Some targets (e.g. PPC and Hexagon) already did this. I think it's best
to do this consistently so that frontend authors don't run into
inconsistent results when they emit `naked` functions. For example, in
Zig, we had to change our emit code to also set `frame-pointer=none` to
get reliable results across targets.
Note: I don't have commit access.
Added .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup) to all BuildMI calls in
HexagonFrameLowering::insertAllocframe. This change ensures that the
test sugared-constants.ll passes upstream by correctly marking
instructions as part of the frame setup.
Rebase of #84114. I've only included the core changes to frame layout
calculation & CFI generation which sidesteps the regressions found after
merging #84114. Since these changes are a necessary precursor to the
overall fix and are themselves slightly beneficial as CFI is now
generated correctly, I think it is reasonable to merge this first step.
---
For very large stack frames, the offset from the stack pointer to a
local can be more than 2^31 which overflows various `int` offsets in the
frame lowering code.
This patch updates the frame lowering code to calculate the offsets as
64-bit values and fixes CFI to use the corrected sizes.
After this patch, additional work is needed to fix offset truncations in
each target's codegen.
MachineFunction's probably should not include a backreference to
the owning MachineModuleInfo. Most of these references were used
just to query the MCContext, which MachineFunction already directly
stores. Other contexts are using it to query the LLVMContext, which
can already be accessed through the IR function reference.
Summary:
- Remove wrappers in `MachineDominatorTree`.
- Remove `MachineDominatorTree` update code in
`MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge`.
- Use `MachineDomTreeUpdater` in passes which call
`MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge` and preserve
`MachineDominatorTreeWrapperPass` or CFG analyses.
Commit abea99f65a97248974c02a5544eaf25fc4240056 introduced related
methods in 2014. Now we have SemiNCA based dominator tree in 2017 and
dominator tree updater, the solution adopted here seems a bit outdated.
Prepare for new pass manager version of `MachineDominatorTreeAnalysis`.
We may need a machine dominator tree version of `DomTreeUpdater` to
handle `SplitCriticalEdge` in some CodeGen passes.
For very large stack frames, the offset from the stack pointer to a local can be more than 2^31 which overflows various `int` offsets in the frame lowering code.
This patch updates the frame lowering code to calculate the offsets as 64-bit values and resolves the overflows, resulting in the correct codegen for very large frames.
Fixes#48911
This patch sorts stack objects by their alignment value from the largest
to the smallest. If two objects have the same alignment, then they are
sorted by their size from the largest to the smallest. This minimizes
padding and reduces run time stack size.
This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future change to the params of
TargetMachine.
This matches other nearby enums.
For downstream users, this should be a fairly straightforward
replacement,
e.g. s/CodeGenOpt::Aggressive/CodeGenOptLevel::Aggressive
or s/CGFT_/CodeGenFileType::
D151036 adds an assertions that prohibits iterating over sub- and
super-registers of a null register. This is already the case when
iterating over register units of a null register, and worked by
accident for sub- and super-registers.
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151406
With D134950, targets get notified when a virtual register is created and/or
cloned. Targets can do the needful with the delegate callback. AMDGPU propagates
the virtual register flags maintained in the target file itself. They are useful
to identify a certain type of machine operands while inserting spill stores and
reloads. Since RegAllocFast spills the physical register itself, there is no way
its virtual register can be mapped back to retrieve the flags. It can be solved
by passing the virtual register as an additional argument. This argument has no
use when the spill interfaces are called during the greedy allocator or even the
PrologEpilogInserter and can pass a null register in such cases.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138656
value() has undesired exception checking semantics and calls
__throw_bad_optional_access in libc++. Moreover, the API is unavailable without
_LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS on older Mach-O platforms (see
_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS).
This fixes clang.
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Make the stack alignment register (AP) reserved in the given function. This
will make it available everywhere in the function, and allow aligned access
to vector register spill slots.
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed,
cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.
Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.
Since this method can apply to cmpxchg operations, make sure it's clear
what value we're actually retrieving. This will help ensure we don't
accidentally ignore the failure ordering of cmpxchg in the future.
We could potentially introduce a getOrdering() method on AtomicSDNode
that asserts the operation isn't cmpxchg, but not sure that's
worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103338
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
To accommodate frame layouts that have both fixed and scalable objects
on the stack, describing a stack location or offset using a pointer + uint64_t
is not sufficient. For this reason, we've introduced the StackOffset class,
which models both the fixed- and scalable sized offsets.
The TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference is made to return a StackOffset,
so that this can be used in other interfaces, such as to eliminate frame indices
in PEI or to emit Debug locations for variables on the stack.
This patch is purely mechanical and doesn't change the behaviour of how
the result of this function is used for fixed-sized offsets. The patch adds
various checks to assert that the offset has no scalable component, as frame
offsets with a scalable component are not yet supported in various places.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90018
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76348
