Summary:
This function existed (with identical code) in both NativeProcessLinux
and NativeProcessNetBSD, and it is likely that it would be useful to any
future implementation of NativeProcessProtocol.
Therefore I move it to the base class.
Reviewers: krytarowski
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52719
llvm-svn: 343683
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D46362.
When evaluating a complex expression in DWARFExpression::Evaluate,
file addresses must be resolved to load addresses before we can
perform operations such as DW_OP_deref on them.
For this the address goes through three steps
1. Read the file address as stored in the DWARF
2. Link/relocate the file address (when reading from a .dSYM, this is a no-op)
3. Convert the file address to a load address.
D46362 implemented step (3) by resolving the file address using the
Module that the original DWARF came from. In the case of a dSYM that
is correct, but when reading from .o files, we need to look up
relocated/linked addresses, so the right place to look them up is the
current frame's module. This patch fixes that by setting the
expression's Module to point to the linked debugmap object.
A word a bout the unorthodox testcase: The motivating testcase for
this fix is in Swift, but I managed to hand-modify LLVM-IR for a
trivial C program to exhibit the same problem, so we can fix this in
llvm.org.
rdar://problem/44689915
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52678
llvm-svn: 343612
Summary:
If there is no newline the "lldb" prompt could be on the wrong line. To reproduce the missing newline you can do 'image dump smytab' on any binary.
Previously
Symtab, file = D:\upstream\build\Debug\bin\clang-diff.exe, num_symbols = 0(lldb)
Now
Symtab, file = D:\upstream\build\Debug\bin\clang-diff.exe, num_symbols = 0
(lldb)
Reviewers: zturner, aleksandr.urakov, lldb-commits
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52627
llvm-svn: 343497
Currently we reject our own default disassembly-format string because it
contains two backticks which causes everything in between to be
interpreter as an expression by the command interpreter. This patch
fixes that by escaping backticks when dumping format strings.
llvm-svn: 343471
Summary:
This function encodes the knowledge of whether the PC points to the
breakpoint instruction of the one following it after the breakpoint is
"hit". This behavior mainly(*) depends on the architecture and not on the
OS, so it makes sense for it to be implemented in the base class, where
it can be shared between different implementations (Linux and NetBSD
atm).
(*) It is possible for an OS to expose a different API, perhaps by doing
some fixups in the kernel. In this case, the implementation can override
this function to implement custom behavior.
Reviewers: krytarowski, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52532
llvm-svn: 343409
Summary:
The `ClangUserExpression::GetLanguageForExpr` method is currently a big
source of sadness, as it's name implies that it's an accessor method, but it actually
is also initializing some variables that we need for parsing. This caused that we
currently call this getter just for it's side effects while ignoring it's return value,
which is confusing for the reader.
This patch renames it to `UpdateLanguageForExpr` and merges all calls to the
method into a single call in `ClangUserExpression::PrepareForParsing` (as calling
this method is anyway mandatory for parsing to succeed)
While looking at the code, I also found that we actually have two language
variables in this class hierarchy. The normal `Language` from the UserExpression
class and the `LanguageForExpr` that we implemented in this subclass. Both
don't seem to actually contain the same value, so we probably should look at this
next.
Reviewers: xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52561
llvm-svn: 343191
Summary:
This patch implements restoring of the calling convention from PDB.
It is necessary for expressions evaluation, if we want to call a function
of the debuggee process with a calling convention other than ccall.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, labath, asmith
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: teemperor, lldb-commits, stella.stamenova
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52501
llvm-svn: 343084
NativeProcessProtocol::ReadMemoryWithoutTrap had a bug, where it failed
to properly remove inserted breakpoint opcodes if the memory read
partially overlapped the trap opcode. This could not happen on x86
because it has a one-byte breakpoint instruction, but it could happen on
arm, which has a 4-byte breakpoint instruction (in arm mode).
Since triggerring this condition would only be possible on an arm
machine (and even then it would be a bit tricky). I test this using a
NativeProcessProtocol unit test.
llvm-svn: 343076
max number of stack frames to backtrace, make it a setting,
target.process.thread.max-backtrace-depth.
Add a test case for the setting.
<rdar://problem/28759559>
llvm-svn: 343029
AbsPosToLineColumnPos is the only reader of m_user_expression_start_pos
and actually treats it like a size_t. Also the value we store in
m_user_expression_start_pos is originally a size_t, so it makes sense
to change the type of this variable to size_t.
llvm-svn: 342804
When creating a target, lldb loads all dependent files (i.e. libs in
LC_LOAD_DYLIB for Mach-O). This can be confusing, especially when two
versions of the same library end up in the shared cache. It's possible
to change this behavior, by specifying target create -d <target> these
dependents are not loaded.
This patch changes the default behavior to only load dependent files
only when the target is an executable. When creating a target for a
library, it is now no longer necessary to pass -d. The user can still
override this behavior by specifying the -d option to change this
behavior.
rdar://problem/43721382
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51934
llvm-svn: 342634
This is an NFC commit to refactor the "load dependent files" parameter
from a boolean to an enum value. We want to be able to specify a
default, in which case we decide whether or not to load the dependent
files based on whether the target is an executable or not (i.e. a
dylib).
This is a dependency for D51934.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51859
llvm-svn: 342633
Summary:
Completing inside the expression command now uses the new description API
to also provide additional information to the user. For now this information
are the types of variables/fields and the signatures of completed function calls.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52103
llvm-svn: 342385
They're not that common, and falling back is definitely
better than throwing an error instead of the result. If we
feel motivated, we might end up implementing support for these,
but it's unclear whether it's worth the effort/complexity.
Fixes PR38925.
<rdar://problem/44436068>
llvm-svn: 342262
Summary:
This patch adds some symbol tag checks before using the `IPDBRawSymbol`
interface to improve safety and readability.
Reviewers: zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits, stella.stamenova
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51967
llvm-svn: 342208
I started from a clean slate to do the checkin, but forgot to svn add the new files.
Do that now.
Also add the one new source file to CMakeLists.txt
llvm-svn: 342190
This change allows you to write a new breakpoint type where the
logic for setting breakpoints is determined by a Python callback
written using the SB API's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51830
llvm-svn: 342185
Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.
Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.
There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).
The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.
An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```
Reviewers: #lldb, jingham
Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham
Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175
llvm-svn: 342181
The two existing implementations have the function implemented
identically, and there's no reason to believe that this would be
different for other implementations.
llvm-svn: 342167
This patch improves the support of DWARF5.
Particularly the reporting of source code locations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51935
llvm-svn: 342153
After landing r341457, we started seeing a failure on the swift-lldb
bots. The change was correct and pretty straightforward, a DW_OP_constu
was replaced with DW_OP_lit23, the value remaining identical.
0x000000f4: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_location (0x00000000
[0x0000000100000a51, 0x0000000100000d47): DW_OP_lit23, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("number")
However, this broke LLDB.
(Int) number = <extracting data from value failed>
The value was read correctly, but apparently the value's type was different.
When reading a constu it was reading a uint64 (m_type = e_ulonglong) while for
the literal, it got a signed int (m_type = e_sint). This change makes sure we
read the value as an unsigned.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51730
llvm-svn: 342142
Summary:
Similar to what we did in D50681, we now stop manually byte counting here
in the SourceManager.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50809
llvm-svn: 342121
