The default behavior for any_extend of a constant is to zero extend.
This occurs inside of getNode rather than allowing type legalization
to promote the constant which would sign extend. By using sign extend
with getNode the constant will be sign extended. This gives a better
chance for isel to find a simm5 immediate since all xlen bits are
examined there.
For instructions that use a uimm5 immediate, this change only affects
constants >= 128 for i8 or >= 32768 for i16. Constants that large
already wouldn't have been eligible for uimm5 and would need to use a
scalar register.
If the instruction isn't able to use simm5 or the immediate is
too large, we'll need to materialize the immediate in a register.
As far as I know constants with all 1s in the upper bits should
materialize as well or better than all 0s.
Longer term we should probably have a SEW aware PatFrag to ignore
the bits above SEW before checking simm5.
I updated about half the test cases in some tests to use a negative
constant to get coverage for this.
Reviewed By: evandro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93487
This adds intrinsics for vmv.x.s and vmv.s.x.
I've used stricter type constraints on these intrinsics than what we've been doing on the arithmetic intrinsics so far. This will allow us to not need to pass the scalar type to the Intrinsic::getDeclaration call when creating these intrinsics.
A custom ISD is used for vmv.x.s in order to implement the change in computeNumSignBitsForTargetNode which can remove sign extends on the result.
I also modified the MC layer description of these instructions to show the tied source/dest operand. This is different than what we do for masked instructions where we drop the tied source operand when converting to MC. But it is a more accurate description of the instruction. We can't do this for masked instructions since we use the same MC instruction for masked and unmasked. Tools like llvm-mca operate in the MC layer and rely on ins/outs and Uses/Defs for analysis so I don't know if we'll be able to maintain the current behavior for masked instructions. So I went with the accurate description here since it was easy.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93365
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: ShihPo Hung <shihpo.hung@sifive.com>
Co-Authored-by: Monk Chiang <monk.chiang@sifive.com>
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93366
If users want to use vector floating point instructions, they need to
specify 'F' extension additionally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93282
The compiler is making no effort to preserve upper elements. To do so would require another source operand tied with the destination and a different intrinsic interface to give control of this source to the programmer.
This patch changes the tail policy to agnostic so that the CPU doesn't need to make an effort to preserve them.
This is consistent with the RVV intrinsic spec here https://github.com/riscv/rvv-intrinsic-doc/blob/master/rvv-intrinsic-rfc.md#configuration-setting
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93080
If SETUNE isn't legal, UO can use the NOT of the SETO expansion.
Removes some complex isel patterns. Most of the test changes are
from using XORI instead of SEQZ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92008
The register operand was not being marked as a def when it should be. No tests
for this in the main branch as there are not yet any pseudos without a
non-negative VLIndex.
Also change the type of a virtual register operand from unsigned to Register
and adjust formatting.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92823
This merges the SEW and LMUL enums that each used into singles enums in RISCVBaseInfo.h. The patch also adds a new encoding helper to take SEW, LMUL, tail agnostic, mask agnostic and turn it into a vtype immediate.
I also stopped storing the Encoding in the VTYPE operand in the assembler. It is easy to calculate when adding the operand which should only happen once per instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92813
A rotate by half the bitwidth swaps the bottom and top half which is the same as one of the MSB GREVI stage.
We have to do this as a special combine because we prefer to keep (rotl/rotr X, BitWidth/2) as a rotate rather than a single stage GREVI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92286
The companion RFC (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html) gives lots of details on the overall strategy, but we summarize it here:
LLVM IR involving vector types is going to be selected using pseudo instructions (only MachineInstr). These pseudo instructions contain dummy operands to represent the vector type being operated and the vector length for the operation.
These two dummy operands, as set by instruction selection, will be used by the custom inserter to prepend every operation with an appropriate vsetvli instruction that ensures the vector architecture is properly configured for the operation. Not in this patch: later passes will remove the redundant vsetvli instructions.
Register classes of tuples of vector registers are used to represent vector register groups (LMUL > 1).
Those pseudos are eventually lowered into the actual instructions when emitting the MCInsts.
About the patch:
Because there is a bit of initial infrastructure required, this is the minimal patch that allows us to select instructions for 3 LLVM IR instructions: load, add and store vectors of integers. LLVM IR operations have "whole-vector" semantics (as in they generate values for all the elements).
Later patches will extend the information represented in TableGen.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Evandro Menezes <evandro.menezes@sifive.com>
Co-Authored-by: Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89449
Rather than having a different opcode for RV32 and RV64. Let's just say the integer type is XLenVT and use a single opcode for both modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92538
This enables bswap/bitreverse to combine with other GREVI patterns or each other without needing to add more special cases to the DAG combine or new DAG combines.
I've also enabled the existing GREVI combine for GREVIW so that it can pick up the i32 bswap/bitreverse on RV64 after they've been type legalized to GREVIW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92253
GORCI performs an OR between each stage. So we need to ensure only
one stage is active before doing this combine.
Initial attempts at finding a test case for this failed due to
the order things get combined. It's most likely that we'll form
one stage of GREVI then combine to GORCI before the two stages of
GREVI are able to be formed and combined with each other to form
a multi stage GREVI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92289
Start with an assumption that FMA is faster than Fmul+FAdd. If thats not true
on some particular implementation we can add a tuning parameter in the future.
