#149079 deprecated CXRemapping and all its methods, however MSVC warns
when a deprecated method is using a deprecated variable (and breaks our
Werror builds) - best way to avoid this is to only deprecate the methods
directly.
For more context, see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119269#issuecomment-3075444493,
but briefly, when removing ARCMigrate, I also removed some symbols in
libclang, which constitutes an ABI break that we don’t want, so this pr
reintroduces the removed symbols; the declarations are marked as
deprecated for future removal, and the implementations print an error
and do nothing, which is what we used to do when ARCMigrate was
disabled.
All other declarations of clang-c already have CINDEX_LINKAGE.
This missing annotation causes a linker error when building
`tools/clang/unittests/libclang/CrashTests/libclangCrashTests.exe` for
the Cygwin target.
On the regular Win32 target, this issue went unnoticed because the
entire libclang gtest-based testsuite is currently disabled for that
platform.
[Discourse
link](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/a-small-proposal-for-extraction-of-inline-assembly-block-information/86658)
We strive for exposing such information using existing stable ABIs. In
doing so, queries are limited to what the original source holds or the
LLVM IR `asm` block would expose in connection with attributes that the
queries are concerned.
These APIs opens new opportunities for `rust-bindgen` to translate
inline assemblies in reasonably cases into Rust inline assembly blocks,
which would further aid better interoperability with other existing
code.
---------
Signed-off-by: Xiangfei Ding <dingxiangfei2009@protonmail.ch>
And adapt the existing code to account for the comments made when
introducing the duplicate API.
Note that this introduces a retro-incompatibility with LLVM 19.
cc @sebastianpoeplau
We're coming from llvm 11. There was a change made back in 15f3cd6 that
changed how type spelling works. Previous we were given namespaces of
the types within the spelling, and this was necessary in our use-case.
There is a more appropriate function available but it was not being
exposed over the Python bindings. This PR is intended to make make this
already-existing functionality accessible.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jannick Kremer <jannick.kremer@mailbox.org>
This statement level construct takes no clauses and has no associated
statement, and simply labels a number of array elements as valid for
caching. The implementation here is pretty simple, but it is a touch of
a special case for parsing, so the parsing code reflects that.
This patch adds a function attribute `riscv_vls_cc` for RISCV VLS
calling
convention which takes 0 or 1 argument, the argument is the `ABI_VLEN`
which is the `VLEN` for passing the fixed-vector arguments, it wraps the
argument as a scalable vector(VLA) using the `ABI_VLEN` and uses the
corresponding mechanism to handle it. The range of `ABI_VLEN` is [32,
65536],
if not specified, the default value is 128.
Here is an example of VLS argument passing:
Non-VLS call:
```
void original_call(__attribute__((vector_size(16))) int arg) {}
=>
define void @original_call(i128 noundef %arg) {
entry:
...
ret void
}
```
VLS call:
```
void __attribute__((riscv_vls_cc(256))) vls_call(__attribute__((vector_size(16))) int arg) {}
=>
define riscv_vls_cc void @vls_call(<vscale x 1 x i32> %arg) {
entry:
...
ret void
}
}
```
The first Non-VLS call passes generic vector argument of 16 bytes by
flattened integer.
On the contrary, the VLS call uses `ABI_VLEN=256` which wraps the
vector to <vscale x 1 x i32> where the number of scalable vector
elements
is calaulated by: `ORIG_ELTS * RVV_BITS_PER_BLOCK / ABI_VLEN`.
Note: ORIG_ELTS = Vector Size / Type Size = 128 / 32 = 4.
PsABI PR: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/418
C-API PR: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/68
Inspired by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120300, add a new
API `clang_visitCXXMethods` to libclang (and the Python bindings) which
allows iterating over the class methods of a type.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vlad Serebrennikov <serebrennikov.vladislav@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
The atomic construct is a particularly complicated one. The directive
itself is pretty simple, it has 5 options for the 'atomic-clause'.
However, the associated statement is fairly complicated.
