With reduced indentation, some strings can be reformatted to take less lines.
Also strategically apply `formatv` to shorten them.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132088
Split out the body of a for-loop in `RewriteInstance::readRelocations` into a
separate function (`handleRelocation`). It's still over 300 lines of code,
so it's worth splitting down further.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132078
Move logging into LLVM_DEBUG scope.
Remove redundant printing of jump table parents:
Old logging:
```
failed to analyze jump table in function _ZN12_GLOBAL__N_116InitHeaderSearch23Ad
dDefaultCIncludePathsERKN4llvm6TripleERKN5clang19HeaderSearchOptionsE/1(*2)
PIC Jump table JUMP_TABLE/_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_116InitHeaderSearch23AddDefaultCInclud
ePathsERKN4llvm6TripleERKN5clang19HeaderSearchOptionsE/1.1 for function _ZN12_GL
OBAL__N_116InitHeaderSearch23AddDefaultCIncludePathsERKN4llvm6TripleERKN5clang19
HeaderSearchOptionsE/1(*2) at 0x65996e0 with a total count of 0:
0x9dc
next jump table at 0x659a810 belongs to function _ZN5clang5Lexer40LexDependencyD
irectiveTokenWhileSkippingERNS_5TokenE
PIC Jump table JUMP_TABLE/_ZN5clang5Lexer40LexDependencyDirectiveTokenWhileSkipp
ingERNS_5TokenE.0 for function _ZN5clang5Lexer40LexDependencyDirectiveTokenWhile
SkippingERNS_5TokenE at 0x659a810 with a total count of 0:
jump table heuristic failure
```
New logging:
```
failed to analyze PIC Jump table JUMP_TABLE/_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_116InitHeaderSearch2
3AddDefaultCIncludePathsERKN4llvm6TripleERKN5clang19HeaderSearchOptionsE/1.1 for
function _ZN12_GLOBAL__N_116InitHeaderSearch23AddDefaultCIncludePathsERKN4llvm6T
ripleERKN5clang19HeaderSearchOptionsE/1(*2) at 0x65996e0 with a total count of 0:
absolute offset: 0x52ac58c
next PIC Jump table JUMP_TABLE/_ZN5clang5Lexer40LexDependencyDirectiveTokenWhile
SkippingERNS_5TokenE.0 for function _ZN5clang5Lexer40LexDependencyDirectiveToken
WhileSkippingERNS_5TokenE at 0x659a810 with a total count of 0:
jump table heuristic failure
```
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131243
We were resetting DW_AT_low_pc to zero when DW_AT_high_pc was zero, or
DW_AT_low_pc == DW_AT_high_pc. This resulted in LLDB to print error "adding
range [0x0-0x0) which has a base that is less than the function's low PC".
Changed it so that when this case arises we set DW_AT_low_pc to the start
address.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132059
If the first block of a fragment is also a landing pad, the landing pad
is not used if an exception is thrown. This is because the landing pad
is at the same start address that the corresponding LSDA describes. In
that case, the offset in the call site records to refer to that landing
pad is zero, and a zero offset is interpreted by the personality
function as "no handler" and ignored.
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132053
Move the implementation out of the header file.
Simplify the method.
Add debug logging.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131811
DW_TAG_call_site/DW_AT_call_return_pc can contain address that is not in any
function. In this case getBinaryFunctionContainingAddress returns nullptr. For
this case preserving original address.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132057
To track whether a function's new layout is different from its old
layout when updating it, the old layout would be kept around in memory
indefinitely (if the new layout is different). This was used only for
debugging/logging purposes. This patch forces the caller of function
layout's update method to copy the old layout into a temporary if they
need it by removing the old layout fields.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131413
Functions that do not contain any code still have to be emitted. This
occurs on AArch64 where functions can consist only of a constant island.
To support fragment semantics in code emission, this commits adds a
guaranteed main fragment to function layout. This fragment might be
empty, but allows us omit checks whether the function is empty in most
places.
Reviewed By: rafauler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130051
Without this patch, I am getting errors like:
llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:233:7: error: use of
the 'nodiscard' attribute is a C++17 extension
[-Werror,-Wc++17-extensions]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131348
Also make the soft toolchain requirements hard. This allows
us to use C++17 features in LLVM now.
If we find patterns with C++17 that improve readability
it should be recommended in the coding standards.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, cor3ntin, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689
Prefer using these accessors to access the special sub-commands
corresponding to the top-level (no subcommand) and all sub-commands.
This is a preparatory step towards removing the use of ManagedStatic:
with a subsequent change, these global instances will be moved to
be regular function-scope statics.
