When a local variable inside a BLOCK construct is used as threadprivate
variable, llvm-flang throws below error:
> error: The THREADPRIVATE directive and the common block or variable in
it must appear in the same declaration section of a scoping unit
Accept the reduction modifier in the Flang parser. Issue a TODO message
during lowering.
OpenMP 5.0 introduced the reduction modifier. Details can be seen in
2.19.5.4 reductionClause.
OpenMP 5.2 relevant section is 5.5.8reductionClause.
This will help remove some of the parser errors highlighted in the
following post and also bring it to a well defined behaviour (produce
TODO errors for unsupported features, do not crash).
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/proposal-rename-flang-new-to-flang/69462/60
This effectively implements some now deprecated OpenMP functionality
that some applications (most notably at the moment GenASiS)
unfortunately depend on (deprecated in specification version 5.2):
"If a list item in a use_device_ptr clause is not of type C_PTR, the
behavior is as if the list item appeared in a use_device_addr clause.
Support for such list items in a use_device_ptr clause is deprecated."
This PR downgrades the hard-error to a deprecated warning and "promotes"
the above cases by simply moving the offending operands from the
use_device_ptr value list to the back of the use_device_addr list (and
moves the related symbols, locs and types that form the BlockArgs
correspondingly) and then the generation of the target data construct
proceeds as normal.
This patch adds support in flang for the depend clause in target and
target enter/update/exit constructs. Previously, the following line in a
fortran program would have resulted in the error shown below it.
!$omp target map(to:a) depend(in:a)
"not yet implemented: Unhandled clause DEPEND in TARGET construct"
This is a support for " #pragma omp atomic compare weak". It has Parser
& AST support for now.
---------
Authored-by: Sunil Kuravinakop <kuravina@pe28vega.us.cray.com>
Changed semantic check from giving error to giving a warning about
deprecation from OpenMP 5.2 and later about checks for dummy argument
list-items present on IS_DEVICE_PTR clause.
This P is blocker for
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71255
1. COPYPRIVATE clause should be specified on END SINGLE construct.
2. NOWAIT clause should be specified on END DO/DO SIMD/SINGLE/SECTIONS
construct.
Special handling for semantic checks for nowait/copyprivate clause is
needed in Fortran due to the fact that Openmp pragmas for C/C++ doesn't
have end directive (clause). nowait/copyprivate clauses are allowed in
begin directive clause lists for C/C++ and it is not allowed for
Fortran.
This patch adds the following semantic check:
```
The ancestor device-modifier must not appear on the device clause on any
directive other than the target construct.
```
This reverts commit edd675ac283909397880f85ba68d0d5f99dc1be2.
This breaks clang build where every component is a shared library.
The file clang/lib/Basic/OpenMPKinds.cpp, which is a part of
libclangBasic.so, uses `getOpenMPClauseName` which isn't:
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/obj.clangBasic.dir/OpenMPKinds.cpp.o: in functio
n `clang ::getOpenMPSimpleClauseTypeName(llvm::omp::Clause, unsigned int
)':
OpenMPKinds.cpp:(.text._ZN5clang29getOpenMPSimpleClauseTypeNameEN4llvm3o
mp6ClauseEj+0x9b): undefined reference to `llvm::omp::getOpenMPClauseNam
e(llvm::omp::Clause)'
This patch adds the following check from OpenMP 5.2.
```
If the directive has a clause, it must contain at least one enter clause
or at least one link clause.
```
Also added a warning for the deprication of `TO` clause on `DECLARE
TARGET` construct.
```
The clause-name to may be used as a synonym for the clause-name enter.
This use has been deprecated.
```
Based on the tests for to clause, the tests for enter clause are added.
This patch does not add tests where both to and enter clause are used together.
Before emitting a warning message, code should check that the usage in
question should be diagnosed by calling ShouldWarn(). A fair number of
sites in the code do not, and can emit portability warnings
unconditionally, which can confuse a user that hasn't asked for them
(-pedantic) and isn't terribly concerned about portability *to* other
compilers.
Add calls to ShouldWarn() or IsEnabled() around messages that need them,
and add -pedantic to tests that now require it to test their portability
messages, and add more expected message lines to those tests when
-pedantic causes other diagnostics to fire.
This is a support for " #pragma omp atomic compare fail ". It has Parser & AST support for now.
