This patch enables support for cloning in indirect callsites.
This is done by synthesizing callsite records for each virtual call
target from the profile metadata. In the thin link all the synthesized
records for a particular indirect callsite initially share the same
context node, but support is added to partition the callsites and
outgoing edges based on the callee function, creating a separate node
for each target.
In the LTO backend, when cloning is needed we first perform indirect
call promotion, then change the target of the new direct call to the
desired clone.
Note this is ThinLTO-specific, since for regular LTO indirect call
promotion should have already occurred.
It is now translated to `<1 x i64>`, which allows the removal of a bunch
of special casing.
This _incompatibly_ changes the ABI of any LLVM IR function with
`x86_mmx` arguments or returns: instead of passing in mmx registers,
they will now be passed via integer registers. However, the real-world
incompatibility caused by this is expected to be minimal, because Clang
never uses the x86_mmx type -- it lowers `__m64` to either `<1 x i64>`
or `double`, depending on ABI.
This change does _not_ eliminate the SelectionDAG `MVT::x86mmx` type.
That type simply no longer corresponds to an IR type, and is used only
by MMX intrinsics and inline-asm operands.
Because SelectionDAGBuilder only knows how to generate the
operands/results of intrinsics based on the IR type, it thus now
generates the intrinsics with the type MVT::v1i64, instead of
MVT::x86mmx. We need to fix this before the DAG LegalizeTypes, and thus
have the X86 backend fix them up in DAGCombine. (This may be a
short-lived hack, if all the MMX intrinsics can be removed in upcoming
changes.)
Works towards issue #98272.
Extend `DIBasicType` and `DISubroutineType` with additional field
`annotations`, e.g. as below:
```
!5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed, annotations: !6)
!6 = !{!7}
!7 = !{!"btf:type_tag", !"tag1"}
```
The field would be used by BPF backend to generate DWARF attributes
corresponding to `btf_type_tag` type attributes, e.g.:
```
0x00000029: DW_TAG_base_type
DW_AT_name ("int")
DW_AT_encoding (DW_ATE_signed)
DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)
0x0000002d: DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation
DW_AT_name ("btf:type_tag")
DW_AT_const_value ("tag1")
```
Such DWARF entries would be used to generate BTF definitions by tools
like [pahole](https://github.com/acmel/dwarves).
Note: similar fields with similar purposes are already present in
DIDerivedType and DICompositeType.
Currently "btf_type_tag" attributes are represented in debug information
as 'annotations' fields in DIDerivedType with DW_TAG_pointer_type tag.
The annotation on a pointer corresponds to pointee having the attributes
in the final BTF.
The discussion in
[thread](https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87r0w9jjoq.fsf@oracle.com/) came to
conclusion, that such annotations should apply to the annotated type
itself. Hence the necessity to extend `DIBasicType` & `DISubroutineType`
types with 'annotations' field to represent cases like below:
```
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("foo"))) bar;
```
This was previously tracked as differential revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143966
Adds a calling convention for calls to the `__arm_get_current_vg`
support
routine, which preserves X1-X15, X19-X29, SP, Z0-Z31 & P0-P15.
See https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/pull/263
Remove support for the icmp and fcmp constant expressions.
This is part of:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179
As usual, many of the updated tests will no longer test what they were
originally intended to -- this is hard to preserve when constant
expressions get removed, and in many cases just impossible as the
existence of a specific kind of constant expression was the cause of the
issue in the first place.
This defines a new kind of IR Constant that represents a ptrauth signed
pointer, as used in AArch64 PAuth.
It allows representing most kinds of signed pointer constants used thus
far in the llvm ptrauth implementations, notably those used in the
Darwin and ELF ABIs being implemented for c/c++. These signed pointer
constants are then lowered to ELF/MachO relocations.
These can be simply thought of as a constant `llvm.ptrauth.sign`, with
the interesting addition of discriminator computation: the `ptrauth`
constant can also represent a combined blend, when both address and
integer discriminator operands are used. Both operands are otherwise
optional, with default values 0/null.
This implements the `nusw` and `nuw` flags for `getelementptr` as
proposed at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-nusw-and-nuw-flags-for-getelementptr/78672.
The three possible flags are encapsulated in the new `GEPNoWrapFlags`
class. Currently this class has a ctor from bool, interpreted as the
InBounds flag. This ctor should be removed in the future, as code gets
migrated to handle all flags.
There are a few places annotated with `TODO(gep_nowrap)`, where I've had
to touch code but opted to not infer or precisely preserve the new
flags, so as to keep this as NFC as possible and make sure any changes
of that kind get test coverage when they are made.
