14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Shilei Tian
a779af3f88
[AMDGPU] Change SGPR layout to striped caller/callee saved (#127353)
This PR updates the SGPR layout to a striped caller/callee-saved design,
similar
to the VGPR layout.

To ensure that s30-s31 (return address), s32 (stack pointer), s33 (frame
pointer), and s34 (base pointer) remain callee-saved, the striped layout
starts
from s40, with a stripe width of 8. The last stripe is 10 wide instead
of 8 to
avoid ending with a 2-wide stripe.

Fixes #113782.
2025-03-08 09:28:20 -05:00
Lucas Ramirez
6206f5444f
[AMDGPU] Occupancy w.r.t. workgroup size range is also a range (#123748)
Occupancy (i.e., the number of waves per EU) depends, in addition to
register usage, on per-workgroup LDS usage as well as on the range of
possible workgroup sizes. Mirroring the latter, occupancy should
therefore be expressed as a range since different group sizes generally
yield different achievable occupancies.

`getOccupancyWithLocalMemSize` currently returns a scalar occupancy
based on the maximum workgroup size and LDS usage. With respect to the
workgroup size range, this scalar can be the minimum, the maximum, or
neither of the two of the range of achievable occupancies. This commit
fixes the function by making it compute and return the range of
achievable occupancies w.r.t. workgroup size and LDS usage; it also
renames it to `getOccupancyWithWorkGroupSizes` since it is the range of
workgroup sizes that produces the range of achievable occupancies.

Computing the achievable occupancy range is surprisingly involved.
Minimum/maximum workgroup sizes do not necessarily yield maximum/minimum
occupancies i.e., sometimes workgroup sizes inside the range yield the
occupancy bounds. The implementation finds these sizes in constant time;
heavy documentation explains the rationale behind the sometimes
relatively obscure calculations.

As a justifying example, consider a target with 10 waves / EU, 4 EUs/CU,
64-wide waves. Also consider a function with no LDS usage and a flat
workgroup size range of [513,1024].

- A group of 513 items requires 9 waves per group. Only 4 groups made up
of 9 waves each can fit fully on a CU at any given time, for a total of
36 waves on the CU, or 9 per EU. However, filling as much as possible
the remaining 40-36=4 wave slots without decreasing the number of groups
reveals that a larger group of 640 items yields 40 waves on the CU, or
10 per EU.
- Similarly, a group of 1024 items requires 16 waves per group. Only 2
groups made up of 16 waves each can fit fully on a CU ay any given time,
for a total of 32 waves on the CU, or 8 per EU. However, removing as
many waves as possible from the groups without being able to fit another
equal-sized group on the CU reveals that a smaller group of 896 items
yields 28 waves on the CU, or 7 per EU.

Therefore the achievable occupancy range for this function is not [8,9]
as the group size bounds directly yield, but [7,10].

Naturally this change causes a lot of test churn as instruction
scheduling is driven by achievable occupancy estimates. In most unit
tests the flat workgroup size range is the default [1,1024] which,
ignoring potential LDS limitations, would previously produce a scalar
occupancy of 8 (derived from 1024) on a lot of targets, whereas we now
consider the maximum occupancy to be 10 in such cases. Most tests are
updated automatically and checked manually for sanity. I also manually
changed some non-automatically generated assertions when necessary.

