Summary:
This was added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D2449, but I'm not sure it's
necessary since an inalloca value is never a Constant (should be an
AllocaInst).
Reviewers: hans, rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79350
We check that C is finite and strictly positive, but there's no need to
check that it's normal too. exp2 should be just as accurate on denormals
as pow is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79413
LSR has some logic that tries to aggressively reuse registers in
formula. This can lead to sub-optimal decision in complex loops where
the backend it trying to use shouldFavorPostInc. This disables the
re-use in those situations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79301
I don't think there's any good reason not to do this transformation when
the pow has multiple uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79407
This adds a general combine that can be used to fold:
or(zext(OP(x)), shl(zext(OP(y)),bw/2))
-->
OP(or(zext(x), shl(zext(y),bw/2)))
Allowing us to widen 'concat-able' style or+zext patterns - I've just set this up for BSWAP but we could use this for other similar ops (BITREVERSE for instance).
We already do something similar for bitop(bswap(x),bswap(y)) --> bswap(bitop(x,y))
Fixes PR45715
Reviewed By: @lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79041
Make the kind of cost explicit throughout the cost model which,
apart from making the cost clear, will allow the generic parts to
calculate better costs. It will also allow some backends to
approximate and correlate the different costs if they wish. Another
benefit is that it will also help simplify the cost model around
immediate and intrinsic costs, where we currently have multiple APIs.
RFC thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/141263.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79002
Summary:
Moving these function initializations into separate functions makes it easier
to read the runOnModule function. There is also precedent in the sanitizer code:
asan has a function ModuleAddressSanitizer::initializeCallbacks(Module &M). I
thought it made sense to break the initializations into two sets. One for the
compiler runtime functions and one for the event callbacks.
Tested with: check-all
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79307
optimizePow does not create any new calls to pow, so it should work
regardless of whether the pow library function is available. This allows
it to optimize the llvm.pow intrinsic on targets with no math library.
Based on a patch by Tim Renouf.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68231
Before we eagerly put dependences into the QueryMap as soon as we
encountered them (via `Attributor::getAAFor<>` or
`Attributor::recordDependence`). Now we will wait to see if the
dependence is useful, that is if the target is not already in a fixpoint
state at the end of the update. If so, there is no need to record the
dependence at all.
Due to the abstraction via `Attributor::updateAA` we will now also treat
the very first update (during attribute creation) as we do subsequent
updates.
Finally this resolves the problematic usage of QueriedNonFixAA.
---
Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):
Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 554675 (389245/s)
temporary memory allocations: 101574 (71280/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 28.46MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 116.26MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 512465 (345559/s)
temporary memory allocations: 98832 (66643/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 22.54MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 106.58MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: -42210 (-727758/s)
temporary memory allocations: -2742 (-47275/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -5.92MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
```
Attributes that only depend on the value (=bit pattern) can be
initialized from uses in the must-be-executed-context (MBEC). We did use
`AAComposeTwoGenericDeduction` and `AAFromMustBeExecutedContext` before
to do this for some positions of these attributes but not for all. This
was fairly complicated and also problematic as we did run it in every
`updateImpl` call even though we only use known information. The new
implementation removes `AAComposeTwoGenericDeduction`* and
`AAFromMustBeExecutedContext` in favor of a simple interface
`AddInformation::fromMBEContext(...)` which we call from the
`initialize` methods of the "value attribute" `Impl` classes, e.g.
`AANonNullImpl:initialize`.
There can be two types of test changes:
1) Artifacts were we miss some information that was known before a
global fixpoint was reached and therefore available in an update
but not at the beginning.
2) Deduction for values we did not derive via the MBEC before or which
were not found as the `AAFromMustBeExecutedContext::updateImpl` was
never invoked.
* An improved version of AAComposeTwoGenericDeduction can be found in
D78718. Once we find a new use case that implementation will be able
to handle "generic" AAs better.