The motivating use case is to support import the function declaration
across modules to construct call graph edges for indirect calls [1]
when importing the function definition costs too much compile time
(e.g., the function is too large has no `noinline` attribute).
1. Currently, when the compiled IR module doesn't have a function
definition but its postlink combined summary contains the function
summary or a global alias summary with this function as aliasee, the
function definition will be imported from source module by IRMover. The
implementation is in FunctionImporter::importFunctions [2]
2. In order for FunctionImporter to import a declaration of a function,
both function summary and alias summary need to carry the def / decl
state. Specifically, all existing summary fields doesn't differ across
import modules, but the def / decl state of is decided by
`<ImportModule, Function>`.
This change encodes the def/decl state in `GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags`.
In the subsequent changes
1. The indexing step `computeImportForModule` [3]
will compute the set of definitions and the set of declarations for each
module, and passing on the information to bitcode writer.
2. Bitcode writer will look up the def/decl state and sets the state
when it writes out the flag value. This is demonstrated in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87600
3. Function importer will read the def/decl state when reading the
combined summary to figure out two sets of global values, and IRMover
will be updated to import the declaration (aka linkGlobalValuePrototype [4])
into the destination module.
- The next change is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87600
[1] mentioned in rfc https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-for-better-call-graph-sort-build-a-more-complete-call-graph-by-adding-more-indirect-call-edges/74029#support-cross-module-function-declaration-import-5
[2] 3b337242ee/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionImport.cpp (L1608-L1764)
[3] 3b337242ee/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionImport.cpp (L856)
[4] 3b337242ee/llvm/lib/Linker/IRMover.cpp (L605)
[RISCV] RISCV vector calling convention (1/2)
This is the vector calling convention based on
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc,
the idea is to split between "scalar" callee-saved registers
and "vector" callee-saved registers. "scalar" ones remain the
original strategy, however, "vector" ones are handled together
with RVV objects.
The stack layout would be:
|--------------------------| <-- FP
| callee-allocated save |
| area for register varargs|
|--------------------------|
| callee-saved registers | <-- scalar callee-saved
| (scalar) |
|--------------------------|
| RVV alignment padding |
|--------------------------|
| callee-saved registers | <-- vector callee-saved
| (vector) |
|--------------------------|
| RVV objects |
|--------------------------|
| padding before RVV |
|--------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|--------------------------| <-- BP
| variable size objects |
|--------------------------| <-- SP
Note: This patch doesn't contain "tuple" type, e.g. vint32m1x2.
It will be handled in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc (2/2).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154576
Another trivial rename patch, the last big one for now, which renamed
DPMarkers to DbgMarkers. This required the field `DbgMarker` in
`Instruction` to be renamed to `DebugMarker` to avoid a clash, but
otherwise was a simple string substitution of `s/DPMarker/DbgMarker` and
a manual renaming of `DPM` to `DM` in the few places where that acronym
was used for debug markers.
This patch renames DPLabel to DbgLabelRecord, in accordance with the
ongoing DbgRecord rename. This rename was fairly trivial, since DPLabel
isn't as widely used as DPValue and has no real conflicts in either its
full or abbreviated name. As usual, the entire replacement was done
automatically, with `s/DPLabel/DbgLabelRecord/` and `s/DPL/DLR/`.
As part of the migration to ptradd
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-replacing-getelementptr-with-ptradd/68699),
we need to change the representation of the `inrange` attribute, which
is used for vtable splitting.
Currently, inrange is specified as follows:
```
getelementptr inbounds ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, inrange i32 1, i64 2)
```
The `inrange` is placed on a GEP index, and all accesses must be "in
range" of that index. The new representation is as follows:
```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, i32 1, i64 2)
```
This specifies which offsets are "in range" of the GEP result. The new
representation will continue working when canonicalizing to ptradd
representation:
```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) (i8, ptr @vt, i64 48)
```
The inrange offsets are relative to the return value of the GEP. An
alternative design could make them relative to the source pointer
instead. The result-relative format was chosen on the off-chance that we
want to extend support to non-constant GEPs in the future, in which case
this variant is more expressive.
This implementation "upgrades" the old inrange representation in bitcode
by simply dropping it. This is a very niche feature, and I don't think
trying to upgrade it is worthwhile. Let me know if you disagree.
This is the major rename patch that prior patches have built towards.