Fixes #118220.
2025-01-23 16:07:57 +01:00
Matt Arsenault
e57b327be2
AMDGPU: Legalize fminimum and fmaximum f32 for gfx950 (#117634)
Select to minimum3/maximum3. Leave f16/v2f16 for later
since it's complicated by only having the vector version.
2024-11-26 14:44:09 -05:00
Matt Arsenault
a6fc489bb7
AMDGPU: Add gfx950 subtarget definitions (#116307)
Mostly a stub, but adds some baseline tests and
tests for removed instructions.
2024-11-18 10:41:14 -08:00
Shilei Tian
6548b6354d Reapply "[AMDGPU] Still set up the two SGPRs for queue ptr even it is COV5 (#112403)"
This reverts commit ca33649abe5fad93c57afef54e43ed9b3249cd86.
2024-11-08 20:21:16 -05:00
Shilei Tian
ca33649abe Revert "[AMDGPU] Still set up the two SGPRs for queue ptr even it is COV5 (#112403)"
This reverts commit e215a1e27d84adad2635a52393621eb4fa439dc9 as it broke both
hip and openmp buildbots.
2024-11-08 16:36:35 -05:00
Shilei Tian
e215a1e27d
[AMDGPU] Still set up the two SGPRs for queue ptr even it is COV5 (#112403) 2024-11-08 13:05:35 -05:00
Carl Ritson
86627149f6
[AMDGPU] Mitigate GFX12 VALU read SGPR hazard (#100067)
Any SGPR read by a VALU can potentially obscure SALU writes to the same
register.
Insert s_wait_alu instructions to mitigate the hazard on affected paths.

Compute a global cache of SGPRs with any VALU reads and use this to
avoid inserting mitigation for SGPRs never accessed by VALUs.

To avoid excessive search when compile time is priority implement
secondary mode where all SALU writes are mitigated.

Co-authored-by: Shilei Tian <shilei.tian@amd.com>
2024-09-04 12:15:20 +09:00
Matt Arsenault
b1bcb7ca46 Reapply "AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)" and follow up commit "clang/AMDGPU: Defeat attribute optimization in attribute test" (#98851)
This reverts commit adaff46d087799072438dd744b038e6fd50a2d78.

Drop the -O3 checks from default-attributes.hip. I don't know why they
are different on some bots but reverting this is far too disruptive.
2024-07-15 11:51:44 +04:00
dyung
adaff46d08
Revert "AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)" and follow up commit "clang/AMDGPU: Defeat attribute optimization in attribute test" (#98851)
This reverts commits 677cc15e0ff2e0e6aa30538eb187990a6a8f53c0 and
78bc1b64a6dc3fb6191355a5e1b502be8b3668e7.

The test CodeGenHIP/default-attributes.hip is failing on multiple bots
even after the attempted fix including the following:
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/1473
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/1380
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/161/builds/595
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/1372
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/1547
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/81/builds/755
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/40/builds/570
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/748
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/1845
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/1695
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/1829
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/193/builds/962
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/991
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/2256
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/1614

These bots have been broken for a day, so reverting to get everything
back to green.
2024-07-14 18:48:54 -07:00
Matt Arsenault
78bc1b64a6
AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)
Removing it from the codegen pipeline induces a lot of test churn
because llc is no longer optimizing out implicit arguments to kernels.

Mostly mechanical, but there are some creative test updates. I preferred
to take the changes as-is in tests where the ABI isn't relevant. In
cases where it's more relevant, or the optimize out logic was too
ingrained in the test, I pre-run the optimization. Some cases manually
add attributes to disable inputs.
2024-07-14 08:36:33 +04:00
Matt Arsenault
212b78aad4
DAG: Improve fminimum/fmaximum vector expansion logic (#93579)
First, expandFMINIMUM_FMAXIMUM should be a never-fail API. The client
wanted it expanded, and it can always be expanded. This logic was tied
up with what the VectorLegalizer wanted.
    
Prefer using the min/max opcodes, and unrolling if we don't have a
vselect.
This seems to produce better code in all the changed tests.
2024-06-06 19:01:39 +02:00
Matt Arsenault
6a8d30b1c1
DAG: Skip 0 sign handling in minimum/maximum lowering for _ieee case (#91326)
dc9664a8adae17f2083fbcc8e96cfce606c56d57 changed the documentation to
assume these order -0 as less than +0.
2024-05-09 14:41:13 +02:00
Matt Arsenault
7ec698e6ed
AMDGPU: Add tests for minimum and maximum intrinsics (#90997)
Baseline tests for new expansion. I think we can do better and avoid the
classes.
2024-05-03 21:43:30 +02:00