'read' accepts:
v = x;
'write' accepts:
x = expr;
'update' (or no clause) accepts:
x++;
x--;
++x;
--x;
x binop= expr;
x = x binop expr;
x = expr binop x;
'capture' accepts either a compound statement, or:
v = x++;
v = x--;
v = ++x;
v = --x;
v = x binop= expr;
v = x = x binop expr;
v = x = expr binop x;
IF 'capture' has a compound statement, it accepts:
{v = x; x binop= expr; }
{x binop= expr; v = x; }
{v = x; x = x binop expr; }
{v = x; x = expr binop x; }
{x = x binop expr ;v = x; }
{x = expr binop x; v = x; }
{v = x; x = expr; }
{v = x; x++; }
{v = x; ++x; }
{x++; v = x; }
{++x; v = x; }
{v = x; x--; }
{v = x; --x; }
{x--; v = x; }
{--x; v = x; }
While these are all quite complicated, there is a significant amount
of similarity between the 'capture' and 'update' lists, so this patch
reuses a lot of the same functions.
This patch implements the entirety of 'atomic', creating a new Sema file
for the sema for it, as it is fairly sizable.
In the discussion around #116792, @rjmccall mentioned that ARCMigrate
has been obsoleted and that we could go ahead and remove it from Clang,
so this patch does just that.
The first API is clang_visitCXXBaseClasses: this allows visiting the
base classes without going through the generic child visitor (which is
awkward, and doesn't work for template instantiations).
The second API is clang_getOffsetOfBase; this allows computing the
offset of a base in the class layout, the same way
clang_Cursor_getOffsetOfField computes the offset of a field.
Also, add a Python binding for the existing function
clang_isVirtualBase.
This executable construct has a larger list of clauses than some of the
others, plus has some additional restrictions. This patch implements
the AST node, plus the 'cannot be the body of a if, while, do, switch,
or label' statement restriction. Future patches will handle the
rest of the restrictions, which are based on clauses.
The 'set' construct is another fairly simple one, it doesn't have an
associated statement and only a handful of allowed clauses. This patch
implements it and all the rules for it, allowing 3 of its for clauses.
The only exception is default_async, which will be implemented in a
future patch, because it isn't just being enabled, it needs a complete
new implementation.
These two constructs are very simple and similar, and only support 3
different clauses, two of which are already implemented. This patch
adds AST nodes for both constructs, and leaves the device_num clause
unimplemented, but enables the other two.
The arguments to this are the same as for the 'wait' clause, so this
reuses all of that infrastructure. So all this has to do is support a
pair of clauses that are already implemented (if and async), plus create
an AST node. This patch does so, and adds proper testing.
Emmm... Maybe I'm splitting hairs. But I really think the paragraph
should be more detailed. The orginal document makes me confused. Do I
take the ownership of the string data?
Here I don't refer the `clang_disposeString` function, because here's a
`clang_disposeStringSet`.
Co-authored-by: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>
These constructs are all very similar and closely related, so this patch
creates the AST nodes for them, serialization, printing/etc.
Additionally the restrictions are all added as tests/todos in the tests,
as those will have to be implemented once we get those clauses implemented.
Combined constructs (OpenACC 3.3 section 2.11) are a short-cut for
writing a `loop` construct immediately inside of a `compute` construct.
However, this interaction requires we do additional work to ensure that
we get the semantics between the two correct, as well as diagnostics.
This patch adds the semantic analysis for the constructs (but no
clauses), as well as the AST nodes.
This is one of the many PRs to fix errors with LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=on.
Built by GCC 11.
Fix warnings:
llvm-project/clang/include/clang-c/Index.h:2983:3: error: C++ style
comments are not allowed in ISO C90 [-Werror]
2983 | // HLSL Types
Introducing `HLSLAttributedResourceType` - a new type that is similar to
`AttributedType` but with additional data specific to HLSL resources.
`AttributeType` currently only stores an attribute kind and no
additional data from the type attribute parameters. This does not really
work for HLSL resources since its type attributes contain non-boolean
values that need to be retained as well.
For example:
```
template <typename T> class RWBuffer {
__hlsl_resource_t [[hlsl::resource_class(uav)]] [[hlsl::is_rov]] handle;
};
```
The data `HLSLAttributedResourceType` needs to eventually store are:
- resource class (SRV, UAV, CBuffer, Sampler)
- texture dimension(1-3)
- flags is_rov, is_array, is_feedback and is_multisample
- contained type
All of these values except contained type will be stored in
`HLSLAttributedResourceType::Attributes` struct and accessed
individually via the fields. There is also `Data` alias that covers all
of these values as a `unsigned` which is used for hashing and the AST
type serialization.