The DPValue class is being renamed to DbgVariableRecord, which reflects
the updated terminology for the "final" implementation of the RemoveDI
feature. This is a pure string substitution + clang-format patch. The
only manual component of this patch was determining where to perform
these string substitutions: `DPValue` and `DPV` are almost exclusively
used for DbgRecords, *except* for:
- llvm/lib/target, where 'DP' is used to mean double-precision, and so
appears as part of .td files and in variable names. NB: There is a
single existing use of `DPValue` here that refers to debug info, which
I've manually updated.
- llvm/tools/gold, where 'LDPV' is used as a prefix for symbol
visibility enums.
Outside of these places, I've applied several basic string
substitutions, with the intent that they only affect DbgRecord-related
identifiers; I've checked them as I went through to verify this, with
reasonable confidence that there are no unintended changes that slipped
through the cracks. The substitutions applied are all case-sensitive,
and are applied in the order shown:
```
DPValue -> DbgVariableRecord
DPVal -> DbgVarRec
DPV -> DVR
```
Following the previous rename patches, it should be the case that there
are no instances of any of these strings that are meant to refer to the
general case of DbgRecords, or anything other than the DPValue class.
The idea behind this patch is therefore that pure string substitution is
correct in all cases as long as these assumptions hold.
Reland #82363 after fixing build failure
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/41428.
Memory sanitizer detects usage of `RawData` union member which is not
filled directly. Instead, the code relies on filling `Data` union
member, which is a struct consisting of signing schema parameters.
According to https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/union, this is
UB:
"It is undefined behavior to read from the member of the union that
wasn't most recently written".
Instead of relying on compiler allowing us to do dirty things, do not
use union and only store `RawData`. Particular ptrauth parameters are
obtained on demand via bit operations.
Original PR description below.
Emit `__ptrauth`-qualified types as `DIDerivedType` metadata nodes in IR
with tag `DW_TAG_LLVM_ptrauth_type`, baseType referring to the type
which has the qualifier applied, and the following parameters
representing the signing schema:
- `ptrAuthKey` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsAddressDiscriminated` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthExtraDiscriminator` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsaPointer` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthAuthenticatesNullValues` (boolean)
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed@bougacha.org>
This patch continues the ongoing rename work, replacing DPValue with
DbgRecord in comments and the names of variables, both members and
fn-local. This is the most labour-intensive part of the rename, as it is
where the most decisions have to be made about whether a given comment
or variable is referring to DPValues (equivalent to debug variable
intrinsics) or DbgRecords (a catch-all for all debug intrinsics); these
decisions are not individually difficult, but comprise a fairly large
amount of text to review.
This patch still largely performs basic string substitutions followed by
clang-format; there are almost* no places where, for example, a comment
has been expanded or modified to reflect the semantic difference between
DPValues and DbgRecords. I don't believe such a change is generally
necessary in LLVM, but it may be useful in the docs, and so I'll be
submitting docs changes as a separate patch.
*In a few places, `dbg.values` was replaced with `debug intrinsics`.
As part of the effort to rename the DbgRecord classes, this patch
renames the widely-used functions that operate on DbgRecords but refer
to DbgValues or DPValues in their names to refer to DbgRecords instead;
all such functions are defined in one of `BasicBlock.h`,
`Instruction.h`, and `DebugProgramInstruction.h`.
This patch explicitly does not change the names of any comments or
variables, except for where they use the exact name of one of the
renamed functions. The reason for this is reviewability; this patch can
be trivially examined to determine that the only changes are direct
string substitutions and any results from clang-format responding to the
changed line lengths. Future patches will cover renaming variables and
comments, and then renaming the classes themselves.
`DPLabel`, the RemoveDI version of `llvm.dbg.label`, was landed recently
at the same time the RemoveDIs IR printing and verifier patches were
landing. The patches were updated to not miscompile, but did not have
full-featured and correct support for DPLabel built in; this patch makes
the remaining set of changes to enable DPLabel support.
Emit `__ptrauth`-qualified types as `DIDerivedType` metadata nodes in IR
with tag `DW_TAG_LLVM_ptrauth_type`, baseType referring to the type
which has the qualifier applied, and the following parameters
representing the signing schema:
- `ptrAuthKey` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsAddressDiscriminated` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthExtraDiscriminator` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsaPointer` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthAuthenticatesNullValues` (boolean)
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed@bougacha.org>
As part of the RemoveDIs project, this patch adds support for checking
DPValues in the verifier. Although this is not strictly parsing-related,
and we currently automatically convert back to the old debug info format
immediately after parsing, we are approaching the point where the we can
operate end-to-end in the new debug info format, at which point it is
appropriate that we can actually validate modules in the new format.
