489 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sindhu Chittireddy
4ad89131e0 [NFC] Add checks for self-assignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155776
2023-08-24 09:20:58 -07:00
Paul Robinson
1fcc2bc31b Reapply "[DebugInfo] Alternate (more efficient) MD5 fix"
D155991 changed the file lookup to do a full string compare on the
filename; however, this added ~0.5% to compile time with -g.
Go back to the previous pointer-based lookup, but capture the main
file's checksum as well as its name to use when creating the extra
DIFile entry. This causes all entries to be consistent and also
avoids computing the checksum twice.

This reverts commit 5956648fc3ba11dd6b0d0f2d1d9b923e7f80f247.
There was a string lifetime issue that is now corrected.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156571
2023-08-18 09:20:42 -07:00
Paul Robinson
5956648fc3 Revert "Reapply "[DebugInfo] Alternate (more efficient) MD5 fix""
This reverts commit 2e4d2d800b9ce0924513a2f24e7a1f3d22b52383.

Invalid checksums detected here:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/37/builds/24465
2023-08-18 06:35:34 -07:00
Paul Robinson
2e4d2d800b Reapply "[DebugInfo] Alternate (more efficient) MD5 fix"
D155991 changed the file lookup to do a full string compare on the
filename; however, this added ~0.5% to compile time with -g.
Go back to the previous pointer-based lookup, but capture the main
file's checksum as well as its name to use when creating the extra
DIFile entry. This causes all entries to be consistent and also
avoids computing the checksum twice.

This reverts commit 21e7f73494663814e0296066895dfacdebfac6d4.
I'm unable to find a reason for the memory management issues
that caused the revert, so trying again.
2023-08-18 05:24:00 -07:00
Paul Robinson
21e7f73494 Revert "[DebugInfo] Alternate (more efficient) MD5 fix"
This reverts commit ca1295c5a15f03ede2fe620cc80d6a1e6e6735b8.
It seems to be the culprit for at least some of today's bot failures,
for example https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/238/builds/4952
2023-08-17 11:34:26 -07:00
Paul Robinson
ca1295c5a1 [DebugInfo] Alternate (more efficient) MD5 fix
D155991 changed the file lookup to do a full string compare on the
filename; however, this added ~0.5% to compile time with -g.
Go back to the previous pointer-based lookup, but capture the main
file's checksum as well as its name to use when creating the extra
DIFile entry. This causes all entries to be consistent and also
avoids computing the checksum twice.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156571
2023-08-17 07:03:47 -07:00
Victor Campos
d77cba6d47 [Clang][DebugInfo] Emit narrower base types for structured binding declarations that bind to struct bitfields
In cases where a structured binding declaration is made to a struct with
bitfields:

struct A {
  unsigned int x : 16;
  unsigned int y : 16;
} g;

auto [a, b] = g; // structured binding declaration

Clang assigns the 'unsigned int' DWARF base type to 'a' and 'b' because
this is their deduced C++ type in the structured binding declaration.

However, their actual type in memory is 'unsigned short' as they have 16
bits allocated for each.

This is a problem for debug information consumers: if the debug
information for 'a' has the 'unsigned int' base type, a debugger will
assume it has 4 bytes, whereas it actually has a length of 2, resulting
in a read (or write) past its length.

This patch mimics GCC's behaviour: in case of structured bindings to
bitfields, the binding declaration's DWARF base type is of the target's
integer type with the same bitwidth as the bitfield.

If no suitable integer type is found in the target, no debug information
is emitted anymore in order to prevent wrong debug output.

Reviewed By: tmatheson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157479
2023-08-16 10:45:01 +01:00
Paul Robinson
7abb5fc618 [DWARF] Make sure file entry for artificial functions has an MD5 checksum
The DIFile cache was keyed on a string pointer instead of string content,
which was causing misses and resulted in an entry without a checksum.
In DWARF v5 if any checksum is missing, we can't write any to the output
file, so this had consequences.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63955

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155991
2023-07-24 10:53:10 -07:00
Michael Platings
fa39c0a58e Revert "[NFC] Add checks for self-assignment."
This reverts commit 8ac137acefc01caf636db5f95eb0977c97def1ba.