During type attribute processing all HLSL type attributes will be
validated and collected by SemaHLSL (by
`SemaHLSL::handleResourceTypeAttr`) and in the end combined into a
single `HLSLAttributedResourceType` instance (in
`SemaHLSL::ProcessResourceTypeAttributes`). `SemaHLSL` will also need to
short-term store the `TypeLoc` information for the new type that will be
grabbed by `TypeSpecLocFiller` soon after the type is created.
Part 1/2 of #104861
Add libclang function `clang_isBeforeInTranslationUnit` to allow checking the order between two source locations.
Simplify the `SourceRange.__contains__` implementation using this new function.
Add tests for `SourceRange.__contains__` and the newly added functionality.
Fixes#22617Fixes#52827
/llvm-project/clang/include/clang-c/Index.h:2984:28:
error: commas at the end of enumerator lists are a C99-specific feature [-Werror,-Wc99-extensions]
CXType_HLSLResource = 179,
^
1 error generated.
HLSL has a set of intangible types which are described in in the
[draft HLSL Specification
(**[Basic.types]**)](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.pdf):
There are special implementation-defined types such as handle types,
which fall into a category of standard intangible types. Intangible
types are types that have no defined object representation or value
representation, as such the size is unknown at compile time.
A class type T is an intangible class type if it contains an base
classes or members of intangible class type, standard intangible type,
or arrays of such types. Standard intangible types and intangible class
types are collectively called intangible
types([9](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.html#Intangible)).
This PR implements one standard intangible type `__hlsl_resource_t`
and sets up the infrastructure that will make it easier to add more
in the future, such as samplers or raytracing payload handles. The
HLSL intangible types are declared in
`clang/include/clang/Basic/HLSLIntangibleTypes.def` and this file is
included with related macro definition in most places that require edits
when a new type is added.
The new types are added as keywords and not typedefs to make sure they
cannot be redeclared, and they can only be declared in builtin implicit
headers. The `__hlsl_resource_t` type represents a handle to a memory
resource and it is going to be used in builtin HLSL buffer types like this:
template <typename T>
class RWBuffer {
[[hlsl::contained_type(T)]]
[[hlsl::is_rov(false)]]
[[hlsl::resource_class(uav)]]
__hlsl_resource_t Handle;
};
Part 1/3 of llvm/llvm-project#90631.
---------
Co-authored-by: Justin Bogner <mail@justinbogner.com>
This is a minimal patch to support parsing for "omp assume" directives.
These are meant to be hints to a compiler's optimisers: as such, it is
legitimate (if not very useful) to ignore them. The patch builds on top
of the existing support for "omp assumes" directives (note spelling!).
Unlike the "omp [begin/end] assumes" directives, "omp assume" is
associated with a compound statement, i.e. it can appear within a
function. The "holds" assumption could (theoretically) be mapped onto
the existing builtin "__builtin_assume", though the latter applies to a
single point in the program, and the former to a range (i.e. the whole
of the associated compound statement).
This patch fixes sollve's OpenMP 5.1 "omp assume"-based tests.
Add the reverse directive which will be introduced in the upcoming
OpenMP 6.0 specification. A preview has been published in [Technical
Report 12](https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/openmp-TR12.pdf).
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev@outlook.com>
This is a rework of patch [D10833](https://reviews.llvm.org/D10833)
previously posted on LLVM Phabricator by arthurp in 2015. It allows to
retrieve the type of binary operator via libclangs python bindings.
I did clean up the changes, removed unrelated changes and rebased the
changeset to the latest main branch. As this is my first contribution to
the LLVM project, let me know if any required tests or documentation are
missing.
This patch implements the 'loop' construct AST, as well as the basic
appertainment rule. Additionally, it sets up the 'parent' compute
construct, which is necessary for codegen/other diagnostics.
A 'loop' can apply to a for or range-for loop, otherwise it has no other
restrictions (though some of its clauses do).
OpenACC is going to need an array sections implementation that is a
simpler version/more restrictive version of the OpenMP version.
This patch moves `OMPArraySectionExpr` to `Expr.h` and renames it `ArraySectionExpr`,
then adds an enum to choose between the two.
This also fixes a couple of 'drive-by' issues that I discovered on the way,
but leaves the OpenACC Sema parts reasonably unimplemented (no semantic
analysis implementation), as that will be a followup patch.
