Summary:
- Remove wrappers in `MachineDominatorTree`.
- Remove `MachineDominatorTree` update code in
`MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge`.
- Use `MachineDomTreeUpdater` in passes which call
`MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge` and preserve
`MachineDominatorTreeWrapperPass` or CFG analyses.
Commit abea99f65a97248974c02a5544eaf25fc4240056 introduced related
methods in 2014. Now we have SemiNCA based dominator tree in 2017 and
dominator tree updater, the solution adopted here seems a bit outdated.
Currently, flags copy lowering does two expensive things:
- It traverses the CFG in RPO, and
- It requires a dominator tree that is not preserved.
Most notably, it is the only machine dominator tree user at -O0.
Many functions have no flag copies to begin with, therefore, add an
early exit if EFLAGS has no COPY def.
The legacy pass manager has no way to dynamically decide whether an
analysis is required. Therefore, if there's a copy, get the dominator
tree from the pass manager, if it has one, otherwise, compute it.
These changes should make the pass very cheap for the common case.
This header is split off from GenericDomTree.h so it can be included
in the source file only. Do this for MachineDominators.h and
MachinePostDominators.h.
Prepare for new pass manager version of `MachineDominatorTreeAnalysis`.
We may need a machine dominator tree version of `DomTreeUpdater` to
handle `SplitCriticalEdge` in some CodeGen passes.
1. MF.begin() == MF.end() -> MF.empty()
2. Set FlagsKilled by API modifiesRegister
3. Utilize APIs in X86GenMnemonicTables.inc to check arithmetic op
4. Merge duplicated code for rewrite*
5. Clang format
This is to address review comments in #91849
```
%1:gr64 = COPY $eflags
OP1 may update eflags
$eflags = COPY %1
OP2 may use eflags
```
To use eflags as input at 4th instruction, we need to use SETcc to
preserve the eflags before 2, and update the source condition of OP2
according to value in GPR %1.
In this patch, we support CCMP/CTEST as OP2.
Fixes#82659
There are some functions, such as `findRegisterDefOperandIdx` and `findRegisterDefOperand`, that have too many default parameters. As a result, we have encountered some issues due to the lack of TRI parameters, as shown in issue #82411.
Following @RKSimon 's suggestion, this patch refactors 9 functions, including `{reads, kills, defines, modifies}Register`, `registerDefIsDead`, and `findRegister{UseOperandIdx, UseOperand, DefOperandIdx, DefOperand}`, adjusting the order of the TRI parameter and making it required. In addition, all the places that call these functions have also been updated correctly to ensure no additional impact.
After this, the caller of these functions should explicitly know whether to pass the `TargetRegisterInfo` or just a `nullptr`.
ADC/SBB with reverse encoding is never emitted by compiler before
encoding optimization, which is called after flag-copy lowering.
This is a partial reland for 8bbf100799a97f8342bf1a8409c6fb48f03e837f
There is no pattern for ADCX/ADOX and they are never selected during
ISEL. So we remove the cases in some MIR optimizations in this patch.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157717
This time with the right bug number.
When we rewrite the setcc we replace set old setcc output register
with the new CondReg. But since CondReg can be shared by other
replacements, we don't know if the kill flags for the old register
are valid for CondReg. So be conservative and remove them.
The test case has a SETCCr and a SETCCm on the same condition so
they end up sharing the same CondReg. The SETCCr had one use with
a kill flag. This kill flag isn't valid after the replacement because
CondReg needs a live range extending to the later SETCCm replacment.
Fixes PR51903.
When we rewrite the setcc we replace set old setcc output register
with the new CondReg. But since CondReg can be shared by other
replacements, we don't know if the kill flags for the old register
are valid for CondReg. So be conservative and remove them.
The test case has a SETCCr and a SETCCm on the same condition so
they end up sharing the same CondReg. The SETCCr had one use with
a kill flag. This kill flag isn't valid after the replacement because
CondReg needs a live range extending to the later SETCCm replacment.
Fixes PR51908.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110046
Previously we took the restored flag in a GPR, extended it 32 or 64 bits. Then used as an input to a sub from 0. This requires creating a zero extend and creating a 0.
This patch changes this to just use an ADD with 255 to restore the carry flag and keep the SETB_C32r/SETB_C64r. Exactly like we handle SBB which is what SETB becomes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74152
Only 32 and 64 bit SBB are dependency breaking instructons on some
CPUs. The 8 and 16 bit forms have to preserve upper bits of the GPR.
