Move the x86 combine from D58974 into the DAGCombine VSELECT code and update the SELECT version to use the isBooleanFlip helper as well.
Requested by @spatel on D59006
llvm-svn: 355533
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002
Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355490
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002
Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355483
This caused the first matcher in the isel table for many targets to Opc_Scope instead of Opc_SwitchOpcode. This leads to a significant increase in isel match failures.
llvm-svn: 355433
This patch enables combining integer bitcasts of integer build vectors when the new scalar type is legal. I've avoided floating point because the implementation bitcasts float to int along the way and we would need to check the intermediate types for legality
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58884
llvm-svn: 355324
Summary:
Before when we implemented the first EH proposal, 'catch <tag>'
instruction may not catch an exception so there were multiple EH pads an
exception can unwind to. That means a BB could have multiple EH pad
successors.
Now after we switched to the new proposal, every 'catch' instruction
catches an exception, and there is only one catchpad per catchswitch, so
we at most have one EH pad successor, making `ThrowUnwindDest` map in
`WasmEHInfo` unnecessary.
Keeping `ThrowUnwindDest` map in `WasmEHInfo` has its own problems,
because other optimization passes can split a BB that contains possibly
throwing calls (previously invokes), and we have to update the map every
time that happens, which is not easy for common CodeGen passes.
This also correctly updates successor info in LateEHPrepare when we add
a rethrow instruction.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58486
llvm-svn: 355296
Previously we had build_vector PatFrags that called ISD::isBuildVectorAllZeros/Ones. Internally the ISD::isBuildVectorAllZeros/Ones look through bitcasts, but we aren't able to take advantage of that in isel. Instead of we have to canonicalize the types of the all zeros/ones build_vectors and insert bitcasts. Then we have to pattern match those exact bitcasts.
By emitting specific matchers for these 2 nodes, we can make isel look through any bitcasts without needing to explicitly match them. We should also be able to remove the canonicalization to vXi32 from lowering, but I've left that for a follow up.
This removes something like 40,000 bytes from the X86 isel table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58595
llvm-svn: 355224
Summary:
The description of KnownBits::zext() and
KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() has confusingly been telling
that the operation is equivalent to zero extending the
value we're tracking. That has not been true, instead
the user has been forced to explicitly set the extended
bits as known zero afterwards.
This patch adds a second argument to KnownBits::zext()
and KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() to control if the extended
bits should be considered as known zero or as unknown.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58650
llvm-svn: 355099
At the moment, we mark every atomic memory access as being also volatile. This is unnecessarily conservative and prohibits many legal transforms (DCE, folding, etc..).
This patch removes MOVolatile from the MachineMemOperands of atomic, but not volatile, instructions. This should be strictly NFC after a series of previous patches which have gone in to ensure backend code is conservative about handling of isAtomic MMOs. Once it's in and baked for a bit, we'll start working through removing unnecessary bailouts one by one. We applied this same strategy to the middle end a few years ago, with good success.
To make sure this patch itself is NFC, it is build on top of a series of other patches which adjust code to (for the moment) be as conservative for an atomic access as for a volatile access and build up a test corpus (mostly in test/CodeGen/X86/atomics-unordered.ll)..
Previously landed
D57593 Fix a bug in the definition of isUnordered on MachineMemOperand
D57596 [CodeGen] Be conservative about atomic accesses as for volatile
D57802 Be conservative about unordered accesses for the moment
rL353959: [Tests] First batch of cornercase tests for unordered atomics.
rL353966: [Tests] RMW folding tests w/unordered atomic operations.
rL353972: [Tests] More unordered atomic lowering tests.
rL353989: [SelectionDAG] Inline a single use helper function, and remove last non-MMO interface
rL354740: [Hexagon, SystemZ] Be super conservative about atomics
rL354800: [Lanai] Be super conservative about atomics
rL354845: [ARM] Be super conservative about atomics
Attention Out of Tree Backend Owners: This patch may break you. If it does, you can use the TLI getMMOFlags hook to restore the MOVolatile to any instruction you need to. (See llvm-dev thread titled "PSA: Changes to how atomics are handled in backends" started Feb 27, 2019.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601
llvm-svn: 355025
If SADDSAT/SSUBSAT are legal, then we can expand SADDO/SSUBO by performing a ADD/SUB and a SADDO/SSUBO and then compare the results.
I looked at doing this for UADDO/USUBO as well but as we don't have to do as many range comparisons I didn't see any/much benefit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58637
llvm-svn: 354866
These helpers extend the existing isConstOrConstSplat helper checks to support DemandedElts masks as well.
We already had a local version of this in SelectionDAG that computeKnownBits/ComputeNumSignBits made use of, but this adds the functionality directly to the BuildVectorSDNode node and extends isConstOrConstSplat etc. to use that.
