Update VPlan to include the scalar loop header. This allows retiring
VPLiveOut, as the remaining live-outs can now be handled by adding
operands to the wrapped phis in the scalar loop header.
Note that the current version only includes the scalar loop header, no
other loop blocks and also does not wrap it in a region block.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109975
Refactors VPVectorPointerRecipe to use the VF VPValue to obtain the
runtime VF, similar to #95305.
Since only reverse vector pointers require the runtime VF, the patch
sets VPUnrollPart::PartOpIndex to 1 for vector pointers and 2 for
reverse vector pointers. As a result, the generation of reverse vector
pointers is moved into a separate recipe.
This patch splits off intrinsic hanlding to a new
VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe. VPWidenIntrinsicRecipes only need access to the
intrinsic ID to widen and the scalar result type (in case the intrinsic
is overloaded on the result type). It does not need access to an
underlying IR call instruction or function.
This means VPWidenIntrinsicRecipe can be created easily without access
to underlying IR.
Add a new VPIRInstruction recipe to wrap existing IR instructions not to
be modified during execution, execept for PHIs. For PHIs, a single
VPValue
operand is allowed, and it is used to add a new incoming value for the
single predecessor VPBB. Expect PHIs, VPIRInstructions cannot have any
operands.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100658.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100735
The patch adds `VPWidenEVLRecipe` which represents `VPWidenRecipe` + EVL
argument. The new recipe replaces `VPWidenRecipe` in
`tryAddExplicitVectorLength` for each binary and unary operations.
Follow up patches will extend support for remaining cases, like `FCmp`
and `ICmp`
This patch implements limited loop vectorization support for the 'all-in-one' histogram intrinsic. The feature is disabled by default, and when enabled will only vectorize if there are no other users of values in the gather-modify-scatter sequence.
This reverts commit 6f538f6a2d3224efda985e9eb09012fa4275ea92.
A number of crashes have been fixed by separate fixes, including
ttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96622. This version of the
PR also pre-computes the costs for branches (except the latch) instead
of computing their costs as part of costing of replicate regions, as
there may not be a direct correspondence between original branches and
number of replicate regions.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This reverts commit 242cc200ccb24e22eaf54aed7b0b0c84cfc54c0b and
eea150c84053035163f307b46549a2997a343ce9, as it is causing a build bot
failure and there have been a number of crashes reported at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This reverts commit 6f538f6a2d3224efda985e9eb09012fa4275ea92.
Extra tests for crashes discovered when building Chromium have been
added in fb86cb7ec157689e, 3be7312f81ad2.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This reverts commit 90fd99c0795711e1cf762a02b29b0a702f86a264.
This reverts commit 43e6f46936e177e47de6627a74b047ba27561b44.
Causes crashes, see comments on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555.
This reverts commit 46080abe9b136821eda2a1a27d8a13ceac349f8c.
Extra tests have been added in 52d29eb287.
Original message:
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
This adds a new interface to compute the cost of recipes, VPBasicBlocks,
VPRegionBlocks and VPlan, initially falling back to the legacy cost model
for all recipes. Follow-up patches will gradually migrate recipes to
compute their own costs step-by-step.
It also adds getBestPlan function to LVP which computes the cost of all
VPlans and picks the most profitable one together with the most
profitable VF.
The VPlan selected by the VPlan cost model is executed and there is an
assert to catch cases where the VPlan cost model and the legacy cost
model disagree. Even though I checked a number of different build
configurations on AArch64 and X86, there may be some differences
that have been missed.
Additional discussions and context can be found in @arcbbb's
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67647 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934 which is an earlier
version of the current PR.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92555
Introduce new subclasses of VPWidenMemoryRecipe for VP
(vector-predicated) loads and stores to address multiple TODOs from
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76172
Note that the introduction of the new recipes also improves code-gen for
VP gather/scatters by removing the redundant header mask. With the new
approach, it is not sufficient to look at users of the widened canonical
IV to find all uses of the header mask.
In some cases, a widened IV is used instead of separately widening the
canonical IV. To handle that, first collect all VPValues representing header
masks (by looking at users of both the canonical IV and widened inductions
that are canonical) and then checking all users (recursively) of those header
masks.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87411.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87816
This patch introduces a new VPWidenMemoryRecipe base class and distinct
sub-classes to model loads and stores.