---
Single run of the Attributor module and then CGSCC pass (oldPM)
for SPASS/clause.c (~10k LLVM-IR loc):
Before:
```
calls to allocation functions: 468428 (328952/s)
temporary memory allocations: 77480 (54410/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 32.71MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 122.46MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
After:
```
calls to allocation functions: 554720 (351310/s)
temporary memory allocations: 101650 (64376/s)
peak heap memory consumption: 28.46MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 116.75MB
total memory leaked: 269.10KB
```
Difference:
```
calls to allocation functions: 86292 (556722/s)
temporary memory allocations: 24170 (155935/s)
peak heap memory consumption: -4.25MB
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B
```
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78719
Summary:
This factors cost and reporting out of the inlining workflow, thus
making it easier to reuse when driving inlining from the upcoming
InliningAdvisor.
Depends on: D79215
Reviewers: davidxl, echristo
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79275
Since every AbstractAttribute so far, and for the foreseeable future,
corresponds to a single IRPosition we can simplify the class structure.
We already did this for IRAttribute but there is no reason to stop
there.
When the shufflevector mask operand was converted into special
instruction data, the FunctionComparator was not updated to
account for this. As such, MergeFuncs will happily merge
shufflevectors with different masks.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45773.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79261
Summary:
shouldInline makes a decision based on the InlineCost of a call site, as
well as an evaluation on whether the site should be deferred. This means
it's possible for the decision to be not to inline, even for an
InlineCost that would otherwise allow it.
Both uses of shouldInline performed the exact same logic after calling
it. In addition, the decision on whether to inline or not was
communicated through two values of the Option<InlineCost> return value:
None, or an InlineCost evaluating to false.
Simplified by:
- encapsulating the decision in the return object. The bool it evaluates
to communicates unambiguously the decision. The InlineCost is also
available.
- encapsulated the common post-shouldInline code into shouldInline.
Reviewers: davidxl, echristo, eraman
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79215
Summary:
Make foldVectorBinop return null if the instruction type is a scalable
vector. It is unclear what, if any, of this function works with scalable
vectors.
Identified by test LLVM.Transforms/InstCombine::nsw.ll
Reviewers: efriedma, david-arm, fpetrogalli, spatel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79196
This fixes potential reference invalidations, when no lattice value is
assigned for CopyOf. As the state of CopyOf won't change while in
handleCallResult, we can get a copy once and use that.
Should fix PR45749.
In D74183 clang started emitting alignment for sret parameters
unconditionally. This caused a 1.5% compile-time regression on
tramp3d-v4. The reason is that we now generate many instance of IR like
%ptrint = ptrtoint %class.GuardLayers* %guards_m to i64
%maskedptr = and i64 %ptrint, 3
%maskcond = icmp eq i64 %maskedptr, 0
tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %maskcond)
to preserve the alignment information during inlining. Based on IR
analysis, these assumptions also regress optimization. The attached
phase ordering test case illustrates two issues: One are instruction
count based optimization heuristics, which are affected by the four
additional instructions of the assumption. The other is blocking of
SROA due to ptrtoint casts (PR45763).
We already encountered the same problem in Rust, where we (unlike
Clang) generally prefer to emit alignment information absolutely
everywhere it is available. We were only able to do this after
hardcoding -preserve-alignment-assumptions-during-inlining=false,
because we were seeing significant optimization and compile-time
regressions otherwise.
This patch disables -preserve-alignment-assumptions-during-inlining
by default, because we should not be punishing people for adding
more alignment annotations.
Once the assume bundle work shakes out and we can represent (and use)
alignment assumptions using assume bundles, it should be possible to
re-enable this with reduced overhead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76886
Summary:
Refactor getInterestingMemoryOperands() so that information about the
pointer operand is returned through an array of structures instead of
passing each piece of information separately by-value.
This is in preparation for returning information about multiple pointer
operands from a single instruction.
A side effect is that, instead of repeatedly generating the same
information through isInterestingMemoryAccess(), it is now simply collected
once and then passed around; that's probably more efficient.