It is split up to give downstream projects a (albeit short) window in
which they can switch to using the accessors in a forward-compatible
way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129118
Compiling llvm/llvm-project/bolt/include/bolt/Passes/RegReAssign.h failed:
...: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'llvm::bolt::BinaryFunctionCallGraph'
static_assert(sizeof(_Tp) >= 0, "cannot delete an incomplete type");
error: type 'llvm::bolt::BinaryBasicBlock *' cannot be used prior to '::' because it has no members
using NodeRef = typename GraphType::UnknownGraphTypeError;
BinaryDomTree.h:31:14: error: no template named 'DomTreeGraphTraitsBase'
: public DomTreeGraphTraitsBase<bolt::BinaryDomTreeNode,
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130402
We were not handling correclty multiple DW_OP_addrx in the location expression.
This was exposed by clang-15 build in release mode with debug information.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130812
This diff uncovers an ASAN leak in getOrCreateJumpTable:
```
Indirect leak of 264 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#1 0x4f6e48c in llvm::bolt::BinaryContext::getOrCreateJumpTable ...
```
The removal of an assertion needs to be accompanied by proper deallocation of
a `JumpTable` object for which `analyzeJumpTable` was unsuccessful.
This reverts commit 52cd00cabf479aa7eb6dbb063b7ba41ea57bce9e.
This patch refactors BAT to be testable as a library, so we
can have open-source tests on it. This further fixes an issue with
basic blocks that lack a valid input offset, making BAT omit those
when writing translation tables.
Test Plan: new testcases added, new testing tool added (llvm-bat-dump)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129382
Disassembly and branch target analysis are not decoupled, so any
analysis that depends on disassembly may not operate properly.
In specific, analyzeJumpTable uses instruction bounds check property.
A jump table was analyzed twice: (a) during disassembly, and (b) after
disassembly, so there are potentially some mismatched results.
In this update, functions that access JTs which fail the second check
will be marked as ignored.
Test Plan:
```
ninja check-bolt
```
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130431
AllowStripped has not been used in BOLT.
This option is replaced by actively detecting stripped binary.
Test Plan:
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130036
Determine stripped status of a binary based on .symtab
Test Plan:
```
ninja check-bolt
```
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130034
This one actually makes the test simpler, because lit doesn't have to
reconstitute a 32-bit little-endian value from individual bytes any
more: llvm-objdump is printing the desired 32-bit value in the first
place, so we can move straight on to doing the arithmetic on it.
`LastSymbol` handling in `discoverFileObjects` assumes a non-zero number of
symbols in an object file. It's not the case for broken_dynsym.test added in
D130073, and potentially other stripped binaries.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130544
The test exercises an implicit ptr-to-int conversion which is made an error in
D129881. We acknowledge the error but still want to test this case.
Add `-Wno-int-conversion` to silence the error.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130546
Rather than iterating over the whole function from the start until no
internal calls are found, process each block only once and continue
processing after splitting. This version of the function also does not
seemingly invalidate iterators from within the loop.
Reviewed By: maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130436
Strip tools cause a few symbols in .dynsym to have bad section index.
This update safely keeps such broken symbols intact.
Test Plan:
```
ninja check-bolt
```
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130073
There should not be a end of child mark before DW_AT_ranges, removed it and fixed unit offset.
Reviewed By: ayermolo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130335
The latest perf tool can return non-empty buffer when executing
buildid-list command, even when perf.data was recorded with -B flag.
Some binaries will be listed without the ID, while others may have a
recorded ID. Allow invalid entires on the input, while checking the
valid ones for the match.
Reviewed By: Amir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130223
First of all, `LLVM_TOOLS_INSTALL_DIR` put there breaks our NixOS
builds, because `LLVM_TOOLS_INSTALL_DIR` defined the same as
`CMAKE_INSTALL_BINDIR` becomes an *absolute* path, and then when
downstream projects try to install there too this breaks because our
builds always install to fresh directories for isolation's sake.
Second of all, note that `LLVM_TOOLS_INSTALL_DIR` stands out against the
other specially crafted `LLVM_CONFIG_*` variables substituted in
`llvm/cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake.in`.
@beanz added it in d0e1c2a550ef348aae036d0fe78cab6f038c420c to fix a
dangling reference in `AddLLVM`, but I am suspicious of how this
variable doesn't follow the pattern.
Those other ones are carefully made to be build-time vs install-time
variables depending on which `LLVMConfig.cmake` is being generated, are
carefully made relative as appropriate, etc. etc. For my NixOS use-case
they are also fine because they are never used as downstream install
variables, only for reading not writing.
To avoid the problems I face, and restore symmetry, I deleted the
exported and arranged to have many `${project}_TOOLS_INSTALL_DIR`s.
`AddLLVM` now instead expects each project to define its own, and they
do so based on `CMAKE_INSTALL_BINDIR`. `LLVMConfig` still exports
`LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR` which is the location for the tools defined in
the usual way, matching the other remaining exported variables.
For the `AddLLVM` changes, I tried to copy the existing pattern of
internal vs non-internal or for LLVM vs for downstream function/macro
names, but it would good to confirm I did that correctly.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117977
