Resolves: #70930 (and probably latest comments from clangd/clangd#251)
by fixing racing for the shared DiagStorage value which caused messing with args inside the storage and then formatting the following message with getArgSInt(1) == 2:
def err_module_odr_violation_function : Error<
"%q0 has different definitions in different modules; "
"%select{definition in module '%2'|defined here}1 "
"first difference is "
which causes HandleSelectModifier to go beyond the ArgumentLen so the recursive call to FormatDiagnostic was made with DiagStr > DiagEnd that leads to infinite while (DiagStr != DiagEnd).
The Main Idea:
Reuse the existing DiagStorageAllocator logic to make all DiagnosticBuilders having independent states.
Also, encapsulating the rest of state (e.g. ID and Loc) into DiagnosticBuilder.
The last attempt failed -
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108187#issuecomment-2353122096
so was reverted - #108838
Resolves: #70930 (and probably latest comments from
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/251)
by fixing racing for the shared `DiagStorage` value which caused messing
with args inside the storage and then formatting the following message
with `getArgSInt(1)` == 2:
```
def err_module_odr_violation_function : Error<
"%q0 has different definitions in different modules; "
"%select{definition in module '%2'|defined here}1 "
"first difference is "
```
which causes `HandleSelectModifier` to go beyond the `ArgumentLen` so
the recursive call to `FormatDiagnostic` was made with `DiagStr` >
`DiagEnd` that leads to infinite `while (DiagStr != DiagEnd)`.
**The Main Idea:**
Reuse the existing `DiagStorageAllocator` logic to make all
`DiagnosticBuilder`s having independent states.
Also, encapsulating the rest of state (e.g. ID and Loc) into
`DiagnosticBuilder`.
**TODO (if it will be requested by reviewer):**
- [x] add a test (I have no idea how to turn a whole bunch of my
proprietary code which leads `clangd` to OOM into a small public
example.. probably I must try using
[this](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70930#issuecomment-2209872975)
instead)
- [x] [`Diag.CurDiagID !=
diag::fatal_too_many_errors`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108187#pullrequestreview-2296395489)
- [ ] ? get rid of `DiagStorageAllocator` at all and make
`DiagnosticBuilder` having they own `DiagnosticStorage` coz it seems
pretty small so should fit the stack for short-living
`DiagnosticBuilder` instances
Generate nuw GEPs for struct member accesses, as inbounds + non-negative
implies nuw.
Regression tests are updated using update scripts where possible, and by
find + replace where not.
Claiming a mismatch is always in a precompiled header is wrong and
misleading as a mismatch can happen in any provided AST file. Emitting a
path for a file with a problem allows to disambiguate between multiple
input files.
Use generic term "AST file" because we don't always know a kind of the
provided file (for example, see `ASTReader::readASTFileControlBlock`).
rdar://65005546
Given "loop" construct, clang will try to treat it as "for",
"distribute" or "simd", depending on either the implied binding, or the
bind clause if present. This patch moves the code that performs this
construct remapping from sema to codegen.
For a "loop" construct without a bind clause, this patch will create an
implicit bind clause based on implied binding to simplify further
analysis.
During codegen the function `EmitOMPGenericLoopDirective` (i.e. "loop")
will invoke the "emit" functions for "for", "distribute" or "simd",
depending on the bind clause.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev@gmx.com>
For the purpose of preprocessing and declarations in header files,
ensure clang accepts SVE types for both device and host targets.
Co-authored-by: Sander De Smalen <sander.desmalen@arm.com>
Given the following invalid code,
```cpp
template <class T>
struct S {
T *a;
};
S s = {1};
```
we produce such diagnostics currently:
```
<source>:2:8: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'S<T>' against 'int'
2 | struct S {
| ^
<source>:2:8: note: candidate template ignored: could not match 'T *' against 'int'
```
Which I think is confusing because there's no `S<T>` nor `T *` at the
location it points to. This is because we're deducing the initializer
against implicitly generated deduction guides, and their source
locations just point to the corresponding `RecordDecl`. Hence the
misleading notes.
