- Fix build with `EXPENSIVE_CHECKS`
- Remove unused `PassName::ID` to resolve warning
- Mark `~SelectionDAGISel` virtual so AArch64 backend can work properly
This reverts commit de37c06f01772e02465ccc9f538894c76d89a7a1 to
de37c06f01772e02465ccc9f538894c76d89a7a1
It still breaks EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build. Sorry.
Port selection dag isel to new pass manager.
Only `AMDGPU` and `X86` support new pass version. `-verify-machineinstrs` in new pass manager belongs to verify instrumentation, it is enabled by default.
This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future change to the params of
TargetMachine.
This matches other nearby enums.
For downstream users, this should be a fairly straightforward
replacement,
e.g. s/CodeGenOpt::Aggressive/CodeGenOptLevel::Aggressive
or s/CGFT_/CodeGenFileType::
Follow up to the series:
1. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140161
2. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140349
3. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140331
4. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140323
Completes the work from the previous two for remaining targets.
This creates the following named passes that can be run via
`llc -{start|stop}-{before|after}`:
- arc-isel
- arm-isel
- avr-isel
- bpf-isel
- csky-isel
- hexagon-isel
- lanai-isel
- loongarch-isel
- m68k-isel
- msp430-isel
- mips-isel
- nvptx-isel
- ppc-codegen
- riscv-isel
- sparc-isel
- systemz-isel
- ve-isel
- wasm-isel
- xcore-isel
A nice way to write tests for SelectionDAGISel might be to use a RUN:
line like:
llc -mtriple=<triple> -start-before=<arch>-isel -stop-after=finalize-isel -o -
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59538
Reviewed By: asb, zixuan-wu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140364
This commit contains a refactoring that merges AVRRelaxMemOperations
into AVRExpandPseudoInsts, so that we have a single place in code that
expands the STDWPtrQRr opcode.
Seizing the day, I've also fixed a couple of potential bugs with our
previous implementation (e.g. when the destination register was killed,
the previous implementation would try to .addDef() that killed
register, crashing LLVM in the process - that's fixed now, as proved by
the test).
Reviewed By: benshi001
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122533
Most notably, Pass.h is no longer included by TargetMachine.h
before: 1063570306
after: 1063332844
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121168
I think this pass was previously used under the assumption that most
functions would not need a frame pointer and it would be more efficient
to store the old stack pointer in a regular register pair.
Unfortunately, right now we're forced to always reserve the Y register
as a frame pointer: whether or not this is needed is only known after
regsiter allocation at which point it doesn't make sense anymore to mark
it as non-reserved. Therefore, it makes sense to use the Y register to
store the old stack pointer in functions with dynamic allocas (with a
variable size or not in the entry block). Knowing this can make the code
around dynamic allocas a lot simpler: simply save/restore the frame
pointer.
This is especially relevant in functions that have a frame pointer
anyway (for example, because they have stack spills). The stack restore
in the epilogue will implicitly restore the old stack pointer, so there
is no need to store the old stack pointer separately. It even reduces
register pressure as a side effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97815
The current inconsistency confuse contributors which coding guidlines to follow.
It would be better to have it consistent using clang-format tool.
Reviewed By: mhjacobson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109270
This patch makes sure shift instructions such as this one:
%result = shl i32 %n, %amount
are expanded just before the IR to SelectionDAG conversion to a loop so
that calls to non-existing library functions such as __ashlsi3 are
avoided. The generated code is currently pretty bad but there's a lot of
room for improvement: the shift itself can be done in just four
instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96677
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Summary:
This pass will be used to relax instructions which use out of bounds
memory accesses to equivalent operations that can work with the
addresses.
The pass currently implements relaxation for the STDWPtrQRr instruction.
Without this pass, an assertion error would be hit in the pseudo expansion pass.
In the future, we will need to add more instructions to this pass. We can do
that on a case-by-case basic.
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27650
llvm-svn: 289517
