Reapply commit 796b84d26f4d461fb50e7b4e84e15a10eaca88fc that was
reverted due to reports of crashes. A minor change now guards against
getVariableLocationOperand() returning a nullptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106659
When hoisting/moving calls to locations, we strip unknown metadata. Such calls are usually marked `speculatable`, i.e. they are guaranteed to not cause undefined behaviour when run anywhere. So, we should strip attributes that can cause immediate undefined behaviour if those attributes are not valid in the context where the call is moved to.
This patch introduces such an API and uses it in relevant passes. See
updated tests.
Fix for PR50744.
Reviewed By: nikic, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104641
This reapplies commit 76f3ffb2b285998f02639db8fd42fb0de8a540d0 that was
reverted due to buildbot failures.
- Update lit tests with REQUIRES condition.
- Abandon salvage attempt if SCEVUnknown::getValue() returns nullptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105207
This patch extends salvaging of debuginfo in the Loop Strength Reduction
(LSR) pass by translating Scalar Evaluations (SCEV) into DIExpressions.
The method is as follows:
- Cache dbg.value intrinsics that are salvageable.
- Obtain a loop Induction Variable (IV) from ScalarExpressionExpander or
the loop header.
- Translate the IV SCEV into an expression that recovers the current
loop iteration count. Combine this with the dbg.value's location
op SCEV to create a DIExpression that salvages the value.
Review by: jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105207
Nowadays, simplifycfg pass already tail-merges all the ret blocks together
before doing anything, and it should not increase the count of ret's,
so this is dead code.
Proposed alternative to D105338.
This is ugly, but short-term I think it's the best way forward: first,
let's formalize the hacks into a coherent model. Then we can consider
extensions of that model (we could have different flavors of volatile
with different rules).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106309
This patch removes RtCheck from RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup to make it
possible to construct RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup objects without a
RuntimePointerChecking object. This should make it easier to
re-use the code to generate runtime checks, e.g. in D102834.
RtCheck was only used to access the pointer info for a given index.
Instead, the start and end expressions can be passed directly.
For code-gen, we also need to know the address space to use. This can
also be explicitly passed at construction.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105481
We could try harder to screen out libcalls by
function signature (and that would be a much larger
change than for sprintf alone), but that might make
the transition to type-less pointers more difficult.
https://llvm.org/PR51200
isSafeToSpeculateStore() looks for a preceding store to the same
location to make sure that introducing a new store of the same
value is safe. It currently bails on intervening mayHaveSideEffect()
instructions. However, I believe just checking mayWriteToMemory()
is sufficient there -- we just need to make sure that we know which
value was stored, we don't care if we can unwind in the meantime.
While looking into this, I started having some doubts about the
correctness of the transform with regard to thread safety. While
we don't try to hoist non-simple stores, I believe we also need
to make sure that the preceding store is simple as well. Otherwise
we could introduce a spurious non-atomic write after an atomic write
-- under our memory model this would result in a subsequent undef
atomic read, even if the second write stores the same value as the
first.
Example: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/q_3YAL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106742
If the branch isn't `unpredictable`, and it is predicted to *not* branch
to the block we are considering speculatively executing,
then it seems counter-productive to execute the code that is predicted not to be executed.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106650
Otherwise e.g. the FoldTwoEntryPHINode() has to do a lot of legwork
to re-deduce what is the dominant block (i.e. for which block
is this branch the terminator).
Constfold constrained variants of operations fadd, fsub, fmul, fdiv,
frem, fma and fmuladd.
The change also sets up some means to support for removal of unused
constrained intrinsics. They are declared as accessing memory to model
interaction with floating point environment, so they were not removed,
as they have side effect. Now constrained intrinsics that have
"fpexcept.ignore" as exception behavior are removed if they have no uses.
As for intrinsics that have exception behavior other than "fpexcept.ignore",
they can be removed if it is known that they do not raise floating point
exceptions. It happens when doing constant folding, attributes of such
intrinsic are changed so that the intrinsic is not claimed as accessing
memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102673
This function is called when some predecessor of an empty return block
ends with a conditional branch, with both successors being empty ret blocks.
Now, because of the way SimplifyCFG works, it might happen to simplify
one of the blocks in a way that makes a conditional branch
into an unconditional one, since it's destinations are now identical,
but it might not have actually simplified said conditional branch
into an unconditional one yet.
So, we have to check that ourselves first,
especially now that SimplifyCFG aggressively tail-merges
all ret and resume blocks.
