Change the AsmPrinter to number values breadth-first so that values in adjacent regions can have the same name. This allows for ModuleOp to contain operations that produce results. This also standardizes the special name of region entry arguments to "arg[0-9+]" now that Functions are also operations.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 257225069
The current syntax separates the name and value with ':', but ':' is already overloaded by several other things(e.g. trailing types). This makes the syntax difficult to parse in some situtations:
Old:
"foo: 10 : i32"
New:
"foo = 10 : i32"
PiperOrigin-RevId: 255097928
This is the standard syntax for types on operations, and is also already used by IntegerAttr and FloatAttr.
Example:
dense<5> : tensor<i32>
dense<[3]> : tensor<1xi32>
PiperOrigin-RevId: 255069157
Trying to activate both LLVM and MLIR passes in mlir-cpu-runner showed name collisions when registering pass names.
One possible way of disambiguating that should also work across dialects is to prepend the dialect name to the passes that specifically operate on that dialect.
With this CL, mlir-cpu-runner tests still run when both LLVM and MLIR passes are registered
--
PiperOrigin-RevId: 246539917
This CL is the 5th on the path to simplifying AffineMap composition.
This removes the distinction between normalized single-result AffineMap and
more general composed multi-result map.
One nice byproduct of making the implementation driven by single-result is
that the multi-result extension is a trivial change: the implementation is
still single-result and we just use:
```
unsigned idx = getIndexOf(...);
map.getResult(idx);
```
This CL also fixes an AffineNormalizer implementation issue related to symbols.
Namely it stops performing substitutions on symbols in AffineNormalizer and
instead concatenates them all to be consistent with the call to
`AffineMap::compose(AffineMap)`. This latter call to `compose` cannot perform
simplifications of symbols coming from different maps based on positions only:
i.e. dims are applied and renumbered but symbols must be concatenated.
The only way to determine whether symbols from different AffineApply are the
same is to look at the concrete values. The canonicalizeMapAndOperands is thus
extended with behavior to support replacing operands that appear multiple
times.
Lastly, this CL demonstrates that the implementation is correct by rewriting
ComposeAffineMaps using only `makeComposedAffineApply`. The implementation
uses a matcher because AffineApplyOp are introduced as composed operations on
the fly instead of iteratively forwardSubstituting. For this purpose, a walker
would revisit freshly introduced AffineApplyOp. Regardless, ComposeAffineMaps
is scheduled to disappear, this CL replaces the implementation based on
iterative `forwardSubstitute` by a composed-by-construction
`makeComposedAffineApply`.
Remaining calls to `forwardSubstitute` will be removed in the next CL.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 228830443
Supervectorization does not plan on handling multi-result AffineMaps and
non-canonical chains of > 1 AffineApplyOp.
This CL uses the simpler single-result unbounded AffineApplyOp in the
MaterializeVectors pass.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 228469085
The entire compiler now looks at structural properties of the function (e.g.
does it have one block, does it contain an if/for stmt, etc) so the only thing
holding up this difference is round tripping through the parser/printer syntax.
Removing this shrinks the compile by ~140LOC.
This is step 31/n towards merging instructions and statements. The last step
is updating the docs, which I will do as a separate patch in order to split it
from this mostly mechanical patch.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 227540453
This CL adds the following free functions:
```
/// Returns the AffineExpr e o m.
AffineExpr compose(AffineExpr e, AffineMap m);
/// Returns the AffineExpr f o g.
AffineMap compose(AffineMap f, AffineMap g);
```
This addresses the issue that AffineMap composition is only available at a
distance via AffineValueMap and is thus unusable on Attributes.
This CL thus implements AffineMap composition in a more modular and composable
way.
This CL does not claim that it can be a good replacement for the
implementation in AffineValueMap, in particular it does not support bounded
maps atm.
Standalone tests are added that replicate some of the logic of the AffineMap
composition pass.
Lastly, affine map composition is used properly inside MaterializeVectors and
a standalone test is added that requires permutation_map composition with a
projection map.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 224376870