This patch also contains some changes that aren't strictly
parsing-related, but are necessary class refactors for parsing support,
and are used in the verifier checks (i.e. changing the DILocalVariable
field to be a tracking MD reference, and adding a Verifier check to
confirm that it is a DILocalVariable).
This reapplication changes debug intrinsic declaration removal to only take
place when printing final IR, so that the processing format of the Module
does not affect the output.
This reverts commit d128448efdd4e2bf3c9bc9a5b43ae642aa78026f.
Reverted due to failures on buildbots, where a new cl flag was placed
in the wrong file, resulting in link errors.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/198/builds/8548
This reverts commit 0b398256b3f72204ad1f7c625efe4990204e898a.
This patch adds support for printing the proposed non-instruction debug
info ("RemoveDIs") out to textual IR. This patch does not add any
bitcode support, parsing support, or documentation.
Printing of the new format is controlled by a flag added in this patch,
`--write-experimental-debuginfo`, which defaults to false. The new
format will be printed *iff* this flag is true, so whether we use the IR
format is completely independent of whether we use non-instruction debug
info during LLVM passes (which is controlled by the
`--try-experimental-debuginfo-iterators` flag).
Even with the flag disabled, some existing tests need to be updated, as this
patch causes debug intrinsic declarations to be changed in a round trip,
such that they always appear at the end of a module and have no attributes
(this has no functional change on the module).
The design of this new IR format was proposed previously on
Discourse, and any further discussion about the design can still be
contributed there:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-debuginfo-proposed-changes-to-the-textual-ir-representation-for-debug-values/73491
Patch 2 of 3 to add llvm.dbg.label support to the RemoveDIs project. The
patch stack adds the DPLabel class, which is the RemoveDIs llvm.dbg.label
equivalent.
1. Add DbgRecord base class for DPValue and the not-yet-added
DPLabel class.
2. Add the DPLabel class.
-> 3. Add support to passes.
The next patch, #82639, will enable conversion between dbg.labels and DPLabels.
AssignemntTrackingAnalysis support could have gone two ways:
1. Have the analysis store a DPLabel representation in its results -
SelectionDAGBuilder reads the analysis results and ignores all DbgRecord
kinds.
2. Ignore DPLabels in the analysis - SelectionDAGBuilder reads the analysis
results but still needs to iterate over DPLabels from the IR.
I went with option 2 because it's less work and is no less correct than 1. It's
worth noting that causes labels to sink to the bottom of packs of debug records.
e.g., [value, label, value] becomes [value, value, label]. This shouldn't be a
problem because labels and variable locations don't have an ordering requirement.
The ordering between variable locations is maintained and the label movement is
deterministic
Patch 2 of 3 to add llvm.dbg.label support to the RemoveDIs project. The
patch stack adds the DPLabel class, which is the RemoveDIs
llvm.dbg.label
equivalent.
1. Add DbgRecord base class for DPValue and the not-yet-added
DPLabel class.
-> 2. Add the DPLabel class.
3. Enable dbg.label conversion and add support to passes.
This will be used (and tested) in the final patch(es), coming next.
NOTE: For brevity the following talks about ConstantInt but
everything extends to cover ConstantFP as well.
Whilst ConstantInt::get() supports the creation of vectors whereby
each lane has the same value, it achieves this via other constants:
* ConstantVector for fixed-length vectors
* ConstantExprs for scalable vectors
However, ConstantExprs are being deprecated and ConstantVector is
not space efficient for larger vector types. By extending ConstantInt
we can represent vector splats by only storing the underlying scalar
value.
More specifically:
* ConstantInt gains an ElementCount variant of get().
* LLVMContext is extended to map <EC,APInt>->ConstantInt.
* BitcodeReader/Writer support is extended to allow vector types.
Whilst this patch adds the base support, more work is required
before it's production ready. For example, there's likely to be
many places where isa<ConstantInt> assumes a scalar type. Accordingly
the default behaviour of ConstantInt::get() remains unchanged but a
set of flags are added to allow wider testing and thus help with the
migration:
--use-constant-int-for-fixed-length-splat
--use-constant-fp-for-fixed-length-splat
--use-constant-int-for-scalable-splat
--use-constant-fp-for-scalable-splat
NOTE: No change is required to the bitcode format because types and
values are handled separately.
NOTE: For similar reasons as above, code generation doesn't work
out-the-box.
Patch 1 of 3 to add llvm.dbg.label support to the RemoveDIs project. The
patch stack adds a new base class
-> 1. Add DbgRecord base class for DPValue and the not-yet-added
DPLabel class.
