Implement cost computation for VPWidenCallRecipe. In some cases, targets
use argument info to compute intrinsic costs. If all operands of the
call are VPValues with an underlying IR value, use the IR values as
arguments.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106731
Move VPWiden[Load|Store]EVLRecipe::executeto VPlanRecipes.cpp in line
with other ::execute implementations that don't depend on anything
defined in LoopVectorization.cpp
It's not possible to pick the best mask to remove when optimising
VPBlend at construction and so this patch refactors the code to move the
decision (and thus transformation) to VPlanTransforms.
NOTE: This patch does not change the decision of which mask to pick.
That will be done in a following PR to keep this patch as NFC from an
output point of view.
Introduce explicit ExtractFromEnd recipes to extract the final values
for live-outs instead of implicitly extracting in VPLiveOut::fixPhi.
This is a follow-up to the recent changes of modeling extracts for
recurrences and consolidates live-out extract creation for fixed-order
recurrences at a single place: addLiveOutsForFirstOrderRecurrences.
It is also in preparation of replacing VPLiveOut with VPIRInstructions
wrapping the original scalar phis.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100658
Implement VPWidenRecipe::computeCost for most cases (except
UDiv,SDiv,URem,SRem which require additional logic).
Note that this specializes `::computeCost` instead of `::cost`, as
`VPRecipeBase::cost` is responsible for skipping cost-computations
for pre-computed recipes for now.
The most recent version of the VPlan-based cost model introduction
has been committed on Jul 10 (b841e2eca3b5c8b) and we should
probably give it at least a week in case additional mismatches surface.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98764
Move VPWidenStoreRecipe::execute to VPlanRecipes.cpp in line with
other ::execute implementations that don't depend on anything
defined in LoopVectorization.cpp
Move VPWidenLoadRecipe::execute to VPlanRecipes.cpp in line with
other ::execute implementations that don't depend on anything
defined in LoopVectorization.cpp
Move VPWidenPointerInductionRecipe::execute to VPlanRecipes.cpp in line
with other ::execute implementations that don't depend on anything
defined in LoopVectorization.cpp
To match the behavior of the legacy cost model, only apply
-force-target-instruction-cost to recipes with underlying instructions
for now, as only original IR instructions are considered by the legacy
cost model.
This fixes a difference between legacy and VPlan based cost model,
triggering the verification assertion, reported by @JonPsson1.
This patch introduces a new ResumePhi VPInstruction which creates a phi
in a leaf block of a VPlan. The first use is to create the phi node for
fixed-order recurrence resume values in the scalar preheader.
The VPInstruction takes 2 operands: 1) the incoming value from the
middle-block and a default value to be used for all other incoming
blocks.
In follow-up changes, it will also be used to create phis for reduction
and induction resume values.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92651
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94760
This patch implements limited loop vectorization support for the 'all-in-one' histogram intrinsic. The feature is disabled by default, and when enabled will only vectorize if there are no other users of values in the gather-modify-scatter sequence.
This reverts commit 6f538f6a2d3224efda985e9eb09012fa4275ea92.
A number of crashes have been fixed by separate fixes, including
ttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96622. This version of the
PR also pre-computes the costs for branches (except the latch) instead
of computing their costs as part of costing of replicate regions, as
there may not be a direct correspondence between original branches and
number of replicate regions.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This patch moves branch condition creation to enter the scalar epilogue
loop to VPlan. Modeling the branch in the middle block also requires
modeling the successor blocks. This is done using the recently
introduced VPIRBasicBlock.
Note that the middle.block is still created as part of the skeleton and
then patched in during VPlan execution. Unfortunately the skeleton needs
to create the middle.block early on, as it is also used for induction
resume value creation and is also needed to properly update the
dominator tree during skeleton creation.
After this patch lands, I plan to move induction resume value and phi
node creation in the scalar preheader to VPlan. Once that is done, we
should be able to create the middle.block in VPlan directly.
This is a re-worked version based on the earlier
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150398 and the main change is the use of
VPIRBasicBlock.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92525
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92651
This is a helper to avoid writing `getModule()->getDataLayout()`. I
regularly try to use this method only to remember it doesn't exist...
`getModule()->getDataLayout()` is also a common (the most common?)
reason why code has to include the Module.h header.
Reoder code to exit early if the BranchOnCond isn't in an exiting block.
This delays retrieving the parent region, which may not be present.
Split off from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92651.
This reverts commit 242cc200ccb24e22eaf54aed7b0b0c84cfc54c0b and
eea150c84053035163f307b46549a2997a343ce9, as it is causing a build bot
failure and there have been a number of crashes reported at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This reverts commit 6f538f6a2d3224efda985e9eb09012fa4275ea92.
Extra tests for crashes discovered when building Chromium have been
added in fb86cb7ec157689e, 3be7312f81ad2.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
If the value we are extracting a lane from is uniform, only the first
lane will be set. Return lane 0 for any requested lane.
This fixes a crash when trying to extract the last lane for a
first-order recurrence resume value.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/95520.
This reverts commit 90fd99c0795711e1cf762a02b29b0a702f86a264.
This reverts commit 43e6f46936e177e47de6627a74b047ba27561b44.
Causes crashes, see comments on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555.
This reverts commit 46080abe9b136821eda2a1a27d8a13ceac349f8c.
Extra tests have been added in 52d29eb287.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
Now that FOR exit and resume value creation is explicitly modeled in
VPlan (05e1b5340b0caf1, 07b330132c0b) it doesn't depend on the first
order recurrence splice being preserved and it can now be marked as not
having side-effects. This allows removal of first-order-recurrence-splce
if the FOR is only used in the exit or as scalar ph resume value.