The code does not compile.
2023-07-24 09:36:11 +01:00
Sindhu Chittireddy
8ac137acef [NFC] Add checks for self-assignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155776
2023-07-24 00:38:08 -07:00
Manna, Soumi
b4fbc4bdbf [NFC][Clang][Coverity] Fix Static Code Analysis Concerns with copy without assign
This patch adds copy/move assignment operator to the class which has user-defined copy/move constructor.

Reviewed By: tahonermann, NoQ, aaronpuchert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150411
2023-05-18 18:14:07 -07:00
Fangrui Song
daad48d6b2 -fdebug-prefix-map=: make the last win when multiple prefixes match
For
`clang -c -g -fdebug-prefix-map=a/b=y -fdebug-prefix-map=a=x a/b/c.c`,
we apply the longest prefix substitution, but
GCC has always been picking the last applicable option (`a=x`, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109591).

I feel that GCC's behavior is reasonable given the convention that the last
value wins for the same option.

Before D49466, Clang appeared to apply the shortest prefix substitution,
which likely made the least sense.

Reviewed By: #debug-info, scott.linder

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148975
2023-04-25 15:12:17 -07:00
Michael Buch
711a644127 [clang][DebugInfo] Emit DW_AT_type of preferred name if available
With this patch, whenever we emit a `DW_AT_type` for some declaration
and the type is a template class with a `clang::PreferredNameAttr`, we
will emit the typedef that the attribute refers to instead. I.e.,

```
0x123 DW_TAG_variable
        DW_AT_name "var"
        DW_AT_type (0x123 "basic_string<char>")

0x124 DW_TAG_structure_type
        DW_AT_name "basic_string<char>"
```
...becomes
```
0x123 DW_TAG_variable
        DW_AT_name "var"
        DW_AT_type (0x124 "std::string")

0x124 DW_TAG_structure_type
        DW_AT_name "basic_string<char>"

0x125 DW_TAG_typedef
        DW_AT_name "std::string"
        DW_AT_type (0x124 "basic_string<char>")
```

We do this by returning the preferred name typedef `DIType` when
we create a structure definition. In some cases, e.g., with `-gmodules`,
we don't complete the structure definition immediately but do so later
via `completeClassData`, which overwrites the `TypeCache`. In such cases
we don't actually want to rewrite the cache with the preferred name. We
handle this by returning both the definition and the preferred typedef
from `CreateTypeDefinition` and let the callee decide what to do with
it.

Essentially we set up the types as:
```
TypeCache[Record] => DICompositeType
ReplaceMap[Record] => DIDerivedType(baseType: DICompositeType)
```

For now we keep this behind LLDB tuning.

**Testing**

- Added clang unit-test
- `check-llvm`, `check-clang` pass
- Confirmed that this change correctly repoints
  `basic_string` references in some of my test programs.
- Will add follow-up LLDB API tests

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145803
2023-04-07 01:37:36 +01:00
Kiran Chandramohan
ab49747f9d [NFC][Clang] Move DebugOptions to llvm/Frontend for reuse in Flang
This patch moves the Debug Options to llvm/Frontend so that it can be shared by Flang as well.

Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, awarzynski

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142347
2023-03-29 12:01:54 +00:00
Juan Manuel MARTINEZ CAAMAÑO
488185cca3 [Clang][DebugInfo][AMDGPU] Emit zero size bitfields in the debug info to delimit bitfields in different allocation units.
Consider the following sturctures when targetting:

  struct foo {
    int space[4];
    char a : 8;
    char b : 8;
    char x : 8;
    char y : 8;
  };

  struct bar {
    int space[4];
    char a : 8;
    char b : 8;
    char : 0;
    char x : 8;
    char y : 8;
  };

Even if both structs have the same layout in memory, they are handled
differenlty by the AMDGPU ABI.

