This patch updates VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe to hold the start value
for the induction variable. This makes the start value explicit and
allows for adjusting the start value for a VPlan.
The flexibility will be used in further patches.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92129
This patch turns updates VPInstruction to manage the value it defines
using VPDef. The VPValue is used during VPlan construction and
codegeneration instead of the plain IR reference where possible.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90565
This patch makes VPRecipeBase a direct subclass of VPDef, moving the
SubclassID to VPDef.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90564
This patch turns updates VPInterleaveRecipe to manage the values it defines
using VPDef. The VPValue is used during VPlan construction and
codegeneration instead of the plain IR reference where possible.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90562
This patch turns updates VPWidenSelectRecipe to manage the value
it defines using VPDef.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90560
This patch turns updates VPWidenGEPRecipe to manage the value it defines
using VPDef. The VPValue is used during VPlan construction and
codegeneration instead of the plain IR reference where possible.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90561
This patch turns updates VPWidenREcipe to manage the value it defines
using VPDef.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90559
This patch updates VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipe to use VPDef
to manage the value it produces instead of inheriting from VPValue.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90563
* Steps are scaled by `vscale`, a runtime value.
* Changes to circumvent the cost-model for now (temporary)
so that the cost-model can be implemented separately.
This can vectorize the following loop [1]:
void loop(int N, double *a, double *b) {
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(4, scalable)
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
a[i] = b[i] + 1.0;
}
}
[1] This source-level example is based on the pragma proposed
separately in D89031. This patch only implements the LLVM part.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91077
VPPredInstPHIRecipe is one of the recipes that was missed during the
initial conversion. This patch adjusts the recipe to also manage its
operand using VPUser.
Interleave groups also depend on the values they store. Manage the
stored values as VPUser operands. This is currently a NFC, but is
required to allow VPlan transforms and to manage generated vector values
exclusively in VPTransformState.
Update VPReplicateRecipe to inherit from VPValue. This still does not
update scalarizeInstruction to set the result for the VPValue of
VPReplicateRecipe, because this first requires tracking scalar values in
VPTransformState.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91500
This is a follow-up to 00a66011366c7b037d6680e6015524a41b761c34 to make
isa<VPReductionRecipe> work and unifies the VPValue ID names, by making
sure they all consistently start with VPV*.
Similar to other patches, this makes VPWidenRecipe a VPValue. Because of
the way it interacts with the reduction code it also slightly alters the
way that VPValues are registered, removing the up front NeedDef and
using getOrAddVPValue to create them on-demand if needed instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88447
This converts the VPReductionRecipe into a VPValue, like other
VPRecipe's in preparation for traversing def-use chains. It also makes
it a VPUser, now storing the used VPValues as operands.
It doesn't yet change how the VPReductionRecipes are created. It will
need to call replaceAllUsesWith from the original recipe they replace,
but that is not done yet as VPWidenRecipe need to be created first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88382
This patch turns VPWidenGEPRecipe into a VPValue and uses it
during VPlan construction and codegeneration instead of the plain IR
reference where possible.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84683
This reverts the revert commit c8d73d939fa4fda9c87b3979225d02d63062bd68.
It includes a fix for cases where we missed inserting VPValues
for some selects, which should fix PR48142.
This patch turns VPWidenSelectRecipe into a VPValue and uses it
during VPlan construction and codegeneration instead of the plain IR
reference where possible.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84682
This patch turns VPWidenCall into a VPValue and uses it
during VPlan construction and codegeneration instead of the plain IR
reference where possible.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84681
This patch changes the type of Start, End in VFRange to be an ElementCount
instead of `unsigned`. This is done as preparation to make VPlans for
scalable vectors, but is otherwise NFC.
Reviewed By: dmgreen, fhahn, vkmr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90715
This reverts the revert commit 710aceb645e7dba4de7053eef2c616311b9163d4
and includes a fix for a memsan failure.
Original message:
This patch turns VPMemoryInstructionRecipe into a VPValue and uses it
during VPlan construction and codegeneration instead of the plain IR
reference where possible.
This patch turns VPMemoryInstructionRecipe into a VPValue and uses it
during VPlan construction and codegeneration instead of the plain IR
reference where possible.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84680
This expands upon the inloop reductions added in e9761688e41cb9e976,
allowing them to be inserted into tail folded loops. Reductions are
generates with the form:
x = select(mask, vecop, zero)
v = vecreduce.add(x)
c = add chain, v
Where zero here is chosen as the identity value for add reductions. The
backend is then expected to fold the select and the vecreduce into a
single predicated instruction.
Most of the code is fairly straight forward, except for the creation of
blockmasks which need to ensure they are created in dominance order. The
order they are added is altered to be after any phis, keeping the
requirements for the underlying IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84451
Update the code responsible for deleting VPBBs and recipes to properly
update users and release operands.
This is another preparation for D84680 & following patches towards
enabling modeling def-use chains in VPlan.
