Don't chane the CFI information when a conditional instruction
is emulated (eg.: popeq {r0, pc}) because the CFI for the next
instruction should be the same as the CFI for the current instruction.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11258
llvm-svn: 242519
These instructions confusing the unwind code because in case of a
push it assumes that the original valu of a register is pushed to
the stack what is not neccessarily true in case of SP. The same is
true for the pop (in the opposite way).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10806
llvm-svn: 241051
The emulation of the branches are required by the new stack
unwinding logic to reinstantiate the prologue at the right place.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10702
llvm-svn: 240769
This test case generates new tests from the source files dropped into
its directory. For stress testing stack unwinding it steps through the
code line by line and then tests unwinding from each instruction.
llvm-svn: 240030