Reviewed By: tianshilei1992, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123235
This patch adds a semantic check for the following:
```
If a list item is a procedure name, it must not be a generic name,
procedure pointer, entry name, or statement function name.
```
This patch adds the following semantic check for is_device_ptr
```
A list item that appears in an is_device_ptr clause must be a
dummy argument that does not have the ALLOCATABLE, POINTER or
VALUE attribute.
```
This patch adds the following semantic check for target update
```
At least one motion-clause must be specified.
```
A motion clause is either a `to` or a `from` clause.
This patch also adds a test for the following semantic check which was
already supported.
```
At most one nowait clause can appear on the directive.
```
This patch creates the `OmpRewriteMutator` pass that runs at the end of
`RewriteParseTree()`. This pass is intended to make OpenMP-specific mutations
to the PFT after name resolution.
In the case of the `atomic_default_mem_order` clause of the REQUIRES directive,
name resolution results in populating global symbols with information about the
REQUIRES clauses that apply to that scope. The new rewrite pass is then able to
use this information in order to explicitly set the memory order of ATOMIC
constructs for which that is not already specified.
Given that this rewrite happens before semantics checks, the check of the order
in which ATOMIC constructs without explicit memory order and REQUIRES
directives with `atomic_default_mem_order` appear is moved earlier into the
rewrite pass. Otherwise, these problems would not be caught by semantics
checks, since the PFT would be modified by that stage.
This is patch 4/5 of a series splitting D149337 to simplify review.
Depends on D157983.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158096
This patch starts the support for OpenMP kernel language, basically to write
OpenMP target region in SIMT style, similar to kernel languages such as CUDA.
What included in this first patch is the `ompx_bare` clause for `target teams`
directive. When `ompx_bare` exists, globalization is disabled such that local
variables will not be globalized. The runtime init/deinit function calls will
not be emitted. That being said, almost all OpenMP executable directives are
not supported in the region, such as parallel, task. This patch doesn't include
the Sema checks for that, so the use of them is UB. Simple directives, such as
atomic, can be used. We provide a set of APIs (for C, they are prefix with
`ompx_`; for C++, they are in `ompx` namespace) to get thread id, block id, etc.
Please refer to
https://tianshilei.me/wp-content/uploads/llvm-hpc-2023.pdf for more details.
This patch adds the following semantic checks:
- None of expr, and expr_list (as applicable) may access the same storage location as x
- Atomic update statement should be of the form x = x operator expr or
x = expr operator x or x = intrinsic_procedure(x, expr_list) or x = intrinsic_procedure(expr_list, x)
- expr_list is a comma-separated, non-empty list of scalar expressions. If intrinsic_procedure_name
refers to IAND, IOR, or IEOR, exactly one expression must appear in expr_list
Reviewed By: TIFitis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128162
This patch starts the support for OpenMP kernel language, basically to
write
OpenMP target region in SIMT style, similar to kernel languages such as
CUDA.
What included in this first patch is the `ompx_bare` clause for `target
teams`
directive. When `ompx_bare` exists, globalization is disabled such that
local
variables will not be globalized. The runtime init/deinit function calls
will
not be emitted. That being said, almost all OpenMP executable directives
are
not supported in the region, such as parallel, task. This patch doesn't
include
the Sema checks for that, so the use of them is UB. Simple directives,
such as
atomic, can be used. We provide a set of APIs (for C, they are prefix
with
`ompx_`; for C++, they are in `ompx` namespace) to get thread id, block
id, etc.
For more details, you can refer to
https://tianshilei.me/wp-content/uploads/llvm-hpc-2023.pdf.
Summary of this patch
- Add semantic support for HAS_DEVICE_ADDR and IS_DEVICE_PTR clauses.
- A list item that appears in an IS_DEVICE_PTR clause must be a valid
device pointer for the device data environment.
- A list item may not be specified in both an IS_DEVICE_PTR clause and a
HAS_DEVICE_ADDR clauses on the directive.
- A list item that appears in an IS_DEVICE_PTR or a HAS_DEVICE_ADDR
clauses must not be specified in any data-sharing attribute clause on
the same target construct.
Unlike other executable constructs with associating selectors, the
selector of a SELECT RANK construct can have the ALLOCATABLE or POINTER
attribute, and will work as an allocatable or object pointer within
each rank case, so long as there is no RANK(*) case.
