Introduce isDesirableCastOp() which determines whether IR builder
and constant folding should produce constant expressions for a
given cast type. This mirrors what we do for binary operators.
Mark zext/sext as undesirable, which prevents most creations of such
constant expressions. This is still somewhat incomplete and there
are a few more places that can create zext/sext expressions.
This is part of the work for
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
The reason for the odd result in the constantexpr-fneg.c test is
that initially the "a[]" global is created with an [0 x i32] type,
at which point the icmp expression cannot be folded. Later it is
replaced with an [1 x i32] global and the icmp gets folded away.
But at that point we no longer fold the zext.
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the tenth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
Currently ConstantExpr::getWithOperands does not handle FNeg and
subsequently treats FNeg as binary operator, leading to an assertion
failure or segmentation fault if built without assertions.
Originally I reproduced this with llvm-dis on a bitcode file, which I
unfortunately cannot share and also cannot really reduce.
But PR45426 describes the same issue and has a reproducer with Clang, so
I'll go with that.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86274