I've update the fmuladd test cases and added new test cases for fast math flag
based contraction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91987
This is the logically correct thing to do. But it generates worse
code for i32 umin/umax on the rv64 due to type legalize requesting
zext even though the arguments are sext. Maybe we can teach type
legalizer to use sext for umin/umax for RISCV.
It's also producing possibly worse code on i64 on RV32 since we
still end up with selects that become branches. But this seems
like something we could improve in type legalization or DAG combine.
Hopefully this makes D92095 work for RISCV with Zbb.
This adds custom opcodes for FSLW/FSRW so we can type legalize
fshl/fshr without needing to match a sign_extend_inreg.
I've used the operand order from fshl/fshr to make the isel
pattern similar to the non-W form. It was also hard to decide
another order since the register instruction has the shift amount
as the second operand, but the immediate instruction has it as
the third operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91479
This is a special calling convention to be used by the GHC compiler.
Patch by Andreas Schwab (schwab)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89788
We generate two 4 byte loads or two stores as part of the expansion.
Previously the MemOperand was set the same for both to cover the
full 8 bytes. Now we set a separate 4 byte mem operand for each
with a 4 byte offset for the high part.
Previously we required a sra to pattern match these properly in isel. If the consumer didn't need the result sign extended we'll have an srl instead of sra and fail to match.
This patch switches to custom legalizing to GREVIW using portions of D91259.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91457
This should result in better utilization of RORIW since we
don't need to look for a SIGN_EXTEND_INREG that may not exist.
Also remove rotl/rotr isel matching to GREVI and just prefer RORI.
This is to keep consistency so we don't have to match ROLW/RORW
to GREVIW as well. I imagine RORI/RORIW performance will be the
same or better than GREVI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91449
This moves the recognition of GREVI and GORCI from TableGen patterns
into a DAGCombine. This is done primarily to match "deeper" patterns in
the future, like (grevi (grevi x, 1) 2) -> (grevi x, 3).
TableGen is not best suited to matching patterns such as these as the compile
time of the DAG matchers quickly gets out of hand due to the expansion of
commutative permutations.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91259
Similar to the X86 and AMDGPU targets, this uses a macro to cut down on
repetitive and error-prone code when converting RISCVISD node names to
strings in getTargetNodeName.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91414
We were creating RISCVISD::SELECT_CC nodes with Glue output that was never being used, and the tablegen SDNode had the SDNPInGlue flag instead of the SDNPOutGlue flag.
Since we don't seem to need the Glue just get rid of it from both places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91199
D80526 added custom lowering to pick the si lib call on RV64, but this custom handling is only enabled when the F and D extension are both disabled. This prevents the si library call from being used for double when F is enabled but D is not.
This patch changes the behavior so we always enable the Custom hook on RV64 and decide in ReplaceNodeResults if we should emit a libcall based on whether the FP type should be softened or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90817
The _F and _D registers are already sub/super registers. When one gets allocated all its aliases are already marked as allocated. We don't need to explicitly shadow it too.
I believe shadow is for calling conventions like 64-bit Windows on X86 where have rules like this
CCIfType<[i32], CCAssignToRegWithShadow<[ECX , EDX , R8D , R9D ],
[XMM0, XMM1, XMM2, XMM3]>>
For that calling convention the argument number determines which register is used regardless of how many scalars or vectors came before it.
Removing this removes a question I had in D90738.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90801
As discussed on D90322, some MSVC builds are failing with is_trivially_copyable static asserts (see D86126) - we can avoid this by not using the std::pair<unsigned,unsigned> which held both the FP+DP Registers, just handle the FP register and convert to DP on the fly.
The return value of this interface still uses an 'unsigned' on all
targets. So we convert Register back to unsigned at the end.
I'm hoping this will prevent the issue that caused the revert of
D90322.
Just return the new node, which is the standard practice.
I also noticed what appeared to be an unnecessary attempt at
creating an ANY_EXTEND where the type should already be correct.
I replace with an assert to verify the type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90444
This combine makes two calls to SimplifyDemandedBits, one for the LHS and one
for the RHS. If the LHS call returns true, we don't make the RHS call. When
SimplifyDemandedBits makes a change, it will add the nodes around the change to
the DAG combiner worklist. If the simplification happens on the first recursion
step, the N will get added to the worklist. But if the simplification happens
deeper in the recursion, then N will not be revisited until the next time the
DAG combiner runs.
This patch explicitly addes N to the worklist anytime a Simplification is made.
Without this we might miss additional simplifications on the LHS or never
simplify the RHS. Special care also needs to be taken to not add N if it has
been CSEd by the simplification. There are similar examples in DAGCombiner and
the X86 target, but I don't have a test for it for RISC-V. I've also returned
SDValue(N, 0) instead of SDValue() so DAGCombiner knows a change was made and
will update its Statistic variable.
The test here was constructed so that 2 simplifications happen to the LHS.
Without this fix one happens in the post type legalization DAG combine and the
other happens after LegalizeDAG. This prevents the RHS from ever being
simplified causing the left and right shift to clear the upper 32 bits of the
RHS to be left behind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90339
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the ternary subset (zbt subextension) of the
experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79875
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions belonging to both the permutation and the base
subsets of the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79873
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the permutation subset (zbp subextension) of
the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79871
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the base subset (zbb subextension) of the
experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79870
... to shift/add or shift/sub.
Do not enable it on riscv32 with the M extension where decomposeMulByConstant
may not be an optimization.
Reviewed By: luismarques, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82660