This adds a helper to convert a VPRecipeBase pointer to a VPUser, for
recipes that inherit from VPUser. Once VPRecipeBase directly inherits
from VPUser this helper can be removed.
Now that VPUser is not inheriting from VPValue, we can take the next
step and turn the recipes that already manage their operands via VPUser
into VPUsers directly. This is another small step towards traversing
def-use chains in VPlan.
This is NFC with respect to the generated code, but makes the interface
more powerful.
This refactors VPuser to not inherit from VPValue to facilitate
introducing operations that introduce multiple VPValues (e.g.
VPInterleaveRecipe).
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84679
This provides a convenient way to print VPValues and recipes in a
debugger. In particular it saves the user from instantiating
VPSlotTracker to print recipes or values.
This patch changes ElementCount so that the Min and Scalable
members are now private and can only be accessed via the get
functions getKnownMinValue() and isScalable(). In addition I've
added some other member functions for more commonly used operations.
Hopefully this makes the class more useful and will reduce the
need for calling getKnownMinValue().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065
Changes:
* Change `ToVectorTy` to deal directly with `ElementCount` instances.
* `VF == 1` replaced with `VF.isScalar()`.
* `VF > 1` and `VF >=2` replaced with `VF.isVector()`.
* `VF <=1` is replaced with `VF.isZero() || VF.isScalar()`.
* Replaced the uses of `llvm::SmallSet<ElementCount, ...>` with
`llvm::SmallSetVector<ElementCount, ...>`. This avoids the need of an
ordering function for the `ElementCount` class.
* Bits and pieces around printing the `ElementCount` to string streams.
To guarantee that this change is a NFC, `VF.Min` and asserts are used
in the following places:
1. When it doesn't make sense to deal with the scalable property, for
example:
a. When computing unrolling factors.
b. When shuffle masks are built for fixed width vector types
In this cases, an
assert(!VF.Scalable && "<mgs>") has been added to make sure we don't
enter coepaths that don't make sense for scalable vectors.
2. When there is a conscious decision to use `FixedVectorType`. These
uses of `FixedVectorType` will likely be removed in favour of
`VectorType` once the vectorizer is generic enough to deal with both
fixed vector types and scalable vector types.
3. When dealing with building constants out of the value of VF, for
example when computing the vectorization `step`, or building vectors
of indices. These operation _make sense_ for scalable vectors too,
but changing the code in these places to be generic and make it work
for scalable vectors is to be submitted in a separate patch, as it is
a functional change.
4. When building the potential VFs in VPlan. Making the VPlan generic
enough to handle scalable vectorization factors is a functional change
that needs a separate patch. See for example `void
LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlans(unsigned MinVF, unsigned
MaxVF)`.
5. The class `IntrinsicCostAttribute`: this class still uses `unsigned
VF` as updating the field to use `ElementCount` woudl require changes
that could result in changing the behavior of the compiler. Will be done
in a separate patch.
7. When dealing with user input for forcing the vectorization
factor. In this case, adding support for scalable vectorization is a
functional change that migh require changes at command line.
Note that in some places the idiom
```
unsigned VF = ...
auto VTy = FixedVectorType::get(ScalarTy, VF)
```
has been replaced with
```
ElementCount VF = ...
assert(!VF.Scalable && ...);
auto VTy = VectorType::get(ScalarTy, VF)
```
The assertion guarantees that the new code is (at least in debug mode)
functionally equivalent to the old version. Notice that this change had been
possible because none of the methods that are specific to `FixedVectorType`
were used after the instantiation of `VTy`.
Reviewed By: rengolin, ctetreau
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794
Reverting because the commit message doesn't reflect the one agreed on
phabricator at https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794.
This reverts commit c8d2b065b98fa91139cc7bb1fd1407f032ef252e.
Changes:
* Change `ToVectorTy` to deal directly with `ElementCount` instances.
* `VF == 1` replaced with `VF.isScalar()`.
* `VF > 1` and `VF >=2` replaced with `VF.isVector()`.
* `VF <=1` is replaced with `VF.isZero() || VF.isScalar()`.
* Add `<` operator to `ElementCount` to be able to use
`llvm::SmallSetVector<ElementCount, ...>`.
* Bits and pieces around printing the ElementCount to string streams.
* Added a static method to `ElementCount` to represent a scalar.
To guarantee that this change is a NFC, `VF.Min` and asserts are used
in the following places:
1. When it doesn't make sense to deal with the scalable property, for
example:
a. When computing unrolling factors.
b. When shuffle masks are built for fixed width vector types
In this cases, an
assert(!VF.Scalable && "<mgs>") has been added to make sure we don't
enter coepaths that don't make sense for scalable vectors.
2. When there is a conscious decision to use `FixedVectorType`. These
uses of `FixedVectorType` will likely be removed in favour of
`VectorType` once the vectorizer is generic enough to deal with both
fixed vector types and scalable vector types.