With the following code:

// clang --target=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -g -O1 example.c -S
char use_foo(struct foo f) { return f.y; }
char use_bar(struct bar b) { return b.y; }

For use_foo, the 'y' field is passed in v4
; v_ashrrev_i32_e32 v0, 24, v4
; s_setpc_b64 s[30:31]

For use_bar, the 'y' field is passed in v5
; v_bfe_i32 v0, v5, 8, 8
; s_setpc_b64 s[30:31]

To make this distinction, we record a single 0-size bitfield for every member that is preceded
by it.

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144870
2023-03-28 10:07:32 +02:00
Paulo Matos
890146b192 [WebAssembly] Initial support for reference type externref in clang
This patch introduces a new type __externref_t that denotes a WebAssembly opaque
reference type. It also implements builtin __builtin_wasm_ref_null_extern(),
that returns a null value of __externref_t. This lays the ground work
for further builtins and reference types.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122215
2023-02-17 18:48:48 -08:00
Vitaly Buka
bccf5999d3 Revert "[clang][WebAssembly] Initial support for reference type externref in clang"
Very likely breaks stage 3 of msan build bot.
Good: 764c88a50ac76a2df2d051a0eb5badc6867aabb6 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/74/builds/17058
Looks unrelated: 48b5a06dfcab12cf093a1a3df42cb5b684e2be4c
Bad: 48b5a06dfcab12cf093a1a3df42cb5b684e2be4c https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/74/builds/17059

This reverts commit eb66833d19573df97034a81279eda31b8d19815b.
2023-02-05 21:41:48 -08:00
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
f84d30e172 Reland "[codegen] Store address of indirect arguments on the stack"
The commit was reverted due to a regression in debug information of an
optimized code test in lldb. This has since been addressed by:

1. rGf753e5be8239: [LiveDebugValues] Allow EntryValue with OP_deref
expressions
2. rG055f2f04e658: [mem2reg][debuginfo] Handle op_deref when converting
dbg.declare

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141381
2023-02-01 13:07:47 -05:00
Paulo Matos
eb66833d19 [clang][WebAssembly] Initial support for reference type externref in clang
This patch introduces a new type __externref_t that denotes a WebAssembly opaque
reference type. It also implements builtin __builtin_wasm_ref_null_extern(),
that returns a null value of __externref_t. This lays the ground work
for further builtins and reference types.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122215
2023-01-31 17:34:01 +01:00
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
f2d301fe82 Revert "[codegen] Store address of indirect arguments on the stack"
This reverts commit 7e4447a17db4a070f01c8f8a87505a4b2a1b0e3a.
2023-01-16 13:05:22 -03:00
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
7e4447a17d [codegen] Store address of indirect arguments on the stack
With codegen prior to this patch, truly indirect arguments -- i.e.
those that are not `byval` -- can have their debug information lost even
at O0. Because indirect arguments are passed by pointer, and this
pointer is likely placed in a register as per the function call ABI,
debug information is lost as soon as the register gets clobbered.

This patch solves the issue by storing the address of the parameter on
the stack, using a similar strategy employed when C++ references are
passed. In other words, this patch changes codegen from:

```
define @foo(ptr %arg) {
   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(%arg, [...], metadata !DIExpression())
```

To:

```
define @foo(ptr %arg) {
   %ptr_storage = alloca ptr
   store ptr %arg, ptr %ptr_storage
   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(%ptr_storage, [...], metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref))
```

Some common cases where this may happen with C or C++ function calls:
  1. "Big enough" trivial structures passed by value under the ARM ABI.
  2. Structures that are non-trivial for the purposes of call (as per
  the Itanium ABI) when passed by value.

A few tests were matching the wrong alloca (matching against the new
alloca, instead of the old one), so they were updated to either match
both allocas or include a `,` right after the alloca type, to prevent
matching against a pointer type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141381
2023-01-16 11:14:55 -03:00
Kazu Hirata
2d861436a9 [clang] Remove remaining uses of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch removes several "using" declarations and #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 13:37:25 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
6ad0788c33 [clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<.  I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 12:31:01 -08:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek
0ca43d4488 DebugInfoMetadata: convert Optional to std::optional 2022-12-04 11:52:02 -06:00
Nico Weber
ea8371247f [clang-cl] Implement /ZH: flag
Based on a patch by Arlo Siemsen (D98438)!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134544
2022-09-25 14:43:14 -04:00
David Blaikie
06c70e9b99 DebugInfo: Remove auto return type representation support
Seems this complicated lldb sufficiently for some cases that it hasn't
been worth supporting/fixing there - and it so far hasn't provided any
new use cases/value for debug info consumers, so let's remove it until
someone has a use case for it.

