This generalizes DWARFTypePrinter class to a template class so that it
can be reused for lldb's DWARFDIE type.
This is a split of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90008. The
difference is that this doesn't have `Visitor` template parameter which
can be added later if necessary.
… (#99444)
The previous version introduced a bug (caught by cross-project tests).
Explicit signature resolution is still necessary when one wants to
access the children (not attributes) of a given DIE.
The new version keeps just the findRecursively extension, and reverts
all the DWARFTypePrinter modifications.
…_sig8
Splitting from #99495.
I've extended the type unit test case to feature more kinds of
references, including the gcc-style DW_AT_type[DW_FORM_ref_sig8]
reference, which this patch fixes.
findRecursively follows DW_AT_specification and DW_AT_abstract_origin
references, but not DW_AT_signature. As far as I can tell, there is no
fundamental difference between these attributes that would make this
behavior desirable, and this just seems like a consequence of the fact
that this attribute is newer. This patch aims to change that.
The motivation is some code in lldb, which assumes that it can construct
a qualified name of a type by just walking the parent chain and looking
at the name attribute. This works for "regular" debug info, even when
some of the DIEs are just forward declarations, but it breaks in the
presence of type units, because of the need to explicitly resolve the
signature reference.
While LLDB does not use the llvm's DWARFDie class (yet?), this seems
like a very important change in the overall API, and any divergence here
would complicate eventual reunification, which is why I am making the
change in the llvm API first. However, putting lldb aside, I think this
change is beneficial in llvm on its own, as it allows us to remove the
explicit DW_AT_signature resolution in the DWARFTypePrinter.
The result of the function cannot be correctly interpreted without
knowing the precise form type (a type signature needs to be looked up
very differently from a supplementary debug info reference). The
function sort of worked because the two reference types (unit-relative
and section-relative) that can be handled uniformly are also the most
common types of references, but this setup made it easy to write code
which does not support other kinds of reference (and if one tried to
support them, the result didn't look pretty --
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97423/files#r1676217081).
The split is based on the reference type classification from DWARFv5
(Section 7.5.5 Classes and Forms), and it should enable uniform (if
slightly more verbose) hadling. Note that this only affects users which
want more control of how (or if) the references are resolved. Users
which just want to access the referenced DIE can use the higher level
API (DWARFDie::GetAttributeValueAsReferencedDie) which returns (or will
return after #97423 is merged) the correct die for all reference types
(except for supplementary references, which we don't support right now).
Part 1 of fix for issue
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54624
Split from PR #87623. Clang front end changes to follow.
Use DICompositeType to represent the template alias, using its extraData
field as a tuple of DITemplateParameter to describe the template
parameters.
Added template-alias.ll - Check DWARF emission.
Modified frame-types.s - Check llvm-symbolizer understands the DIE.
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This patch had to be reverted because on gcc 7.5.0 we see an error converting from std::unique_ptr<MCRegisterInfo> to Expected<std::unique_ptr<MCRegisterInfo>> as the return type for the function createRegInfo. This has now been fixed.
The DWARF spec says:
Any debugging information entry representing the declaration of an object,
module, subprogram or type may have DW_AT_decl_file, DW_AT_decl_line and
DW_AT_decl_column attributes, each of whose value is an unsigned integer
^^^^^^^^
constant.
If however, a producer happens to emit DW_AT_decl_file /
DW_AT_decl_line using a signed integer form, llvm-dwarfdump crashes,
like so:
(... snip ...)
0x000000b4: DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name ("test_struct")
DW_AT_byte_size (136)
DW_AT_decl_file (llvm-dwarfdump: (... snip ...)/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:197: T& llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<T, true>::getValue() &
[with T = long unsigned int]: Assertion `hasVal' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: /opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump ./testsuite/outputs/gdb.rocm/lane-pc-vega20/lane-pc-vega20-kernel.so
#0 0x000055cc8e78315f PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) Signals.cpp:0:0
#1 0x000055cc8e780d3d SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0
#2 0x00007f8f2cae8420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420)
#3 0x00007f8f2c58d00b raise /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1
#4 0x00007f8f2c56c859 abort /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/stdlib/abort.c:81:7
#5 0x00007f8f2c56c729 get_sysdep_segment_value /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:509:8
#6 0x00007f8f2c56c729 _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:970:34
#7 0x00007f8f2c57dfd6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x33fd6)
#8 0x000055cc8e58ceb9 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2e0eb9)
#9 0x000055cc8e58bec3 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2dfec3)
#10 0x000055cc8e5b28a3 llvm::DWARFCompileUnit::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::DIDumpOptions) (.part.21) DWARFCompileUnit.cpp:0:0
Likewise with DW_AT_call_file / DW_AT_call_line.
