This commit explicitly specifies the matching mode (C library function,
any non-method function, or C++ method) for the `CallDescription`s
constructed in the iterator/container checkers.
This change won't cause major functional changes, but isn't NFC because
it ensures that e.g. call descriptions for a non-method function won't
accidentally match a method that has the same name.
Separate commits will perform (or have already performed) this change in
other checkers. My goal is to ensure that the call description mode is
always explicitly specified and eliminate (or strongly restrict) the
vague "may be either a method or a simple function" mode that's the
current default.
I'm handling the iterator checkers in this separate commit because
they're infamously complex; but I don't expect any trouble because this
transition doesn't interact with the "central" logic of iterator
handling.
`CallDescriptions` deserve its own translation unit.
This patch simply moves the corresponding parts.
Also includes the `CallDescription.h` where it's necessary.
Reviewed By: martong, xazax.hun, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113587
Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271
STL Algorithms are usually implemented in a tricky for performance
reasons which is too complicated for the analyzer. Furthermore inlining
them is costly. Instead of inlining we should model their behavior
according to the specifications.
This patch is the first step towards STL Algorithm modeling. It models
all the `find()`-like functions in a simple way: the result is either
found or not. In the future it can be extended to only return success if
container modeling is also extended in a way the it keeps track of
trivial insertions and deletions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70818