[RISCV] RISCV vector calling convention (1/2)
This is the vector calling convention based on
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc,
the idea is to split between "scalar" callee-saved registers
and "vector" callee-saved registers. "scalar" ones remain the
original strategy, however, "vector" ones are handled together
with RVV objects.
The stack layout would be:
|--------------------------| <-- FP
| callee-allocated save |
| area for register varargs|
|--------------------------|
| callee-saved registers | <-- scalar callee-saved
| (scalar) |
|--------------------------|
| RVV alignment padding |
|--------------------------|
| callee-saved registers | <-- vector callee-saved
| (vector) |
|--------------------------|
| RVV objects |
|--------------------------|
| padding before RVV |
|--------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|--------------------------| <-- BP
| variable size objects |
|--------------------------| <-- SP
Note: This patch doesn't contain "tuple" type, e.g. vint32m1x2.
It will be handled in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc (2/2).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154576
'serial', 'parallel', and 'kernel' constructs are all considered
'Compute' constructs. This patch creates the AST type, plus the required
infrastructure for such a type, plus some base types that will be useful
in the future for breaking this up.
The only difference between the three is the 'kind'( plus some minor
clause legalization rules, but those can be differentiated easily
enough), so rather than representing them as separate AST nodes, it
seems
to make sense to make them the same.
Additionally, no clause AST functionality is being implemented yet, as
that fits better in a separate patch, and this is enough to get the
'naked' constructs implemented.
This is otherwise an 'NFC' patch, as it doesn't alter execution at all,
so there aren't any tests. I did this to break up the review workload
and to get feedback on the layout.
The new experimental calling convention preserve_none is the opposite
side of existing preserve_all. It tries to preserve as few general
registers as possible. So all general registers are caller saved
registers. It can also uses more general registers to pass arguments.
This attribute doesn't impact floating-point registers. Floating-point
registers still follow the c calling convention.
Currently preserve_none is supported on X86-64 only. It changes the c
calling convention in following fields:
* RSP and RBP are the only preserved general registers, all other
general registers are caller saved registers.
* We can use [RDI, RSI, RDX, RCX, R8, R9, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, RAX]
to pass arguments.
It can improve the performance of hot tailcall chain, because many
callee saved registers' save/restore instructions can be removed if the
tail functions are using preserve_none. In my experiment in protocol
buffer, the parsing functions are improved by 3% to 10%.
Implements https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2662R3.pdf
The feature is exposed as an extension in older language modes.
Mangling is not yet supported and that is something we will have to do before release.
This patch deprecates `module.map` in favor of `module.modulemap`, which
has been the preferred form since 2014. The eventual goal is to remove
support for `module.map` to reduce the number of stats Clang needs to do
while searching for module map files.
This patch touches a lot of files, but the majority of them are just
renaming tests or references to the file in comments or documentation.
The relevant files are:
* lib/Lex/HeaderSearch.cpp
* include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td
* include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td
This patch adds `CC_M68kRTD`, which will be used on function if either
`__attribute__((m68k_rtd))` is presented or `-mrtd` flag is given.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149867
structured-block
where clause is one of the following:
private(list)
reduction([reduction-modifier ,] reduction-identifier : list)
nowait
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157933
When building with compilers that do not support the Blocks extension,
we would fail to compile due to the missing type specifier on the
`typedef`. This should repair those builds.
Fixes: #62640
The implementation of these methods is not reliant on the availability
of the Blocks extension in the compiler. However, when building on
Windows, the interface declaration is important for the attribution of
the DLL storage. Without the attribution, the method implementation is
built but not made available as part of the ABI. Use a check for the
blocks extension to determine how method signature is viewed rather than
controlling whether it is part of the interface.
In code we use `#include "llvm/Lib/Header.h"` which is located in
"llvm/include/llvm/Lib/Header.h", so we use "llvm/include/" as a header
search path. We should put modulemaps in the same directory and
shouldn't rely on clang to search in immediate subdirectories.
rdar://106677321
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148776
Various driver features, such as the sysroot path detection for Android
targets, rely on being able to find the Clang install directory (look
for callers of `getDriver().getInstalledDir()`). However, the install
directory isn't currently being plumbed through to the driver, which is
conventionally done via the argv[0] passed to the Driver constructor.
It looks like D14695 attempted to fix this by adding another API that
allows specifying the argv[0]. However, rather than requiring every
user of libclang to switch to this API for correct behavior, let's have
the other existing APIs work by default, by using the existing logic in
libclang for finding the install directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146497