(side note: the original implementation of this still had a bug (I
should've caught it in review) that we still didn't produce
auto-returning function declarations in types where the function wasn't
instantiatied (that requires a fix to remove the `if
getContainedAutoType` condition in
`CGDebugInfo::CollectCXXMemberFunctions` - without that, auto returning
functions were still being handled the same as member function templates
and special member functions - never added to the member list, only
attached to the type via the declaration chain from the definition)

Further discussion about this in D123319

This reverts commit 5ff992bca208a0e37ca6338fc735aec6aa848b72: [DEBUG-INFO] Change how we handle auto return types for lambda operator() to be consistent with gcc

This reverts commit c83602fdf51b2692e3bacb06bf861f20f74e987f: [DWARF5][clang]: Added support for DebugInfo generation for auto return type for C++ member functions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131933
2022-08-17 00:35:05 +00:00
Mitch Phillips
7aa1fa0a0a Reland "[dwarf] Emit a DIGlobalVariable for constant strings."
An upcoming patch will extend llvm-symbolizer to provide the source line
information for global variables. The goal is to move AddressSanitizer
off of internal debug info for symbolization onto the DWARF standard
(and doing a clean-up in the process). Currently, ASan reports the line
information for constant strings if a memory safety bug happens around
them. We want to keep this behaviour, so we need to emit debuginfo for
these variables as well.

Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk, aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123534
2022-05-18 13:56:45 -07:00
Mitch Phillips
ed2c3218f5 Revert "[dwarf] Emit a DIGlobalVariable for constant strings."
This reverts commit 4680982b36a84770a1600fc438be8ec090671724.

Broke a fuchsia windows bot. More details in the review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123534
2022-05-16 19:07:38 -07:00
Mitch Phillips
4680982b36 [dwarf] Emit a DIGlobalVariable for constant strings.
An upcoming patch will extend llvm-symbolizer to provide the source line
information for global variables. The goal is to move AddressSanitizer
off of internal debug info for symbolization onto the DWARF standard
(and doing a clean-up in the process). Currently, ASan reports the line
information for constant strings if a memory safety bug happens around
them. We want to keep this behaviour, so we need to emit debuginfo for
these variables as well.

Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk, aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123534
2022-05-16 16:52:16 -07:00
Kavitha Natarajan
b1ea0191a4 [clang][DebugInfo] Support debug info for alias variable
clang to emit DWARF information for global alias variable as
DW_TAG_imported_declaration. This change also handles nested
(recursive) imported declarations.

Reviewed by: dblaikie, aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120989
2022-04-07 17:15:40 +05:30
Yonghong Song
3251ba2d0f [Attr] Fix a btf_type_tag AST generation
Current ASTContext.getAttributedType() takes attribute kind,
ModifiedType and EquivType as the hash to decide whether an AST node
has been generated or note. But this is not enough for btf_type_tag
as the attribute might have the same ModifiedType and EquivType, but
still have different string associated with attribute.

For example, for a data structure like below,
  struct map_value {
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag4"))) *b;
  };
The current ASTContext.getAttributedType() will produce
an AST similar to below:
  struct map_value {
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *b;
  };
and this is incorrect.

It is very difficult to use the current AttributedType as it is hard to
get the tag information. To fix the problem, this patch introduced
BTFTagAttributedType which is similar to AttributedType
in many ways but with an additional BTFTypeTagAttr. The tag itself can
be retrieved with BTFTypeTagAttr.
With the new BTFTagAttributed type, the debuginfo code can be greatly
simplified compared to previous TypeLoc based approach.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120296
2022-03-16 08:46:52 -07:00
Shafik Yaghmour
f56cb520d8 [DEBUGINFO] [LLDB] Add support for generating debug-info for structured bindings of structs and arrays
Currently we are not emitting debug-info for all cases of structured bindings a
C++17 feature which allows us to bind names to subobjects in an initializer.