This patch alleviates the issue by adding extra notes demonstrating
which implicit deduction guide we're deducing against. In other words,
in addition to the note of `could not match 'T *' against 'int'`, we
would also say the implicit deduction guide we're trying to use:
`template <class T> S(T *) -> S<T>`, which looks clearer IMO.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sirraide <aeternalmail@gmail.com>
According to [temp.expl.spec] p2:
> The declaration in an _explicit-specialization_ shall not be an
_export-declaration_. An explicit specialization shall not use a
_storage-class-specifier_ other than `thread_local`.
Clang partially implements this, but a number of issues exist:
1. We don't diagnose class scope explicit specializations of variable
templates with _storage-class-specifiers_, e.g.
```
struct A
{
template<typename T>
static constexpr int x = 0;
template<>
static constexpr int x<void> = 1; // ill-formed, but clang accepts
};
````
2. We incorrectly reject class scope explicit specializations of
variable templates when `static` is not used, e.g.
```
struct A
{
template<typename T>
static constexpr int x = 0;
template<>
constexpr int x<void> = 1; // error: non-static data member cannot be
constexpr; did you intend to make it static?
};
````
3. We don't diagnose dependent class scope explicit specializations of
function templates with storage class specifiers, e.g.
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
template<typename U>
static void f();
template<>
static void f<int>(); // ill-formed, but clang accepts
};
````
This patch addresses these issues as follows:
- # 1 is fixed by issuing a diagnostic when an explicit
specialization of a variable template has storage class specifier
- # 2 is fixed by considering any non-function declaration with any
template parameter lists at class scope to be a static data member. This
also allows for better error recovery (it's more likely the user
intended to declare a variable template than a "field template").
- # 3 is fixed by checking whether a function template explicit
specialization has a storage class specifier even when the primary
template is not yet known.
One thing to note is that it would be far simpler to diagnose this when
parsing the _decl-specifier-seq_, but such an implementation would
necessitate a refactor of `ParsedTemplateInfo` which I believe to be
outside the scope of this patch.
The commit adds serialization and de-serialization implementations for
the stored regions. Basically, the serialized representation of the
regions of a PP is a (ordered) sequence of source location encodings.
For de-serialization, regions from loaded files are stored by their ASTs.
When later one queries if a loaded location L is in an opt-out
region, PP looks up the regions of the loaded AST where L is at.
(Background if helps: a pair of `#pragma clang unsafe_buffer_usage begin/end` pragmas marks a
warning-opt-out region. The begin and end locations (opt-out regions)
are stored in preprocessor instances (PP) and will be queried by the
`-Wunsafe-buffer-usage` analyzer.)
The reported issue at upstream: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90501
rdar://124035402
This makes codegen for array initialization simpler in two ways:
1. Drop the zero-index GEP at the start, which is no longer needed with
opaque pointers.
2. Emit GEPs directly to the correct element, instead of having a long
chain of +1 GEPs. This is more canonical, and also avoids regressions in
unoptimized builds from #93823.
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921.
The original commit cf5a8b4 was reverted by 2e5035a due to some
failures (see #83774).
Fixes#60061
We previously doubled the id-expression expansion, even when the pack
was expanded to empty. The previous condition for determining whether we
should expand couldn't distinguish between cases where 'the expansion
was previously postponed' and 'the expansion occurred but resulted in
emptiness.'
In the latter scenario, we crash because we have not been examining the
current lambda's parent local instantiation scope since
[D98068](https://reviews.llvm.org/D98068): Any Decls instantiated in the
parent scope are not visible to the generic lambda, and thus any attempt
of looking for instantiated Decls in the lambda is capped to the current
Lambda's LIS.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/92230
After https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85605 ([clang] Set
correct FPOptions if attribute 'optnone' presents) the current FP
options in Sema are saved during parsing function because Sema can
modify them if optnone is present. However they were saved too late, it
caused fails in some cases when precompiled headers are used. This patch
moves the storing earlier.