Even if it was an unconditional branch already,
`SimplifyCFGOpt::simplifyReturn()` doesn't call `FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch()`
by default.
The logical (select) form of and/or will now be a source of problems.
We don't really account for it's inverted form, yet it exists,
and presumably we should treat it just like non-inverted form:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/BU9AXkhttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51149 reports a reportedly-serious
perf regression that will hopefully be mitigated by this.
This removes an abuse of ELF linker behaviors while keeping Mach-O/COFF linker
behaviors unchanged.
ELF: when module_ctor is in a comdat, this patch removes reliance on a linker
abuse (an SHT_INIT_ARRAY in a section group retains the whole group) by using
SHF_GNU_RETAIN. No linker behavior difference when module_ctor is not in a comdat.
Mach-O: module_ctor gets `N_NO_DEAD_STRIP`. No linker behavior difference
because module_ctor is already referenced by a `S_MOD_INIT_FUNC_POINTERS`
section (GC root).
PE/COFF: no-op. SanitizerCoverage already appends module_ctor to `llvm.used`.
Other sanitizers: llvm.used for local linkage is not implemented in
`TargetLoweringObjectFileCOFF::emitLinkerDirectives` (once implemented or
switched to a non-local linkage, COFF can use module_ctor in comdat (i.e.
generalize ELF-specific rL301586)).
There is no object file size difference.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106246
We need to make sure that the value types are the same. Otherwise
we both may not have the necessary dereferenceability implication,
nor can we directly form the desired select pattern.
Without opaque pointers this is enforced implicitly through the
pointer comparison.
When adding noalias/alias.scope metadata, we analyze the instructions
of the original callee, and then place metadata on the corresponding
inlined instructions in the caller as provided by VMap. However, this
assumes that this actually a clone of the instruction, rather than
the result of simplification. If simplification occurred, the
instruction that VMap points to may not have any relationship as far
as ModRef behavior is concerned.
Fix this by tracking simplified instructions during cloning and then
only processing instructions that have not been simplified. This is
done with an additional map form original to cloned instruction,
into which we only insert if no simplification is performed. The
mapping in VMap can then be compared to this map. If they're the
same, the instruction hasn't been simplified. (I originally wanted
to only track a set of simplified instructions, but that wouldn't
work if the instruction only gets simplified afterwards, e.g. based
on rewritten phis.)
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50589.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106242
This fixes the lower and upper bound calculation of a
RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup when it has more than one loop
invariant pointers. Resolves PR50686.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104148
This implements the elementtype attribute specified in D105407. It
just adds the attribute and the specified verifier rules, but
doesn't yet make use of it anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106008
`SinkCommonCodeFromPredecessors()` doesn't itself ensure that duplicate PHI nodes aren't created.
I suppose, we could teach it to do that on-the-fly (& account for the already-existing PHI nodes,
& adjust costmodel), the diff will be bigger than this.
The alternative is to schedule a new EarlyCSE pass invocation somewhere later in the pipeline.
Clearly, we don't have any EarlyCSE runs in module optimization passline, so this pattern isn't cleaned up...
That would perhaps better, but it will again have some compile time impact.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106010
This patch make coroutine passes run by default in LLVM pipeline. Now
the clang and opt could handle IR inputs containing coroutine intrinsics
without special options.
It should be fine. On the one hand, the coroutine passes seems to be stable
since there are already many projects using coroutine feature.
On the other hand, the coroutine passes should do nothing for IR who doesn't
contain coroutine intrinsic.
Test Plan: check-llvm
Reviewed by: lxfind, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105877
The bug was that evaluateBitcastFromPtr attempts a narrowing to a struct's 0th
element of a store that covers other elements. While this is okay on the load
side, applying it to stores causes us to miss the writes to the additionally
covered elements.
rdar://79503568
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105838
This patch fixes code that incorrectly handled dbg.values with duplicate
location operands, i.e. !DIArgList(i32 %a, i32 %a). The errors in
question were caused by either applying an update to dbg.value multiple
times when the update is only valid once, or by updating the
DIExpression for only the first instance of a value that appears
multiple times.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105831
Just like intrinsics are not tracked for IFI.InlinedCalls, they should not be tracked for IFI.InlinedCallSites.
In the current top-of-tree this change is a NFC, but the full restrict patches (D68484) potentially trigger an read-after-free
if intrinsics are also added to the InlindeCallSites, due to a late optimization potentially removing some of the inlined intrinsics.
