At its core, this commit changes `OpaqueProperties` (aka a void*) to
`PropertyRef`, which is a {TypeID, void*}, where the TypeID is the ID of
the storage type of the given property (which can, as is often the case
for operations, be a struct of other properties).
Long-term, this change will allow for
1) Some sort of getFooPropertyRef() on property structs, allowing
individual members to be extracted generically
2) By having a property kind that is an OwningProprtyRef, generic
parsing (in combination with a bunch of other changes) 3) Probably a
safer C/Python API because we'll be able to indicate what's supposed to
be under a given void*
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Provides the infrastructure for implementing and late-binding
OpInterfaces from Python.
* On the mlir-c API declaration side, each `XOpInterface` has a callback
struct, with a callback for each method and a userdata member (provided
as an arg to each method), and a
`mlirXOpInterfaceAttachFallbackModel(ctx, op_name, callbacks)` func.
* This CAPI is implemented by defining a subclass of
`XOpInterface::FallbackModel` that holds the callback struct and has
each method call the corresponding callback (with userdata as an arg).
Given a callback struct, a new `FallbackModel` is created and attached,
i.e. late bound, to the named op. (MLIR's interface infrastructure is
such that the thus registered `FallbackModel` will be returned in case
the op gets cast to the `XOpInterface`.)
* On the Python side, we expose a stand-in `XOpInterface` base class
which has one (class)method: `XOpInterface.attach(cls, op_name, ctx)`.
Python users subclass this class (`class MyInterfaceImpl(XOpInterface):
...`) and implement the interface's methods (with the right names and
signatures). The user calls `attach` on the subclass
(`MyInterfaceImpl.attach("my_dialect.my_op", ctx)`) which prepares the
callbacks struct _with userdata set to the subclass_ (as we use it to
lookup methods). These callbacks (and userdata) are then registered as
an `XOpInterface::FallbackModel` by
`mlirXOpInterfaceAttachFallbackModel(...)`. From then on the Python
methods will be used to respond to calls to the interface methods
(originating in C++).
This PR enables implementing the TransformOpInterface and the
MemoryEffectsOpInterface, both of which are required for making an op
into a transform op.
Everything besides the above linked code is there to facilitate exposing
the interfaces: the right types for the arguments of the methods are
exposed as are functions/methods for manipulating these arguments (e.g.
specifying side effects on `OpOperand`s and `OpResult`s and being able
to access and set the transform handles associated with args and
results).
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.
Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.
Context:
- https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants
for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
- Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443
Implementation:
This patch updates all remaining uses of the deprecated functionality in
mlir/. This was done with clang-tidy as described below and further
modifications to GPUBase.td and OpenMPOpsInterfaces.td.
Steps are described per line, as comments are removed by git:
0. Retrieve the change from the following to build clang-tidy with an
additional check:
main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
1. Build clang-tidy
2. Run clang-tidy over your entire codebase while disabling all checks
and enabling the one relevant one. Run on all header files also.
3. Delete .inc files that were also modified, so the next build rebuilds
them to a pure state.
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy
run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
-header-filter=mlir/ mlir/* -fix
rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151542
Add C and python bindings for InferShapedTypeOpInterface
and ShapedTypeComponents. This allows users to invoke
InferShapedTypeOpInterface for ops that implement it.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149494
This new features enabled to dedicate custom storage inline within operations.
This storage can be used as an alternative to attributes to store data that is
specific to an operation. Attribute can also be stored inside the properties
storage if desired, but any kind of data can be present as well. This offers
a way to store and mutate data without uniquing in the Context like Attribute.
See the OpPropertiesTest.cpp for an example where a struct with a
std::vector<> is attached to an operation and mutated in-place:
struct TestProperties {
int a = -1;
float b = -1.;
std::vector<int64_t> array = {-33};
};
More complex scheme (including reference-counting) are also possible.
The only constraint to enable storing a C++ object as "properties" on an
operation is to implement three functions:
- convert from the candidate object to an Attribute
- convert from the Attribute to the candidate object
- hash the object
Optional the parsing and printing can also be customized with 2 extra
functions.
A new options is introduced to ODS to allow dialects to specify:
let usePropertiesForAttributes = 1;
When set to true, the inherent attributes for all the ops in this dialect
will be using properties instead of being stored alongside discardable
attributes.
The TestDialect showcases this feature.
Another change is that we introduce new APIs on the Operation class
to access separately the inherent attributes from the discardable ones.
We envision deprecating and removing the `getAttr()`, `getAttrsDictionary()`,
and other similar method which don't make the distinction explicit, leading
to an entirely separate namespace for discardable attributes.
Recommit d572cd1b067f after fixing python bindings build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141742
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional. This patch changes the way mlir-tblgen generates .inc
files, and modifies tests and documentation appropriately. It is a "no
compromises" patch, and doesn't leave the user with an unpleasant mix of
llvm::Optional and std::optional.
A non-trivial change has been made to ControlFlowInterfaces to split one
constructor into two, relating to a build failure on Windows.
See also: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <r@artagnon.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138934
The current implementation is quite clunky; OperationName stores either an Identifier
or an AbstractOperation that corresponds to an operation. This has several problems:
* OperationNames created before and after an operation are registered are different
* Accessing the identifier name/dialect/etc. from an OperationName are overly branchy
- they need to dyn_cast a PointerUnion to check the state
This commit refactors this such that we create a single information struct for every
operation name, even operations that aren't registered yet. When an OperationName is
created for an unregistered operation, we only populate the name field. When the
operation is registered, we populate the remaining fields. With this we now have two
new classes: OperationName and RegisteredOperationName. These both point to the
same underlying operation information struct, but only RegisteredOperationName can
assume that the operation is actually registered. This leads to a much cleaner API, and
we can also move some AbstractOperation functionality directly to OperationName.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114049
Introduce the initial support for operation interfaces in C API and Python
bindings. Interfaces are a key component of MLIR's extensibility and should be
available in bindings to make use of full potential of MLIR.
This initial implementation exposes InferTypeOpInterface all the way to the
Python bindings since it can be later used to simplify the operation
construction methods by inferring their return types instead of requiring the
user to do so. The general infrastructure for binding interfaces is defined and
InferTypeOpInterface can be used as an example for binding other interfaces.
Reviewed By: gysit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111656