This patch removes the smaller forms and selects the wider form
instead. I had to do this with custom code as the tblgen generated
code glued the eflags copytoreg to the extract_subreg instead of
to the SETB pseudo.
Longer term I think we can remove X86ISD::SETCC_CARRY and use
(X86ISD::SBB zero, zero). We'll want to keep the pseudo and select
(X86ISD::SBB zero, zero) to either a MOV32r0+SBB for targets where
there is no dependency break and SETB_C32/SETB_C64 for targets
that have a dependency break. May want some way to avoid the MOV32r0
if the instruction that produced the carry flag happened to def a
register that we can use for the dependency.
I think the flag copy lowering should be using NEG instead of SUB to
handle SETB. That would avoid the MOV32r0 there. Or maybe it should
use a ADC with -1 to recreate the carry flag and keep the SETB?
That would avoid a MOVZX on the input of the SUB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74024
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Summary:
- Remove redundant initializations from pass constructors that were
already being initialized by LLVMInitializeX86Target().
- Add initialization function for the FPS pass.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63218
llvm-svn: 363221
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between Jcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, courbet, gchatelet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, eraman, hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60228
llvm-svn: 357802
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between SETcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60138
llvm-svn: 357801
Summary:
Reorder the condition code enum to match their encodings. Move it to MC layer so it can be used by the scheduler models.
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes
translation switches for converting between CMOV instructions and condition
codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate.
We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the
asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked
IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
This does complicate the scheduler models a little since we can't assign the
A and BE instructions to a separate class now.
I plan to make similar changes for SETcc and Jcc.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb, courbet
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gchatelet, hiraditya, kristina, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60041
llvm-svn: 357800
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Normally the peephole pass converts EXTRACT_SUBREG to COPY instructions. But we're after peephole so we can't rely on it to clean these up.
To fix this, the eflags pass now emits a COPY with a subreg input.
I also noticed that in 32-bit mode we need to constrain the input to the copy to ensure the subreg is valid. Otherwise we'll fail verify-machineinstrs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50656
llvm-svn: 339945
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.
The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for setting and
manipulating the `MachineMemOperand` pointer arrays so chat we can
change how they are allocated.
Then we introduce an extra info object that using the trailing object
pattern to attach some number of MMOs but also other extra info. The
design of this is specifically so that this extra info has a fixed
necessary cost (the header tracking what extra info is included) and
everything else can be tail allocated. This pattern works especially
well with a `BumpPtrAllocator` which we use here.
I've also added the basic scaffolding for putting interesting pointers
into this, namely pre- and post-instruction symbols. These aren't used
anywhere yet, they're just there to ensure I've actually gotten the data
structure types correct. I'll flesh out support for these in
a subsequent patch (MIR dumping, parsing, the works).
Finally, I've included an optimization where we store any single pointer
inline in the `MachineInstr` to avoid the allocation overhead. This is
expected to be the overwhelmingly most common case and so should avoid
any memory usage growth due to slightly less clever / dense allocation
when dealing with >1 MMO. This did require several ergonomic
improvements to the `PointerSumType` to reasonably support the various
usage models.
This also has a side effect of freeing up 8 bits within the
`MachineInstr` which could be repurposed for something else.
The suggested direction here came largely from Hal Finkel. I hope it was
worth it. ;] It does hopefully clear a path for subsequent extensions
w/o nearly as much leg work. Lots of thanks to Reid and Justin for
careful reviews and ideas about how to do all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50701
llvm-svn: 339940
EFLAGS copy lowering.
If you have a branch of LLVM, you may want to cherrypick this. It is
extremely unlikely to hit this case empirically, but it will likely
manifest as an "impossible" branch being taken somewhere, and will be
... very hard to debug.
Hitting this requires complex conditions living across complex control
flow combined with some interesting memory (non-stack) initialized with
the results of a comparison. Also, because you have to arrange for an
EFLAGS copy to be in *just* the right place, almost anything you do to
the code will hide the bug. I was unable to reduce anything remotely
resembling a "good" test case from the place where I hit it, and so
instead I have constructed synthetic MIR testing that directly exercises
the bug in question (as well as the good behavior for completeness).
