Summary: This is a common pattern that arise when legalizing large integers operations. Only do it when Y + 1 cannot overflow as this would change the carry behavior of uaddo .
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32687
llvm-svn: 301922
Summary: Common pattern when legalizing large integers operations. Similar to D32687, when the carry isn't used.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32738
llvm-svn: 301919
The existing code only looks at half of the tree when matching bswap + rol patterns ending in an OR tree (as opposed to a cascade).
Patch originally introduced by Jim Lewis.
Submitted on the behalf of Dinar Temirbulatov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32039
llvm-svn: 301907
We discussed shrinking/widening of selects in IR in D26556, and I'll try to get back to that
patch eventually. But I'm hoping that this transform is less iffy in the DAG where we can check
legality of the select that we want to produce.
A few things to note:
1. We can't wait until after legalization and do this generically because (at least in the x86
tests from PR14657), we'll have PACKSS and bitcasts in the pattern.
2. This might benefit more of the SSE codegen if we lifted the legal-or-custom requirement, but
that requires a closer look to make sure we don't end up worse.
3. There's a 'vblendv' opportunity that we're missing that results in andn/and/or in some cases.
That should be fixed next.
4. I'm assuming that AVX1 offers the worst of all worlds wrt uneven ISA support with multiple
legal vector sizes, but if there are other targets like that, we should add more tests.
5. There's a codegen miracle in the multi-BB tests from PR14657 (the gcc auto-vectorization tests):
despite IR that is terrible for the target, this patch allows us to generate the optimal loop
code because something post-ISEL is hoisting the splat extends above the vector loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32620
llvm-svn: 301781
Summary: As per discution on how to get better codegen an large int legalization, it became clear that using a glue for the carry was preventing several desirable optimizations. Passing the carry down as a value allow for more flexibility.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29872
llvm-svn: 301775
This patch replaces the separate APInts for KnownZero/KnownOne with a single KnownBits struct. This is similar to what was done to ValueTracking's version recently.
This is largely a mechanical transformation from KnownZero to Known.Zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32569
llvm-svn: 301620
This patch uses various APInt methods to reduce the number of temporary APInts. These were all found while working through converting SelectionDAG's computeKnownBits to also use the KnownBits struct recently added to the ValueTracking version.
llvm-svn: 301618
Besides better codegen, the motivation is to be able to canonicalize this pattern
in IR (currently we don't) knowing that the backend is prepared for that.
This may also allow removing code for special constant cases in
DAGCombiner::foldSelectOfConstants() that was added in D30180.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31944
llvm-svn: 301457
While we use BaseIndexOffset in FindBetterNeighborChains to
appropriately realize they're almost the same address and should be
improved concurrently we do not use it in isAlias using the non-index
understanding FindBaseOffset instead. Adding a BaseIndexOffset check
in isAlias like should allow indexed stores to be merged.
FindBaseOffset to be excised in subsequent patch.
Reviewers: jyknight, aditya_nandakumar, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31987
llvm-svn: 301187
This reverts commit r301105, 4, 3 and 1, as a follow up of the previous
revert, which broke even more bots.
For reference:
Revert "[APInt] Use operator<<= where possible. NFC"
Revert "[APInt] Use operator<<= instead of shl where possible. NFC"
Revert "[APInt] Use ashInPlace where possible."
PR32754.
llvm-svn: 301111
getSignBit is a static function that creates an APInt with only the sign bit set. getSignMask seems like a better name to convey its functionality. In fact several places use it and then store in an APInt named SignMask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32108
llvm-svn: 300856
I've changed one of the tests to not fold away, but we didn't and still don't do the transform
that the comment claims we do (and I don't know why we'd want to do that).
Follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300725https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300763
llvm-svn: 300772
This allows forming more 'not' ops, so we get improvements for ISAs that have and-not.
Follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300725
llvm-svn: 300763
The patch itself is simple: stop discriminating against vectors in visitAnd() and again in
SimplifyDemandedBits().
Some notes for reference:
1. We're not consistent about calls to SimplifyDemandedBits in the various visitXXX functions.
Sometimes, we check if the RHS is a constant first. Other times (like here), we just dive in.
2. I'd like to break the vector shackles in steps for the sake of risk minimization, but we could
make similar simultaneous changes in other places if we think that would be better.
3. I don't know what the intent of the changed tests in this patch was supposed to be, but since
they wiggled in a positive way, I'm just going with that. :)
4. In the rotate tests, note that we can see through non-splat constants. This is a result of D24253.
5. My motivation for being here now is to make D31944 look better, so this is step 1 of N towards
improving the vector codegen in that patch without writing any actual new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32230
llvm-svn: 300725
This patch uses lshrInPlace to replace code where the object that lshr is called on is being overwritten with the result.
This adds an lshrInPlace(const APInt &) version as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32155
llvm-svn: 300566
Remove non-consecutive stores from store merge candidate search as
they cannot be merged and will prevent us from finding subsequent
mergeable store cases.
Reviewers: jyknight, bogner, javed.absar, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32086
llvm-svn: 300561
This is a follow-on to r299096 which added support for fmadd.
Subtract does not have the case where with two multiply operands we commute in
order to fuse with the multiply with the fewer uses.
llvm-svn: 299572
This is a generic combine enabled via target hook to reduce icmp logic as discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32401
It's likely that other targets will want to enable this hook for scalar transforms,
and there are probably other patterns that can use bitwise logic to reduce comparisons.
Note that we are missing an IR canonicalization for these patterns, and we will probably
prefer the pair-of-compares form in IR (shorter, more likely to fold).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31483
llvm-svn: 299542
This reverts commit r299047 which is incorrect because the
simplification may result in incorrect propogation of undefs to users of
the folded shuffle.
Thanks to Andrea Di Biagio for pointing this out.
llvm-svn: 299368
This moves the isMask and isShiftedMask functions to be class methods. They now use the MathExtras.h function for single word size and leading/trailing zeros/ones or countPopulation for the multiword size. The previous implementation made multiple temorary memory allocations to do the bitwise arithmetic operations to match the MathExtras.h implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31565
llvm-svn: 299362
The code already allowed vector types in via "isInteger" (which might want
a more specific name), so use splat-friendly constant predicates to match
those types.
llvm-svn: 299304
This can only happen when we have a mix of zero and undef elements and the two vectors have a different arrangement of zeros/undefs. The shuffle should eventually be constant folded to all zeros.
Fixes PR32484.
llvm-svn: 299291
(and (setlt X, 0), (setlt Y, 0)) --> (setlt (and X, Y), 0)
We have 7 similar folds, but this one got away. The fact that the
x86 test with a branch didn't change is probably a separate bug. We
may also be missing this and the related folds in instcombine.
llvm-svn: 299252
Now alternatively to the TargetOption.AllowFPOpFusion global flag, FMUL->FADD
can also use the per operation FMF to allow fusion.
The idea here is not to port everything to the new scheme (e.g. fused
multiply-and-sub will be ported later) but that this work all the way from
clang.
The transformation is conditionalized on *both* the FADD and the FMUL having
the FMF contract flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31169
llvm-svn: 299096