Apply the onlyFirstPartUsed logic generally to all per-part
VPInstructions. Note that the test changes remove the second part
of an unsued first-order recurrence splice.
This patch introduces a new ExtractFromEnd VPInstruction opcode to
extract the value of a FOR for users outside the loop (i.e. in the
scalar loop's exits). This moves the first part of fixing first order
recurrences to VPlan, and removes some additional code to patch up
live-outs, which is now handled automatically.
The majority of test changes is due to changes in the order of which the
extracts are generated now. As we are now using VPTransformState to
generate the extracts, we may be able to re-use existing extracts in the
loop body in some cases. For scalable vectors, in some cases we now have
to compute the runtime VF twice, as each extract is now independent, but
those should be trivial to clean up for later passes (and in line with
other places in the code that also liberally re-compute runtime VFs).
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93395
Update VPBlendRecipe::execute to support generating code for first-lane
only. This fixes a crash in the newly added test
@test_not_first_lane_only_wide_compare_incoming_order_swapped.
This reverts the revert commit c6e01627acf859.
This patch includes a fix for any-of reductions and epilogue
vectorization. Extra test coverage for the issue that caused the revert
has been added in bce3bfced5fe0b019 and an assertion has been added in
c7209cbb8be7a3c65813.
--------------------------------
Original commit message:
Update AnyOf reduction code generation to only keep track of the AnyOf
property in a boolean vector in the loop, only selecting either the new
or start value in the middle block.
The patch incorporates feedback from https://reviews.llvm.org/D153697.
This fixes the #62565, as now there aren't multiple uses of the
start/new values.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62565
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78304
Replace relying on the underling CallInst for looking up the called
function and its types by instead adding the called function as operand,
in line with how called functions are handled in CallInst.
Operand bundles, metadata and fast-math flags are optionally used if
there's an underlying CallInst.
This enables creating VPWidenCallRecipes without requiring an underlying
IR instruction.
Introduce new subclasses of VPWidenMemoryRecipe for VP
(vector-predicated) loads and stores to address multiple TODOs from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76172
Note that the introduction of the new recipes also improves code-gen for
VP gather/scatters by removing the redundant header mask. With the new
approach, it is not sufficient to look at users of the widened canonical
IV to find all uses of the header mask.
In some cases, a widened IV is used instead of separately widening the
canonical IV. To handle that, first collect all VPValues representing header
masks (by looking at users of both the canonical IV and widened inductions
that are canonical) and then checking all users (recursively) of those header
masks.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87411.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87816
This patch introduces a new VPWidenMemoryRecipe base class and distinct
sub-classes to model loads and stores.
This is a first step in an effort to simplify and modularize code
generation for widened loads and stores and enable adding further more
specialized memory recipes.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87411
VPBlendRecipe does not use the first mask operand. Removing it allows
VPlan-based DCE to remove unused mask computations.
This also fixes#87410, where unused Not VPInstructions are considered
having only their first lane demanded, but some of their operands
providing a vector value due to other users.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87410
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87770
Instead of using ILV.useOrderedReductions during ::execute, instead
store the information at recipe construction.
Another step towards making recipe'::execute independent of legacy ILV.
This reverts the revert commit 589c7abb03448.
This patch includes a fix for any-of reductions and epilogue
vectorization. Extra test coverage for the issue that caused the revert
has been added in 399ff08e29d.
--------------------------------
Original commit message:
Update AnyOf reduction code generation to only keep track of the AnyOf
property in a boolean vector in the loop, only selecting either the new
or start value in the middle block.
The patch incorporates feedback from https://reviews.llvm.org/D153697.
This fixes the #62565, as now there aren't multiple uses of the
start/new values.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62565
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78304
This patch introduces generating VP intrinsics in the Loop Vectorizer.
Currently the Loop Vectorizer supports vector predication in a very
limited capacity via tail-folding and masked load/store/gather/scatter
intrinsics. However, this does not let architectures with active vector
length predication support take advantage of their capabilities.
Architectures with general masked predication support also can only take
advantage of predication on memory operations. By having a way for the
Loop Vectorizer to generate Vector Predication intrinsics, which (will)
provide a target-independent way to model predicated vector
instructions. These architectures can make better use of their
predication capabilities.
Our first approach (implemented in this patch) builds on top of the
existing tail-folding mechanism in the LV (just adds a new tail-folding
mode using EVL), but instead of generating masked intrinsics for memory
operations it generates VP intrinsics for loads/stores instructions. The
patch adds a new VPlanTransforms to replace the wide header predicate
compare with EVL and updates codegen for load/stores to use VP
store/load with EVL.
Other important part of this approach is how the Explicit Vector Length
is computed. (VP intrinsics define this vector length parameter as
Explicit Vector Length (EVL)). We use an experimental intrinsic
`get_vector_length`, that can be lowered to architecture specific
instruction(s) to compute EVL.
Also, added a new recipe to emit instructions for computing EVL. Using
VPlan in this way will eventually help build and compare VPlans
corresponding to different strategies and alternatives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99750
Add a new PtrAdd opcode to VPInstruction that corresponds to
IRBuilder::CreatePtrAdd, which creates a GEP with source element type
i8.
This is then used to model scalarizing VPWidenPointerInductionRecipe by
introducing scalar-steps to model the index increment followed by a
PtrAdd.
Note that PtrAdd needs to be able to generate code for only the first
lane or for all lanes. This may warrant introducing a separate recipe
for scalarizing that can be created without relying on the underlying
IR.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80271
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83068