The issue is that we would mistakenly assume any SETcc with a valid
condition and an initial operand that was a register and a virtual
register at that to be a register *defining* SETcc...
It isn't though....
This would in turn cause us to test some other bizarre register,
typically the base pointer of some memory. Now, testing this register
and using that to branch on doesn't make any sense. It even fails the
machine verifier (if you are running it) due to the wrong register
class. But it will make it through LLVM, assemble, and it *looks*
fine... But wow do you get a very unsual and surprising branch taken in
your actual code.
The fix is to actually check what kind of SETcc instruction we're
dealing with. Because there are a bunch of them, I just test the
may-store bit in the instruction. I've also added an assert for sanity
that ensure we are, in fact, *defining* the register operand. =D
llvm-svn: 338481
flow patterns including forks, merges, and even cyles.
This tries to cover a reasonably comprehensive set of patterns that
still don't require PHIs or PHI placement. The coverage was inspired by
the amazing variety of patterns produced when copy EFLAGS and restoring
it to implement Speculative Load Hardening. Without this patch, we
simply cannot make such complex and invasive changes to x86 instruction
sequences due to EFLAGS.
I've added "just" one test, but this test covers many different
complexities and corner cases of this approach. It is actually more
comprehensive, as far as I can tell, than anything that I have
encountered in the wild on SLH.
Because the test is so complex, I've tried to give somewhat thorough
comments and an ASCII-art diagram of the control flows to make it a bit
easier to read and maintain long-term.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49220
llvm-svn: 336985
there for a long time.
The boolean tracking whether we saw a kill of the flags was supposed to
be per-block we are scanning and instead was outside that loop and never
cleared. It requires a quite contrived test case to hit this as you have
to have multiple levels of successors and interleave them with kills.
I've included such a test case here.
This is another bug found testing SLH and extracted to its own focused
patch.
llvm-svn: 336876
multiple successors where some of the uses end up killing the EFLAGS
register.
There was a bug where rather than skipping to the next basic block
queued up with uses once we saw a kill, we stopped processing the blocks
entirely. =/
Test case produces completely nonsensical code w/o this tiny fix.
This was found testing Speculative Load Hardening and split out of that
work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49211
llvm-svn: 336874
specially handle SETB_C* pseudo instructions.
Summary:
While the logic here is somewhat similar to the arithmetic lowering, it
is different enough that it made sense to have its own function.
I actually tried a bunch of different optimizations here and none worked
well so I gave up and just always do the arithmetic based lowering.
Looking at code from the PR test case, we actually pessimize a bunch of
code when generating these. Because SETB_C* pseudo instructions clobber
EFLAGS, we end up creating a bunch of copies of EFLAGS to feed multiple
SETB_C* pseudos from a single set of EFLAGS. This in turn causes the
lowering code to ruin all the clever code generation that SETB_C* was
hoping to achieve. None of this is needed. Whenever we're generating
multiple SETB_C* instructions from a single set of EFLAGS we should
instead generate a single maximally wide one and extract subregs for all
the different desired widths. That would result in substantially better
code generation. But this patch doesn't attempt to address that.
The test case from the PR is included as well as more directed testing
of the specific lowering pattern used for these pseudos.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46799
llvm-svn: 332389
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
a zero register.
Previously I tried this and saw LLVM unable to transform this to fold
with memory operands such as spill slot rematerialization. However, it
clearly works as shown in this patch. We turn these into `cmpb $0,
<mem>` when useful for folding a memory operand without issue. This form
has no disadvantage compared to `testb $-1, <mem>`. So overall, this is
likely no worse and may be slightly smaller in some cases due to the
`testb %reg, %reg` form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45475
llvm-svn: 330269
across basic blocks in the limited cases where it is very straight
forward to do so.
This will also be useful for other places where we do some limited
EFLAGS propagation across CFG edges and need to handle copy rewrites
afterward. I think this is rapidly approaching the maximum we can and
should be doing here. Everything else begins to require either heroic
analysis to prove how to do PHI insertion manually, or somehow managing
arbitrary PHI-ing of EFLAGS with general PHI insertion. Neither of these
seem at all promising so if those cases come up, we'll almost certainly
need to rewrite the parts of LLVM that produce those patterns.
We do now require dominator trees in order to reliably diagnose patterns
that would require PHI nodes. This is a bit unfortunate but it seems
better than the completely mysterious crash we would get otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45673
llvm-svn: 330264
