This is a follow-up to b71edfaa4ec3c998aadb35255ce2f60bba2940b0
since I forgot the lit.local.cfg files in that one.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: barannikov88, kwk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150762
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
CodeGenPrepare sinks address computations from one basic block to another
and attempts to reuse address computations that have already been sunk. If
the same address computation appears twice with the first instance as an
operand of a load whose result is an operand to a simplifable select,
CodeGenPrepare simplifies the select and recursively erases the now dead
instructions. CodeGenPrepare then attempts to use the erased address
computation for the second load.
Fix this by erasing the cached address value if it has zero uses before
looking for the address value in the sunken address map.
This partially resolves PR35209.
Thanks to Alexander Richardson for reporting the issue!
This fixed version relands r318032 which was reverted in r318049 due to
sanitizer buildbot failures.
Reviewers: john.brawn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39841
llvm-svn: 318956
CodeGenPrepare sinks address computations from one basic block to another
and attempts to reuse address computations that have already been sunk. If
the same address computation appears twice with the first instance as an
operand of a load whose result is an operand to a simplifable select,
CodeGenPrepare simplifies the select and recursively erases the now dead
instructions. CodeGenPrepare then attempts to use the erased address
computation for the second load.
Fix this by erasing the cached address value if it has zero uses before
looking for the address value in the sunken address map.
This partially resolves PR35209.
Thanks to Alexander Richardson for reporting the issue!
Reviewers: john.brawn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39841
llvm-svn: 318032
