder stored
in the Stream parent class isn't movable and I don't think it's worth
changing that. Additionally, there's a few places that expect a
StreamSP, which are easily created from a StreamUP.
lldb today has two rules: When a thread stops at a BreakpointSite, we
set the thread's StopReason to be "breakpoint hit" (regardless if we've
actually hit the breakpoint, or if we've merely stopped *at* the
breakpoint instruction/point and haven't tripped it yet). And second,
when resuming a process, any thread sitting at a BreakpointSite is
silently stepped over the BreakpointSite -- because we've already
flagged the breakpoint hit when we stopped there originally.
In this patch, I change lldb to only set a thread's stop reason to
breakpoint-hit when we've actually executed the instruction/triggered
the breakpoint. When we resume, we only silently step past a
BreakpointSite that we've registered as hit. We preserve this state
across inferior function calls that the user may do while stopped, etc.
Also, when a user adds a new breakpoint at $pc while stopped, or changes
$pc to be the address of a BreakpointSite, we will silently step past
that breakpoint when the process resumes. This is purely a UX call, I
don't think there's any person who wants to set a breakpoint at $pc and
then hit it immediately on resuming.
One non-intuitive UX from this change, butt is necessary: If you're
stopped at a BreakpointSite that has not yet executed, you `stepi`, you
will hit the breakpoint and the pc will not yet advance. This thread has
not completed its stepi, and the ThreadPlanStepInstruction is still on
the stack. If you then `continue` the thread, lldb will now stop and
say, "instruction step completed", one instruction past the
BreakpointSite. You can continue a second time to resume execution.
The bugs driving this change are all from lldb dropping the real stop
reason for a thread and setting it to breakpoint-hit when that was not
the case. Jim hit one where we have an aarch64 watchpoint that triggers
one instruction before a BreakpointSite. On this arch we are notified of
the watchpoint hit after the instruction has been unrolled -- we disable
the watchpoint, instruction step, re-enable the watchpoint and collect
the new value. But now we're on a BreakpointSite so the watchpoint-hit
stop reason is lost.
Another was reported by ZequanWu in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/lldb-unable-to-break-at-start/78282 we
attach to/launch a process with the pc at a BreakpointSite and
misbehave. Caroline Tice mentioned it is also a problem they've had with
putting a breakpoint on _dl_debug_state.
The change to each Process plugin that does execution control is that
1. If we've stopped at a BreakpointSite that has not been executed yet,
we will call Thread::SetThreadStoppedAtUnexecutedBP(pc) to record that.
When the thread resumes, if the pc is still at the same site, we will
continue, hit the breakpoint, and stop again.
2. When we've actually hit a breakpoint (enabled for this thread or
not), the Process plugin should call
Thread::SetThreadHitBreakpointSite(). When we go to resume the thread,
we will push a step-over-breakpoint ThreadPlan before resuming.
The biggest set of changes is to StopInfoMachException where we
translate a Mach Exception into a stop reason. The Mach exception codes
differ in a few places depending on the target (unambiguously), and I
didn't want to duplicate the new code for each target so I've tested
what mach exceptions we get for each action on each target, and
reorganized StopInfoMachException::CreateStopReasonWithMachException to
document these possible values, and handle them without specializing
based on the target arch.
I first landed this patch in July 2024 via
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96260
but the CI bots and wider testing found a number of test case failures
that needed to be updated, I reverted it. I've fixed all of those issues
in separate PRs and this change should run cleanly on all the CI bots
now.
rdar://123942164
Generally speaking, process plugins (e.g. ProcessGDBRemote) should not
be aware of OS plugin threads. However, ProcessGDBRemote attempts to
check for the existence of OS threads when calculating stop info. When
OS threads are present, it sets the stop info directly on the OS plugin
thread and leaves the ThreadGDBRemote without a StopInfo.
This is problematic for a few reasons:
1. No other process plugins do this, as they shouldn't. They should set
the stop info for their own process threads, and let the abstractions
built on top propagate StopInfos.
2. This conflicts with the expectations of ThreadMemory, which checks
for the backing threads's info, and then attempts to propagate it (in
the future, it should probably ask the plugin itself too...). We see
this happening in the code below. The `if` condition will not trigger,
because `backing_stop_info_sp` will be null (remember, ProcessGDB remote
is ignoring its own threads), and then this method returns false.
```
bool ThreadMemory::CalculateStopInfo() {
...
lldb::StopInfoSP backing_stop_info_sp(
m_backing_thread_sp->GetPrivateStopInfo());
if (backing_stop_info_sp &&
backing_stop_info_sp->IsValidForOperatingSystemThread(*this)) {
backing_stop_info_sp->SetThread(shared_from_this());
```
```
Thread::GetPrivateStopInfo
...
if (!CalculateStopInfo())
SetStopInfo(StopInfoSP());
```
To solve this, we change ProcessGDB remote so that it does the
principled thing: it now only sets the stop info of its own threads.
