This avoids the use of the vector unit for copying from scalar to
vector. There is an extra ptrue instruction, but a predicate register
with the ptrue pattern populated is likely to be free in the context of
real code.
Tests were generated from a template to cover the axes mentioned at the
top of the test file.
Co-authored-by: Francesco Petrogalli <francesco.petrogalli@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103170
For the following case:
t8: i32 = or t7, t4
t10: i32 = ORRWrs t8, t8, TargetConstant:i32<73>
Current code wrongly returns (t8 >> shiftConstant) as the
UsefulBits of t8, which in fact is (t8 | (t8 >> shiftConstant)).
Reviewed by: sdesmalen, mdchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102759
Improve codegen when lowering the common vector shuffle case from the
vectorizer (op1[last]:op2[0:last-1]). This patch only handles this
common case as it is difficult to handle this more generally when using
fixed length vectors, due to being unable to use the SVE ext instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105289
This adds simple patterns for signed and unsigned saturating extract
narrow instructions. They combine a min/max/truncate into a single
instruction, providing that the immediates on the min/max are correct
for the saturation type. This is just handled in tablegen with some
extra patterns.
v2i64->v2i32 is not handled here as the min/max nodes are not legal,
making the lowering quite different.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103263
We're trying to match a few pointer computation patterns here for
re-association opportunities.
1) Isolating a constant operand to be on the RHS, e.g.:
G_PTR_ADD(BASE, G_ADD(X, C)) -> G_PTR_ADD(G_PTR_ADD(BASE, X), C)
2) Folding two constants in each sub-tree as long as such folding
doesn't break a legal addressing mode.
G_PTR_ADD(G_PTR_ADD(BASE, C1), C2) -> G_PTR_ADD(BASE, C1+C2)
AArch64 code size improvements on CTMark with -Os:
Program before after diff
pairlocalalign 251048 251044 -0.0%
consumer-typeset 421820 421812 -0.0%
kc 431348 431320 -0.0%
SPASS 413404 413300 -0.0%
clamscan 384396 384220 -0.0%
tramp3d-v4 370640 370412 -0.1%
lencod 432096 431772 -0.1%
bullet 479400 478796 -0.1%
sqlite3 288504 288072 -0.1%
7zip-benchmark 573796 570768 -0.5%
Geomean difference -0.1%
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105069
In `IRTranslator::translateGetElementPtr`, when we run into a vector gep with
some scalar operands, we try to normalize those operands using
`buildSplatVector`.
This is fine except for when the getelementptr has a <1 x N> type. In that case
it is treated as a scalar. If we run into one of these then every call to
```
// With VectorWidth = 1
LLT::fixed_vector(VectorWidth, PtrTy)
```
will assert.
Here's an example (equivalent to the added testcase):
https://godbolt.org/z/hGsTnMYdW
To get around this, this patch adds a variable, `WantSplatVector`, which
is true when our vector type ought to actually be represented using a vector.
When it's false, we'll translate as a scalar. This checks if `VectorWidth > 1`.
This fixes this bug:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35496
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105316
Target-independent code only knows how to spill to the stack; instead,
use AArch64ISD::REINTERPRET_CAST.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104573
Inserting into a smaller-than-legal scalable vector would result in an
internal compiler error. For example, inserting a <vscale x 4 x i8> into
a <vscale x 8 x i8> (both illegal vector types for SVE) would cause a
crash.
This crash was happening because there was no code to promote (legalise)
the result of an INSERT_SUBVECTOR node.
This patch implements PromoteIntRes_INSERT_SUBVECTOR, which legalises
the ISD node. This is currently done by going through memory. This is
necessary because of the requirement that the SubVec parameter of the
INSERT_SUBVECTOR node must be smaller than the Vec parameter, which
means that INSERT_SUBVECTOR cannot always have a legal result/operand
types.
Co-Authored-by: Joe Ellis <joe.ellis@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102766
Since gather lowering can now lower to nodes that may need expansion via
the vector legalizer, do MGATHER lowering via vector legalizer.
Additionally, as part of adding passthru support for fixed typed
gathers, fix passthru support for scalable types.
Depends on D104910
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104217
This enables proper lowering of non-byte sized loads. We still aren't
faithfully preserving memory types everywhere, so the legality checks
still only consider the size.
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
When clamping the index for a memory access to a stacked vector we must
take into account the entire type being accessed, not just assume that
we are accessing only a single element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105016
This reverts commit 51e434fc2590d1d3ffa6545cd07290a238db2b88 because of a
build bot failure in test-suite::GCC-C-execute-pr60960.test that I need to
investigate.