This is a first step in an effort to simplify and modularize code
generation for widened loads and stores and enable adding further more
specialized memory recipes.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87411
This patch restructures the way names for printing VPValues are handled.
It moves the logic to generate names for printing to VPSlotTracker.
VPSlotTracker will now version names of the same underlying value if it
is used by multiple VPValues, by adding a .V suffix to the name.
This fixes cases where at the moment the same name is printed for
different VPValues.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81411
This patch introduces generating VP intrinsics in the Loop Vectorizer.
Currently the Loop Vectorizer supports vector predication in a very
limited capacity via tail-folding and masked load/store/gather/scatter
intrinsics. However, this does not let architectures with active vector
length predication support take advantage of their capabilities.
Architectures with general masked predication support also can only take
advantage of predication on memory operations. By having a way for the
Loop Vectorizer to generate Vector Predication intrinsics, which (will)
provide a target-independent way to model predicated vector
instructions. These architectures can make better use of their
predication capabilities.
Our first approach (implemented in this patch) builds on top of the
existing tail-folding mechanism in the LV (just adds a new tail-folding
mode using EVL), but instead of generating masked intrinsics for memory
operations it generates VP intrinsics for loads/stores instructions. The
patch adds a new VPlanTransforms to replace the wide header predicate
compare with EVL and updates codegen for load/stores to use VP
store/load with EVL.
Other important part of this approach is how the Explicit Vector Length
is computed. (VP intrinsics define this vector length parameter as
Explicit Vector Length (EVL)). We use an experimental intrinsic
`get_vector_length`, that can be lowered to architecture specific
instruction(s) to compute EVL.
Also, added a new recipe to emit instructions for computing EVL. Using
VPlan in this way will eventually help build and compare VPlans
corresponding to different strategies and alternatives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99750
At the moment, some VPInstructions create only a single scalar value,
but use VPTransformatState's 'vector' storage for this value. Those
values are effectively uniform-per-VF (or in some cases
uniform-across-VF-and-UF). Using the vector/per-part storage doesn't
interact well with other recipes, that more accurately using (Part,
Lane) to look up scalar values and prevents VPInstructions creating
scalars from interacting with other recipes working with scalars.
This PR tries to unify handling of scalars by using (Part, 0) for scalar
values where only the first lane is demanded. This allows using
VPInstructions with other recipes like VPScalarCastRecipe and is also
needed when using VPInstructions in more cases otuside the vector loop
region to generate scalars.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80269
Unify VPlan verifiers in verifyVPlanIsValid. This adds verification for
various properties on blocks to the verifier used for VPlans generated
by the inner loop vectorizer. It also adds def-use checks for the
verifier used in the VPlan native path.
This drops the separate flag to enable HCFG verification. Instead, all
VPlans are verified once they have been created, if assertions are
enabled.
This also removes VPWidenPHIRecipe from VPHeaderPHIRecipe; it is used to
model any phi node in the native path.
Add a new recipe to model scalar cast instructions, without relying on
an underlying instruction.
This allows creating scalar casts, without relying on an underlying
instruction (like the current VPReplicateRecipe). The new recipe is
used to explicitly model both truncating the induction step and the
VPDerivedIVRecipe, thus simplifying both the recipe and code
needed to introduce it.
Truncating VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipes should also be modeled using
the new recipe, as follow-up.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78113
Move vector pointer generation to a separate VPVectorPointerRecipe.
This untangles address computation from the memory recipes future
and is also needed to enable explicit unrolling in VPlan.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72164
This patch starts initial modeling of VF * UF in VPlan.
Initially, introduce a dedicated VFxUF VPValue, which is then
populated during VPlan::prepareToExecute. Initially, the VF * UF
applies only to the main vector loop region. Once we extend the
scope of VPlan in the future, we may want to associate different VFxUFs
with different vector loop regions (e.g. the epilogue vector loop)
This allows explicitly parameterizing recipes that rely on the
VF * UF, like the canonical induction increment. At the moment, this
mainly helps to avoid generating some duplicated calls to vscale with
scalable vectors. It should also allow using EVL as induction increments
explicitly in D99750. Referring to VF * UF is also needed in other
places that we plan to migrate to VPlan, like the minimum trip count
check during skeleton creation.
