Only the [cmp.alg] part (for `comparison_meow_fallback` CPOs) in the
paper required changes. Other parts merely fixed preconditions of some
standard library functions.
I strongly feel that P2167R3 should be a DR despite that it is not a DR
officially: CPOs -> C++20; remain parts -> C++98/11 (except that
_`boolean-testable`_ should be transformed into the original
_BooleanTestable_ requirements in the old resolution of LWG2114).
Note that P2167R3 damaged the resolution of LWG3465: the type of `F < E`
was left underconstrained. I've tried to submit an LWG issue for this,
which is now LWG4157.
Drive-by change:
- enable some test coverages in `compare_strong_order_fallback.pass.cpp`
when `TEST_LONG_DOUBLE_IS_DOUBLE`, following up #106742Closes#105241.
This target (as well as 32-bit ARM Android) have sizeof(long double)
equal to sizeof(double).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137135
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
This does not include `std::compare_*_fallback`; those are coming later.
There's still an open question of how to implement std::strong_order
for `long double`, which has 80 value bits and 48 padding bits on x86-64,
and which is presumably *not* IEEE 754-compliant on PPC64 and so on.
So that part is left unimplemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110738