This add as a fold of sub(0, splat(sub(0, x))) -> splat(x). This can
come up in the lowering of right shifts under AArch64, where we generate
a shift left of a negated number.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103755
This custom lowers <4 x i8> vector loads using a 32-bit load, followed by 2
SSHLL instructions to extend it to e.g. a <4 x i32> vector. Before, it was
really inefficient and expensive to construct a <4 x i32> for this as 4 byte
loads and 4 moves were used. With this improvement SLP vectorisation might for
example become profitable, see D103629.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104782
PACI*SP have the advantage that they are in HINT space, meaning
they can be run successfully in hardware without PAuth support -
they will just behave as a NOP. However, PACI*SP are also implicit
landing pads (think of an extra BTI jc). Therefore, they allow
indirect jumps of all kinds into them, potentially inserting new
gadgets. This patch replaces PACI*SP by PACI* LR, SP when
compiling explicitly for hardware with full PAuth support. PACI*
is not in the HINT space, therefore it will fault when run in
hardware without PAuth support, but it is also not a landing pad,
making programs safer in newer HW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101920
Based ontop of D104598, which is a NFCI-ish refactoring.
Here, a restriction, that only empty blocks can be merged, is lifted.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104597
With regards to overrunning, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(``subvec``) - 1)
must be valid ``vec`` indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(result_type) - 1)
must be valid vector indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
For the non-mixed cases (e.g. inserting/extracting a scalable into/from
another scalable, or inserting/extracting a fixed into/from another
fixed), it is possible to statically check whether or not the above
conditions are met. This was previously missing from the verifier, and
if the conditions were found to be false, the result of the
insertion/extraction would be replaced with an undef.
With regards to invalid indices, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
``idx`` represents the starting element number at which ``subvec``
will be inserted. ``idx`` must be a constant multiple of
``subvec``'s known minimum vector length.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
The ``idx`` specifies the starting element number within ``vec``
from which a subvector is extracted. ``idx`` must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Similarly, these conditions were not previously enforced in the
verifier. In some circumstances, invalid indices were permitted
silently, and in other circumstances, an undef was spawned where a
verifier error would have been preferred.
This commit adds verifier checks to enforce the constraints above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104468
This reverts commit ea011ec5ed53599305de62ca5fcfd31f4b3448c3.
This still causes some miscompiles, I'll follow up in the phabricator
review with a sample of that issue (which is part of the sample of
the previous issue).
This is a recommit that fixes unwanted STP generation by checking that
the base register has not been modified or used elsewhere.
Our initial motivating case was memcpy's with alignments > 16. The
loads/stores, to which small memcpy's expand, are kept together in
several places so that we get a sequence like this for a 64 bit copy:
LD w0
LD w1
ST w0
ST w1
The load/store optimiser can generate a LDP/STP w0, w1 from this because
the registers read/written are consecutive. In our case however, the
sequence is optimised during ISel, resulting in:
LD w0
ST w0
LD w0
ST w0
This instruction reordering allows reuse of registers. Since the registers
are no longer consecutive (i.e. they are the same), it inhibits LDP/STP
creation. The approach here is to perform renaming:
LD w0
ST w0
LD w1
ST w1
to enable the folding of the stores into a STP. We do not yet generate
the LDP due to a limitation in the renaming implementation, but plan to
look at that in a follow-up so that we fully support this case. While
this was initially motivated by certain memcpy's, this is a general
approach and thus is beneficial for other cases too, as can be seen
in some test changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103597
According to IR LangRef, the FMF flag:
contract
Allow floating-point contraction (e.g. fusing a multiply followed by an
addition into a fused multiply-and-add).
reassoc
Allow reassociation transformations for floating-point instructions.
This may dramatically change results in floating-point.
My understanding is that these two flags shouldn't imply each other,
as we might have a SDNode that can be reassociated with others, but
not contractble.
eg: We may want following fmul/fad/fsub to freely reassoc, but don't
want fma being generated here.
%F = fmul reassoc double %A, %B ; <double> [#uses=1]
%G = fmul reassoc double %C, %D ; <double> [#uses=1]
%H = fadd reassoc double %F, %G ; <double> [#uses=1]
%I = fsub reassoc double %H, %E ; <double> [#uses=1]
Before https://reviews.llvm.org/D45710, `reassoc` flag actually
did not imply isContratable either.
The current implementation also only check the flag in fadd node,
ignoring fmul node, this patch update that as well.
Reviewed By: spatel, qiucf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104247
These all (and some others) are being affected by D104597,
but they are manually-written, which rather complicates
checking the effect that change has on them.
This problem is exposed by D104598, after it tail-merges `ret` in
`@test_inline_constraint_S_label`, the verifier would start complaining
`invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'S'`.
Essentially, taking address of a block is mismodelled in IR.
It should probably be an explicit instruction, a first one in block,
that isn't identical to any other instruction of the same type,
so that it can't be hoisted.