Also see https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-July/151722.html for a discussion about the problem.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105805
This patch fixes the problem of SimplifyBranchOnICmpChain that occurs
when extra values are Undef or poison.
Suppose the %mode is 51 and the %Cond is poison, and let's look at the
case below.
```
%A = icmp ne i32 %mode, 0
%B = icmp ne i32 %mode, 51
%C = select i1 %A, i1 %B, i1 false
%D = select i1 %C, i1 %Cond, i1 false
br i1 %D, label %T, label %F
=>
br i1 %Cond, label %switch.early.test, label %F
switch.early.test:
switch i32 %mode, label %T [
i32 51, label %F
i32 0, label %F
]
```
incorrectness: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/BWScX
Code before transformation will not raise UB because %C and %D is false,
and it will not use %Cond. But after transformation, %Cond is being used
immediately, and it will raise UB.
This problem can be solved by adding freeze instruction.
correctness: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/x9x4oY
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104569
This is now the same as isIntAttrKind(), so use that instead, as
it does not require manual maintenance. The naming is also more
accurate in that both int and type attributes have an argument,
but this method was only targeting int attributes.
I initially wanted to tighten the AttrBuilder assertion, but we
have some in-tree uses that would violate it.
Rules:
1. SCEVUnknown is a pointer if and only if the LLVM IR value is a
pointer.
2. SCEVPtrToInt is never a pointer.
3. If any other SCEV expression has no pointer operands, the result is
an integer.
4. If a SCEVAddExpr has exactly one pointer operand, the result is a
pointer.
5. If a SCEVAddRecExpr's first operand is a pointer, and it has no other
pointer operands, the result is a pointer.
6. If every operand of a SCEVMinMaxExpr is a pointer, the result is a
pointer.
7. Otherwise, the SCEV expression is invalid.
I'm not sure how useful rule 6 is in practice. If we exclude it, we can
guarantee that ScalarEvolution::getPointerBase always returns a
SCEVUnknown, which might be a helpful property. Anyway, I'll leave that
for a followup.
This is basically mop-up at this point; all the changes with significant
functional effects have landed. Some of the remaining changes could be
split off, but I don't see much point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105510
This reverts commit 52aeacfbf5ce5f949efe0eae029e56db171ea1f7.
There isn't full agreement on a path forward yet, but there is agreement that
this shouldn't land as-is. See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
Also reverts unreviewed "[clang] Improve `-Wnull-dereference` diag to be more in-line with reality"
This reverts commit f4877c78c0fc98be47b926439bbfe33d5e1d1b6d.
And all the related changes to tests:
This reverts commit 9a0152799f8e4a59e0483728c9f11c8a7805616f.
This reverts commit 3f7c9cc27422f7302cf5a683eeb3978e6cb84270.
This reverts commit 329f8197ef59f9bd23328b52d623ba768b51dbb2.
This reverts commit aa9f58cc2c48ca6cfc853a2467cd775dc7622746.
This reverts commit 2df37d5ddd38091aafbb7d338660e58836f4ac80.
This reverts commit a72a44181264fd83e05be958c2712cbd4560aba7.
Currently InstructionSimplify.cpp knows how to simplify floating point
instructions that have a NaN operand. It does not know how to handle the
matching constrained FP intrinsic.
This patch teaches it how to simplify so long as the exception handling
is not "fpexcept.strict".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103169
This reverts commit 4e413e16216d0c94ada2171f3c59e0a85f4fa4b6,
which landed almost 10 months ago under premise that the original behavior
didn't match reality and was breaking users, even though it was correct as per
the LangRef. But the LangRef change still hasn't appeared, which might suggest
that the affected parties aren't really worried about this problem.
Please refer to discussion in:
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D87399 (`Revert "[InstCombine] erase instructions leading up to unreachable"`)
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D53184 (`[LangRef] Clarify semantics of volatile operations.`)
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D87149 (`[InstCombine] erase instructions leading up to unreachable`)
clang has `-Wnull-dereference` which will diagnose the obvious cases
of null dereference, it was adjusted in f4877c78c0fc98be47b926439bbfe33d5e1d1b6d,
but it will only catch the cases where the pointer is a null literal,
it will not catch the cases where an arbitrary store is expected to trap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
C++23 will make these conversions ambiguous - so fix them to make the
codebase forward-compatible with C++23 (& a follow-up change I've made
will make this ambiguous/invalid even in <C++23 so we don't regress
this & it generally improves the code anyway)