HWAddressSanitizer has a bunch of copypasted code from AddressSanitizer,
so these changes have to be duplicated.
This is patch 3/4 of a patch series:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77616 [PATCH 1/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor ClDebug{Min,Max} handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77617 [PATCH 2/4] [AddressSanitizer] Split out memory intrinsic handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77618 [PATCH 3/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor: Permit >1 interesting operands per instruction
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77619 [PATCH 4/4] [AddressSanitizer] Instrument byval call arguments
[glider: renamed llvm::InterestingMemoryOperand::Type to OpType to fix
GCC compilation]
Reviewers: kcc, glider
Reviewed By: glider
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77618
Summary:
In both AddressSanitizer and HWAddressSanitizer, we first collect
instructions whose operands should be instrumented and memory intrinsics,
then instrument them. Both during collection and when inserting
instrumentation, they are handled separately.
Collect them separately and instrument them separately. This is a bit
more straightforward, and prepares for collecting operands instead of
instructions in a future patch.
This is patch 2/4 of a patch series:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77616 [PATCH 1/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor ClDebug{Min,Max} handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77617 [PATCH 2/4] [AddressSanitizer] Split out memory intrinsic handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77618 [PATCH 3/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor: Permit >1 interesting operands per instruction
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77619 [PATCH 4/4] [AddressSanitizer] Instrument byval call arguments
Reviewers: kcc, glider
Reviewed By: glider
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77617
Summary:
A following commit will split the loop over ToInstrument into two.
To avoid having to duplicate the condition for suppressing instrumentation
sites based on ClDebug{Min,Max}, refactor it out into a new function.
While we're at it, we can also avoid the indirection through
NumInstrumented for setting FunctionModified.
This is patch 1/4 of a patch series:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77616 [PATCH 1/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor ClDebug{Min,Max} handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77617 [PATCH 2/4] [AddressSanitizer] Split out memory intrinsic handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77618 [PATCH 3/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor: Permit >1 interesting operands per instruction
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77619 [PATCH 4/4] [AddressSanitizer] Instrument byval call arguments
Reviewers: kcc, glider
Reviewed By: glider
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77616
I couldn't make arc land the changes properly, for some reason they all got
squashed. Reverting them now to land cleanly.
Summary: This reverts commit cfb5f89b62f885a7a50b1dd49a0cb5532fc75176.
Reviewers: kcc, thejh
Subscribers:
Summary:
A following commit will split the loop over ToInstrument into two.
To avoid having to duplicate the condition for suppressing instrumentation
sites based on ClDebug{Min,Max}, refactor it out into a new function.
While we're at it, we can also avoid the indirection through
NumInstrumented for setting FunctionModified.
This is patch 1/4 of a patch series:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77616 [PATCH 1/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor ClDebug{Min,Max} handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77617 [PATCH 2/4] [AddressSanitizer] Split out memory intrinsic handling
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77618 [PATCH 3/4] [AddressSanitizer] Refactor: Permit >1 interesting operands per instruction
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77619 [PATCH 4/4] [AddressSanitizer] Instrument byval call arguments
Reviewers: kcc, glider
Reviewed By: glider
Subscribers: jfb, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77616
of a struct that cover the whole struct
This can happen when the rest of the
members of are zero length. Following
the same pattern applied to the SROA
pass in:
d7f6f1636d53c3e2faf55cdf20fbb44a1a149df1
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45335
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78720
Summary: There is no need to create BPI explicitly. It should be requested through AM in a normal way.
Reviewers: skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79080
Summary: Currenlty BPI unconditionally creates post dominator tree each time. While this is not incorrect we can save compile time by reusing existing post dominator tree (when it's valid) provided by analysis manager.
Reviewers: skatkov, taewookoh, yrouban
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78987
Summary:
Renamed 'CS' to 'CB', and, in one case, to a more specific name to avoid
naming collision with outer scope (a maintainability/readability reason,
not correctness)
Also updated comments.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, jdoerfert
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79101