The first version creates the value for VF * UF directly in
prepareToExecute to limit the scope of the patch. A follow-on patch will
model VF * UF computation explicitly in VPlan using recipes.
Moved from Phabricator (https://reviews.llvm.org/D157322)
C++20 comes with std::erase to erase a value from std::vector. This
patch renames llvm::erase_value to llvm::erase for consistency with
C++20.
We could make llvm::erase more similar to std::erase by having it
return the number of elements removed, but I'm not doing that for now
because nobody seems to care about that in our code base.
Since there are only 50 occurrences of erase_value in our code base,
this patch replaces all of them with llvm::erase and deprecates
llvm::erase_value.
To generate cast instructions, the result type is needed. To allow
creating widened casts without underlying instruction, introduce a new
VPWidenCastRecipe that also holds the result type.
This functionality will be used in a follow-up patch to
implement truncateToMinimalBitwidths as VPlan-to-VPlan transform.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149081
At the moment, both VPValue and VPDef have an ID used when casting via
classof. This duplication is cumbersome, because it requires adding IDs
for new recipes twice and also requires setting them twice. In a few
cases, there's only a VPDef ID and no VPValue ID, which can cause same
confusion.
To simplify things, remove the VPValue IDs for different recipes.
Instead, only retain the generic VPValue ID (= used VPValues without a
corresponding defining recipe) and VPVRecipe for VPValues that are
defined by recipes that inherit from VPValue.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140848
This reverts commit bf15f1e489aa2f1ac13268c9081a992a8963eb5b.
The updated version fixes a crash by checking the induction kind instead
of the opcode; for integer inductions, the step is always added, but the
opcode might not be set.
This patch splits off the logic to transform the canonical IV to a
a value for an induction with a different start and step. This
transformation only needs to be done once (independent of VF/UF) and
enables sinking of VPScalarIVStepsRecipe as follow-up.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133758
The return value of getDef is guaranteed to be a VPRecipeBase and all
users can also accept a VPRecipeBase *. Most users actually case to
VPRecipeBase or a specific recipe before using it, so this change
removes a number of redundant casts.
Also rename it to getDefiningRecipe to make the name a bit clearer.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136068
@Ayal suggested a better named helper than using `!getDef()` to check if
a value is invariant across all parts.
The property we are using here is that the VPValue is defined outside
any vector loop region. There's a TODO left to handle recipes defined in
pre-header blocks.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133666
This addresses a suggestion to simplify the check from D131989. This
also makes it easier to ensure that VPHeaderPHIRecipe::classof checks
for all header phi ids.
Currently, for vectorised loops that use the get.active.lane.mask
intrinsic we only use the mask for predicated vector operations,
such as masked loads and stores, etc. The loop itself is still
controlled by comparing the canonical induction variable with the
trip count. However, for some targets this is inefficient when it's
cheap to use the mask itself to control the loop.
This patch adds support for using the active lane mask for control
flow by:
1. Generating the active lane mask for the next iteration of the
vector loop, rather than the current one. If there are still any
remaining iterations then at least the first bit of the mask will
be set.
2. Extract the first bit of this mask and use this bit for the
conditional branch.
I did this by creating a new VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe that sets
up the initial PHI values in the vector loop pre-header. I've also
made use of the new BranchOnCond VPInstruction for the final
instruction in the loop region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125301
This patch removes CondBit and Predicate from VPBasicBlock. To do so,
the patch introduces a new branch-on-cond VPInstruction opcode to model
a branch on a condition explicitly.
This addresses a long-standing TODO/FIXME that blocks shouldn't be users
of VPValues. Those extra users can cause issues for VPValue-based
analyses that don't expect blocks. Addressing this fixme should allow us
to re-introduce 266ea446ab7476.
The generic branch opcode can also be used in follow-up patches.
Depends on D123005.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126618
This patch introduces a new VPLiveOut subclass of VPUser to model
exit values explicitly. The initial version handles exit values that
are neither part of induction or reduction chains nor first order
recurrence phis.
Fixes#51366, #54867, #55167, #55459
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123537
Those helpers model properties of a user and they should also be
available to non-recipe users. This will be used in D123537 for a new
exit value user.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124936
