Rename R_X86_64_REX2_GOTPCRELX to R_X86_64_CODE_4_GOTPCRELX, to align
with GCC/binutils and ABI.
GCC/binutils:
3d5a60de52
and
4a54cb0658
ABI:
357de358ba
so that we can remove the global `ctx` from toString implementations.
Rename lld::toString (to lld:🧝:toStr) to simplify name lookup (we
have many llvm::toString and another lld::toString(const llvm::opt::Arg
&)).
also rename `TargetInfo *getXXXTargetInfo` to `void setXXXTargetInfo`
and change it to set `ctx.target`. This ensures that when `ctx` becomes
a local variable, two lld invocations will not reuse the function-local
static variable.
---
Reland after commit c35214c131c0bc7f54dc18ceb75c75cba89f58ee
([ELF] Initialize TargetInfo members).
also rename `TargetInfo *getXXXTargetInfo` to `void setXXXTargetInfo`
and change it to set `ctx.target`. This ensures that when `ctx` becomes
a local variable, two lld invocations will not reuse the function-local
static variable.
Ctx was introduced in March 2022 as a more suitable place for such
singletons.
llvm/Support/thread.h includes <thread>, which transitively includes
sstream in libc++ and uses ios_base::in, so we cannot use `#define in ctx.sec`.
`symtab, config, ctx` are now the only variables using
LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY.
When `!isInt<32>(x.va)`, `addq x@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax` (possibly due to
getelementptr of a global variable) should not be optimized to
`addq offset, %rax`. We currently have either an assertion failure or an
incorrect optimization.
Fix it using the relaxOnce framework.
The existing implementation didn't handle when the input text section
was some offset from the output section.
This resulted in an assert in relaxGot() with an lld built with asserts
for some large binaries, or even worse, a silently broken binary with an
lld without asserts.
Close#77201. When linking code with a R_X86_64_TPOFF64 relocation, LLD
exits with an 'unknown reloaction' error message due to two missing
cases in relocation switch statements. This patch adds in those cases so
that LLD successfully links code R_X86_64_TPOFF64 relocations.
For each R_X86_64_(REX_)GOTPCRELX relocation, check that the offset to the symbol is representable with 2^32 signed offset. If not, add a GOT entry for it and set its expr to R_GOT_PC so that we emit the GOT load instead of the relaxed lea. Do this in finalizeAddressDependentContent() where we iteratively attempt this (e.g. RISCV uses this for relaxation, ARM uses this to insert thunks).
Decided not to do the opposite of inserting GOT entries initially and removing them when relaxable because removing GOT entries isn't simple.
One drawback of this approach is that if we see any GOTPCRELX relocation, we'll create an empty .got even if it's not required in the end.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157020
When the .eh_frame section is placed at a non-zero
offset within its output section, the relocation
value within .eh_frame are computed incorrectly.
We had similar issue in .ARM.exidx section and it has been
fixed already in https://reviews.llvm.org/D148033.
While applying the relocation using S+A-P, the value
of P (the location of the relocation) is getting wrong.
P is:
P = SecAddr + rel.offset, But SecAddr points to the
starting address of the outputsection rather than the
starting address of the eh frame section within that
output section.
This issue affects all targets which generates .eh_frame
section. Hence fixing in all the corresponding targets it affecting.
to prepare for changing `relocations` from a SmallVector to a pointer.
Also change the `isec` parameter in `addAddendOnlyRelocIfNonPreemptible` to `GotSection &`.
The target-specific code (AArch64, PPC64) does not fit into the generic code and
adds virtual function overhead. Move relocateAlloc into ELF/Arch/ instead. This
removes many virtual functions (relaxTls*). In addition, this helps get rid of
getRelocTargetVA dispatch and many RelExpr members in the future.
In many call sites we know uncompression cannot happen (non-SHF_ALLOC, or the
data (even if compressed) must have been uncompressed by a previous pass).
Prefer rawData in these cases. data() increases code size and prevents
optimization on rawData.
to decrease sizeof(SymbolUnion) by 8 on ELF64 platforms.
Symbols needing such information are typically 1% or fewer (5134 out of 560520
when linking clang, 19898 out of 5550705 when linking chrome). Storing them
elsewhere can decrease memory usage and symbol initialization time.
There is a ~0.8% saving on max RSS when linking a large program.
Future direction:
* Move some of dynsymIndex/verdefIndex/versionId to SymbolAux
* Support mixed TLSDESC and TLS GD without increasing sizeof(SymbolUnion)
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116281
The current TLSDESC optimization code assumes:
```
leaq x@tlsdesc(%rip), %rax
call *x@tlscall(%rax) # adjacent
```
From https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5665 , it seems that the
two instructions may not be adjacent in GCC 10's output:
```
leaq x@tlsdesc(%rip), %rax
something else
call *x@tlscall(%rax)
```
This patch supports the case. While here, support non-RAX registers for
R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC, in case the compiler generates inefficient:
```
leaq x@tlsdesc(%rip), %rcx # or %rdx, %rbx, %rdi, ...
movq %rcx, %rax
call *x@tlscall(%rax) # GNU ld/gold error for non-RAX
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114416
This brings back the original version of D81359.
I have found several use cases now.
* Unlike GNU ld, LLD's relocation processing is one pass. If we decide to
optimize(relax) R_X86_64_{,REX_}GOTPCRELX, we will suppress GOT generation and
cannot undo the decision later. Optimizing R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX can usually
make it easy to hit `relocation R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX out of range` because
the distance to GOT is usually shorter. Without --no-relax, the user has to
recompile with `-Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no`.
* The option would help during my investigationg of the root cause of https://git.kernel.org/linus/09e43968db40c33a73e9ddbfd937f46d5c334924
* There is need for relaxation for AArch64 & RISC-V. Implementing this for
x86-64 improves consistency with little target-specific cost (two-line
X86_64.cpp change).
Reviewed By: alexander-shaposhnikov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113615