Getting this right exposed a correctness risk with the popular
predicate IsAllocatableOrPointer() -- it will be true for procedure
pointers as well as object pointers, and in many contexts, a procedure
pointer should not be acceptable. So this patch adds the new predicate
IsAllocatableOrObjectPointer(), and updates some call sites of the original
function to use the new one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159043
This patch adds general checks for atomic read, write, and capture statements.
-check "capture statement is of the form v = x if atomic construct is read"
-check "write statement is of the form x = expr if atomic construct is write"
-check "x must not have the ALLOCATABLE attribute."
-check for non-scalar variables
-check if x (LHS variable) is accessed on the RHS of assignment statement
-improve error reporting in atomic update statemen
Reviewed By: TIFitis, raghavendhra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127620
This patch adds semantics checks for REQUIRES directives appearing after other
directives that are affected by them. In particular, it adds checks for device
constructs appearing after device-related REQUIRES directives and for the
`atomic_default_mem_order` clause appearing after atomic operations where the
memory order is not explicitly specified.
This is patch 2/5 of a series splitting D149337 to simplify review.
Depends on D157710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157722
This patch moves directive sets defined internally in Semantics to a header
accessible by other stages of the compiler to enable reuse. Some sets are
renamed/rearranged and others are lifted from local definitions to provide
a single source of truth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157090
This patch adds support for matching multiple OpenMP `if` clauses to their
specified directive in a combined construct. It also enables this clause to be
attached by name to `simd` and `teams` directives, in addition to the others
that were already supported.
This patch on its own cannot yet be tested because there is currently no
lowering to MLIR support for any combined construct containing two or more
OpenMP directives that can have an `if` clause attached.
Depends on D155981.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156313
The following restrictions for USE_DEVICE_PTR and USE_DEVICE_ADDR clauses on OMP TARGET DATA directive are implemented in this patch.
- A list item may not be specified more than once in use_device_ptr clauses that appear on the directive.
- A list item may not be specified more than once in use_device_addr clauses that appear on the directive.
- A list item may not be specified in both a use_device_addr clause and a use_device_ptr clause on the directive.
- A list item that appears in a use_device_ptr or use_device_addr clause must not be a structure element.
- A list item that appears in a use_device_ptr must be of type C_PTR.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155133
This patch applies the semantic checks for executable allocation directives to the new allocators construct. It also introduces a new check that ensures all items in the list appear in the corresponding Fortran allocate statement.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150428
This reverts commit 0d12683046ca75fb08e285f4622f2af5c82609dc and
reapplies ef9ec4bbcca2fa4f64df47bc426f1d1c59ea47e2 with an extension to
fix the Flang build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156184
This is an assisting patch which is implemented to address review comment to switch std::list<Name> to OmpObjectlist from https://reviews.llvm.org/D142722.
Also addressed a semantic check https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61161 OpenMP 5.2 standard states that only pointer variables (C_PTR, Cray pointers, POINTER or ALLOCATABLE items) can appear in SIMD aligned clause (section 5.11). And not to allow common block names on an ALIGNED clause.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152637
Prior to this change, if you define a module as such with a declare target in it:
module test_0
implicit none
!$omp declare target(no_implicit_materialization_1)
end module test_0
The compiler will crash rather than give some form of reasonable
diagnostic. This patch attempts to fix that.
Reviewers: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149913
Initial support for USE_DEVICE_PTR clause on OMP TARGET DATA directive.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148254
Constraint checking for explicit SAVE attributes is more
accurate when done along with other declaration checking, rather
than on the fly during name resolution. This allows us to
catch attempts to attach explicit SAVE attributes to anything
that can't have one (constraints C859, C860).
Also delete `IsSave()`, whose few remaining uses were changed to the
more general `IsSaved()` predicate that seems more correct for
those uses, returning true for both explicit and implied SAVE
attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146579
The outer context private check for reduction variables was firing
for all constructs. This check is not applicable to non-worksharing
constructs.
OpenMP 5.2: Section 5.5.8
A list item that appears in a reduction clause on a worksharing construct
must be shared in the parallel region to which a correspodning worksharing
region binds.
Reviewed By: peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144824
If the toplevel unit is present in a declare target construct, do not
try to again find the enclosing construct.
Patch also re-arranges the checks.
Reviewed By: peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144264
