The only change is a fix for the "register" iterator test to not rely on
particular register names.
I mistook where the artificial "pc" register is generated. It isn't
added to the register list or the register sets (except on arm where
that's the name of the actual register), so I can't use it in this test.
I instead just assert that the "register" generator produces the same
list as flattening the register sets from "registers".
This reverts commit 9f14914753599f3879e4c273191959e2f1b3632c.
The code returned lldb.SBValue() when you passed in an unrecognized
register name. But referring to "lldb" is apparently not legal within
the module.
I changed this to just return SBValue(), but then this construct:
(lldb) script
>>> for reg_set in lldb.target.process.thread[0].frames[0].register
... print(reg)
Runs forever printing "No Value". The __getitem__(key) gets called with
a monotonically increasing by 1 series of integers. I don't know why
Python decided the class we defined should have a generator that returns
positive integers in order, but we can add a more useful one here by
returning an iterator over the flattened list of registers.
Note, the not very aptly named "SBFrame.registers" is an iterator over
register sets, not registers, so the two are not redundant.
This patch re-lands f0731d5b61ba with more fixes and improvements.
First, this patch removes `__eq__` implementations from classes that
didn't implemented `operator!=` on the C++ implementation.
This patch removes sphinx document generation for special members such
as `__len__`, since there is no straightforward way to skip class that
don't implement them. We also don't want to introduce a change in
behavior by implementing artifical special members for classes that are
missing them.
Finally, this patch improve the ergonomics of some classes by
implementing special members where it makes sense, i.e. `hex(SBFrame)`
is equivalent to `SBFrame.GetPC()`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159017
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
This reverts 3 commit:
- f0731d5b61ba798e6d5a63a92d9228010e5a3b50.
- 8e0a087571a31057bb98939e3ada73227bed83c7.
- f2f5d6fb8d53bc4bd93a3d4e110134ed017b636f.
This changes were introduced to silence the warnings that are printed
when generating the lldb module documentation for the website but it
changed the python bindings and causes test failures on the macos bot:
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/lldb-cmake/59438/
We will have to consider other options to silence these warnings.
This reverts commit 18f1c1ace7a6099f3e8e56cf4b81aa0f64a7dd23 and fix the
build failure issues introduced because of the `STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE`
swig macros.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159017
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
This patch does various things to silence the warnings that show up when
generating the website documentation.
First, this patch adds the missing definition for special member methods
in every SBAPI class. If the class cannot implement one of the special
member method, we just define it as a null operation (pass).
This should fix the following warnings:
```
WARNING: missing attribute __int__ in object lldb.SB*
WARNING: missing attribute __len__ in object lldb.SB*
WARNING: missing attribute __hex__ in object lldb.SB*
WARNING: missing attribute __oct__ in object lldb.SB*
WARNING: missing attribute __iter__ in object lldb.SB*
```
Then, it un-skips the various `static` methods that we didn't generate
the methods for, since it's not necessary thanks to the automod-api module.
Finally, this comments out the `_static` directory in the sphinx config,
since we don't need it anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159017
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
Instead of maintaining separate swig interface files, we can use the API
headers directly. They implement the exact same C++ APIs and we can
conditionally include the python extensions as needed. To remove the
swig extensions from the API headers when building the LLDB
framework, we can use the unifdef tool when it is available. Otherwise
we just copy them as-is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142926