These test cases are testing features not available when either
targeting the s390x-ibm-zos target or use tools/features not available
on the z/OS operating system. In a couple cases the lit test had a
number of subtests with one or two that aren't supported on z/OS. Rather
than mark the entire test as unsupported I split out the unsupported
tests into a separate test case.
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921.
Fixes#60061
This fixes some problems wrt dependence of captures in lambdas with
an explicit object parameter.
[temp.dep.expr] states that
> An id-expression is type-dependent if [...] its terminal name is
> - associated by name lookup with an entity captured by copy
> ([expr.prim.lambda.capture]) in a lambda-expression that has
> an explicit object parameter whose type is dependent [dcl.fct].
There were several issues with our implementation of this:
1. we were treating by-reference captures as dependent rather than
by-value captures;
2. tree transform wasn't checking whether referring to such a
by-value capture should make a DRE dependent;
3. when checking whether a DRE refers to such a by-value capture, we
were only looking at the immediately enclosing lambda, and not
at any parent lambdas;
4. we also forgot to check for implicit by-value captures;
5. lastly, we were attempting to determine whether a lambda has an
explicit object parameter by checking the `LambdaScopeInfo`'s
`ExplicitObjectParameter`, but it seems that that simply wasn't
set (yet) by the time we got to the check.
All of these should be fixed now.
This fixes#70604, #79754, #84163, #84425, #86054, #86398, and #86399.
In `-fbounds-safety`, bounds annotations are considered type attributes
rather than declaration attributes. Constructing them as type attributes
allows us to extend the attribute to apply nested pointers, which is
essential to annotate functions that involve out parameters: `void
foo(int *__counted_by(*out_count) *out_buf, int *out_count)`.
We introduce a new sugar type to support bounds annotated types,
`CountAttributedType`. In order to maintain extra data (the bounds
expression and the dependent declaration information) that is not
trackable in `AttributedType` we create a new type dedicate to this
functionality.
This patch also extends the parsing logic to parse the `counted_by`
argument as an expression, which will allow us to extend the model to
support arguments beyond an identifier, e.g., `__counted_by(n + m)` in
the future as specified by `-fbounds-safety`.
This also adjusts `__bdos` and array-bounds sanitizer code that already
uses `CountedByAttr` to check `CountAttributedType` instead to get the
field referred to by the attribute.
Implements https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2662R3.pdf
The feature is exposed as an extension in older language modes.
Mangling is not yet supported and that is something we will have to do before release.
A previous commit (82f75ed) made clang ignore .gch files that were not
Clang AST files. This broke `-gmodules`, which embeds the Clang AST into
an object file containing debug info.
This changes the probing to detect any file format recognized by
`llvm::identify_magic()` as potentially containing a Clang AST.
Previous PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69204
Changes uploaded to the phabricator on Dec 16th are lost because the
phabricator is down. Hence re-uploading it to the github.com.
Changes to be committed:
modified: clang/include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
modified: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
modified: clang/test/OpenMP/generic_loop_ast_print.cpp
modified: clang/test/OpenMP/loop_bind_messages.cpp
modified: clang/test/PCH/pragma-loop.cpp
---------
Co-authored-by: Sunil Kuravinakop
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76443
Previously we assume the bits of the function scope index of ParmVarDecl
won't exceed 8. But this is a misreading. See the implementation of
`ParmVarDecl::getParameterIndex()`, which may
exceed the size of the normal bitfield. So it may be better to not
pack these bits.
This patch deprecates `module.map` in favor of `module.modulemap`, which
has been the preferred form since 2014. The eventual goal is to remove
support for `module.map` to reduce the number of stats Clang needs to do
while searching for module map files.
This patch touches a lot of files, but the majority of them are just
renaming tests or references to the file in comments or documentation.