A structured binding is represented by a DecompositionDecl AST node and the
binding are represented by a BindingDecl. It looks the original implementation
only covered the tuple like case which be represented by a DeclRefExpr which
contains a VarDecl.

If the binding is to a subobject of the struct the binding will contain a
MemberExpr and in the case of arrays it will contain an ArraySubscriptExpr.
This PR adds support emitting debug-info for the MemberExpr and ArraySubscriptExpr
cases as well as llvm and lldb tests for these cases as well as the tuple case.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119178
2022-02-17 11:14:14 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
d1b127b5b7 [clang] Remove unused forward declarations (NFC) 2022-01-08 11:56:40 -08:00
Shao-Ce SUN
ec501f15a8 [clang][CodeGen] Remove the signed version of createExpression
Fix a TODO. Remove the callers of this signed version and delete.

Reviewed By: CodaFi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116014
2021-12-27 14:16:08 +08:00
Aaron Ballman
6c75ab5f66 Introduce _BitInt, deprecate _ExtInt
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:

* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.

I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
2021-12-06 12:52:01 -05:00
Jonas Devlieghere
4cb79294e8 Revert "[clang][DebugInfo] Allow function-local statics and types to be scoped within a lexical block"
This reverts commit e403f4fdc88322201040f2bee7b328e8a78e2f7f because it
breaks TestSetData.py on GreenDragon:

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/39089/
2021-12-06 09:34:53 -08:00
Kristina Bessonova
e403f4fdc8 [clang][DebugInfo] Allow function-local statics and types to be scoped within a lexical block
This is almost a reincarnation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D15977 originally
implemented by Amjad Aboud. It was discussed on llvm-dev [0], committed
with its backend counterpart [1], but finally reverted [2].

This patch makes clang to emit debug info for function-local static variables,
records (classes, structs and unions) and typdefs correctly scoped if
those function-local entites defined within a lexical (bracketed) block.

Before this patch, clang emits all those entities directly scoped in
DISubprogram no matter where they were really defined, causing
debug info loss (reported several times in [3], [4], [5]).

[0] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092551.html
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/rG30e7a8f694a19553f64b3a3a5de81ce317b9ec2f
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/rGdc4531e552af6c880a69d226d3666756198fbdc8
[3] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19238
[4] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23164
[5] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44695

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113743
2021-12-06 12:19:09 +02:00
Yonghong Song
3466e00716 Reland "[Attr] support btf_type_tag attribute"
This is to revert commit f95bd18b5faa (Revert "[Attr] support
btf_type_tag attribute") plus a bug fix.

Previous change failed to handle cases like below:
    $ cat reduced.c
    void a(*);
    void a() {}
    $ clang -c reduced.c -O2 -g

In such cases, during clang IR generation, for function a(),
CGCodeGen has numParams = 1 for FunctionType. But for
FunctionTypeLoc we have FuncTypeLoc.NumParams = 0. By using
FunctionType.numParams as the bound to access FuncTypeLoc
params, a random crash is triggered. The bug fix is to
check against FuncTypeLoc.NumParams before accessing
FuncTypeLoc.getParam(Idx).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199
2021-11-05 11:25:17 -07:00
Martin Storsjö
f95bd18b5f Revert "[Attr] support btf_type_tag attribute"
This reverts commits 737e4216c537c33aab8ec51880f06b8a54325b94 and
ce7ac9e66aba2b937b3d3b5505ce6cc75dcc56ac.

After those commits, the compiler can crash with a reduced
testcase like this:

$ cat reduced.c
void a(*);
void a() {}
$ clang -c reduced.c -O2 -g
2021-11-05 10:36:40 +02:00
Yonghong Song
737e4216c5 [Attr] support btf_type_tag attribute
This patch added clang codegen and llvm support
for btf_type_tag support. Currently, btf_type_tag
attribute info is preserved in DebugInfo IR only for
pointer types associated with typedef, global variable
and function declaration. Eventually, such information
is emitted to dwarf.