This change by itself breaks the tests TestPythonOSPlugin.py and
TestOSPluginStepping.py and probably explains why ProcessGDB had
originally "violated" this isolation of layers.
To make this work, BreakpointSites must be aware of BackingThreads when
answering the question: "Is this breakpoint valid for this thread?".
Why? Breakpoints are created on top of the OS threads (that's what the
user sees), but breakpoints are hit by process threads. In the presence
of OS threads, a TID-specific breakpoint is valid for a process thread
if it is backing an OS thread with that TID.
This reverts commit a774de807e56c1147d4630bfec3110c11d41776e.
This is the same changes as last time, plus:
* We load the binary into the target object so that on Windows, we can
resolve the locations of the functions.
* We now assert that each required breakpoint has at least 1 location,
to prevent an issue like that in the future.
* We are less strict about the unsupported error message, because it
prints "error: windows" on Windows instead of "error: gdb-remote".
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#123945
Has failed on the Windows on Arm buildbot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/5865
```
********************
Unresolved Tests (2):
lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueWatchpoints.py
********************
Failed Tests (1):
lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueNotSupported.py
```
Reverting while I reproduce locally.
This reverts commit 22561cfb443267905d4190f0e2a738e6b412457f and fixes
b7b9ccf44988edf49886743ae5c3cf4184db211f (#112079).
The problem is that x86_64 and Arm 32-bit have memory regions above the
stack that are readable but not writeable. First Arm:
```
(lldb) memory region --all
<...>
[0x00000000fffcf000-0x00000000ffff0000) rw- [stack]
[0x00000000ffff0000-0x00000000ffff1000) r-x [vectors]
[0x00000000ffff1000-0xffffffffffffffff) ---
```
Then x86_64:
```
$ cat /proc/self/maps
<...>
7ffdcd148000-7ffdcd16a000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
7ffdcd193000-7ffdcd196000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0 [vvar]
7ffdcd196000-7ffdcd197000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso]
ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 --xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vsyscall]
```
Compare this to AArch64 where the test did pass:
```
$ cat /proc/self/maps
<...>
ffffb87dc000-ffffb87dd000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0 [vvar]
ffffb87dd000-ffffb87de000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso]
ffffb87de000-ffffb87e0000 r--p 0002a000 00:3c 76927217 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1
ffffb87e0000-ffffb87e2000 rw-p 0002c000 00:3c 76927217 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1
fffff4216000-fffff4237000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
```
To solve this, look up the memory region of the stack pointer (using
https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/lldbgdbremote.html#qmemoryregioninfo-addr)
and constrain the read to within that region. Since we know the stack is
all readable and writeable.
I have also added skipIfRemote to the tests, since getting them working
in that context is too complex to be worth it.
Memory write failures now display the range they tried to write, and
register write errors will show the name of the register where possible.
The patch also includes a workaround for a an issue where the test code
could mistake an `x` response that happens to begin with an `O` for an
output packet (stdout). This workaround will not be necessary one we
start using the [new
implementation](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fixing-incompatibilties-of-the-x-packet-w-r-t-gdb/84288)
of the `x` packet.
---------
Co-authored-by: Pavel Labath <pavel@labath.sk>
This commit adds support for a
`SBProcess::ContinueInDirection()` API. A user-accessible command for
this will follow in a later commit.
This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing
support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support
those packets, and there is no plan to change that. For testing
purposes, this commit adds a Python implementation of *very limited*
record-and-reverse-execute functionality, implemented as a proxy between
lldb and lldb-server in `lldbreverse.py`. This should not (and in
practice cannot) be used for anything except testing.
The tests here are quite minimal but we test that simple breakpoints and
watchpoints work as expected during reverse execution, and that
conditional breakpoints and watchpoints work when the condition calls a
function that must be executed in the forward direction.
Reverting this again; I added a commit which added @skipIfDarwin
markers to the TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py and
TestReverseContinueNotSupported.py API tests, which use lldb-server
in gdbserver mode which does not work on Darwin. But the aarch64 ubuntu
bot reported a failure on TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py,
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/6397
File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 63, in test_reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint
self.reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal(async_mode=False)
File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 81, in reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal
self.expect(
File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2372, in expect
self.runCmd(
File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 1002, in runCmd
self.assertTrue(self.res.Succeeded(), msg + output)
AssertionError: False is not true : Process should be stopped due to history boundary
Error output:
error: Process must be launched.
This reverts commit 4f297566b3150097de26c6a23a987d2bd5fc19c5.
This commit only adds support for the
`SBProcess::ReverseContinue()` API. A user-accessible command for this
will follow in a later commit.
This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing
support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support
those packets, and there is no plan to change that. So, for testing
purposes, `lldbreverse.py` wraps `lldb-server` with a Python
implementation of *very limited* record-and-replay functionality for use
by *tests only*.
The majority of this PR is test infrastructure (about 700 of the 950
lines added).