The relevant files are:
* lib/Lex/HeaderSearch.cpp
* include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
* include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td
Despite CWG2497 not being resolved, it is reasonable to expect the
following code to compile (and which is supported by other compilers)
```cpp
template<typename T> constexpr T f();
constexpr int g() { return f<int>(); } // #1
template<typename T> constexpr T f() { return 123; }
int k[g()];
// #2
```
To that end, we eagerly instantiate all referenced specializations of
constexpr functions when they are defined.
We maintain a map of (pattern, [instantiations]) independent of
`PendingInstantiations` to avoid having to iterate that list after each
function definition.
We should apply the same logic to constexpr variables, but I wanted to
keep the PR small.
Fixes#73232
* Mark SVE ACLE types as substitution candidates.
* Change mangling of svbfloat16_t from __SVBFloat16_t to
__SVBfloat16_t.
https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst
This is an ABI break with the old behaviour available via
"-fclang-abi-compat=17".
Instead of deprecating the "gch probe" as in
f726da1193baf51e0a66453cc32dcffb8a9121d4, this makes clang ignore files
which are not clang pch files (See discussion on PR #67084).
This fixes the issues mentioned in the former patch, with GCC-generated
.gch files getting in the way when using clang, while maintaining the
probing behavior for builds which rely on that.
`-include a.h` probes `a.h.pch` and `a.h.gch`, if not found, falls back to
`a.h`. `.pch` is the preferred extension name. Probing .gch is supposed to
provide compatibility with build systems that do
```
clang -x c-header a.h -o out/a.h.gch
clang -include out/a.h -c a.c # out/a.h.gch is present while out/a.h is absent
```
(not sure what projects actually do this with Clang)
But it can often get in the way [^0][^1][^2] when GCC and Clang are mixed as the file
format is incompatible with GCC's. Let's deprecate .gch probing.
Some tests using `-include` are switched to `.pch`.
`test/PCH/pch-dir.c` shows the -Wdeprecated warning.
[^0]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/how-to-have-clang-ignore-gch-directories/51835
[^1]: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-22427
[^2]: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/22081
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
Reviewed By: rnk, aaron.ballman, #libc, ldionne, Mordante, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
This reverts commit f2583f3acf596cc545c8c0e3cb28e712f4ebf21b.
There is a large body of non-conforming C-like code using format strings
like this:
#define PRIuS "zu"
void h(size_t foo, size_t bar) {
printf("foo is %"PRIuS", bar is %"PRIuS, foo, bar);
}
Rejecting this code would be very disruptive. We could decide to do
that, but it's sufficiently disruptive that I think it requires
gathering more community consensus with an RFC, and Aaron indicated [1]
it's OK to revert for now so continuous testing systems can see past
this issue while we decide what to do.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156#4607717
Commit 98390ccb80569e8fbb20e6c996b4b8cff87fbec6 fixed late template
instantiation by clearing FP pragma stack before instantiation. This
solution was based on the assumptions:
- FP pragma stack is not used anymore and it is safe to clear it,
- Default FP options are determined by command line options.
Both the assumptions are wrong. When compilation produces precompiled
header file, state of the stack is serialized and then restored when the
precompiled header is used. Delayed template parsing occurs at the end
of translation unit but before serialization, so clearing FP pragma
stack effects serialized representation. When the precompiled file is
loaded, some conditions can be broken and clang crashed, it was
described in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63704. The
crash was observed only in few cases, on most buildbots it was absent.
The violation of expected conditions was caused by violation of the
second assumption. FPEvalMethod can be modified by target, so it is not
possible to deduce it from LangOptions only. So default FP state read
from precompiled header was different from the state in the initialized
Sema, and this was the crash reason.
Only two targets do such modification of default FP options, these are
i386 and AIX. so the problem was hard to reproduce.
Delayed template parsing should occur with empty pragma stack, so it
must be cleared before the instantiation, but the stack now is saved
and restored after the instantiation is done.
This change should fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63704.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155380