The problem is that the code in llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp
dumping these attributes assumes that
FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() returns an armed optional. If in
debug mode, we get an assertion line the above. If in release mode,
and asserts are compiled out, then we proceed as if the optional had a
value, running into undefined behavior, printing whatever random
value.
Fix this by checking whether the optional returned by
FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() has a value, like done in other
places.
In addition, DWARFVerifier.cpp is validating DW_AT_call_file /
DW_AT_decl_file, but not AT_call_line / DW_AT_decl_line. This commit
fixes that too.
The llvm-dwarfdump/X86/verify_file_encoding.yaml testcase is extended
to cover these cases. Current llvm-dwarfdump crashes running the
newly-extended test.
"make check-llvm-tools-llvm-dwarfdump" shows no regressions, on x86-64
GNU/Linux.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129392
Running iwyu-diff on LLVM codebase since fb67d683db46dfd88da09d99 detected a few
regressions, fixing them.
The impact on preprocessed output is negligible: -4k lines.
Type attributes are currently printed as:
DW_AT_type (<address> "<name>")
For example:
DW_AT_type (0x00000086 "double")
However, containing_type attributes omit the name, for example:
DW_AT_containing_type (0x00000086)
In order to make the dwarf dumps easier to read, and to have consistency
between the type-like attributes, this commit changes the way
DW_AT_containing_type is printed so that it includes the name of the
type it refers to:
DW_AT_containing_type (0x00000086 "double")
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127078
Currently, llvm-symbolizer doesn't like to parse .debug_info in order to
show the line info for global variables. addr2line does this. In the
future, I'm looking to migrate AddressSanitizer off of internal metadata
over to using debuginfo, and this is predicated on being able to get the
line info for global variables.
This patch adds the requisite support for getting the line info from the
.debug_info section for symbolizing global variables. This only happens
when you ask for a global variable to be symbolized as data.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123538
Since enumerators may not be available in every translation unit they
can't be reliably used to name entities. (this also makes simplified
template name roundtripping infeasible - since the expected name could
only be rebuilt if the enumeration definition could be found (or only if
it couldn't be found, depending on the context of the original name))
As usual with that header cleanup series, some implicit dependencies now need to
be explicit:
llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFContext.h no longer includes:
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFAcceleratorTable.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFCompileUnit.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDebugAbbrev.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDebugAranges.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDebugFrame.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDebugLoc.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDebugMacro.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFGdbIndex.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFSection.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFTypeUnit.h"
- "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFUnitIndex.h"
Plus llvm/Support/Errc.h not included by a bunch of llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARF*.h files
Preprocessed lines to build llvm on my setup:
after: 1065629059
before: 1066621848
Which is a great diff!
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119723
Most notably,
llvm/Object/Binary.h no longer includes llvm/Support/MemoryBuffer.h
llvm/Object/MachOUniversal*.h no longer include llvm/Object/Archive.h
llvm/Object/TapiUniversal.h no longer includes llvm/Object/TapiFile.h
llvm-project preprocessed size:
before: 1068185081
after: 1068324320
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119457
This patch creates functions which might be used to dump types.
This functionality was already implemented by DWARFTypePrinter.
Now it could be reused. It will help D96035, which uses DWARFTypePrinter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117134
Otherwise these look a lot like actual templates (they have a name and
they have template parameters) but they don't participate in naming
(this doesn't come up in practice because a template parameter pack DIE
is never referenced from another DIE (so we don't do full name
rebuilding for it) or the subject of simplified template name rebuilding
(never has the _STN prefix)) - it could be tested with some hand crafted
DWARF but doesn't seem important/useful to do so.
This change is just for performance - to avoid trying to parse more
DIEs, etc, when it's not needed when computing the name in the DWARF
verifier.
It is often useful to know which die is the parent of the current die.
This patch adds information about parent offset into the dump:
0x0000000b: DW_TAG_compile_unit
DW_AT_producer ("by_hand")
0x00000014: DW_TAG_base_type (0x0000000b) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<
DW_AT_name ("int")
Now it is easy to see which die is the parent of the current die.
This patch makes that behaviour to be default.
We can make it to be opt-in if neccessary.
This functionality differs from already existed "--show-parents"
in that sence that parent information is shown for all dies and
only link to the immediate parent is shown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113406
Matching a recent clang change I've made, now 'int[3]' is formatted
without the space between the type and array bound. This commit updates
libDebugInfoDWARF/llvm-dwarfdump to match that formatting.
Actually we can, for now, remove the explicit "operator" handling
entirely - since clang currently won't try to flag any of these as
rebuildable. That seems like a reasonable state for now, but it could be
narrowed down to only apply to conversion operators, most likely - but
would need more nuance for op> and op>> since they would be incorrectly
flagged as already having their template arguments (due to the trailing
'>').