2. Add the DPLabel class.
3. Enable dbg.label conversion and add support to passes.
Patches 1 and 2 are NFC.
In the near future we also will rename DPValue to DbgVariableRecord and
DPLabel to DbgLabelRecord, at which point we'll overhaul the function
names too. The name DPLabel keeps things consistent for now.
The function to print DPValues currently tries to incorporate the
function it is part of, which is found through its marker; this means
when we try to print a DPValue with no marker, we dereference a nullptr.
We can print instructions without parents, and so the same should be
true for DPValues; this patch changes DPValue::print to check for a null
marker and avoid dereferencing it.
Fixes issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82230
We originally thought that printing the DPMarker pointer after each
instruction was going to be useful, but it turns out it only serves to
generate spurious test output differences now. As it stands, the cannonical
way to debug RemoveDIs metadata is "dumpDbgValues".
This reverts commit e8512786fedbfa6ddba70ceddc29d7122173ba5e.
This revert is done because llvm::drop_begin over an empty ArrayRef
doesn't return an empty range, and therefore can lead to an invalid
address returned instead.
See discussion in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80737 for
more context.
The new experimental calling convention preserve_none is the opposite
side of existing preserve_all. It tries to preserve as few general
registers as possible. So all general registers are caller saved
registers. It can also uses more general registers to pass arguments.
This attribute doesn't impact floating-point registers. Floating-point
registers still follow the c calling convention.
Currently preserve_none is supported on X86-64 only. It changes the c
calling convention in following fields:
* RSP and RBP are the only preserved general registers, all other
general registers are caller saved registers.
* We can use [RDI, RSI, RDX, RCX, R8, R9, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, RAX]
to pass arguments.
It can improve the performance of hot tailcall chain, because many
callee saved registers' save/restore instructions can be removed if the
tail functions are using preserve_none. In my experiment in protocol
buffer, the parsing functions are improved by 3% to 10%.
This implements the DbgAssignIntrinsic class as a variant of DPValues -
unfortunately this involves increasing the size of the `DebugValueUser`
storage by 3x, but this is necessary to enable assigns to be
represented, and can be offset in a future patch by splitting DPValue
into subclasses such that each variant can store only the fields it
needs. This patch does not actually create DPVAssigns in any case;
future patches will handle this variant in all cases where generic
DPValue handling does not. This patch also does not implement tracking
support for DIAssignIDs, which is necessary to find DPVAssigns that
reference a given DIAssignID; that is added in a subsequent patch.
Currently, the AsmWriter can print DPValues, but does not consider them
when creating slots for metadata, which can result in erroneous output
where metadata is numbered incorrectly. This patch modifies the
ModuleSlotTracker to correctly track slots for metadata that appears in
DPValues.
On platforms where char is signed, the ">> 4" shift will produce
incorrect results. We were already working on unsigned char for
most characters, but not for the first one.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/74732.
This adds support for a HasTailCall flag on function call edges in the
ThinLTO summary. It is intended for use in aiding discovery of missing
frames from tail calls in profiled call stacks for MemProf of profiled
binaries that did not disable tail call elimination. A follow on change
will add the use of this new flag during MemProf context disambiguation.
The new flag is encoded in the bitcode along with either the hotness
flag from the profile, or the relative block frequency under the
-write-relbf-to-summary flag when there is no profile data.
Because we now will always have some additional call edge information, I
have removed the non-profile function summary record format, and we
simply encode the tail call flag along with a hotness type of none when
there is no profile information or relative block frequency. The change
of record format and name caused most of the test case changes.
I have added explicit testing of generation of the new tail call flag
into the bitcode and IR assembly format as part of the changes to
llvm/test/Bitcode/thinlto-function-summary-refgraph.ll. I have also
added round trip testing through assembly and bitcode to
llvm/test/Assembler/thinlto-summary.ll.
With RTTI, a C++ class type info will get two entries in the summary
index: a gv and a typeidCompatibleVTable, both sharing the same GUID.
Ensure we use different namespaces to generate the entry slot numbers
for these two different summary entries.
This flag indicates that every bit is known to be zero in at least one
of the inputs. This allows the Or to be treated as an Add since there is
no possibility of a carry from any bit.
If the flag is present and this property does not hold, the result is
poison.
This makes it easier to reverse the InstCombine transform that turns Add
into Or.
This is inspired by a comment here
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71955#discussion_r1391614578
Discourse thread
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-or-disjoint-flag/75036