3. When dealing with building constants out of the value of VF, for
example when computing the vectorization `step`, or building vectors
of indices. These operation _make sense_ for scalable vectors too,
but changing the code in these places to be generic and make it work
for scalable vectors is to be submitted in a separate patch, as it is
a functional change.
4. When building the potential VFs in VPlan. Making the VPlan generic
enough to handle scalable vectorization factors is a functional change
that needs a separate patch. See for example `void
LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlans(unsigned MinVF, unsigned
MaxVF)`.
5. The class `IntrinsicCostAttribute`: this class still uses `unsigned
VF` as updating the field to use `ElementCount` woudl require changes
that could result in changing the behavior of the compiler. Will be done
in a separate patch.
7. When dealing with user input for forcing the vectorization
factor. In this case, adding support for scalable vectorization is a
functional change that migh require changes at command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794
Arm MVE has multiple instructions such as VMLAVA.s8, which (in this
case) can take two 128bit vectors, sign extend the inputs to i32,
multiplying them together and sum the result into a 32bit general
purpose register. So taking 16 i8's as inputs, they can multiply and
accumulate the result into a single i32 without any rounding/truncating
along the way. There are also reduction instructions for plain integer
add and min/max, and operations that sum into a pair of 32bit registers
together treated as a 64bit integer (even though MVE does not have a
plain 64bit addition instruction). So giving the vectorizer the ability
to use these instructions both enables us to vectorize at higher
bitwidths, and to vectorize things we previously could not.
In order to do that we need a way to represent that the reduction
operation, specified with a llvm.experimental.vector.reduce when
vectorizing for Arm, occurs inside the loop not after it like most
reductions. This patch attempts to do that, teaching the vectorizer
about in-loop reductions. It does this through a vplan recipe
representing the reductions that the original chain of reduction
operations is replaced by. Cost modelling is currently just done through
a prefersInloopReduction TTI hook (which follows in a later patch).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75069
This reverts commit e9761688e41cb979a1fa6a79eb18145a75104933. It breaks the build:
```
~/src/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/IVDescriptors.cpp:868:10: error: no viable conversion from returned value of type 'SmallVector<[...], 8>' to function return type 'SmallVector<[...], 4>'
return ReductionOperations;
```
Arm MVE has multiple instructions such as VMLAVA.s8, which (in this
case) can take two 128bit vectors, sign extend the inputs to i32,
multiplying them together and sum the result into a 32bit general
purpose register. So taking 16 i8's as inputs, they can multiply and
accumulate the result into a single i32 without any rounding/truncating
along the way. There are also reduction instructions for plain integer
add and min/max, and operations that sum into a pair of 32bit registers
together treated as a 64bit integer (even though MVE does not have a
plain 64bit addition instruction). So giving the vectorizer the ability
to use these instructions both enables us to vectorize at higher
bitwidths, and to vectorize things we previously could not.
In order to do that we need a way to represent that the reduction
operation, specified with a llvm.experimental.vector.reduce when
vectorizing for Arm, occurs inside the loop not after it like most
reductions. This patch attempts to do that, teaching the vectorizer
about in-loop reductions. It does this through a vplan recipe
representing the reductions that the original chain of reduction
operations is replaced by. Cost modelling is currently just done through
a prefersInloopReduction TTI hook (which follows in a later patch).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75069
This patch adds VPValue version of the GEP's operands to
VPWidenGEPRecipe and uses them during code-generation.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80220
This emits new IR intrinsic @llvm.get.active.mask for tail-folded vectorised
loops if the intrinsic is supported by the backend, which is checked by
querying TargetTransform hook emitGetActiveLaneMask.
This intrinsic creates a mask representing active and inactive vector lanes,
which is used by the masked load/store instructions that are created for
tail-folded loops. The semantics of @llvm.get.active.mask are described here in
LangRef:
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-get-active-lane-mask-intrinsics
This intrinsic is also used to provide a hint to the backend. That is, the
second argument of the intrinsic represents the back-edge taken count of the
loop. For MVE, for example, we use that to set up tail-predication, which is a
new form of predication in MVE for vector loops that implicitely predicates the
last vector loop iteration by implicitely setting active/inactive lanes, i.e.
the tail loop is predicated. In order to set up a tail-predicated vector loop,
we need to know the number of data elements processed by the vector loop, which
corresponds the the tripcount of the scalar loop, which we can now reconstruct
using @llvm.get.active.mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79100
Currently extracting a lane for a VPValue def is not supported, if it is
managed directly by VPTransformState (e.g. because it is created by a
VPInstruction or an external VPValue def).
For now, simply extract the requested lane. In the future, we should
also cache the extracted scalar values, similar to LV.
Reviewers: Ayal, rengolin, gilr, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80787
VPWidenSelectRecipe already contains a VPUser, but it is not used. This
patch updates the code related to VPWidenSelectRecipe to use VPUser for
its operands.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80219
This patch adds VPValue version of the instruction operands to
VPReplicateRecipe and uses them during code-generation.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80114
