This adds a new flag and lldb runtime command to allow users to manage the behavior of the lldb-vscode evaluate repl request.
When evaluating a repl context this now has runtime managed flag for control how the repl behaviors with the follow values:
* `variable` - the existing behavior, with this mode requests are evaluted in the current frame context as variable expressions. To trigger a lldb command prefix an expression with ` and it will be evaluted as an lldb command.
* `command` - all expressions are evaluated as lldb commands.
* `auto` - An alternative mode that will attempt to determine if the expression is an lldb command or a variable expression. Based off the intepreted results the expression will be evaluted either as a command or an expression.
Additionally, I enabled completions and ensured they work with the new repl expression behavior to provide auto-completes.
This commit includes updates to the tests to verify the new behavior after the previous failures from submitting https://reviews.llvm.org/D154030.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155248
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
I don't think the intent of this test is to make sure we only have one compile unit; it's to make sure request_compileUnits returns something sensible. Relax the test case to just make sure that the main source file is one of the compile units returned, even if there are others.
Fixes llvm.org/pr49418.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138344
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.
These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
lldb-vsdode was communicating the list of modules to the IDE with events, which in practice ended up having some drawbacks
- when debugging large targets, the number of these events were easily 10k, which polluted the messages being transmitted, which caused the following: a harder time debugging the messages, a lag after terminated the process because of these messages being processes (this could easily take several seconds). The latter was specially bad, as users were complaining about it even when they didn't check the modules view.
- these events were rarely used, as users only check the modules view when something is wrong and they try to debug things.
After getting some feedback from users, we realized that it's better to not used events but make this simply a request and is triggered by users whenever they needed.
This diff achieves that and does some small clean up in the existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94033
Caused by D86662. The fix is only checking some fields when the expect_debug_info_size flag is true. For some reason this was not failing on a local linux machine.
The Symbol Status in modules view is simplified so that only when the module has debug info and its size is non-zero, will the status message be displayed. The symbol status message is renamed to debug info size and flag message like "Symbols not found" and "Symbols loaded" is deleted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86662
If a module has debug info, the size of debug symbol will be displayed after the Symbols Loaded Message for each module in the VScode modules view.{F12335461}
Reviewed By: wallace, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83731
Summary: If a module has debug info, the size of debug symbol will be displayed after the Symbols Loaded Message for each module in the VScode modules view.{F12335461}
Reviewers: wallace, clayborg
Reviewed By: wallace, clayborg
Subscribers: cfe-commits, aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83731
Original commit c60216db15132401ff60c08ccef899321f63b6b6.
The test can only run on Darwin because of how it was setup, so I'm
enforcing that.
Summary:
Test Plan:
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags:
This reverts commit 881af6eb0030986876d3b80668193e5c3c04a87c.
Revert "[lldb-vscode] Add Compile Unit List to Modules View"
This reverts commit 03ef61033ff5e1e40518f14f642e4ad8d686974c.
Revert "[lldb-vscode] Add Support for Module Event"
This reverts commit f7f80159753ba725f7e32529fcc369bc358efbb3.
The debian buildbot has reported issues with the modules test.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/13767/steps/test/logs/stdio
Reverting it for now.
For some reason this works on the original author's machine, but not on my. So I'm using a safer approach of using an unstripped dynamic library to place breakpoints on. The author was placing a breakpoint on the main symbol of a stripped library and for some reason it worked on their machine, but it shouldn't have...
Offender diff: D82477
Summary: User can expand and check compile unit list for the modules that have debug info.
Reviewers: wallace, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83072
Summary:
Whenever a module is created, removed or changed, lldb-vscode is now sending an event that can be interpreted by the IDE so that modules can be rendered in the IDE, like the tree view in this screenshot
{F12229758}
Reviewers: wallace, clayborg, kusmour, aadsm
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: cfe-commits, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82477