This will allow us to reuse the functionality in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts/SimplifyDemandedBits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58503
llvm-svn: 354797
Support undef shuffle mask indices in the shuffle(concat_vectors, concat_vectors) -> concat_vectors fold
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58585
llvm-svn: 354793
OPC_CheckCondCode is always used as operand 2 of a setcc. And its always surrounded by a MoveChild2 and a MoveParent. By having a dedicated opcode for this case we can reduce the number of bytes needed for this pattern from 4 bytes to 2.
This saves ~3000 bytes in the X86 table.
llvm-svn: 354763
Summary:
When promoting the over flow vector for these ops we should use the target's desired setcc result type. This way a v8i32 result type will use a v8i32 overflow vector instead of a v8i16 overflow vector. A v8i16 overflow vector will cause LegalizeDAG/LegalizeVectorOps to have to use v8i32 and truncate to v8i16 in its expansion. By doing this in type legalization instead, we get the truncate into the DAG earlier and give DAG combine more of a chance to optimize it.
We also have to fix unrolling to use the scalar setcc result type for the scalarized operation, and convert it to the required vector element type after the scalar operation. We have to observe the vector boolean contents when doing this conversion. The previous code was just taking the scalar result and putting it in the vector. But for X86 and AArch64 that would have only put a the boolean value in bit 0 of the element and left all other bits in the element 0. We need to ensure all bits in the element are the same. I'm using a select with constants here because that's what setcc unrolling in LegalizeVectorOps used.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58567
llvm-svn: 354753
r354648 was a follow up to fix a regression "[X86] Add a DAG combine for (aext_vector_inreg (aext_vector_inreg X)) -> (aext_vector_inreg X) to fix a regression from my previous commit."
These were reverted in r354713 as their context depended on other patches that were reverted for a bug.
llvm-svn: 354734
r354363 caused https://crbug.com/934963#c1, which has a plain C reduced
test case.
I also had to revert some dependent changes:
- r354648
- r354647
- r354640
- r354511
llvm-svn: 354713
When we need to merge two adjacent loads the AND mask for the low piece was still sized for the full src element size. But we didn't have that many bits. The upper bits are already zero due to the SRL. So we can skip the AND if we're going to combine with the high bits.
We do need an AND to clear out any bits from the high part. We were anding the high part before combining with the low part, but it looks like ANDing after the OR gets better results.
So we can just emit the final AND after the optional concatentation is done. That will handling skipping before the OR and get rid of extra high bits after the OR.
llvm-svn: 354655
Otherwise we end up creating extract_vector_elts that then each need to have their input promoted. This can lead to truncates needing to be emitted for each of those.
But we already emitted any_extends when we legalized the extract_subvector. So now we have pairs of any_extend+trunc that partially cancel. But depending on how DAGCombiner visits them we can get weird results.
By promoting the input at the same time we can create only a single any_extend or truncate.
There's one regression in the vector-narrow-binop.ll case, but that looks easy to fix with a follow up patch.
llvm-svn: 354647
This fold can occur during legalization, so it can fight with promotion
to the larger type. It apparently takes a special sequence and subtarget
to avoid more basic simplifications that would hide the problem.
But there's a bigger question raised here: why does distributeTruncateThroughAnd()
even exist? It duplicates functionality from a more minimal pattern that we
already have. But getting rid of this function requires some preliminary steps.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
llvm-svn: 354594
If the LHS has known zeros, then the RHS immediate mask might have been simplified to remove those bits.
This patch adds a call to computeKnownBits to get the known zeroes to handle that possibility. I left an early out to skip the call if all of the demanded bits are set in the mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58464
llvm-svn: 354514
Second part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442.
This adds an extra UnrollVectorOverflowOp() method to SDAG, because
the general UnrollOverflowOp() method can't deal with multiple results.
Additionally we need to expand UMULO/SMULO during vector op
legalization, as it may result in unrolling, which may need additional
type legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57997
llvm-svn: 354513
If the bit position has known zeros in it, then the AND immediate will likely be optimized to remove bits.
This can prevent GetDemandedBits from recognizing that the AND is unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 354498
Directly use the correct shift amount type if it is possible, and
future-proof the code against vectors. The added test makes sure that
bitwidths that do not fit into the shift amount type do not assert.
Split out from D57997.
llvm-svn: 354359
Summary:
A store to an object whose lifetime is about to end can be removed.
See PR40550 for motivation.
Reviewers: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57541
llvm-svn: 354244
In preparation for supporting vector expansion.
Add an isPostTypeLegalization flag to makeLibCall(), because this
expansion relies on the legalized form using MERGE_VALUES. Drop
the corresponding variant of ExpandLibCall, which is no longer used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58006
llvm-svn: 354226