The following is an example:
  $ cat test.c
  #define __tag __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag")))
  int __tag *g;
  $ clang -O2 -g -c test.c
  $ llvm-dwarfdump --debug-info test.o
  ...
  0x0000001e:   DW_TAG_variable
                  DW_AT_name      ("g")
                  DW_AT_type      (0x00000033 "int *")
                  DW_AT_external  (true)
                  DW_AT_decl_file ("/home/yhs/test.c")
                  DW_AT_decl_line (2)
                  DW_AT_location  (DW_OP_addr 0x0)

  0x00000033:   DW_TAG_pointer_type
                  DW_AT_type      (0x00000042 "int")

  0x00000038:     DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation
                    DW_AT_name    ("btf_type_tag")
                    DW_AT_const_value     ("tag")

  0x00000041:     NULL

  0x00000042:   DW_TAG_base_type
                  DW_AT_name      ("int")
                  DW_AT_encoding  (DW_ATE_signed)
                  DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)

  0x00000049:   NULL

Basically, a DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation tag will be inserted
under DW_TAG_pointer_type tag if that pointer has a btf_type_tag
associated with it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199
2021-11-04 14:23:31 -07:00
Yonghong Song
a162b67c98 [Clang][Attr] rename btf_tag to btf_decl_tag
Current btf_tag is applied to declaration only.
Per discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199,
we plan to introduce btf_type_tag attribute for types.
So rename btf_tag to btf_decl_tag to make it easily
differentiable from btf_type_tag.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111588
2021-10-11 22:17:17 -07:00
David Blaikie
85f612efeb DebugInfo: Use sugared function type when emitting function declarations for call sites
Otherwise we're losing type information for these functions.
2021-09-28 10:44:35 -07:00
David Blaikie
db4ff98bf9 DebugInfo: Add support for template parameters with qualifiers
eg: t1<void () const> - DWARF doesn't have a particularly nice way to
encode this, for real member function types (like `void (t1::*)()
const`) the const-ness is encoded in the type of the artificial first
parameter. But `void () const` has no parameters, so encode it like a
normal const-qualified type, using DW_TAG_const_type. (similarly for
restrict and volatile)

Reference qualifiers (& and &&) coming in a separate commit shortly.
2021-09-14 00:04:40 -07:00
David Blaikie
4f3a92ca0a DebugInfo: Refactor/deduplicate various template argument list emission
Streamline template arguments across types, variables, and functions -
for convenient reuse in experiments related to template argument list
reconstitution (not including template argument lists in the "name" of
those entities, and leaving it to debug info consumers to rebuild the
full template name from the semantic descriptions of the argument lists)

But the change seems like a good refactoring/cleanup anyway.

I'd certainly be open to suggestions about how this might be more
streamlined - like is there no generic way to query template argument
lists across the 3 kinds of entities, rather than needing special case
code?
2021-08-30 22:39:46 -07:00
Yonghong Song
5ca7131eb3 [DebugInfo] convert btf_tag attrs to DI annotations for record fields
Generate btf_tag annotations for record fields. The annotations
are represented as an DINodeArray in DebugInfo.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106616
2021-08-20 12:52:51 -07:00
Yonghong Song
cab12fc28c [DebugInfo] convert btf_tag attrs to annotations for DIComposite types
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of
meta strings. Each record may have more than one
btf_tag annotations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615
2021-08-19 18:01:29 -07:00
David Blaikie
dac582ad3a DebugInfo: Name class templates with default arguments consistently (both direct naming, and as a template argument for a function template)
It's noteworthy that GCC has the same bug here, which is a bit
surprising. Both Clang and GCC's bug is only for function template
arguments that are themselves templates with default template arguments
(f1<t1<int[, missing_default_here]>>). Probably because function name
matching isn't generally necessary - whereas type matching is necessary
for DWARF consumers to associate declarations and definitions across
translation units, so the bug's been addressed there already - but
continued to exist for function templates since it's fairly benign
there.

I came across this while working on a change that could reconstitute
these pretty printed names based on the rest of the DWARF, reducing the
size of the DWARF by not having to encode all the template parameters in
the name string. That reconstitution code can't tell the difference
between a defaulted argument or not, so couldn't create the current
buggy-ish output.

Making the names more consistent between direct and indirect references,
and between function and class templates seems all to the good.

(I fixed the function template version of this a few years back in
9fdd09a4ccd01feb8e00be22b17e944e46807746 - clearly I should've looked
more closely and generalized the code better so it only had to be fixed
once - well, doing that here now)
2021-07-17 23:58:15 -07:00
Nathan Sidwell
b2d0c16e91 [clang] p1099 using enum part 2
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.

There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:

struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator

this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
2021-06-08 11:11:46 -07:00
Nathan Sidwell
ddda05add5 [clang][NFC] Break out BaseUsingDecl from UsingDecl
This is a pre-patch for adding using-enum support.  It breaks out
the shadow decl handling of UsingDecl to a new intermediate base
class, BaseUsingDecl, altering the decl hierarchy to

def BaseUsing : DeclNode<Named, "", 1>;
  def Using : DeclNode<BaseUsing>;
def UsingPack : DeclNode<Named>;
def UsingShadow : DeclNode<Named>;
  def ConstructorUsingShadow : DeclNode<UsingShadow>;

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101777
2021-06-07 06:29:28 -07:00
yifeng.dongyifeng
3a6a80b641 [Clang][Coroutine][DebugInfo] In c++ coroutine, clang will emit different debug info variables for parameters and move-parameters.
The first one is the real parameters of the coroutine function, the
other one just for copying parameters to the coroutine frame.

Considering the following c++ code:
```
struct coro {
  ...
};

coro foo(struct test & t) {
  ...
  co_await suspend_always();
    ...
    co_await suspend_always();
    ...
    co_await suspend_always();
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
  auto c = foo(...);
    c.handle.resume();
      ...
  }
```

Function foo is the standard coroutine function, and it has only
one parameter named t (ignoring this at first),
when we use the llvm code to compile this function, we can get the
following ir:

```
!2921 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", linkageName:
"_ZN6Object3fooE4test", scope: !2211, file: !45, li\
ne: 48, type: !2329, scopeLine: 48, flags: DIFlagPrototyped |
DIFlagAllCallsDescribed, spFlags: DISPFlagDefi\
nition | DISPFlagOptimized, unit: !44, declaration: !2328,
retainedNodes: !2922)
!2924 = !DILocalVariable(name: "t", arg: 2, scope: !2921, file: !45,
line: 48, type: !838)
...
!2926 = !DILocalVariable(name: "t", scope: !2921, type: !838, flags:
DIFlagArtificial)
```
We can find there are two `the same` DIVariable named t in the same
dwarf scope for foo.resume.
And when we try to use llvm-dwarfdump to dump the dwarf info of this
elf, we get the following output:

```
0x00006684:   DW_TAG_subprogram
                DW_AT_low_pc    (0x00000000004013a0)
                DW_AT_high_pc   (0x00000000004013a8)
                DW_AT_frame_base        (DW_OP_reg7 RSP)
                DW_AT_object_pointer    (0x0000669c)
                DW_AT_GNU_all_call_sites        (true)
                DW_AT_specification     (0x00005b5c "_ZN6Object3fooE4test")

0x000066a5:     DW_TAG_formal_parameter
                DW_AT_name    ("t")
                DW_AT_decl_file       ("/disk1/yifeng.dongyifeng/my_code/llvm/build/bin/coro-debug-1.cpp")
                DW_AT_decl_line       (48)
                DW_AT_type    (0x00004146 "test")

0x000066ba:     DW_TAG_variable
                  DW_AT_name    ("t")
                  DW_AT_type    (0x00004146 "test")
                  DW_AT_artificial      (true)
```
The elf also has two 't' in the same scope.
But unluckily, it might let the debugger
confused. And failed to print parameters for O0 or above.
This patch will make coroutine parameters and move
parameters use the same DIVar and try to fix the problems
that I mentioned before.

Test Plan: check-clang

Reviewed By: aprantl, jmorse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97533
2021-04-12 11:10:47 +08:00